EU Defends Trump Trade Deal Facing Backlash
"I'm 100 percent sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," top EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic told journalists.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched the framework accord with Trump Sunday after dashing to Scotland as the August 1 deadline loomed for steep levies that threatened to cripple Europe's economy.
EU exports are now set to face across-the-board tariffs of 15 percent -- higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30 percent.
The 27-nation bloc also promised its companies would purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments -- although it was not clear how binding those pledges would be.
"This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Sefcovic said.
Full details of the agreement -- and crucially which sectors could escape the 15-percent levy -- will be known in coming days, although the EU says it has avoided steeper tariffs on key exports including cars and medicines.
But the reaction from European capitals -- which gave von der Leyen the mandate to negotiate -- ranged from muted to outright hostile.
French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was a "dark day" for Europe and said the accord was tantamount to "submission".
Speaking for Europe's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz gave a warmer welcome to a deal he said had avoided "needless escalation".
Industry groups in both countries made plain their disappointment however, with Germany's main auto sector body saying the 15-percent levy "burdens" carmakers while its VCI chemical trade association said the rates were "too high".
Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban attacked the deal in blunt terms, saying "Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast".
"It looks a bit like a capitulation," said Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
"The EU accepted a fairly unbalanced deal," he added, saying it delivered a "political victory for Trump".
Von der Leyen had faced intense pressure from EU states to strike a deal quickly with the bloc's biggest partner and protect a $1.9-trillion trading relationship.
Defending Brussels' approach, Sefcovic warned that a no-deal scenario -- meaning a 30-percent tariff and the prospect of further escalation -- would have risked up to five million jobs in Europe.
Throughout the months-long talks, Brussels prioritised stability and maintaining good relations with Washington, over escalation.
That line of thinking has support: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a Trump ally, said the deal had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences.
Markets in Asia and Europe welcomed the certainty and rose following the announcement -- reflecting the 4.4 billion euros ($5.1 billion) worth of daily transatlantic goods and services trade that were at stake.
Hanging over the negotiations was the risk to other areas of cooperation -- like Ukraine -- if the EU descended into a trade war with its closest security partner.
"It's not only about the trade -- it's about security, it's about Ukraine," Sefcovic told reporters Monday.
Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics acknowledged it was "clearly an imbalanced deal" if judged purely on trade terms.
"But if you're trying to avoid worse national security outcomes, well then maybe the deal is not so bad," he said.
The EU had sought to ramp up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, fearing a bad deal and higher levies, with countries approving a $109-billion package of counter-tariffs at the last minute.
And states led by France were pushing for a more robust response including the option to deploy the trade "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument.
But the threat of retaliation was consistently framed by Brussels as a last resort should talks fail, and experts suggested the hardening stance may have come too late to make a real difference.
"If the EU had played hardball at the very beginning, it probably could have got a better deal," ECFR's Rizzi told AFP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Investors Walk Fine Line As Trump Tariffs Temper Rate Hopes
Asian investors trod warily Wednesday amid lingering uncertainty over Donald Trump's trade war, while another round of data indicated further weakness in the US economy but added interest rate cut speculation. The US president's claim that Washington was "very close to a deal" to extend a China truce provided some optimism, though that was tempered by his warning of fresh levies on pharmaceuticals and chips. After a strong start to the week sparked by hopes that painful jobs data will force the US Federal Reserve to lower rates next month, another batch of figures added fuel to the fire. A closely watched index of services activity showed it had barely grown in July as companies contend with weaker hiring conditions and rising prices. The news came after Friday's jobs data revealed far fewer US jobs were created than expected in May, June and July. "Market pricing has moved aggressively in favour of a September rate cut by the Federal Reserve, after a weak July jobs report and ugly revisions to May and June signalled the US labour market may finally be cracking under the pressure of tariffs," said Neil Wilson at Saxo Markets. "The data pushed the US closer to stagflationary territory," he said. "So far, the market has held up and looked beyond the tariff risks, but we may at last be seeing the hard data finally catch up with the soft survey data." But while bets on a rate cut in September have soared, he remained unsure that such a move was a certainty. Stocks fluctuated through the morning. Tokyo, Shanghai, Sydney, Wellington, Manila and Jakarta rose but Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul and Taipei were in the red. Confidence remains thin as Trump's tariff threats linger, with several countries -- including India and Switzerland -- still to hammer out deals before his delayed deadline Thursday, and agreed levies with others begin to kick in. In his latest salvo, Trump told CNBC he was looking at hitting pharmaceuticals with tolls that eventually reach 250 percent, while semiconductors were also in the firing line. He has said he will also hammer India over its purchases of Russian oil. Still, Trump did strike a positive note on China, which is in talks with US officials to continue a truce agreed in May that saw the world's two largest economies pare down their eye-watering triple-digit tariffs. Regarding Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump told CNBC's "Squawk Box" that "I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal. "If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting. I mean, you know, what's the purpose of meeting if we're not going to make a deal? "But we're getting very close to a deal." He added that his relationship with Xi was "very good" and that "I think we'll make a good deal. It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal". Tokyo - Nikkei 225: UP 0.6 percent at 40,802.73 (break) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.2 percent at 24,844.94 Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.1 percent at 3,619.78 Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1570 from $1.1582 on Tuesday Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3303 from $1.3294 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.61 yen from 147.55 yen Euro/pound: DOWN at 86.97 pence from 87.01 pence West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.5 percent at $65.46 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.5 percent at $67.96 per barrel New York - Dow: DOWN 0.1 percent at 44,111.74 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.2 percent at 9,142.73 (close)
