logo
‘They roll right over': Many Democratic voters call their party weak and ineffective, poll finds

‘They roll right over': Many Democratic voters call their party weak and ineffective, poll finds

WASHINGTON — Many Democrats see their political party as 'weak' or 'ineffective,' while Republicans are more complimentary of their party, although a small but significant share describe the GOP as 'greedy' or say it is generally 'bad,' according to a new poll.
The poll conducted by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research in July reveals warning signs for both major U.S. parties as the political focus shifts to elections in New Jersey and Virginia this fall and the midterm contests next year.
Respondents were asked to share the first word or phrase that came to mind when they thought of the Republican and Democratic parties. Answers were then sorted into broad categories, including negative and positive attributes. Overall, U.S. adults held a dim view of both parties, with about 4 in 10 using negative attributes, including words such as 'dishonest' or 'stupid.'
But nearly nine months after Republican Donald Trump won a second presidential term, Democrats appear to be harboring more resentment about the state of their party than do Republicans. Democrats were likelier to describe their own party negatively than Republicans. Republicans were about twice as likely to describe their own party positively.
'They're spineless,' Cathia Krehbiel, a 48-year-old Democrat from Indianola, Iowa, said of her party.
She believes the party's response to the Trump administration has been 'scattershot.'
'I just feel like there's so much recently that's just going abhorrently wrong,' Krehbiel said. 'And they speak up a little bit and they roll right over.'
Overall, roughly one-third of Democrats described their party negatively in the open-ended question.
About 15% described the Democratic Party using such words as 'weak' or 'apathetic,' while an additional 10% believe it is broadly 'ineffective' or 'disorganized.'
Only about 2 in 10 Democrats described their party positively, with roughly 1 in 10 saying it is 'empathetic' or 'inclusive.' An additional 1 in 10 used more general positive descriptors.
It is unclear what effect the Democrats' unease may have on upcoming elections or the political debate in Washington, but no political organization wants to be plagued by internal divisions.
Still, the Democrats' frustration appears to reflect their concern that party leaders are not doing enough to stop Trump's GOP, which controls Washington.
There is little sign that such voters would abandon their party in favor of Trump's allies in upcoming elections, and the vast majority of Democrats described the GOP negatively. But disaffected Democrats might decide not to vote at all. That could undermine their party's push to reclaim at least one chamber of Congress in 2026.
Jim Williams, a 78-year-old retiree from Harper Woods, Mich., is a self-described political independent who said he typically supports Democrats, but he is 'disappointed' with the party and its murky message. He views the Republican Party as much worse, saying it 'has lost it' under Trump's leadership.
'All he does is bully and call names. They've got no morals, no ethics. And the more they back him, the less I like them,' he said of Trump.
Republicans are about twice as likely as Democrats to describe their party positively, with many also using straightforward ideological descriptors like 'conservative.'
About 4 in 10 Republicans used positive attributes to characterize the GOP, making general mentions of words such as 'patriotic' or 'hardworking,' or offering associations with the word 'freedom.'
Samuel Washington, 65, of Chicago, said he typically votes Republican. He praised Trump's leadership, even while acknowledging that the president's policies on trade and spending might be creating short-term economic hardship.
'There's a lot of pain, but the pain is the result of 12 years of misuse and misguided leadership from the Democratic Party,' he said. 'I'm feeling really good about Republicans and the direction that they're going.'
But views were not uniformly good. About 2 in 10 Republicans said something negative about the party, including phrases such as 'greedy,' 'for the rich' or 'corrupt.'
Republican Dick Grayson, an 83-year-old veteran from Trade, Tenn., said he is 'disappointed' by his party's fealty to Trump.
Among other things, he pointed to the price tag of Trump's tax-and-spend package, which will add nearly $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
'I've always been a Republican, but I'm disillusioned about both parties,' Grayson said.
Among all Americans, the poll finds that the Republican Party is viewed slightly more negatively than the Democratic Party. The different is not large: 43% used negative words to describe the Republicans, compared with 39% for the Democrats.
Much of the negativity is driven by the opposing party — and nonaligned voters' distaste for both. So-called political independents are much likelier to describe both parties with negative attributes rather than positive descriptors, though a significant share did not offer an opinion.
Curtis Musser, a 60-year-old unaffiliated voter from Beverly Hills, Fla., said both parties have shifted too far toward the extreme for his liking.
He said he is ready for a serious third party to emerge before the next presidential election, pointing to Elon Musk's new America Party, which has been slow to launch.
'Maybe he would get us headed in the right direction,' the retired schoolteacher said.
The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.
Peoples, Sanders and Yoo write for the Associated Press. Peoples reported from New York, Sanders and Yoo from Washington.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Social Security phasing out paper checks as Trump pushes payment overhaul
Social Security phasing out paper checks as Trump pushes payment overhaul

