logo
Musk calls Trump spending bill 'disgusting abomination'

Musk calls Trump spending bill 'disgusting abomination'

West Australian03-06-2025
Elon Musk has plunged into the congressional debate over US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, calling the measure a "disgusting abomination" that will increase the country's federal deficit in social media posts that fiscally hawkish Republicans quickly embraced.
"I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," the billionaire Musk wrote in an X post.
"This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination."
He added: "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it."
The House of Representatives last month passed the bill by one vote after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the measure - which would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative accomplishment in his first term - would add $US3.8 trillion ($A5.9 trillion) to the federal government's $US36.2 trillion in debt.
The Senate, also controlled by Trump's Republicans, aims to pass the measure titled the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" in the next month although senators are expected to revise the House-passed version of the bill.
House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Musk's calculations were in error.
"It's very disappointing," Johnson told reporters.
"With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong."
But two House Republicans - Representatives Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson - who opposed the measure went to Musk's social platform X to endorse his message.
"The Big Beautiful Tweet," Davidson said while reposting Musk's words.
Senator Mike Lee, one of at least four Republicans pushing for deeper spending cuts, also rallied to Musk in a tweet that called on party members to use the Trump bill and future spending measures to reduce the deficit.
"We must commit now to doing so, as this is what voters justifiably expect - and indeed deserve - from the GOP Congress," the Utah Republican said on X.
Trump appointed Musk, the world's richest person, to lead a government cost-cutting and efficiency drive, during which he upended several federal agencies but ultimately failed to deliver the massive savings he had sought.
Musk left his formal role in the administration last week as his time as a special government employee with the Department of Government Efficiency came to an end.
The Tesla CEO also criticised the bill in an interview the week before he left, saying it will undermine DOGE's work.
Trump brushed off the criticism.
Musk came out against it even more strongly on Tuesday.
"It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt," Musk said on X.
The White House dismissed the most recent attack.
"Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said at a White House briefing.
"It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it."
Thune, who aims to pass the bill through his chamber in the next month, said he disagreed with Musk.
"My hope is that as he has an opportunity to further assess what this bill actually does, that he comes to a different conclusion," Thune, of South Dakota, told reporters.
"But nevertheless, I mean, we have a job to do."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese lost in translation as he heads to Beijing
Albanese lost in translation as he heads to Beijing

AU Financial Review

time2 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

Albanese lost in translation as he heads to Beijing

Timing and imagery matter in politics. It may be a coincidence that Anthony Albanese's visit to Beijing this weekend is uncomfortably close to yet another supposed Trump deadline for tariff and trade deals this week. But the willingness of this US president to trample on the diplomatic sensitivities of close allies doesn't give an Australian prime minister the same leeway. Not when the power, economic and security balance is so unequal.

Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok
Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok

