Mahmoud Abbas chose division at a moment when Palestinians need unity
His words highlight the depth of the Palestinian tragedy. Israel bears responsibility for the deaths of more than 50,000 Palestinians in Gaza and nearly a thousand more in the occupied West Bank; for the total destruction of Gaza, making its population refugees on their own land; and for the forced displacement of tens of thousands of Palestinians in the West Bank.
But Abbas once again chose to use his platform not to call for unity or resistance, but to launch a crude verbal assault on Hamas - this time using language reminiscent of street insults.
'Sons of dogs, just release whoever you're holding and be done with it,' Abbas said, referring to the Israeli hostages still remaining in Gaza. 'Shut down [Israel's] excuses and spare us.'
Criticism of Hamas, which is proscribed as a terrorist group in the UK and other countries, and its actions on 7 October 2023 is valid and necessary. There must be a critical and open intra-Palestinian discourse.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
But it is unacceptable that, in the face of the ongoing catastrophe in Gaza, Abbas's primary message is to condemn Hamas, without offering a vision or a plan for Palestinian unity - especially given the existential threats looming over the Palestinian people.
Worse still is his manipulation of historical facts to erase his own responsibility for the fragmentation of the Palestinian national movement. It was Abbas who undermined the results of the 2006 elections, supervised by international observers, after Hamas won a majority. The ensuing rift between Fatah and Hamas eventually led to Hamas's takeover of Gaza and the territory's geographic and political division from the West Bank.
Deepening alienation
Abbas shares equal blame for this split. Whether through agreeing to elections he had no intention of honouring, or by refusing to accept their outcome, his role in the crisis is undeniable.
Other Palestinian factions, such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Palestinian National Initiative, boycotted the session in which Abbas spoke - a testament to the deepening alienation between the president and the broader Palestinian political spectrum.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
Public opinion echoes this sentiment. A September 2024 poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that in a hypothetical election between three candidates, only six percent of Palestinians would vote for Abbas, compared with 32 percent for Fatah's Marwan Barghouti and 31 percent for Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, who was killed by Israeli forces weeks after the poll was conducted.
Even if one were to accept Abbas's narrative blaming Hamas for the Gaza schism, nearly 20 years have passed since the last election. During that time, successive Israeli governments - especially Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's - have strategically used the Palestinian split to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Abbas's narrative that Hamas is to blame for our current predicament absolves both Israel and himself from their shared responsibility in this national catastrophe
Why has Abbas not proposed a political plan for reconciliation? If the Palestinian Authority (PA) is meant to represent all Palestinians, then his failure to restore unity is a monumental dereliction of duty. Today, Palestinians are no longer split only into 1948 and 1967 groups; we now face a triple fragmentation of 1948 territories, the occupied West Bank and Gaza.
Abbas's speech reflects both an acknowledgment of the real and growing dangers facing Palestinians, and a deliberate denial of the realities on the ground, particularly in the occupied West Bank, before 7 October. This denial helps him avoid accountability for the failure of his political path, as Israel openly declared its intentions to annex and ethnically cleanse parts of the West Bank well before the Gaza war.
In 2022 alone, under the so-called 'unity government' of Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett, more than 1,000 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank were displaced and around 150 were killed, including dozens of minors. Settlement expansion continued unabated. Palestinian prisoners suffered worsening conditions. Al-Aqsa Mosque remained under threat.
Regardless of the Palestinian political situation, Israel has veered sharply rightwards over the past decade. Despite close security coordination between the PA and Israel - with Palestinian security forces even raiding refugee camps - and Abbas offering no serious plan to counter settler violence, Israel has steadily moved to render the Palestinian issue obsolete through de facto annexation.
'No future in Palestine'
To understand Israel's strategy, one needs only to revisit a 2017 policy document by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, which called to dismantle refugee camps, weaken the PA, encourage 'voluntary emigration' (a euphemism for expulsion), and break any chance of territorial contiguity for a Palestinian state.
The despair now visible across the occupied West Bank - with billboards and graffiti funded by Israeli campaigns declaring: 'You have no future in Palestine' - was envisioned long before 7 October.
Framing Israeli policies as mere reactions to 7 October flattens the discourse and allows Israel to justify its ongoing atrocities on the global stage. Even when a deal was within reach - including a Gaza ceasefire, a phased return of all hostages and an Israeli withdrawal of troops - Israel violated the terms. Hostage families themselves have accused Netanyahu of sabotaging the deal and endangering their loved ones.
Mahmoud Abbas is in his final act as betrayer of the Palestinian cause Read More »
Israel then uses these justifications to expel tens of thousands of people from the occupied West Bank, shut down Unrwa schools, and withhold the PA's tax funds. Abbas's narrative that Hamas is to blame for our current predicament absolves both Israel and himself from their shared responsibility in this national catastrophe.
