Teenager says man convicted of murdering her father ‘deserves every second' of his life sentence
Dylan Scannell, of O'Rahilly Street, Cobh,
Co Cork
, was sentenced to life imprisonment at a sitting of the
Central Criminal Court
in Cork on Friday for the murder of Ian Baitson (33). The tattoo artist (31) was last month found guilty by a jury after a weeklong trial of murdering the father of two.
Jurors heard that Scannell struck Mr Baitson, who owed him a small drug debt, behind the left knee with the sword in the Eurospar car park on Newtown Road, Cobh on March 15th, 2024. Mr Baitson was rushed to hospital to have emergency surgery but died four days later.
In a victim impact statement, Zoey Baitson (14) said her father had turned his life around before his death after a period of drug taking.
'We got very close after that. I was so happy to have my Daddy back to his normal self,' she said.
'In March 2024, we all celebrated my younger brother's birthday. Daddy was so happy. Then a few days later we got a call saying my father had been attacked. My heart broke.'
Zoey said it was scary to see her father hooked up to multiple machines in Cork University Hospital's intensive care unit.
She said two teddy bears were placed on her father's shoulder as he lay in his hospital bed – one from her and one from her baby brother.
'My heart shattered (when my father died) and I never felt so much pain like this. I would never wish this on anyone. You (Scannell) deserve every second of your sentence.'
Sarah Geasley, Mr Baitson's former partner, said he was a kind man and a loving father. She said he was stolen from them in a 'senseless, cruel and violent manner' just four days after celebrating their son's third birthday.
Ms Geasley said one of the hardest things she ever had to do was tell her son his father is in heaven.
'He associates stars in the sky now with his Daddy. At night, if and when he sees a bright star, he will say 'Look, look Mammy, there's Daddy',' she added.
Scannell, a father of two, expressed remorse for his actions in a letter read to the court by his counsel, Tom Creed, SC, He said he would love to take back what he did that day.
The evidence at the trial was that Scannell had previously sent Ian Baitson a text messages in which he threatened to chop off his fingers because of a drug debt, which he claimed had at one point amounted to €2,500.
Mr Baitson replied insisting he only owed him a couple of hundred euro. On the night of the attack, Mr Baitson had €185 in his pocket which he planned to give to Scannell. However, the evidence was that he never got the chance to hand over the money as he was attacked when they met.
'Ian was my friend and I will have to carry his cross with me for the rest of my days. It was a dark and dangerous time and it will haunt me for the rest of my life,' he said.
Ms Justice Eileen Creedon offered her condolences to the Baitson family and praised the eloquence of their victim impact statements.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
19 minutes ago
- Irish Times
LVMH's Loro Piana placed under court administration over worker exploitation
A Milanese court placed exclusive clothing label Loro Piana under judicial administration for subcontracting production to suppliers that allegedly exploited workers, making the LVMH-owned cashmere brand the latest fashion house to be caught up in a series of investigations into labour rights violations. The court said Loro Piana had handed the production of apparel, including jackets, to Evergreen Fashion Group, which is owned by a Chinese company. 'The production of such apparel had been carried out in a context of labour exploitation,' according to the ruling. Loro Piana has been placed into a one-year court administration to address the shortfalls in its supply chain, the ruling shows. The sanction means a court-appointed administrator will oversee the brand's operations. The brand is not under criminal investigation and the order will be lifted if the company complies with legal requirements before the 12-month deadline given by the court. Loro Piana declined to comment on the ruling. Loro Piano is known for its cashmere jumpers which retail for more than €1,000, as well as jeans selling at close to €700. Loro Piana was bought by LVMH, the world's largest luxury conglomerate, in 2013. Frédéric Arnault, son of LVMH founder Bernard Arnault, was appointed chief executive of the Milan-based fashion house in March. It is the fifth fashion company to have been placed under court administration over labour issues in Italy in the past 18 months, in a scandal that has tarnished the image of the country's luxury industry. Milanese prosecutors have been investigating the industry's supply chain for several years after media investigations uncovered multiple cases of labour malpractice across several companies that have Chinese owners based in Lombardy and Tuscany. Luxury brands subcontracted production to meet heightened demand during the pandemic-era luxury boom. LVMH's Dior, Italy's Armani and Alviero Martini have had the restrictions placed on them lifted before the 12-month deadline. Valentino, part-owned by France's other luxury conglomerate Kering, was also subjected to a similar order in May. