Martin Lewis shares how your neighbours can save you hundreds of pounds a year
01:42
Lucy Leeson
Martin Lewis has shared how your neighbours could save you hundreds of pounds a year.
The Money Saving Expert founder explained how thousands of households across the UK are currently in the wrong council tax banding, meaning they are paying more money than they should.
Appearing on Good Morning Britain on Wednesday (25 July), the financial expert urged people to carry out 'the neighbour check' to see if you are paying the same for your property as next door.
Mr Lewis explained the necessary checks you need to take in the video above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump celebrates tax bill passing, UK electric car sales rise
Update: Date: 2025-07-04T06:34:45.000Z Title: UK electric car sales up by a third in first half Content: Meanwhile in the UK, British electric car sales rose by a third in the first half of 2025 after the strongest June for overall car sales since before the Covid pandemic. The number of battery electric car sales rose 34.6% to 224,838 units in the first six months of the year, according to preliminary data from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), a lobby group. New car sales rose 6.8% year-on-year in June to 191,200 units, the best sales figures for the month since 2019. A quarter of all June sales, or nearly 47,400, were electric. The figures come amid a difficult period for the the UK car industry, which has struggled to increase sales to pre-pandemic levels as potential buyers have been hit by the cost of living crisis after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. British car factories have also had to contend with a major slowdown in response to extra US tariffs of 25% announced by Donald Trump in March. Last month UK car production fell to its lowest level for May since 1949 as manufacturers cut back shipments. You can read the full story from my colleague Jasper Jolly here. Update: Date: 2025-07-04T06:31:30.000Z Title: Introduction: Trump celebrates spending and tax bill on US Independence Day Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. President Donald Trump has secured passage of his controversial flagship tax and spending bill, after the House of Representatives approved the bill late on Thursday. The 218-to-214 vote sends the legislation to Trump, who has said he plans to sign the bill on Friday as the US celebrates Independence Day. Speaking to supporters at the Iowa State Fairground, he said 'there could be no birthday present for America'. There could be no better birthday present for America than the phenomenal victory we achieved just hours ago, when Congress passed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' to make America great again…one-hundred-and-sixty-five days into the Trump administration, America is on a winning streak like, frankly, nobody has ever seen before in the history of the presidency.' Meanwhile, the president's trade war rattles on. Trump told reporters late on Thursday that his administration will start sending out letters on Friday setting unilateral tariff rates, which countries would have to begin paying on 1 August. Trump said '10 or 12' letters would go out on Friday, with additional letters coming 'over the next few days'. The higher import duties will range in value from 'maybe 60 or 70% tariffs to 10 and 20% tariffs', he said. The top tier of that range would be higher than any of the levies the president first outlined during his Liberation Day rollout in April. He did not provide any detail on which countries might receive such high tariffs. The UK is one of a few countries that has reached a trade agreement with Trump, including Vietnam. Many trading partners such as the European Union, Japan and South Korea are still trying to finalise trade deals. Trump has threatened that if countries fail to reach deals by 9 July, he could simply impose tariff rates on them. 9:00am BST: UK SMMT car market figures for the first half of the year 9:30am BST: UK PMI construction data US market closed for Independence Day
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
There will be no second chance for Labour
The ANC were the first to coin the slogan 'make the country ungovernable' as they sought to depose the apartheid government in South Africa. An unruly people would weaken the centre, extract concessions and push tensions until they became contradictions. From there, you get the real prospect of regime change. Britain remains a relatively prosperous and secure nation. But it is becoming palpably less governable by the day. This is not confined to one party or leader. The lifespan of prime ministers and their cabinets are getting shorter. Parliament is sovereign once again, but it does not feel that way. Successive governments have failed to grip the centre and act decisively to overcome Britain's malaise. This is the task that falls to Labour. These are not easy times in which to govern. The Government has little room for manoeuvre. The bond markets are tetchy, gilt yields are higher than they have been for decades, pushing up the cost of borrowing. The failure of the leadership to shave £5 billion off welfare spending only increases the nervousness. Scleroticism has taken hold in seemingly every institution. How have we got here? And how can Labour get us out of it? From the 1990s through to 2016, the political class on both Left and Right was characterised above all by complacency. These were the fat years. Growth was good, largely because of a booming services economy centred on London and the south east in general and the City of London in particular. This growth enabled New Labour's economics of redistribution that supported the country's heartlands. After years of hardship, Blair's model seemed to finally bring the warring factions of the country back together again. The 2008 crash should have shaken the political class out of its complacency, exposing the precarity of our heavily financialised economy and the malaise that lurked beneath the surface of our now fragile economic model. While services had grown, our productive capacity had been denuded. Strategic industries had been closed down, outsourced or sold off to foreign investors. Regions once massaged by public sector employment opportunities and welfare found these tools were no longer powerful enough to smooth the cracks left by deindustrialisation. The recession marked the juncture at which Britain began to decline relative to the US and most other European nations, yet it prompted little critical reflection. Austerity was the coalition government's answer – and it was an expensive one. Huge structural weaknesses in our economy were reduced to a matter of simple accounting. Investment dried up and infrastructure