
An explosive Grand Canyon wildfire brings terror, loss and tough questions: ‘It came like a freight train'
Fire managers decided that conditions seemed ideal to let the blaze burn at a low intensity – a practice known as 'control and contain' that helps clear out excess fuels and decreases the chance of a more catastrophic wildfire in the future. Rains from previous weeks had left the forest floor moist and weather forecasts indicated the summer monsoon season would arrive soon.
But a week later, the park's strategy fell apart. On 11 July, the fire burst through its containment lines and began to rapidly pick up speed – exploding tenfold in a day.
'The fire sounded like a freight train coming towards us,' says a firefighter, who was part of the National Parks Service crew battling the blaze.
By 12 July, it seemed the destruction was unstoppable. Over the next 24 hours some 70 buildings would be destroyed, including the historic Grand Canyon Lodge, dozens of visitor cabins as well as park administrative offices and residences. Images of the smoldering lodge and the smoke-filled canyon filled news stories and social media feeds.
Suddenly, it felt like the whole world was questioning the decision to not put the blaze out immediately. Almost two weeks after it began, the so-called Dragon Bravo fire is still only 2% contained and encompasses nearly 12,000 acres (4,856 hectares), as more than 750 firefighters have battled the blaze.
The park's North Rim has long been the sleepy cousin of the more bustling South Rim, bringing in just 10% of the park's annual visitors, and inspiring loyal fans. News of the tragedy has hit Grand Canyon lovers hard. The area has been shut down for the remainder of the season, and hundreds of national park and concession employees have suddenly found themselves without homes and jobs. An untold number of summer vacations to the park have been cancelled.
But there is also a more existential loss. A place beloved by visitors and employees for its beauty and solitude has suddenly been ripped away. And the heart of that sanctuary, the Grand Canyon Lodge – the park's Notre Dame – is in ruins.
'It's hard to put into words how devastating the loss of the Grand Canyon Lodge is,' wrote one longtime Grand Canyon North Rim park employee on social media. 'The Lodge and North Rim weren't just buildings and trails – they were a home to us … and now it's gone. It feels like a piece of who we are has burned with it.'
As the initial shock subsides and the reality of the loss sets in, questions are swirling about how the tragedy occurred – and how to move forward.
In hindsight, the decision not to tamp out the fire swiftly has drawn the most scrutiny. But the Grand Canyon fire crew member who was on scene in early July, who asked not to be identified for fear of losing his job, said it seemed like a reasonable call based on assessment at the time.
For the first few days after it broke out, the blaze behaved exactly as expected. But then on 11 July the humidity level suddenly plummeted. Embers began jumping containment lines in the dry air as strong winds changed direction and the fire escaped down a drainage, picking up momentum as if gasoline had been dumped on it. By the next day it had exploded from 120 acres to 1,500 acres.
Some 500 visitors at the North Rim had already been evacuated due to another fire burning outside the park, dubbed the White Sage fire. The remaining residents were evacuated, and the park's fire crew began hosing down structures. But the team was lacking adequate equipment and manpower, the firefighter said.
According to the firefighter, some of the department's already limited resources had been sent to fight the White Sage fire. They were missing two fire engines and a bulldozer, and they needed more boots on the ground. Plus, aerial suppression support would not arrive until the next day.
By nightfall on 11 July, the fast-growing fire had surrounded the crew and they were instructed by managers to take cover in the North Rim's fire station. Soon, he said, the fire was everywhere. Nearby, another group of firefighters were trapped on a helipad, flanked by flames 100ft (30.5 metres) tall.
'We were trapped,' recalled the firefighter. 'We thought we were going to die. Propane tanks from surrounding buildings were exploding all around us. Our homes and our friend's homes were burning and there was nothing we could do.'
Located at a cool elevation of 8,000ft on the Kaibab plateau in northern Arizona, Grand Canyon national park's North Rim is a four-hour drive from the more famous South Rim. The isolation is what makes it special for park employees and visitors, but the largely undeveloped region is also especially vulnerable to wildfire. A single paved road connects the park to Jacob Lake, a small village some 50 miles away.
