'The best is still yet to come': unlikely political duo announce pregnancy
The couple, who were first seen publicly together at the 2024 Midwinter Ball in Canberra, shared plans to expand their family while continuing to hold office.
"Next year, my team and I will keep working hard for the community we love, but I also plan on being a present and involved dad every step of the way," Mr Burns said on social media.
Ms Purcell, 33, represents the Northern Victoria Region seat in the state parliament, a region that reaches from Mildura in the state's north west to Bendigo in Central Victoria and Wodonga in the north east.
She said she plans to seek reelection for her upper house seat in the state election, which is expected to be held in November next year.
"Some people might be wondering if I'll still be contesting the state election in 2026. Absolutely, yes," Ms Purcell said.
"I'll be working right up until the end of the parliamentary year, and I'll return to sitting weeks as usual in February, with every intention to campaign and contest the 2026 election," she said.
"I am more committed to animals, people and the planet than ever before. This is just one more path I am choosing.
"And I am ready to call out any suggestion otherwise. Not just for me, but for everybody else who may face conscious or unconscious bias when choosing to have a career and a family."
The baby will be Mr Burns' second child, as he has a daughter, Tia, from a previous relationship.
"Our little baby already has the most excited and loving big sister in Tia. And she'll have a home full of animals, love, and fun," Mr Burns said.
Ms Purcell, an advocate for bodily autonomy, said that she was "grateful" to have been able to choose when she was ready to welcome a child.
"As I prepare for motherhood (beyond cats, dogs, horses and sheep), I carry with me the stories of my abortions," she said.
"They are not only part of my advocacy as a politician, but also part of who I am.
"I am more grateful than ever before to have had access to choice so that I could do this on my own terms and timeline, and will always fight for everybody to have the same."
The Animal Justice Party MP said that she was navigating a complex pregnancy that placed her in a "high-risk" category.
"This is obviously a vegan pregnancy (and baby!) and I've been feeling good, which has let me keep pace with sitting weeks, late nights, international travel, community events and the general silliness of this job," Ms Purcell said.
"But this new life stage hasn't been without challenges, some of you will have seen me talk in the past about my autoimmune disease," she said.
"It means I am navigating pregnancy and a chronic illness, and because of a range of antibodies I am positive for, I am officially in the high-risk category.
"It's weekly hospital visits for the time being. and I am so grateful to the incredibly kind, reassuring and supportive medical care I've been receiving."
The couple shared their appreciation for their support networks and staff, and asked for privacy as the pregnancy continues.
"I know that two members from two different parliaments having a baby is a bit unique, and there is bound to be interest in it," Ms Purcell said.
"While we are indeed in public life, pregnancy is an incredibly personal experience, so l ask that we're granted respect and privacy just like anybody else," she said.
"But l do look forward to sharing the parts with you that we are willing to share."
Victorian Animal Justice Party MP Georgie Purcell will welcome a baby girl with federal Labor politician Josh Burns, as the pair announced their "exciting" plans for 2026.
The couple, who were first seen publicly together at the 2024 Midwinter Ball in Canberra, shared plans to expand their family while continuing to hold office.
"Next year, my team and I will keep working hard for the community we love, but I also plan on being a present and involved dad every step of the way," Mr Burns said on social media.
Ms Purcell, 33, represents the Northern Victoria Region seat in the state parliament, a region that reaches from Mildura in the state's north west to Bendigo in Central Victoria and Wodonga in the north east.
She said she plans to seek reelection for her upper house seat in the state election, which is expected to be held in November next year.
"Some people might be wondering if I'll still be contesting the state election in 2026. Absolutely, yes," Ms Purcell said.
"I'll be working right up until the end of the parliamentary year, and I'll return to sitting weeks as usual in February, with every intention to campaign and contest the 2026 election," she said.
"I am more committed to animals, people and the planet than ever before. This is just one more path I am choosing.
"And I am ready to call out any suggestion otherwise. Not just for me, but for everybody else who may face conscious or unconscious bias when choosing to have a career and a family."
The baby will be Mr Burns' second child, as he has a daughter, Tia, from a previous relationship.
"Our little baby already has the most excited and loving big sister in Tia. And she'll have a home full of animals, love, and fun," Mr Burns said.
