logo
A symbol of victory lies in ruins

A symbol of victory lies in ruins

The Hindu18-07-2025
A few kilometres away from the Brihadisvara Temple at Gangaikonda Cholapuram lies a tank stretching over 17 km. Chola Gangam, locally known as Ponneri, was dug by Rajendra Chola to celebrate his northern campaign. Historian K.A. Nilakanta Sastri, author of The Cholas, citing the Tiruvalangadu Copper Plates, notes that 'at the end of the expedition, Rajendra erected a 'liquid pillar of victory' (ganga-jalamayam jayastambham) in his capital with the waters of the Ganga in the form of the tank Cholaganga.'
Depends on rainwater
But the 1,000-year-old lake is in ruins. Once spread over 16 miles, the tank has shrunk to 17 km. It remains dry for most of the year as the canals that brought water from the Kollidam have long been abandoned. Yet, traces of these canals remain. Locals believe that the proposed visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 27 and the government's plan to release a commemorative coin could shed much-needed light on the lake. 'The lake depends on surface water collected during the rains. It is a pity that the tank, which once supplied water to Gangaikonda Cholapuram and the 60-acre palace, is in such a pathetic state,' says R. Komagan, chairman of the Gangaikonda Cholapuram Development Council Trust, who has been fighting for years to restore the lake.
The Trichinopoly Gazetteer, authored by F.R. Hemingway, records that the tank once irrigated 1,564 acres of land, its primary purpose being to supply drinking water to Gangaikonda Cholapuram. Sastri also reproduces a report on the tank that appeared in a local publication in 1855: 'There is an embankment 16 miles long, running north and south, provided with several substantial sluices and of great strength, which in former times must have formed one of the largest reservoirs in India.' According to the same report, when the palace was still in existence, Gangaikonda Cholapuram was a wealthy and flourishing capital, and the great tank spread fertility over miles and miles of what is now trackless forest. 'It has been projected to restore that magnificent work, but the scheme has remained in abeyance for want of engineer officers,' the report laments.
Even 170 years after the report appeared, nothing has been done to restore this gigantic enterprise of ancient sovereigns. A bridge constructed by the British runs through the empty lake-bed, which could easily be restored to its former glory by linking it with the Kollidam, transforming it once again into a great reservoir.
Mr. Komagan, an engineer by training, lays out the map of the northern Cauvery system to explain how water from the Kollidam once filled tank after tank before flowing into the Veeranarayanapuram tank, known as Veeranam Lake, which then released surplus water into the river. The tank remains a testimony to the Cholas' expertise in water management. Its bunds, strengthened with laterite stones, were built in an elliptical shape to withstand hydraulic pressure. Even after 1,000 years, these stones remain intact. 'The sluices are a great feat of engineering, constructed with the ability to trap sediment brought in by the inlet canal,' Mr. Komagan says. Today, just one defunct sluice remains, protected by a concrete boundary from total destruction, thanks to his efforts. Another such sluice exists in Sri Lanka. He has asked the Tamil Nadu government to declare it a protected monument.
A tax for maintenance
'The square-shaped structure at the lower side of the tank contains a sediment trap linked with a silt ejector. The structure for releasing water ['thoompu'], when the tank reaches its minimum capacity, is designed to create a vortex flow. This sucks the silt and deposits it into paddy fields, enriching them with nutrient-rich sediment,' Mr. Komagan explains. The sediment covering the fields was traditionally removed through the annual maintenance of waterbodies ('kudimaramathu'). 'Eri-ayam', a levy for this purpose, was collected from local farmers.
The tank had once served as a stop-over for overseas birds migrating to the Kodiakkarai Bird Sanctuary. Its destruction has broken the chain of migration. It has also resulted in groundwater depletion in Gangaikonda Cholapuram and its neighbourhood. The water level has now dropped to 650 feet. 'If restored, the tank will serve as a groundwater recharge zone. If the 12 lakes fed by the Kollidam are repaired, they can supply water to Chennai throughout the year,' Mr. Komagan says. In 1949, T.V. Sadasiva Pandarathar, in his work Pirkala Cholarkal, recorded that many areas in Tiruchi and South Arcot districts remained fertile because of the water from this lake, which also served as a drainage outlet for the Veeranam Lake. 'Thousands of acres can be irrigated with water from the lake at a time of famine,' he wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minister Mahadevappa sparks row, says Tipu Sultan laid KRS dam foundation
Minister Mahadevappa sparks row, says Tipu Sultan laid KRS dam foundation