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
34 minutes ago
- Irish Times
TikTok given High Court permission to challenge €530m fine over transfer of personal data to China
The High Court has granted social media giant TikTok permission to pursue a legal challenge against what it argues is the 'penal' €530 million fine imposed upon it by the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) over the alleged transfer of site-users' personal data to China. The fine was imposed on the video-sharing site last April, for what the DPC described as an infringement on data protection regarding its transfers of European users' data to The People's Republic of China via remote access to data stored in the US and Singapore by personnel based in China. In addition to the €530 million fine, the April 30th censure also included an order suspending TikTok's transfer of data to China if its processing was not brought into compliance with European directives on transparency within six months. On Monday, Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty granted permission for TikTok to pursue a legal challenge against the DPC decisions and put a stay on them pending the outcome of the legal review. READ MORE The High Court action is being taken by TikTok Technology Limited, with an address at The Sorting Office, Ropemaker Place, Dublin 2, and by TikTok Information Technologies UK Limited, Kaleidoscope, Lindsey Street, London, UK, against the DPC, Ireland and the Attorney General. TikTok Ireland is a private company limited by shares incorporated in the Republic of Ireland and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TikTok UK. Both TikTok entities seek the quashing of the decision of the DPC of April 30th, 2025. Lawyers for the applicants appeared in the High Court on Tuesday on an ex parte basis, where only one side is represented. They submitted that the sections of the Data Protection Act under which the DPC made their decision are invalid when viewed in relation to the Constitution, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. In papers lodged to the High Court, TikTok says that the Ireland and UK arms are 'joint controllers' for the processing of personal data of users based in Europe but add that TikTok UK is 'the entity that will ultimately bear the cost of the administration fines imposed in the decision'. Ireland and the Attorney General are joined as respondents to the proceedings. TikTok submits that the imposition of 'administrative' fines of €485 million and €45 million 'constitutes the imposition of a sanction that in its nature and severity is properly characterised as 'criminal' or penal'. TikTok contends that 'even if the imposition of the fine did not constitute a sanction of a criminal nature, the DPC was nonetheless not exercising merely limited functions and powers of a judicial nature within the meaning of Article 37.1 of the Constitution'. Article 37.1 aims to validate the delegation of certain judicial powers to administrative bodies without infringing on the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in criminal matters. TikTok claims that the fines 'cannot be said to be of a limited nature'. TikTok submits that the ECHR provides that 'in the determination of civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charges, an individual is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law'. The applicants further claim that the fine 'constitutes an interference with the applicants' right to private property protected under Article 40.3 or 43, or both, of the Constitution'. 'The decision to impose a fine, the amount of the fine and the absence of a full right of appeal constitutes an unjust, unjustified and disproportionate interference with the applicants' right to private property,' TikTok claims. Ms Justice Gearty granted leave for the judicial review and adjourned the matter to October.