The ponderosa pine forest ecosystem of the Kaibab plateau relies on regular low-intensity fires to stay healthy, but those fires were supressed by federal policies throughout most of the 20th century. National park managers have attempted to restore the Grand Canyon's natural forest ecosystem over the last two decades through prescribed fires, or by allowing lightning-sparked wildfires to burn.
The strategy went off without a hitch as recently as July 2022, when a lightning strike started a fire on the North Rim that grew to only 1,300 acres as fire crews tightly managed the boundaries of the blaze.
However, other examples have been less successful. In June 2006, a lightning-sparked fire trapped several hundred visitors after strong winds pushed the flames beyond its containment lines. The only paved road out of the park was blocked by flames, but law enforcement officers led visitors to safety on a web of winding dirt roads.
Ken Phillips, who worked at Grand Canyon for 27 years and served as chief of emergency services, believes the decision to let the Dragon Bravo fire burn was a mistake. He also points out that lives could have been lost if visitors had not already been evacuated due to the White Sage fire.
'The North Rim did not need to burn the way it did and put firefighters in harm's way,' he said. 'There is a history of escaped managed wildfires at Grand Canyon. It is very tragic that the lessons learned from those fires weren't heeded in this situation.'
In response to a request for comment about the handling of the fire, a spokesperson directed the Guardian to a public statement from Ed Keable, the Grand Canyon superintendent, that described the wildfire as a 'devastating event'.
In a previous statement to the Arizona Republic, Rachel Pawlitz, a park spokesperson, defended the initial handling of the fire and also contradicted what firefighters said they experienced on 11 and 12 July. 'We've lost buildings but hundreds of lives were saved due to the fact that this fire was expertly handled,' she said. 'The firefighters did not put themselves or others at risk when they managed the initial firefight, pushing historic wind gusts that caused the fire to jump multiple containment features and move toward facilities instead.'
Built in 1936, the Grand Canyon Lodge sits at the tip of a peninsula jutting out into the canyon allowing unmatched views of the natural wonder. Visitor cabins, perched on the rim nearby, are shaded by towering old growth pine and spruce trees.
Kathryn Leonard, the state historic preservation officer for the state of Arizona, calls the style of the historic buildings 'national park rustic'. The lodge and cabins echo the surrounding environment with rock walls made from Kaibab limestone and roofs supported by exposed ponderosa pine trusses.
The Grand Canyon Lodge was uniquely 'idyllic' and 'open' according to Leonard. Once visitors entered the building, they could walk down a stairway where a sun room with leather couches featured a giant south-facing picture window looking out onto the Grand Canyon, some 5,000ft deep and 20 miles across. The best view in the house was on the lodge patio where visitors leaned back in Adirondack chairs and watched the sunset while sipping a beer.
Pictures of the lodge that circulated on social media after the fire showed that all but two Adirondack chairs had been destroyed. Everything else was ash except for the limestone walls.
'I couldn't believe that the lodge was gone until I saw the photo,' said Phillips, the former emergency services manager. 'The loss of the entire North Rim developed area is like the death of a close friend.'
'The scale of this loss is breathtaking,' agreed Leonard. 'Historic resources are non-renewable and the workmanship in the cabin and lodge interiors can't be replaced.'
Yet Leonard is also cautiously optimistic that some elements of the building can be salvaged. 'There could be a way to rebuild that does not attempt to replicate what was there but honors it.'
Beyond the charred facilities, the more lasting damage could be to the Grand Canyon's environment itself.
The forested area on the Kaibab plateau where the Dragon Bravo fire is burning encompasses the recharge zone feeding Roaring Springs, the park's sole drinking water source. Rain and snowmelt percolate down through the ground to feed the springs located several thousand feet below the canyon rim. Surface water in the area also flows off the plateau and into Bright Angel Creek.
'From a hydrology perspective, the fire is a disaster,' said Mark Nebel, who until recently retiring, oversaw water monitoring at Grand Canyon.
Nebel worries that ash, sediment and chemical fire retardant may seep through the ground and into the aquifer that feeds the springs. These pollutants will also likely be swept into the Bright Angel watershed this summer as flash flooding is expected to occur as a result of the fire.