What was even more puzzling about Abbas's speech was his call for Hamas to lay down its arms and hand over control of Gaza to the PA. In other words, the only legitimate arms would be those held by Palestinian security forces, and the PA would work with Egypt to rebuild Gaza.
It's not the proposal itself that is puzzling - on the contrary, it makes sense - but rather the expectation that Israel would allow Fatah or the PA to return to Gaza, given that Netanyahu himself declared as recently as February: 'On the day after the war in Gaza, there will be no Hamas and no Palestinian Authority.' He added that he was 'committed' to US President Donald Trump's plan 'to create a different Gaza'.
The Abbas speech was tragic, especially since he leads the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), the historic body officially recognised as the representative of the Palestinian people. Once a unifying force, the PLO now presides over a fractured movement. The boycott of Abbas's council meeting by key factions reflects this unprecedented crisis.
In the face of real and imminent threats of mass expulsion, especially in Gaza but also in the occupied West Bank, Palestinians need their leaders to be unifiers, not dividers. Abbas had a platform to call for unity and resistance in the face of Israeli war crimes. Instead, he chose vilification and denial.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ARN News Center
an hour ago
- ARN News Center
OPEC+ speeds up oil output hikes, adds 548,000 bpd in August
OPEC+ agreed on Saturday to raise production by 548,000 barrels per day in August, further accelerating output increases at its first meeting since oil prices jumped - and then retreated - following Israeli and US attacks on Iran. The group, which pumps about half of the world's oil, has been curtailing production since 2022 to support the market. But it has reversed course this year to regain market share and as US President Donald Trump demanded the group pump more to help keep gasoline prices lower. The production boost will come from eight members of the group - UAE, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Kuwait, Oman, Iraq, Kazakhstan and Algeria. The eight started to unwind their most recent layer of cuts of 2.2 million bpd in April. The August increase represents a jump from monthly increases of 411,000 bpd OPEC+ had approved for May, June and July, and 138,000 bpd in April. OPEC+ cited a steady global economic outlook and healthy market fundamentals, including low oil inventories, as reasons for releasing more oil. The acceleration came after some OPEC+ members, such as Kazakhstan and Iraq, produced above their targets, angering other members that were sticking to cuts, sources have said. Kazakh output returned to growth last month and matched an all-time high. OPEC+, which groups the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies led by Russia, wants to expand market share amid growing supplies from rival producers like the United States, sources have said. With the August increase, OPEC+ will have released 1.918 million bpd since April, which leaves just 280,000 bpd to be released from the 2.2 million bpd cut. On top of that, OPEC+ allowed the UAE to increase output by 300,000 bpd. The group still has in place other layers of cuts amounting to 3.66 million bpd. The group of eight OPEC+ members will next meet on August 3.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Three more opposition mayors arrested in Turkey
Three opposition mayors have been arrested in Turkey in what the Republican People's Party (CHP) have a branded a "political operation". Adana Mayor Zeydan Karalar, Antalya Mayor Muhittin Bocek and Adiyaman Mayor Abdurrahman Tutdere were all arrested on Saturday as part of an investigation into corruption allegations that have already seen the imprisonment of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu. It follows the arrest of more than 120 people earlier this week as part of an investigation into alleged corruption in the opposition stronghold of Izmir, the country's third-largest city. The CHP, the largest opposition party in Turkey, has accused the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of targeting them after widespread success in the 2024 local elections and polling suggesting Imamoglu could unseat the president in a future election. Mansur Yavas, CHP mayor of the capital Ankara, criticised the arrests on X, saying his party would not bow to "unlawfulness". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "In a system where the law is bent and twisted according to politics, where justice is applied for one segment and ignored for another, no one should expect us to trust the rule of law or believe in justice," he wrote. According to the state-run Anadolu Agency, the mayors of Adana and Adiyaman were linked to a case involving alleged tender-rigging and corruption. Police also arrested Ahmet Sahin, deputy mayor of Istanbul's Buyukcekmece district. The mayor of Antalya was detained in a separate investigation into corruption allegations, while police also arrested his son. The left-wing Peoples' Equality and Democracy Party (DEM Party) also condemned the arrests on social media. Turkey passes first 'far from ideal' climate change bill as heatwave ravages country Read More » "This persecution of elected officials must stop," wrote Tulay Hatimogullari, co-chair of the party, on X. "Failure to recognise the will of the people is causing deep divisions within society - these operations are not a solution, but rather block the path to a democratic Turkiye." Typically the interior ministry only has the power to replace elected mayors if they are suspected of terrorism offences. Under the municipal law, if a mayor is suspended over corruption investigations a deputy mayor is selected by the city council and since the CHP holds a majority in the councils of all three cities they will not lose control. On Monday, an Ankara court began examining a case involving allegations of vote-buying in the party's 2023 primaries. The move could lead to the annulment of the election of its leader Ozgur Ozel, who has become well-known for organising protests against the imprisonment of Imamoglu.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US consultancy firm involved in GHF aid scheme modelled plans to 'relocate' Palestinians