Ms Purcell, an advocate for bodily autonomy, said that she was "grateful" to have been able to choose when she was ready to welcome a child.
"As I prepare for motherhood (beyond cats, dogs, horses and sheep), I carry with me the stories of my abortions," she said.
"They are not only part of my advocacy as a politician, but also part of who I am.
"I am more grateful than ever before to have had access to choice so that I could do this on my own terms and timeline, and will always fight for everybody to have the same."
The Animal Justice Party MP said that she was navigating a complex pregnancy that placed her in a "high-risk" category.
"This is obviously a vegan pregnancy (and baby!) and I've been feeling good, which has let me keep pace with sitting weeks, late nights, international travel, community events and the general silliness of this job," Ms Purcell said.
"But this new life stage hasn't been without challenges, some of you will have seen me talk in the past about my autoimmune disease," she said.
"It means I am navigating pregnancy and a chronic illness, and because of a range of antibodies I am positive for, I am officially in the high-risk category.
"It's weekly hospital visits for the time being. and I am so grateful to the incredibly kind, reassuring and supportive medical care I've been receiving."
The couple shared their appreciation for their support networks and staff, and asked for privacy as the pregnancy continues.
"I know that two members from two different parliaments having a baby is a bit unique, and there is bound to be interest in it," Ms Purcell said.
"While we are indeed in public life, pregnancy is an incredibly personal experience, so l ask that we're granted respect and privacy just like anybody else," she said.
"But l do look forward to sharing the parts with you that we are willing to share."
Victorian Animal Justice Party MP Georgie Purcell will welcome a baby girl with federal Labor politician Josh Burns, as the pair announced their "exciting" plans for 2026.
The couple, who were first seen publicly together at the 2024 Midwinter Ball in Canberra, shared plans to expand their family while continuing to hold office.
"Next year, my team and I will keep working hard for the community we love, but I also plan on being a present and involved dad every step of the way," Mr Burns said on social media.
Ms Purcell, 33, represents the Northern Victoria Region seat in the state parliament, a region that reaches from Mildura in the state's north west to Bendigo in Central Victoria and Wodonga in the north east.
She said she plans to seek reelection for her upper house seat in the state election, which is expected to be held in November next year.
"Some people might be wondering if I'll still be contesting the state election in 2026. Absolutely, yes," Ms Purcell said.
"I'll be working right up until the end of the parliamentary year, and I'll return to sitting weeks as usual in February, with every intention to campaign and contest the 2026 election," she said.
"I am more committed to animals, people and the planet than ever before. This is just one more path I am choosing.
"And I am ready to call out any suggestion otherwise. Not just for me, but for everybody else who may face conscious or unconscious bias when choosing to have a career and a family."
The baby will be Mr Burns' second child, as he has a daughter, Tia, from a previous relationship.
"Our little baby already has the most excited and loving big sister in Tia. And she'll have a home full of animals, love, and fun," Mr Burns said.
Ms Purcell, an advocate for bodily autonomy, said that she was "grateful" to have been able to choose when she was ready to welcome a child.
"As I prepare for motherhood (beyond cats, dogs, horses and sheep), I carry with me the stories of my abortions," she said.
"They are not only part of my advocacy as a politician, but also part of who I am.
"I am more grateful than ever before to have had access to choice so that I could do this on my own terms and timeline, and will always fight for everybody to have the same."
The Animal Justice Party MP said that she was navigating a complex pregnancy that placed her in a "high-risk" category.
"This is obviously a vegan pregnancy (and baby!) and I've been feeling good, which has let me keep pace with sitting weeks, late nights, international travel, community events and the general silliness of this job," Ms Purcell said.
"But this new life stage hasn't been without challenges, some of you will have seen me talk in the past about my autoimmune disease," she said.
"It means I am navigating pregnancy and a chronic illness, and because of a range of antibodies I am positive for, I am officially in the high-risk category.
"It's weekly hospital visits for the time being. and I am so grateful to the incredibly kind, reassuring and supportive medical care I've been receiving."
The couple shared their appreciation for their support networks and staff, and asked for privacy as the pregnancy continues.
"I know that two members from two different parliaments having a baby is a bit unique, and there is bound to be interest in it," Ms Purcell said.