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Social Security phasing out paper checks as Trump pushes payment overhaul

The Trump administration's effort to modernize federal payment systems is coming to Social Security, which will start phasing out paper Social Security checks. The Social Security Administration (SSA) announced in mid-July that it would no longer issue paper checks starting on Sept. 30. Advertisement The agency noted in a blog post announcing the move that electronic funds transfers (EFTs) get payments to beneficiaries faster than paper checks, while also providing increased security against fraud and saving the federal government millions of dollars annually – as paper checks cost about 50 cents each to issue while EFTs are less than 15 cents. While the SSA is looking to transition as many beneficiaries as possible to direct deposit or a prepaid debit card designed for federal benefit payments, known as the Direct Express card, the agency does plan to continue issuing paper checks under some limited circumstances. Most Social Security beneficiaries have already transitioned away from paper checks, though the SSA says it's working to notify those who are receiving paper checks about the upcoming changes and how to prepare. 3 The SSA said that they will no longer issue paper checks starting on Sept. 30. MargJohnsonVA – Advertisement 'Less than one percent of Social Security Administration currently receive paper checks. SSA is proactively contacting those beneficiaries to alert them about the change and the process to enroll in direct deposit or receive Direct Express cards. Where a beneficiary has no other means to receive payment, we will continue to issue paper checks,' a Social Security spokesperson told FOX Business. At the time of the agency's announcement in July, the SSA said that in addition to reaching out to beneficiaries receiving paper checks directly, it will include an insert with all benefit checks that explains how a beneficiary can transition to electronic payments with the assistance of SSA technicians. 3 Donald Trump delivers remarks before signing an executive order to create a White House Olympics task force to handle security and other issues related to the LA 2028 summer Olympic games, August 5, 2025. REUTERS SSA's announcement that paper checks are being phased out also noted the security concerns with mailing checks to beneficiaries. Advertisement 'Paper checks are 16 times more likely to be lost or stolen compared to electronic payments, increasing the risk of fraud. Electronic payments provide a safer, more secure way to receive benefits,' SSA wrote. The electronic payment push is being pursued under an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in March, as well as federal policies that predated the second Trump administration to encourage electronic payments. 3 The majority of Social Security beneficiaries have already moved away from paper checks. visuals6x – SSA noted in its mid-July announcement that beneficiaries may update their payment options at any time online through their personal Social Security account. Advertisement The agency also has an informational webpage outlining how beneficiaries can enroll in direct deposit or obtain a Direct Express card.