New Indian Express

time40 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Minister Mahadevappa sparks row, says Tipu Sultan laid KRS dam foundation

MANDYA; Karnataka Social Welfare and Mysuru district in-charge minister HC Mahadevappa sparked a controversy on Sunday, claiming that Tipu Sultan, not Maharaja Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar, who first laid the foundation for the Krishna Raja Sagar (KRS) dam. His remarks came on August 3, the death anniversary of Wadiyar — who is widely credited for his visionary contributions to Mysuru's development, including the construction of KRS dam. After laying the foundation stone for the Dr BR Ambedkar Bhavan in Srirangapatna, Mahadevappa said, 'Tipu Sultan laid the foundation stone, but no one dares to acknowledge this. There is clear evidence of this on the main gate of KRS dam.' He said, 'Those who don't understand history cannot create history. Tipu was a secular ruler. There's a mosque and a temple next to each other. Allahu Akbar is heard in the mosque, and temple bells ring at the same time. Tipu listened to both with calmness and acceptance.' Praising contributions of the ruler, Mahadevappa said said he abolished the exploitative Devadasi system, resisted giving land to the rich, made Gubbi and Harihara commercial centres and introduced sericulture to India. 'Tipu was a great freedom fighter who fought the British. The palace of Mysuru kingdom was located in Srirangapatna,' he said.

BJP reaffirms support to de-notified nomadic tribes in Andhra
BJP reaffirms support to de-notified nomadic tribes in Andhra

New Indian Express

time40 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

BJP reaffirms support to de-notified nomadic tribes in Andhra

VIJAYAWADA: BJP AP president PVN Madhav reaffirmed the party's commitment to the welfare of de-notified nomadic tribes during a roundtable conference in Vijayawada, held ahead of the 75th Vimukti Divas (Liberation Day). Addressing tribal leaders, Madhav said only the Narendra Modi-led government has allocated a dedicated budget for these communities, which have been historically marginalised due to colonial-era policies. He recalled that these tribes, despite participating in India's freedom struggle, were branded as criminals by the British in 1871, resulting in decades of persecution. Their liberation began on August 31, 1952, and gained momentum under former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, whose commission highlighted the cultural significance of these communities. 'The commission clearly stated that India's rich cultural heritage owes much to these nomadic tribes,' Madhav said. Since 2014, the Modi government has prioritised their recognition and welfare, he added. Highlighting local challenges, Madhav noted that many de-notified tribes in Andhra Pradesh still lack voting rights, contributing to their continued socio-economic struggles. He said the BJP has conducted studies to address this issue and is formulating plans to protect identity and dignity. As part of the 75th Vimukti Diwas celebrations, Madhav announced a month-long series of 'Spoorthi' programmes across all districts, culminating in a grand event on August 30. BJP MLA Dr Parthasarathi, former IAS officer Dasari Srinivas Rao, State General Secretary Bitra Shivannarayana, and OBC Morcha State President Rongala Gopi Srinivas were also present.

What is the Sykes-Picot Agreement? how 1916 treaty influences modern Palestinian recognition moves
What is the Sykes-Picot Agreement? how 1916 treaty influences modern Palestinian recognition moves

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

What is the Sykes-Picot Agreement? how 1916 treaty influences modern Palestinian recognition moves

