UN concerned by Taliban's arrest of Afghan women and girls for dress code violations
In May 2022, the Taliban government issued a decree calling for women to show only their eyes and recommending they wear a head-to-toe burqa. The Taliban, which returned to power in 2021, has cracked down on the way women dress and behave in public, notably through morality laws forbidding them to show their faces outside the home.
The UN mission in Afghanistan said it was concerned by the arrest of 'numerous' women and girls in Kabul between July 16 and 19, who authorities claimed had not followed instructions on wearing the hijab, or the Islamic headscarf.
'These incidents serve to further isolate women and girls, contribute to a climate of fear, and erode public trust,' the mission added, without details including the number of arrests or the ages and where they have been held.
The UN mission urged the Taliban government to ' rescind policies and practices ' that restrict women and girls' human rights and fundamental freedoms, particularly the ban on education beyond sixth grade.
A Taliban representative was not immediately available for comment.
In January 2024, the country's Vice and Virtue Ministry said it had arrested women in the Afghan capital for wearing 'bad hijab.' A ministry spokesman, Abdul Ghafar Farooq, did not say how many women were arrested or what constituted bad hijab.
The UN mission said at the time it was looking into claims of ill treatment of the women and extortion in exchange for their release.
The Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021 following the withdrawal of U.S. and NATO forces. Since then, the Taliban administration has sought international recognition while enforcing its interpretation of Islamic law. In July, Russia became the only country to grant formal recognition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
US Senate committee approves Trump's UN envoy pick, nomination heads to full vote
By Patricia Zengerle US Senate committee approves Trump's UN envoy pick, nomination heads to full vote WASHINGTON, - The U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday voted narrowly in favor of Mike Waltz, President Donald Trump's pick to be U.N. envoy, clearing the way for a confirmation vote in the full 100-member Senate. The panel voted 12-10 in favor of Waltz, who was removed as Trump's national security adviser in May after he was caught up in a scandal involving a Signal chat among top Trump aides. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the committee's ranking Democrat, joined Republicans in backing Waltz and Republican Senator Rand Paul joined Democrats in voting against him. There was no immediate indication of when the full Senate might consider the nomination. A spokesperson for the chamber's Republican leader, Senator John Thune, said there were no scheduling updates. Thune has indicated he might delay the Senate's annual August recess if Democrats do not allow Republicans to confirm Trump nominees more quickly. In a recent post on his Truth Social platform, Trump urged the Senate to stay in Washington for votes on his nominees. Waltz - a retired Army Green Beret and former Republican lawmaker from Florida - is one of the last major Trump nominees awaiting likely Senate confirmation. He was ousted as national security adviser on May 1 after he was caught up in a March scandal involving the Signal chat that discussed details of a U.S. military operation and mistakenly included a journalist. Trump then promptly nominated Waltz as his U.N. ambassador. In a statement on her vote, Shaheen said she disagreed with Waltz on some issues, including his "use of unclassified systems to coordinate sensitive discussions." However she also called him a moderating force with a background in national security policy-making who does not seem to be isolationist. "Mike Waltz did not represent himself to me as someone who wants to retreat from the world - and this is a quality I value in nominees," Shaheen said. At his confirmation hearing this month, Waltz said the United Nations needs reform and the United States must have a strong voice to counter China, adding that he is "confident we can make the U.N. great again." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Myanmar junta claims recapture of gold mining town, Thabeikkyin
Myanmar's junta claimed on Thursday (July 24, 2025) claimed to have recaptured the gold mining town of Thabeikkyin after a year-long battle, marking its second key town regained in a week. With control of Thabeikkyin and Nawnghkio, junta forces hold two flanks of the town of Mogok — the renowned centre of Myanmar's ruby mining industry. A civil war has consumed Myanmar since a 2021 coup deposed the civilian government, with the military battling a myriad of pro-democracy guerrillas and ethnic armed organisations. This year, the junta's China- and Russia-backed forces have clawed back ground on the northern front, and state media said its soldiers managed "to fully retake" the town of Thabeikkyin on Wednesday. One resident, Ye Dinn, said people had fled fighting to shelter in the forest or nearby schools and monasteries. "People have nothing to eat and no place to flee to," the 65-year-old said. Thabeikkyin, located about 100 kilometres north of the second most populous city of Mandalay, is a lucrative hive of gold mining sitting on the banks of the Irrawaddy River bisecting Myanmar. State mouthpiece the Global New Light of Myanmar said an anti-coup alliance attacked Thabeikkyin with "overwhelming strength" last August, but its counteroffensive retook the town after 17 major battles. "We are really scared," said another resident, speaking on condition of anonymity. "Nowhere