GOP's Rep. Lawler on Texas redistricting: ‘I think it's wrong'
GOP's Rep. Lawler on Texas redistricting: ‘I think it's wrong'

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

GOP's Rep. Lawler on Texas redistricting: ‘I think it's wrong'

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said what Texas Republicans are doing is 'wrong' after they passed a gerrymandered congressional map, which would result in five new GOP seats in the House ahead of next year's midterm elections, as he seeks reelection in his New York swing district. 'I think it's wrong, what Texas is doing,' he said of Texas Republicans' release of the new map during a Tuesday evening appearance on CNN. 'I don't support it. I think it is wrong.' Lawler compared the situation to the situations in Illinois and New Jersey, which have also been criticized for doing the same, in some cases, even seeing their maps struck down because of it. 'We have to actually have neutral districts across this country,' he said. 'It would serve the country better.' Lawler mentioned that he plans to introduce legislation to 'outright ban gerrymandering,' a term coined over 200 years ago in the U.S. that's used to describe political manipulation in legislative map-making, according to the Associated Press. 'This is fundamentally why Congress is broken,' he continued. 'You do not have competitive districts, and so most members are focused on primaries and not actually engaging in a general election.' Lawler's comments come as he seeks reelection in his battleground House district in New York, where Democrats will seek to oust him as part of the party's efforts to win back control. Democrats fell short in the district by more than 6 points in November. In the backdrop, Texas Democrats on Sunday traveled for various strategic trips to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts to deny Republicans a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers needed present to conduct legislative business, as the GOP tries to pass the new congressional lines. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) threatened to remove the Democrats as they go into day three of their trips, which is in response to the Texas GOP, at the behest of President Trump, redrawing the state's congressional maps. While redistricting was initially on the agenda items for the special session called by Gov. Greg Abbott (R), it was added later. Typically, lines aren't withdrawn until after a census — making the move a clear power play.

Vertex falls after FDA doubts broad use of chronic pain drug
Vertex falls after FDA doubts broad use of chronic pain drug

Boston Globe

time9 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Vertex falls after FDA doubts broad use of chronic pain drug