'The drinking water quality in the park could be impacted for many years,' added Nebel.
As Arizona governor Katie Hobbs has called for an investigation into park service decisions and firefighters continue to battle the blaze, North Rim employees find themselves reminiscing about happier times.
John McFarland, a former maintenance mechanic who lived and worked on the North Rim for 30 years, recalls how he organized a Fourth of July parade at the park every summer that was followed by an 'epic' water gun fight in front of the lodge. Many of the buildings he cared for are gone, but he is taking the loss in stride.
'The Grand Canyon is still there,' he said. 'Some of the old growth trees are still there. The place will come back.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Man United's bomb squad back home casts shadow over Ruben Amorim's trip to the United States - as Red Devils face losing fortune on £350m worth of stars
It's 21 years since Manchester United first arrived in Chicago having left a number of star names at home, drawing criticism from a US audience who didn't appreciate that Cristiano Ronaldo and his teammates were resting after Euro 2004 and the Copa America or preparing for the Athens Olympics. Fans even booed when a United side featuring very few big names besides Roy Keane fought out a drab goalless draw with Bayern Munich here at Soldier Field, forcing Sir Alex Ferguson to fly in reinforcements for the remaining two games in Philadelphia and New Jersey. When a significantly stronger United head back to the Windy City on Tuesday there will again be some notable absentees, but it's safe to say there is little chance of Alejandro Garnacho, Jadon Sancho Antony or Tyrell Malacia getting an SOS call from Ruben Amorim. The United boss will be happy to leave them behind to train at Carrington as United set up camp in Chicago ahead of Saturday's opening game of the Premier League Summer Series against West Ham in New Jersey, a meeting with Bournemouth at Soldier Field and the final tour game against Everton in Atlanta. With Marcus Rashford already in Barcelona to complete a loan move to the Nou Camp, Amorim clearly thinks it would be too much of a distraction to have the rest of his 'bomb squad' on the trip having kept them away from their teammates for the first two weeks of pre-season training and Saturday's goalless draw with Leeds in Stockholm. Sancho went to the US and played on tour last summer despite his fall-out with Erik ten Hag, but Amorim wants a clean slate and that is understandable. Alejandro Garnacho is a member of Man United's bomb squad who will not travel, while Marcus Rashford is closing in on a move to Barcelona on an initial loan He will also be delighted to have Bryan Mbeumo on the plane to Illinois after his £71m move from Brentford went through on Monday night. United have committed more than £130m to signing Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha, giving Amorim the two bespoke No10s he wants for his 3-4-2-1 system, and two attackers who are proven in the Premier League. United's traditions have been built on exciting wingers but Rashford, Sancho, Garnacho and Antony have become an endangered species at Old Trafford this summer. Malacia, meanwhile, was the first signing of the Ten Hag era but does not fit the specific requirements to be a left wing-back under his successor. Amorim knows what he wants and United's leadership team should be commended for backing him in that regard. Still, there is something rather incongruous about a club so desperately in need of goals – a problem underlined again in Stockholm – freezing out so much attacking talent. Leaving them at home may be better for morale, but it could also cost United a fortune this summer. By making it abundantly clear that they are surplus to requirements, the club have severely compromised their bargaining position on a group of players who were valued at close to £350m at their peak. United will find new homes for all five, but at what cost? Rashford's price rocketed to £100m not so long ago, but he will be allowed to join Barcelona for around £30m next summer if his loan is a success. The 27-year-old is understood to have taken a 15 per cent wage-cut to help the deal go through with Barca agreeing to pay all of his salary. Garnacho was valued at around £70m when Napoli made an approach for him in January, but United would consider offers of around £40m for the Argentina winger after Amorim told him to find a new club. The 21-year-old wants to stay in the Premier League and there is interest from Chelsea, Tottenham and Aston Villa. Antony is the second most expensive player in United's history following his £86m move from Ajax three years ago, but would fetch less than half that now with the Old Trafford hierarchy likely to consider offers under £40m. Although the Brazil winger impressed on loan at Real Betis last season, the Spaniards are reluctant to pay above £25m or £50,000-a-week towards his wages, so another loan spell in Seville is a possibility. Sancho cost £73m from Borussia Dortmund in 2021, but United are struggling to offload him for a fraction of that price after Chelsea paid a £5m penalty rather than turn his loan into a permanent £25m transfer. With the 25-year-old now in the final 11 months of his contract, and his £275,000-a-week wages a significant stumbling block, United may have to consider another loan amid interest from Juventus. Malacia, who cost £14.7m from Feyenoord when he became the first signing of the Ten Hag era, is available after returning from a loan spell at PSV Eindhoven. Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Ineos would no doubt argue that they are paying for the excesses of a previous regime. They would prefer to sell players rather than loan them where possible as they look to raise money for more new signings after bringing in Mbeumo and Cunha. A striker is the next priority as United work out what to do with Rasmus Hojlund, another player whose value has halved since he signed from Atalanta for £72m two years ago. Throw in a central midfielder and possibly a goalkeeper, and there will be plenty to occupy Amorim's thoughts on Tuesday's flight to Chicago.


Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Travis Kelce's dad, Ed, on his special bond with Taylor Swift and his 'surreal' new life in rare interview
Ed Kelce turns and begins the long walk down the path beside hole 18 of Edgewood Tahoe Resort. He is wearing a straw hat and Hawaiian shirt. His two sons, Travis and Jason, are visible just over his left shoulder. The brothers are waiting to finish the first round of the American Century Championship, an annual celebrity golf event on the shores of Lake Tahoe. The field is rammed with A-Listers from TV and film and football and beyond. None draws more devotion than the Kelces and, for five hours, only their golf shots provide respite between requests. To stop for a selfie. To sign a fan's hat or their jersey or their baby. At one point, a black bear comes to see what all the fuss is about. And yet, as Ed leaves his kids behind and wanders through the hordes, barely anyone affords him a second glance. Remarkable, really, given he is the patriarch of a family that over recent years has morphed into part-commercial empire, part-royal court. 'It borders on the surreal,' Ed, 74 tells the Daily Mail. 'There's no ifs, ands or buts about that... it's pretty crazy when you stop and think about it.' Travis and Jason had already grown from the suburbs of Cleveland to become NFL legends. 'I've been to six Super Bowls. Can you believe that?' Ed says with a chuckle. But then his youngest son began dating Taylor Swift and this family was catapulted into another stratosphere. 'She is a very special person,' Ed says. 'One of the most giving and caring people I've ever met.' To think he didn't recognize the pop sensation when they first crossed paths a couple of years ago. Travis often invites friends over to his Kansas City home before NFL games and one day Swift walked in with her security guard. 'Oh my god, I know this kid, but I don't know what her name is,' Ed said at the time. 'Taylor Swift, you idiot,' his girlfriend, Maureen, replied. Since then, though, the singer has built a close bond with Kelce Sr - or 'Papa', as Travis calls him. They have been spotted arm-in-arm and watching alongside one another in the stands. Ed has spoken about his efforts to find Swift a 'special' birthday gift that 'tweaks the strings of her heart' and turn her 'all gooey.' Back in November 2024, he travelled to Toronto to catch one of the final shows of her epic Eras Tour. He exchanged friendship bracelets with Swifties and then took his place among them. 'It was like (seeing) The Beatles,' Ed says, while another concert continues around him. He doesn't do many interviews and this one is taking place beside the 17th green at Edgewood. The 200-yard par three runs along the edge of Lake Tahoe and, during the American Century Championship, dozens of boats park up on the shore. Footballs and pens are hurled at the players to sign, while a DJ conducts the party. By the time the Kelce boys arrive, it is mid-afternoon and the heat, the noise and the atmosphere are ratcheting up. 'Oh, I love coming out here,' Ed says. Ed Kelce was seen swapping friendship bracelets at Swift's Eras Tour show in Toronto Ed Kelce insisted 'there was never any doubt in my mind' that his younger son would play on For a while, it seemed that both brothers might land in Tahoe as former NFL players. Jason walked away in March 2024 and Travis teased retirement a year later. The tight end had won back-to-back Super Bowls with the Chiefs but back in February - with a historic three-peat on offer, with his family and girlfriend in the crowd - Kansas City was humiliated by the Philadelphia Eagles. Jason's former team. Uncertainty reigned for weeks, until Travis confirmed he was not done yet. 'Oh, there was never any doubt in my mind,' his father reveals. 'Although I kept my mouth shut.' Did Travis ask for any advice? 'No,' Ed says. Would he have offered any? 'No.' So how did he know his son would carry on? 'Because he wasn't ready to quit. It was a sour taste. That sucked. If you were a Chiefs (player) or a Chiefs fan, that Super Bowl was the worst.' He didn't spot any particular scars on Travis after that night in New Orleans. 'I wouldn't say I saw that in him (then),' his dad says. 