"While we are indeed in public life, pregnancy is an incredibly personal experience, so l ask that we're granted respect and privacy just like anybody else," she said.
"But l do look forward to sharing the parts with you that we are willing to share."
Victorian Animal Justice Party MP Georgie Purcell will welcome a baby girl with federal Labor politician Josh Burns, as the pair announced their "exciting" plans for 2026.
The couple, who were first seen publicly together at the 2024 Midwinter Ball in Canberra, shared plans to expand their family while continuing to hold office.
"Next year, my team and I will keep working hard for the community we love, but I also plan on being a present and involved dad every step of the way," Mr Burns said on social media.
Ms Purcell, 33, represents the Northern Victoria Region seat in the state parliament, a region that reaches from Mildura in the state's north west to Bendigo in Central Victoria and Wodonga in the north east.
She said she plans to seek reelection for her upper house seat in the state election, which is expected to be held in November next year.
"Some people might be wondering if I'll still be contesting the state election in 2026. Absolutely, yes," Ms Purcell said.
"I'll be working right up until the end of the parliamentary year, and I'll return to sitting weeks as usual in February, with every intention to campaign and contest the 2026 election," she said.
"I am more committed to animals, people and the planet than ever before. This is just one more path I am choosing.
"And I am ready to call out any suggestion otherwise. Not just for me, but for everybody else who may face conscious or unconscious bias when choosing to have a career and a family."
The baby will be Mr Burns' second child, as he has a daughter, Tia, from a previous relationship.
"Our little baby already has the most excited and loving big sister in Tia. And she'll have a home full of animals, love, and fun," Mr Burns said.
Ms Purcell, an advocate for bodily autonomy, said that she was "grateful" to have been able to choose when she was ready to welcome a child.
"As I prepare for motherhood (beyond cats, dogs, horses and sheep), I carry with me the stories of my abortions," she said.
"They are not only part of my advocacy as a politician, but also part of who I am.
"I am more grateful than ever before to have had access to choice so that I could do this on my own terms and timeline, and will always fight for everybody to have the same."
The Animal Justice Party MP said that she was navigating a complex pregnancy that placed her in a "high-risk" category.
"This is obviously a vegan pregnancy (and baby!) and I've been feeling good, which has let me keep pace with sitting weeks, late nights, international travel, community events and the general silliness of this job," Ms Purcell said.
"But this new life stage hasn't been without challenges, some of you will have seen me talk in the past about my autoimmune disease," she said.
"It means I am navigating pregnancy and a chronic illness, and because of a range of antibodies I am positive for, I am officially in the high-risk category.
"It's weekly hospital visits for the time being. and I am so grateful to the incredibly kind, reassuring and supportive medical care I've been receiving."
The couple shared their appreciation for their support networks and staff, and asked for privacy as the pregnancy continues.
"I know that two members from two different parliaments having a baby is a bit unique, and there is bound to be interest in it," Ms Purcell said.
"While we are indeed in public life, pregnancy is an incredibly personal experience, so l ask that we're granted respect and privacy just like anybody else," she said.