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
How Trump's Love For TV Is Shaping US Diplomacy
Donald Trump's sudden concern about starving Palestinians was a major shift for the US president, who had previously ignored the endless cries for help from aid groups. So what changed? In his words, it was images of emaciated children in Gaza that Trump saw on television -- his main window into the world that has long shaped his political and diplomatic decision-making. Trump made clear his affection for the small screen in late July when asked if he agreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a major US ally, that there was no famine in Gaza. "Based on television, I would say not particularly, because those children look very hungry," said Trump, a former reality TV star. "That's real starvation stuff. I see it, and you can't fake that." Since then, the 79-year-old has repeated that aid must be brought to people living in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory, though he has stopped of any major diplomatic moves. "Trump has a reputation for not reading anything, including the briefing papers that his aides prepare for him, and for always believing that he knows better than his staff or anyone else does," said Dan Kennedy, a journalist professor at Northeastern University. "So it's not surprising that he would be affected by images on television, especially since he is known to spend a lot of time watching TV." Trump has attended 22 intelligence briefings since taking office in January, according to an AFP tally, despite several reports having revealed that he lacks interest in written reports. However, his love for television is well-documented -- even when it comes to major decisions. In 2015, before he first entered the White House, the billionaire told a journalist asking how he educates himself on military strategy: "Well, I watch the shows." And a New York Times report recounted how Trump spent several hours a day in his first term glued to the television, mainly watching Fox News -- his favorite channel -- but also CNN, NBC and ABC news channels. His second term has been little changed, despite Trump leading an election campaign that deployed social media and podcasts. "Trump is a product of his generation," Kennedy said. "He's not sitting around looking at TikTok." The Republican, who hosted 14 seasons of "The Apprentice" television series, knows better than most how images can be weaponized for political point-scoring. He was gleeful after his shocking clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House in February, which saw the pair rowing in front of the world's press. "This is going to be great television," Trump said. And in May he gave a similar public dressing down to South African leader Cyril Ramaphosa when he sat in the Oval Office for what turned into a diplomatic ambush. Trump hijacked the meeting by playing a video montage -- one littered with inaccuracies -- that purported to prove claims of a "genocide" against white farmers in South Africa.
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Targets Tariff Evasion, With Eye On China
As the United States ramps up tariffs on major trading partners globally, President Donald Trump is also disrupting strategies that could be used -- by Chinese companies or others -- to circumvent them. Goods deemed to be "transshipped," or sent through a third country with lower export levies, will face an additional 40-percent duty under an incoming wave of Trump tariffs Thursday. The latest tranche of "reciprocal" tariff hikes, taking aim at what Washington deems unfair trade practices, impacts dozens of economies from Taiwan to India. The transshipment rule does not name countries, but is expected to impact China significantly given its position as a manufacturing powerhouse. Washington likely wants to develop supply chains that are less reliant on China, analysts say, as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest economies and the US sounds the alarm on Beijing's excess industrial capacity. But "it's a little more about the short-term effect of strengthening the tariff regime than it is about a decoupling strategy," said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. "The point is to make countries worried about it and then have them err on the side of not doing it, because they know that Trump could then jack up the tariff rates higher again," he added, referring to tariff evasion. The possibility of a sharply higher duty is a "perpetual stick in the negotiations" with countries, said Richard Stern, a tax and budget expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He told AFP that expanding penalties across the globe takes the focus away from Beijing alone. Experts have noted that Vietnam was the biggest winner from supply chain diversions from China since the first Trump tariffs around 2018, when Washington and Beijing engaged in a trade war. And Brookings Institution senior fellow Robin Brooks pointed to signs this year of significant transshipments of Chinese goods. He noted in a June report that Chinese exports to certain Southeast Asian countries started surging "anomalously" in early 2025 as Trump threatened widespread levies. While it is unclear if all these products end up in the United States, Brooks cast doubt on the likelihood that domestic demand in countries like Thailand and Vietnam rocketed right when Trump imposed duties. "One purpose of the transshipment provisions is to force the development of supply chains that exclude Chinese inputs," said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "The other purpose is to push back on Chinese overcapacity and force them to eat their own surpluses," he added. But Washington's success in the latter goal depends on its ability to get other countries on board. "The transshipment penalties are designed to encourage that," Reinsch said. Lipsky added: "The strategy that worked in the first Trump term, to try to offshore some Chinese manufacturing to other countries like Vietnam and Mexico, is going to be a much more difficult strategy to execute now." Lipsky noted that Beijing could see the transshipment clause as one targeting China on trade, "because it is." "The question is, how China takes that in the broader context of what had been a thawing relationship between the US and China over the past two months," he added. While both countries temporarily lowered triple-digit tariffs on each other's exports, that truce expires August 12. The countries are in talks to potentially extend the de-escalation, although the final decision lies with Trump. It will be tough to draw a line defining product origins, analysts say. Customs fraud has been illegal for some time, but it remains unclear how Washington will view materials from China or elsewhere that have been significantly transformed. The burden lies with customs authorities to identify transshipment and assess the increased duties. "That will be difficult, particularly in countries that have close relations with China and no particular incentive to help US Customs and Border Protection," Reinsch added. Analysts have noted signs of transshipment of Chinese goods this year AFP