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up FINANCE Advertisement Trump airs personal financial grievances before 'debanking' crackdown President Trump gestured while answering questions from reporters as he toured the roof of the West Wing of the White House. Win McNamee/Getty President Trump said Tuesday that he was a victim of discrimination by two of the nation's largest banks and suggested that his personal experience was fueling his animus with Wall Street. Trump, in an interview on CNBC, said both JPMorgan Chase — the nation's largest bank — and Bank of America refused to accept more than $1 billion in deposits from the Trump Organization after his first term. He said he made personal appeals to the CEOs of both banks but was rejected. 'The banks discriminated against me very badly,' Trump said. Trump's remarks couldn't immediately be confirmed. A JPMorgan spokesperson did not address Trump's charge, instead sending a statement saying that the bank would not comment on clients. Bank of America declined to comment. The Trump Organization earlier sued Capital One for closing its accounts in the wake of the Jan 6. attack on the Capitol. The president's commentary Tuesday carries significant weight on Wall Street because his administration has been preparing a crackdown, in the form of an executive order and other proposed regulatory changes, on so-called debanking practices. Many right-leaning organizations have claimed that the financial system has locked them out because of their political positions. Bank executives and lobbying groups have broadly pushed back against that assertion, although they have said that beginning with the Obama administration — and during Trump's first term — they were required by regulators to apply close scrutiny to certain categories of deposits, including payday lenders and gun-related businesses. — NEW YORK TIMES Advertisement LEADERSHIP After Musk's X, Yaccarino shifts to run GLP-1 tech upstart Linda Yaccarino photographed in 2024. Susan Walsh/Associated Press Linda Yaccarino, who recently left Elon Musk's X social media site, is taking the helm at eMed, a telehealth company that offers access to weight-loss drugs. The digital health upstart sold COVID tests with results it confirmed virtually during the pandemic, then pivoted to offering weight-loss drugs more recently. The company announced Yaccarino's appointment as chief executive on Tuesday. She left X in July after two years, following a contentious effort to reverse an exodus of advertisers who were alienated by the site's direction under Musk. Now Yaccarino's going from one challenging situation to the next, and said her experience leading at a time of transformation will come in handy. 'I'm really proud of what we accomplished at X during my tenure,' she said in an interview with Bloomberg. 'Going from Twitter to X, becoming a beacon of free speech around the world, and to actually turning the company around and accelerating the success.' — BLOOMBERG NEWS Advertisement TRADE US imports slid in June on higher tariffs Cargo containers at PortMiami in Miami, Fla., on June 26. SCOTT MCINTYRE/NYT US imports of goods fell in June, the Commerce Department said Tuesday, as President Trump's tariffs continued to weigh on trade. The nearly 4 percent decline from May came as businesses adjusted to shifting tariff deadlines and uncertainty in negotiations between the Trump administration and officials from other countries. Companies had rushed to stockpile goods before higher tariffs were put in place. That led to a temporary surge earlier in the year in goods shipments that pushed the trade deficit to a record $138.3 billion in March. Exports dipped slightly, down about 0.5 percent, as US companies sold fewer industrial goods. Still, the overall trade deficit narrowed to $60.2 billion in June. Trump has imposed tariffs on a variety of industries and trading partners since returning to the presidency in January, raising the US tariff rate to levels not seen in a century. He has suspended, altered, and delayed many of those tariffs many times to allow for negotiations, which have resulted in broad-brush agreements with America's major trading partners like Japan and the European Union. Higher tariffs for dozens of countries are set to snap back into effect Thursday unless more deals are reached. — NEW YORK TIMES Advertisement TECH Meta disrupts millions of WhatsApp scam accounts as internet schemes rise Meta's headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif., on Jan. 7. JASON HENRY/NYT Meta said Tuesday it banned more than 6.8 million WhatsApp accounts this year linked to scam operations, as the company fights a wave of criminal activity on the internet that has wrangled billions of dollars out of victims' savings. Scam accounts were often linked to criminal centers across Southeast Asia, where they run multiple operations at one time, from fraudulent crypto investments to pyramid schemes. Meta warned users that the operations often ask targets to pay upfront to get promised returns or earnings. Later, scammers sometimes show their victims how much they have already 'earned' before asking them to deposit even more money into the scam, according to the company. Between January and June, Meta used technical signals to identify many of the fraudulent accounts on the encrypted messaging platform before they were able to execute their scams, the company said. Meta also said it will introduce a new safety overview that prompts users when someone who is not in their contact lists adds them to a WhatsApp group. Meta's scam disclosures arrive as federal authorizes warn that people are losing more money to increasingly sophisticated scams. In March, the Federal Trade Commission reported consumers lost more than $12.5 billion to fraud in 2024 — a 25 percent increase over the prior year before. While the number of reported scams stayed stable, the percentage of people who lost money from them increased by double digits, according to the FTC. — WASHINGTON POST LEGAL Murdoch to give Trump health updates to delay Epstein deposition Under the deal, Rupert Murdoch will avoid the deposition altogether if the case is tossed out. Jordan Strauss/Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP A federal judge approved Rupert Murdoch's agreement to give President Trump regular updates on his health as part of a deal to delay the media mogul's deposition indefinitely in a $10 billion libel suit the president filed over a Wall Street Journal report tying him to the late Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami adopted the agreement and ordered the 94-year-old News Corp. chairman emeritus to provide the president's lawyer with a sworn declaration 'describing his current health condition' within three days. 'Murdoch shall also provide regularly scheduled updates to the plaintiff regarding his health and alert plaintiff if there is a material change,' the judge, a Barack Obama appointee, said in the order Tuesday. Trump sued July 18, accusing Murdoch, News Corp., and Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones & Co. of maligning his character in a story that said he'd once sent a suggestive birthday letter to Epstein. The suit comes as Trump is fighting a firestorm of criticism over the government's handling of documents related to the late, disgraced financier. Epstein died in prison in 2019 as he faced sex-trafficking charges. Under the deal, Murdoch will avoid the deposition altogether if the case is tossed out. Murdoch's motion to dismiss the suit could be filed as soon as Sept. 22, when his initial response to the case is due. — BLOOMBERG NEWS Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store