Understanding the Sykes-Picot Agreement's historical impact British Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently announced his government would recognize Palestinian statehood if Israel does not agree to a cease-fire with Hamas, stating Britain acted with the "hand of history on our shoulders." French officials similarly invoked historical precedent when France took comparable steps a week earlier, referencing Charles de Gaulle's calls for Israeli-Palestinian conflict resolution based on mutual state recognition. Also read: Canada to join France, Britain in supporting Palestinian statehood by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Specialist Down Jackets for Ultralight Adventures Trek Kit India Learn More Undo Neither official mentioned the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the secret 1916 treaty between Britain and France that carved up Levantine territories from the declining Ottoman Empire into European spheres of control. What was the Sykes-Picot Agreement? The Sykes-Picot Agreement established British and French control zones across territories that encompass modern-day Israel, Lebanon, Syria, and Palestinian territories. Historians cite the agreement as an example of Western imperial overreach that created arbitrary borders cutting across religious, ethnic, and tribal communities. Many Arabs view the Sykes-Picot Agreement as a betrayal that created lasting regional instability and conflict in the Middle East. Historical context behind current recognition moves Eugene L. Rogan, professor of modern Middle Eastern history at Oxford University, emphasized the agreement's continued relevance. Live Events "The history is so relevant," Rogan said. "It shows there's always a chance for historical actors who screwed up in the past to make up for their mistakes." Also read: UK to recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel acts The current Gaza crisis, including humanitarian concerns over aid restrictions and civilian casualties, has influenced recent decisions by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and President Emmanuel Macron more than historical considerations. The Balfour Declaration connection Speaking at the United Nations, Lammy referenced another century-old document: the Balfour Declaration, issued in 1917, one year after the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The declaration endorsed "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people" while including provisions protecting "civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." After 21 months of Israeli military operations in Gaza, Lammy argued Britain has a responsibility to act on behalf of Palestinians. "His argument is that it's time to make good on the second half of that promise," Rogan said, whose books include "The Arabs: A History." "At the time of the Balfour Declaration, Britain had a worldwide empire, which in 1917, they could not imagine losing. David Lammy is operating in a post-colonial, post-E.U. Britain. But he's using history as a legitimating factor." British strategic motivations beyond the Sykes-Picot framework Britain's support for a Jewish homeland was primarily strategic rather than moral, according to Rogan. London sought a client community in Palestine to prevent enemy control of territory that could threaten the British-controlled Suez Canal. Britain later retreated from its pro-Zionist position due to difficulties reconciling Jewish statehood with Arab world relations. The 1939 White Paper proposed creating a Jewish homeland within a majority-Arab Palestinian state, limiting Jewish immigration to 75,000 over five years. Israeli perspective on recognition timing Michael B. Oren, Israeli-American historian and former Israeli ambassador to Washington, argued that current recognition moves would prolong rather than end the Gaza conflict. Also read: Why is Britain recognising a Palestinian state, and which other countries have done the same? "Israel was not created because of the Balfour Declaration; it was created in spite of the Balfour Declaration," said Oren, author of "Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East." Oren characterized British and French recognition moves as attempts by post-colonial powers to maintain regional relevance. "These are former Middle Eastern powers that want to feel like Middle Eastern powers," Oren said. "There's a pathetic quality to it." France's complex history beyond Sykes-Picot France ceded Palestinian claims under the Sykes-Picot Agreement but maintained regional influence through other means. From 1945 to 1967, France served as Israel's primary Western supporter, providing Mirage fighter aircraft and nuclear technology that formed the foundation of Israel's undeclared nuclear program. French support stemmed partly from shared decolonization experiences. Facing Algerian nationalist uprising in 1954, backed by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, France viewed Israel as a counterweight to Nasser's influence. President Charles de Gaulle reversed French policy in 1967, imposing arms embargos on Israel after military strikes against Egypt and shifting focus toward Arab states. Gérard Araud, former French ambassador to Israel (2003-2006), recalled lasting diplomatic tensions from this policy shift. "I felt there was always a sense of 'Don't trust the French,'" Araud said. Contemporary international recognition dynamics More than three-quarters of the United Nations' 193 member states will recognize Palestinian statehood following recent commitments from Britain, France, Canada, and Malta to support recognition at September's UN General Assembly. France faces significant domestic political risks in supporting Palestinian recognition, given its large Jewish and Muslim populations and history of Islamist terrorist attacks, according to Araud. Also read: Trump says Canada's Palestine statehood stance may hurt trade deal Colonial legacy and modern limitations Recognition moves highlight Britain and France's diminished influence in regions they once controlled through agreements like Sykes-Picot. "Neither country understood that the age of colonialism was over," Araud said. "They behaved as if they were still all powerful. It's not the most glorious page of history for either country."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store