A consulting firm involved in the scandal-plagued Gaza Humanitarian Foundation entered into a multimillion-dollar contract to develop the initiative and modelled a plan to "relocate" Palestinians from Gaza as part of its work, a Financial Times investigation has revealed. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) helped design and run the US and Israeli-backed scheme which aimed to supplant United Nations-led aid coordination mechanisms in Gaza. The chaotic roll out of the programme has seen 600 Palestinians killed and another 4,000 wounded by Israeli forces while attempting to access aid. The firm has disavowed its involvement in the project, claiming in a statement in June that it had initially provided "pro bono support" for the project, but two senior partners that led the work "failed to disclose" its full nature and had subsequently carried out "unauthorised work" on the project. It said that the partners have since been fired and an investigation has been launched into the firm's involvement in the scheme. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But according to sources familiar with the project who spoke to the Financial Times, the BCG were more enmeshed with the scheme than the firm has publicly acknowledged, with the company contracted to perform $4m worth of work over a period of seven months. Over a dozen BCG staff worked directly on the project, dubbed "Aurora", between October and late May. Senior figures at the firm were reported to have discussed the initiative, but the BCG said they were misled about the scope and nature of the work by the partners helming the project. 'My journey to get aid in Gaza was like Squid Game' Read More » "The lead partner was categorically told no, and he violated this directive. We disavow this work," the BCG said. The work included financial modelling for the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, commissioned by Israeli backers, with one scenario envisioning the "voluntary relocation" of Palestinians from the enclave. This would have involved paying out "relocation packages" to 500,000 people worth $9,000 per person to induce people to leave the territory. The model assumed a quarter of Palestinians would opt to leave Gaza, with three-quarters of them unlikely to return. It estimated the cost of forced expulsion of Palestinians to be $23,000 cheaper, per Palestinian, than the costs of providing support to them in Gaza during reconstruction. According to BCG, this side of the operation was conducted without the knowledge of senior management and against their instructions. Involvement in security operations The revelations also raise questions about BCG's involvement in developing the security aspect of the initiative. According to sources familiar with the early stages of BCG's work on the initiative, the firm was initially contracted by Washington-based security contractor Orbis to develop a feasibility study for a new aid operation on behalf of the Tachlith Institute, an Israeli think tank. BCG was chosen for the project because of its connections with Phil Reilly, a 29-year veteran of the CIA who worked at Orbis. He was a senior adviser to BCG's defence practice where the two fired partners, Matt Schlueter and Ryan Ordway, worked. Middle East Eye previously reported that Reilly served as a senior adviser at BCG for eight years, and began discussing Gaza aid with Israeli civilians while still in his advisory role in early 2024. The BCG did not answer MEE's questions regarding its involvement in the security operations to support GHF, what role it had played with the foundation and who had asked the firm to get involved initially. Reilly dropped his advisory role with BCG and went on to found Safe Reach Solutions (SRS), a private military company which became the main security provider for the GHF. According to the report, half a dozen staff shifted to "more detailed business planning" for the SRS and GHF. This work was helmed by the US defence practice, while the initial pro-bono phase was billed to BCG's social impact practice helmed by Rich Hutchinson. Ex-CIA officer running Gaza aid security advised Boston Consulting Group Read More » By January, the BCG was contracted by McNally Capital, a Chicago-based private equity firm which owns Orbis, to plan GHF's ground operations from Tel Aviv. The SRS signed an initial contract with the group worth over $1m to cover eight weeks of work to develop SRS's operations in Gaza, with travel approvals given by officials in BGC's risk management operation. The group told the Financial Times that it was "pleased to have supported the establishment of SRS as an important step toward meeting the full scope of the humanitarian need in Gaza". Funding sources for both GHF and SRS remain unclear. Both are registered in US tax havens, with scant details available in public records. A source previously told the Financial Times that the GHF had been pledged $100m from a country they refused to name. Reuters reported on Friday that UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to open bank accounts for the GHF, with the foundation's lack of transparency over its funding cited as being one of the main stumbling blocks in the discussions with the banks. A GHF spokesperson said it has "spoken about initial funding from Europe, but we don't disclose donors for their privacy". GHF's scheme has seen 400 aid distribution points across the enclave replaced by four militarised distribution sites, where millions are forced to risk death in the hope of receiving aid. Israeli troops have admitted to deliberately shooting and killing unarmed Palestinians waiting for aid in the Gaza Strip, following direct orders from their superiors.