"But l do look forward to sharing the parts with you that we are willing to share."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Vote counting done, the deal-making begins for Tasmania's next government
So here it is. The final seat chart for Tasmania's parliament: Liberals with 14, Labor with 10, five Greens and six other members of the crossbench. Sound familiar? Well, aside from some shuffling of the deckchairs, the 2025 Tasmanian election — not to be confused with the 2024 one (although you'd be forgiven for doing so) — ended up almost exactly where it was before Premier Jeremy Rockliff pulled the trigger. We can get to the whole what was the point later, but there is one rather vital question that has yet to be answered — who will be the government? Gone are the days when who would form government was known on election night. And, apparently, gone are the days when knowing the final makeup of parliament means we know which party will be leading the state at the end of the year. That answer may not be known for over a month. But at least the players are known, because the pathways to government or a no-confidence motion have become slightly clearer. Let's start with the Liberals on 14 seats. That may seem, on the face of things, to be a better chance. Whichever party hopes to form government will need 18 votes on their side. Finding four votes from a crossbench of 11 does not sound that hard in theory — until you start to break down who is in the crossbench. The Greens won't be offering up their five. Craig Garland is so infuriated by the way the Liberals have handled Marinus Link that he would be willing to vote for a no-confidence motion. Kristie Johnston voted for the last no-confidence motion and, while she hasn't ruled out offering supply and confidence, it may not be encouraging. That's six, maybe seven votes down, leaving four for the Liberals to truly court, with three of them newbies. The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers' Carlo Di Falco and former Launceston Councillor George Razay have both said they are open to working with either side. For the record, so has anti-salmon campaigner Peter George, but his progressive values don't mesh particularly well with either major party. The easiest person for the Liberals get, or in this case keep onside, is independent David O'Byrne. Mr O'Byrne offered support in the last parliament, voted against the no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff and has spoken about how difficult it was for Labor to govern with 10 when there were just 25 members of the lower house as opposed to the 35 they now have. Mind you, last election Labor ruled out trying to form government, so Mr O'Byrne had no other option. As a former Labor leader with those values, he has to entertain the idea. Labor's rather mammoth effort of securing eight votes is made so much easier by the fact the Greens want to engage with it. Greens Leader Rosalie Woodruff gave Labor Leader Dean Winter the opportunity to work together during that weird time between the no-confidence motion and the election. Mr Winter flat-out refused. But things look very different from the other side of this election. The party is out of options, down on votes, and staring down four years of opposition, assuming this parliament makes it that long. The very fact that Mr Winter is playing phone tag with Dr Woodruff says it all. But the two clearly have some different ideas about how a minority Labor government might work. Labor is continuing to insist it will not do a deal with the Greens, while Dr Woodruff maintains there must be an agreement for it to work. She may not be sure what that looks like, but has said "there is no possibility of any minority government without some movement". That suggests compromise. So, is Labor just playing semantics with the word deal? Will it accept a so-called agreement with the Greens? They will be roasted by the Liberals if they do, but how much does that matter if the Libs are the ones sitting on the Opposition benches? Perhaps, Labor thinks it can avoid doing any sort of agreement with The Greens. After all, the Greens seem very determined to kick out the Rockliff Government — even more so post Marinus drama — and Labor is their only path to do so. Maybe that is all Labor has to offer up. Be it on the Greens if they want to be the key reason the Liberals stay in power. But there is a middle ground. The parties' values overlap, why not lean into that? After all, it was the Greens and Labor, with others on the crossbench, that banded together last parliament to lower the political donation disclosure threshold to $1,000, introduce industrial manslaughter laws and decriminalise begging. Surely working together could be about finding the middle space in the Venn diagram where no one compromises their values. Banning conversion therapy, working towards a treaty for First Nations peoples and strengthening the Integrity Commission are a few commonalities that spring to mind. If Labor gets the Greens on board, and with Craig Garland's vote, the party is only crossbenchers away from seizing power through a vote of no confidence. Of course, it may not come to that, but the backup plan is looking viable. And how wild would that be? Labor, which recorded its lowest ever primary vote, taking government and installing a premier that could not even pull a quota in his own right. If it pulls this off, Labor MPs will make up just over half of the 18 votes that they need in the lower house. What mandate do they really have? Then again, Tasmanians voted for 11 MPs that are neither Labor nor Liberal and the vast majority of those 11 MPs hold values that are far closer to Labor than the Liberals. Whether it can be called a progressive parliament is debatable. Winter's 'jobs jobs jobs' Labor is big on industries like mining, forestry and aquaculture and rarely delves into social issues. In fact, some have observed Mr Rockliff appears more socially progressive. But it certainly is not a Liberal friendly parliament either. They may have seen an uptick in their primary vote of more than three per cent and Mr Rockliff's 22,000 first preference votes, but their right-wing values do not appear to have won over the vast majority of Tasmanians. If the result was a true endorsement of the Liberals, wouldn't they have gained a single seat? In the end, all of this pondering does not matter, because both parties want government. One is trying to keep it, the other trying to claim it — and that means it is going to take a while. It is unclear exactly when Tasmanians will know who is going the lead the state. But while the parties play their power games, parliament is paused. No legislation is being passed, no big brave decisions (save Marinus) are being made — and the state is effectively left on standby.