could not keep pace with maddeningly high levels of immigration. Growth, productivity and real wages flatlined. Complacency was still the order of the day for a political class who had grown decadent and far-removed from the real conditions of the country. Whatever else it may have done, the vote to leave the European Union punctured this complacency. Blue Labour had been warning since 2009 that all was not well in the body politic, that lurking beneath the glitzy New Labour veneer social disaffection was growing. Blue represented melancholia as much as conservatism. Now all was out in the open: the disconnect between the political class and the country it sought to govern; the towns that had been left behind, their economic purpose in a global economy obscure; and the dysfunction of government, parliament and our public institutions. The Conservatives proved incapable of exiting this quagmire. The 2019 government began with an 80-seat majority and ended in ignominy and an announcement of a new fund for chess players. Lacking the will or confidence to take on Treasury orthodoxy, immigration trebled and levelling up was abandoned. The civil service was left unreformed. Growth continued to stagnate as judicial overreach and regulatory constraints made building impossible. A few brief spasms aside, inertia replaced complacency as the defining feature of our political class. As little as a year ago, you could still find echoes of complacency in the political and media class when they spoke of Labour's election win as a victory for the 'grown-ups'. But fixing a broken political system, a dysfunctional state and a stagnant economy requires more than a clean suit and tie. It has taken Labour one year to discover what took the Conservatives 14 years: that Britain, its economy and its institutions, are barely functioning. Too many in Labour defined themselves solely in opposition to the Conservatives and thought a new Government need only focus on 'delivery', with a few technical fixes here and there. Others wanted to reduce the task of governance to a form of altruism for those in need. Their vibes-based politics has no resonance in the country, no acknowledgment of the hard reality of trade-offs in a low growth economy, and no solutions for Britain's malaise. If there is a divide in Labour it is not between Left and Right, New Labour or Blue Labour, but between those who understand the severity of the country's situation and those who do not. The future success of this Government depends on this understanding. It must be an insurgent on behalf of the people, willing to grip the centre and take on its own party and the scleroticism of our institutions as it rebuilds a shattered country, shifting resources to the productive economy, to build, make and grow, driving social and economic development, radically reducing immigration and speaking for the whole country as one people united in a shared national identity and purpose. This is the choice facing Labour, the fork in the road in this inauspicious moment – a retreat into the comfort zone of liberal progressivism confined to the prosperous areas of the country, doing things for a client electorate, promising the impossible, or a striving for a radical rebuilding of the national economy, renewing our sovereign democracy and building our national revival on a broad, cross-class coalition. This way lies a second term and a new political settlement. The first year has not gone well, but there will be no second chance for Labour.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
This high street giant is leading the fight against foreign raiders
Britain has long been crying out for a corporate chief with the courage to fly the flag for independence when an opportunistic foreign raider swoops in. The overwhelming tendency of the vast majority of PLC boards is to wave a white flag the minute a takeover attempt lands. Hiding behind feeble claims that they have a 'fiduciary duty' to recommend any offer pitched at a mild premium, these handsomely paid custodians of Britain's brightest and best companies nearly always take the money and run. Presented with a rare opportunity to cash in shares and stock options – often running into the many millions of pounds – that might take years to vest, pure greed all too often quickly takes over. The hollowing out of the stock market is undoubtedly a bona fide national crisis, and the reasons for it are many. But if the UK wasn't possessed with a bizarre predilection for allowing overseas predators and private equity barons to pick off the jewels of British business at will, not to mention nearly always on the cheap, the problem wouldn't be nearly so pronounced. It is the elephant in the room that nobody in power seems remotely prepared to even acknowledge, never mind tackle, for fear of being branded anti-foreign investment. Yet the idea that this long-standing habit is even remotely in the national interest really is one of the great lies of our time. Three cheers then for Alex Baldock, boss of electricals chain Currys, for demonstrating that there is a genuine alternative to all those lily-livered surrender monkeys out there, which is, of course, to have faith in your standalone prospects and to send the vultures packing. In fact, Baldock has done it with such aplomb that it should really pave the way for a bold new era in which corporate Britain is prepared to stand up and fight for its future. After spurning not one but two takeover attempts from activist investor Elliott just last year, Currys is riding high. Share prices often crash when suitors walk away, but not at this high street giant. Having slumped to an all-time low of just 43p in late 2023, its shares are currently trading at a three and half-year high of 126p. What's more, that's more than double the 67p-a-share that Elliott was dangling in front of the Currys board as a final offer. This is money in the pockets of shareholders, many of them pension funds managing the retirement savings of people up and down the country, not to mention staff whose hard work behind the tills and in the aisles has helped to drive its impressive revival. More than 30,000 Currys employees have been awarded stock through the company's 'colleague shareholder scheme' since it was introduced in 2019. It's a stark reminder of what can be achieved in a relatively short period of time by managers who are prepared to take risks. Annual profits are up 37pc to £162m, beating expectations again, despite raising targets three times this year. The chain is also sitting on a hefty cash pile of nearly £200m – a sharp turnaround for an outfit that not too long ago looked to be carrying too much debt. 'The balance sheet has not been this strong in a decade,' analysts at Panmure Liberum said.