'I saw that in him for 35 years raising him. And I knew that when it happened.' Travis has one year left on his $34.25million deal with the Chiefs. What comes next, only time will tell. All that is certain: the 35-year-old won't be short of offers. The brothers were mobbed by fans during the celebrity golf tournament earlier this month 'I think Travis has all the tools and charisma to do something similar to what Jason's doing,' Ed says. 'Only it will be his.' Jason is now building a career in broadcasting. The 37-year-old works as an NFL analyst for ESPN and even hosted his own late-night chat show. 'I've always felt that's where his future lies,' Ed says of his eldest son. 'I think it's great - he picked a time that was right for him (to retire). He made the decision and did it and hasn't looked back.' Travis has already taken his first steps into TV and film, too. The 35-year-old hosted a gameshow - 'Are You Smarter Than a Celebrity?' - and appeared in horror series 'Grotesquerie'. He will soon make his big-screen debut in 'Happy Gilmore 2'. Together, the brothers co-host a hugely popular podcast, 'New Heights'. So does Jason's wife, Kylie. Swift is hardly short of fans, either. Between them all, it's an empire worth nearly $2billion. Financially, the Kelces still make up a tiny fraction of that, of course, but their footprint continues to expand. Even Donna Kelce, Ed's ex-wife, has become a celebrity in her own right. She spent decades working in banking. Now she is making acting cameos and is a contestant in the upcoming series of 'The Traitors'. Donna and Ed divorced around a decade ago but both remain devoted to their two sons. Even as 'Papa' Kelce has managed to keep a lid on his own profile. He isn't too bothered by all the noise and attention. When Travis and Jason were kids, they knew the 'one way to p** off' their dad was to leave food on their plate. His biggest concern in the minutes before this opening round of golf? 'How are you set for sunscreen?' Ed asked Travis. A few hours later, he heads down the 18th hole of Edgewood, which sits on the state line separating California and Nevada. It's been a while since Ed Kelce crossed another border - from football father to head of a booming empire.


Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
TSA issues urgent warning to all smartphone users over data theft
By Many people would consider themselves to be nervous flyers. But a recent warning from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) may be an indication that you need to be more worried about what happens before you even get on a plane. 'In this technology age, cybersecurity has never been more important,' the TSA wrote on a recent Facebook post. 'You've likely heard about things like email scams and social media scams (tip: don't accept that friend request from your buddy's "new" profile), but today we want to share our two best tips for staying cyber safe at airports while you're traveling.' Both of the tips involved safety with your smartphone. While we all typically glue ourselves to our phone once we're safely by our gate and waiting for a flight, it's possible that your mobile device might be behind your next cybersecurity attack. The TSA suggested that charging ports at the airport aren't always as trustworthy as you might have assumed. They warned against 'juice jacking,' which is when a charging port has been altered so that it can be used to transfer malware to or steal personal information from a phone. 'So, when you're at an airport do not plug your phone directly into a USB port,' the TSA wrote. 'Bring your TSA-compliant power brick or battery pack and plug in there.' The second warning involves WiFi. In terms of free internet, the TSA pretty much says to stay away entirely. 'Don't use free public WiFi, especially if you're planning to make any online purchases,' the entity posted. 'Do not ever enter any sensitive info while using unsecure WiFi.' Similar to juice jacking, some unsecure WiFi networks could be stealing your information - which includes your card information when you're trying to pay for something. So what if you need to get on the WiFi? The TSA suggested you disconnect from unknown networks, only enter encrypted sites, and stay away from downloads.