In doing so, Musk is further escalating his already damaging brawl with former bestie Donald Trump whose Big Beautiful Bill has been the subject of invective from Musk, who believes its profligate spending will bankrupt the US economy. Trump's response was to declare Musk a 'train wreck' that had gone off the rails over the past five weeks. But not a peep yet from the Tesla board, which in theory is supposed to keep Musk on the rails. Shareholders must surely be waiting for updates from the company. For perspective, imagine how the board of BHP would react if its boss Mike Henry or Commonwealth Bank's chief executive, Matt Comyn, decided to start a political party as a part-time gig. They would be sent packing. For the Tesla board, placing restraints on a rogue chief executive is way more difficult. In part, this is because Musk IS Tesla – its founder, its major shareholder and its strategy engine. Loading To the extent that parallels can be found in Australia in the hazards of dealing with entrepreneurial founders, Wisetech's Richard White and Fortescue's creator and major shareholder, Andrew Forrest, would be the closest. White's complicated personal life, including multiple relationships with women, including WiseTech employees, has resulted in board upheaval following a number of complaints about inappropriate conduct, a number of which have been settled. A pushback from the Wisetech board was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a mass resignation of a number of directors. Ultimately, White prevailed. Forrest's strategic deviation into saving the planet using Fortescue's financial resources to finance green projects has been tolerated rather than encouraged by many shareholders. He has been branded a zealot and has been an outspoken critic – particularly of those in the oil and gas industry. But his family's 36 per cent stake in Fortescue has rendered him an untouchable king of the company. Meanwhile, shareholders and regulators have attempted to intervene in the governance of Tesla for years – including a 2018 shareholder lawsuit to limit a stratospheric $US50 billion ($77 billion) pay package awarded to Musk based on hitting market capitalisation milestones. In her ruling in favour of the shareholder, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick noted: 'There were undoubtedly a range of healthy amounts that the board could have decided to pay Musk,' McCormick wrote, but she said the board instead 'capitulated to Musk's terms and then failed to prove that those terms were entirely fair'. But Musk's latest action, which will create for him a major distraction from running Tesla, is arguably much more serious for the company and its other shareholders. Loading It threatens to undermine the performance of the company that is already challenged by falling sales volumes and a massive influx of competition from China electric vehicle companies. Two weeks ago, Elon Musk reportedly fired Omead Afshar, the automaker's vice president of manufacturing and operations, CNBC has confirmed, following declines in car sales in key markets this year. His termination followed the resignation of Milan Kovac, previously head of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics program, last month. At this point, Musk's presence at the helm of Tesla is sorely needed.

Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok
Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok

In doing so, Musk is further escalating his already damaging brawl with former bestie Donald Trump whose Big Beautiful Bill has been the subject of invective from Musk, who believes its profligate spending will bankrupt the US economy. Trump's response was to declare Musk a 'train wreck' that had gone off the rails over the past five weeks. But not a peep yet from the Tesla board, which in theory is supposed to keep Musk on the rails. Shareholders must surely be waiting for updates from the company. For perspective, imagine how the board of BHP would react if its boss Mike Henry or Commonwealth Bank's chief executive, Matt Comyn, decided to start a political party as a part-time gig. They would be sent packing. For the Tesla board, placing restraints on a rogue chief executive is way more difficult. In part, this is because Musk IS Tesla – its founder, its major shareholder and its strategy engine. Loading To the extent that parallels can be found in Australia in the hazards of dealing with entrepreneurial founders, Wisetech's Richard White and Fortescue's creator and major shareholder, Andrew Forrest, would be the closest. White's complicated personal life, including multiple relationships with women, including WiseTech employees, has resulted in board upheaval following a number of complaints about inappropriate conduct, a number of which have been settled. A pushback from the Wisetech board was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a mass resignation of a number of directors. Ultimately, White prevailed. Forrest's strategic deviation into saving the planet using Fortescue's financial resources to finance green projects has been tolerated rather than encouraged by many shareholders. He has been branded a zealot and has been an outspoken critic – particularly of those in the oil and gas industry. But his family's 36 per cent stake in Fortescue has rendered him an untouchable king of the company. Meanwhile, shareholders and regulators have attempted to intervene in the governance of Tesla for years – including a 2018 shareholder lawsuit to limit a stratospheric $US50 billion ($77 billion) pay package awarded to Musk based on hitting market capitalisation milestones. In her ruling in favour of the shareholder, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick noted: 'There were undoubtedly a range of healthy amounts that the board could have decided to pay Musk,' McCormick wrote, but she said the board instead 'capitulated to Musk's terms and then failed to prove that those terms were entirely fair'. But Musk's latest action, which will create for him a major distraction from running Tesla, is arguably much more serious for the company and its other shareholders. Loading It threatens to undermine the performance of the company that is already challenged by falling sales volumes and a massive influx of competition from China electric vehicle companies. Two weeks ago, Elon Musk reportedly fired Omead Afshar, the automaker's vice president of manufacturing and operations, CNBC has confirmed, following declines in car sales in key markets this year. His termination followed the resignation of Milan Kovac, previously head of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics program, last month. At this point, Musk's presence at the helm of Tesla is sorely needed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store