The Australian
an hour ago
- The Australian
ACTU boss Sally McManus calls for five-year plan to limit negative gearing, CGT concessions to one investment property
Union boss Sally McManus has urged Labor to 'bite the bullet' and slash tax benefits for Australians with invest properties through a five-year plan which would only allow people to access the tax incentives on one home. Speaking to the ABC, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) secretary said the changes were needed to tackle intergenerational inequity and calm soaring house prices which have locked young people out of the market. Under the ACTU's proposal, which will be debated at the Jim Chalmers' Economic Reform Roundtable in August, both negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions would be limited to one investment property. Current conditions would be grandfathered for the next five years for existing homes 'to allow people to adjust'. The move would also annually add about $1.5bn to the budget, or $6bn over the forward estimates. 'One of the biggest issues in terms of living standards for younger people in Australia is the issue of housing affordability. It's the number one issue. We need to address it,' Ms McManus said on Sunday. ACTU secretary Sally McManus urged Labor to 'bite the bullet' and enact the changes. Picture: NewsWire/ Ian Currie 'Young people should have the same aspirations as the generations before them, and at the moment, then don't. It's been wiped out by the fact that the housing prices have gone up twice the rate of wages over the last 25 years.' She said the provisions would target the 'small number of investors' who own '25 per cent of investment properties'. Ms McManus quoted a study from the NSW Productivity Commission in 2024, which found the state was losing about 7000 people aged between 30 to 40 years old a year - something that could result in Sydney being a city with no grandchildren. 'That has been driving or fuelling the housing prices. I don't think that we ever intended even for this to happen as a result of these tax measures but this is where we're at,' she said. 'Unless we change it, unless we change it, working people can't live where they work. They can't live where they grew up.' Asked whether Labor had the political will to enact the changes, she urged Labor to 'bite bullet' and be 'brave enough to do something about it'. It not, they would be at risk of 'abandoning' the younger generations,' she added. 'We're going to go and argue it. We're going to advocate for it. In the end, the Government will make their decisions based on what they think is the national interest. We would say that it is in the national interest,' she said. Previously, Labor has unsuccessfully taken changes to negative gearing and capital gains concessions to the 2016 and 2019 federal elections under former opposition leader Bill Shorten, before Anthony Albanese ended the policies. However the government has faced pressure from grassroots advocacy group Labor for Housing to reconsider the concessions. Jessica Wang NewsWire Federal Politics Reporter Jessica Wang is a federal politics reporter for NewsWire based in the Canberra Press Gallery. She previously covered NSW state politics for the Wire and has also worked at and Mamamia covering breaking news, entertainment, and lifestyle. @imjesswang_ Jessica Wang
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Australia urged to 'bite the bullet' on tax breaks
Working Australians will be locked out of home ownership unless the government winds back property tax breaks, a major union body has warned. As the federal government seeks ways to reinvigorate the nation's languishing productivity, the Australian Council of Trade Unions has urged the government to reform the tax system and make housing affordable. Tax concessions like negative gearing, which allows investors to claim deductions on losses, and the capital gains tax discount, which halves the amount of tax paid by those who sell assets owned for a year or more, have incentivised property investment and tied up capital that could otherwise be invested more productively, according to the union. "Working people can no longer afford to live near where they work and young people are locked out of the housing market and locked into high rents," ACTU secretary Sally McManus said. "It's just not right and has to change." The union has proposed limiting negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts to a single investment property, though those tax breaks would be grandfathered for five years on properties that already benefit, giving investors time to adjust. But such reforms have historically been political kryptonite for Labor, with a proposal to limit negative gearing contributing to its narrow defeat at the 2019 election. Even in the aftermath of its significant election win in May, the party has largely avoided the topic and attempts at tax reform in recent years have been met with vocal opposition. The government's bill to lift taxes on super balances above $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent has proved controversial among industry giants and the coalition. But Ms McManus insisted the system needs to change. "We've got to bite the bullet," Ms McManus told ABC's Insiders on Sunday. "Otherwise we're just saying, 'too bad young people, you're not going to be able to ever own a home'." The union has also urged the government to implement a minimum 25 per cent tax rate for individuals who earn more than $1 million and for family trusts. Labor is preparing to host an economic roundtable later in August that will focus on lifting living standards by improving productivity, building resilience and strengthening the budget. Unions, business representatives and a host of government and economic figures have been invited to offer their answers.