is safe. We are all looking for a safe place, but people have no idea where they should go and hide." The junta last Thursday said it had recaptured the northeastern town of Nawnghkio, on another key highway towards Mandalay city, fending allied rebels back further into the fringes of the country. Earlier this week, guerrillas said they ambushed a junta flotilla of five ships sailing up the Irrawaddy north of Mandalay — another apparent sign of the military's renewed regional offensive. With control of Thabeikkyin and Nawnghkio, junta forces hold two flanks of the town of Mogok -- the renowned centre of Myanmar's ruby mining industry which rebel forces claimed last summer. Mines excavating precious metals, gemstones and rare earth elements are coveted by all factions in Myanmar's civil war, allowing them to fill their coffers and fund their offensives. Some 3.5 million people are living displaced amid the war, according to the United Nations, while more than half the nation of around 50 million now lives in poverty.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
In Bihar, policing stays handcuffed to an old law
In December 2018, young industrialist Gunjan Khemka fell to a single headshot outside his factory in Hajipur. In January 2021, Indigo's Patna station manager Rupesh Kumar Singh was riddled with six bullets at his apartment gate. By mid-2025, it had become all too common: A JD(U) district secretary in Khagaria, two businessmen in Chhapra, a BJP general secretary in Patna, and finally, Gopal Khemka (Gunjan's father) shot as he stepped out of his SUV, 50 metres from a police outpost. Each killing was quicker than the last and carried the same message: We can kill whoever we want, whenever we choose, and the law will arrive just in time to photograph the corpse. A pattern emerges across these six high-profile murders: textbook precision, minimal forensic residue, no reliable witnesses, and investigations that collapse before reaching a judge. This is the Patna Protocol — a doctrine of strategic gangland violence, not rooted in bravado or political conspiracy, but in institutional failure — a police force still handcuffed to the 1861 Police Act, drafted by colonial administrators less interested in solving crimes than in keeping a conquered population subdued. This law's first principle was control, not protection. After the 1857 rebellion, the British needed a constabulary to quell uprisings, enforce taxes, and watch the population. Scientific investigation and specialised homicide squads weren't part of the script. The genius of the design lay in under-training: A constable with a lathi was a symbol that Crown authority stretched from cantonment to every muddy lane. That legacy still defines the Bihar Police. Patrolling is mandatory; investigation is optional. Consider the numbers. Bihar's sanctioned police strength is 115 per 100,000 people, but actual deployment is just 76 — well below the UN-recommended 222. Nearly 50% of positions are vacant, as per recent DGP statements. Less than 5% of officers are certified in forensic collection of ballistic evidence. The state has only one working forensic lab — short on staff, power, and supplies. By the time a 9-mm shell casing gets from crime scene to lab and back, political winds may have shifted. Witnesses vanish. Evidence disappears. Cases lose shape. This is how the Protocol thrives. Bihar's average emergency response time is 34 minutes. UP's UP-100 helpline averages under 15 minutes in urban areas. Globally, sub-5-minute responses raise arrest probabilities from 20% to over 60%. In Bihar, a 60-second killing meets a patrol 33 minutes later, just in time for photos. Would bigger budgets solve the rot? Only if doctrine changes with the hardware. In 2015, Bihar got Scorpio SUVs for district police. Many now sit idle, with no drivers, no fuel. Patrolling has become ceremonial. When a colonial-era force is handed modern tools, it finds colonial-era uses for them. Contrast this with New York City in the 1990s. The NYPD's CompStat linked promotions to case resolution, not patrol hours. Lab capacity expanded. Investigators were trained to build trial-ready cases. Convictions rose. Confidence returned. Bihar doesn't lack brave officers; it lacks an institutional mandate that rewards forensic certainty over lathi-wielding optics. Courts don't help either. Overburdened and under-resourced, they admit forensic evidence only if protocols are followed, often impossible at the local thana. Some district armoires have just one non-functional microscope. One police station stores all evidence in a disused broom closet. Chains of custody break before trial begins. Consequently, citizens lose faith. Some turn to illegal arms; others quietly pay extortion. Inaction is paid for in cash, in silence, and in blood. Reform must begin at the source: Repeal the 1861 Police Act. The 2006 Model Police Act (still languishing in legislative limbo) offered an alternative: independent oversight, scientific training, fixed tenures, insulation from political interference. Because the Patna Protocol remains undefeated, its architects grow bolder with every cold case, with every family that gives up. In our republic, the Police exist to protect, not suppress. The law cannot serve administrators at the expense of the administered. Bihar's people must ask whether safety is a matter of charity or a constitutional right. If it is the latter, they must demand institutions built to protect, not dominate. The 1861 Act was written to subdue them. It's time to write something better; something worthy of citizens, not subjects. Khagesh Gautam is professor of law, Jindal Global Law School. The views expressed are personal.