Irish Times
34 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Neighbours did not recognise Tom Niland due to injuries sustained in alleged home invasion
A man in his 70s was so badly beaten during an alleged home invasion in Co Sligo that his neighbours did not recognise him walking along the middle of the road covered in blood, a Central Criminal Court trial has heard. Anna and Fiona Calpin said they only realised it was Tom Niland when he spoke to say he had been 'robbed' by three men. A paramedic also told the court Mr Niland was 'crying blood' as a result of the multiple traumatic injuries he sustained to his face and skull. John Irving (31), of Shanwar, Foxford, Co Mayo, is on trial accused of breaking into Mr Niland's house along with Francis Harman (58), of Nephin Court, Killala Road, Ballina, Co Mayo, and John Clarke (37), of Carrowkelly, Ballina, on January 18th, 2022. READ MORE Mr Irving is alleged to have assaulted Mr Niland, leaving him with injuries that caused his death more than 20 months later, on September 30th, 2023. He was 75 when he died. Mr Irving is accused of unlawfully killing Mr Niland at his home at Doonflynn, Skreen, Co Sligo. He is also accused of entering the house as a trespasser and causing Mr Niland serious harm. He is further alleged to have intentionally or recklessly caused serious harm to Mr Niland and to have falsely imprisoned him. Mr Irving has pleaded not guilty to all four charges. Anna Calpin told Tony McGillicuddy SC, prosecuting, that she was walking around outside her home opposite Mr Niland's house with her daughter Fiona when they noticed cars slowing down on the road. They went to see what was happening and saw a man on the road. 'As we approached he was standing in the middle of the road with his hands out in front of him, he couldn't see anything and we didn't know who it was,' she said. 'When we got closer to him, the first thing we heard was, 'I was robbed', and then we realised it was Tom.' The witness said Mr Niland's face was 'totally distorted', his eyes were swollen and shut, and there was a lot of blood. She said he had a runner on one foot and a shoe on the other but neither was laced up. She recalled Mr Niland telling her his doorbell rang and when he opened the door, three men wearing masks appeared and pushed him into his hallway. He said they took his wallet, which contained €800 or €900. Ms Calpin brought Mr Niland into her home and called an ambulance and the Garda. Fiona Calpin said Mr Niland was 'unrecognisable' until he spoke. Anna Calpin's husband, David Calpin, said he was in his workshop when his daughter came in and said Mr Niland had been 'robbed and assaulted'. Mr Calpin went inside to his neighbour before going across to Mr Niland's house where he saw blood 'running down the glass of the front door', on the driveway and the road. A pair of tights or nylons lay on the driveway. He said he realised it was a crime scene so he left to wait for gardaí to come. George Williams, who works in the ambulance service in Co Sligo, told Mr McGillicuddy he went into the Calpin home and saw Mr Niland with a towel wrapped around his head. When Mr Williams removed the towel, he saw multiple injuries around Mr Niland's face, head and skull. He said Mr Niland's eyes were 'completely swollen shut and he had the appearance as if he was crying blood.' Given Mr Niland's age and the level of trauma, Mr Williams believed the injuries were potentially life threatening so he decided to immediately remove him to an ambulance. Dr Martin Caldwell told Mr McGillicuddy he was the emergency surgeon on duty at Sligo University Hospital when Mr Niland arrived. He said Mr Niland had suffered 'serious and life threatening injuries'. Scans revealed bleeding to the brain, a fracture to the floor of the orb of the right eye and multiple broken ribs on his right side, the court heard. Despite the brain injury, doctors decided it was not necessary to send him to the Beaumont Hospital in Dublin for surgery. Between January 20th and January 26th, Mr Niland made progress and was able to sit on a chair. However, his condition deteriorated at that point and he became more drowsy. He required a ventilator to help him breathe and doctors decided to place him on life support in the intensive care unit. By early March, he had made no progress, Dr Caldwell said, and a consultant neurologist took over his care. Another witness, John Scott, told Mr McGillicuddy he was part of a group of kayakers who were heading out on Lough Easkey in Co Sligo four days after the assault on Mr Niland. As he was placing a kayak into the water, he said he noticed something unusually square under a couple of inches of water by the side of the lake. When he took it from the water he realised it was a wallet. He phoned a friend who is a garda and told him the name Tom Niland was on the ID inside the wallet. He said he did not know the significance of it at the time, but about one hour later, Garda Elaine McAndrew arrived at Lough Easkey and took possession of the wallet. The trial continues before Ms Justice Eileen Creedon and a jury of eight women and four men.
