logo
The GOP is proposing $1,000 ‘MAGA' savings accounts for kids. Here's how they would stack up next to existing investment options

The GOP is proposing $1,000 ‘MAGA' savings accounts for kids. Here's how they would stack up next to existing investment options

Yahoo20-05-2025
Republicans are proposing the creation of a new tax-preferred savings account for children dubbed the 'money account for growth and advancement,' or MAGA account, in their 'one big beautiful' tax bill. The proposal calls for giving $1,000 to children born between 2025 and 2028 to kickstart savings, and supplies other incentives for parents to save for their kids' future.
As currently written in the draft legislation, the MAGA account would allow parents to contribute up to $5,000 per year that would be invested in U.S. equities. Money contributed to the account could be put toward qualifying expenses like school or job training expenses, to buy a home, or to start a small business. Republicans are still working out what they mean by tax advantaged. One plan says it would be 'exempt for taxation,' while another bill summary says the withdrawals would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate, akin to a brokerage account. The government could also contribute, and those would not be subject to a cap.
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tx., previously told Semafor that the accounts would help children in the U.S. 'begin the journey of savings and benefit from the wonders of compound interest.' The U.S. Treasury would automatically set up accounts for those who do not have them, and fund them with a one-time $1,000 payment for the next four years. The proposal also calls for letting parents with kids under the age of 8 establish an account, though only newborns receive $1,000. Half of the funds could be withdrawn between the ages of 18 and 25, while any remaining funds would have to be disbursed by 31.
The proposed MAGA savings accounts would represent a new vehicle for parents to save for their children, but states have long offered variations of such plans—meaning parents would want to evaluate the various merits of each.
Parents already have some tax-preferred savings options for their kids, albeit with slightly different parameters. A 529 savings plans is most commonly structured as a tax-advantaged investment account that can be used to pay for qualified education expenses like tuition. The plans and their exact tax structure vary by state, but so long as the funds go toward qualified educational expenses, earnings and withdrawals are tax free. Until the MAGA bill writers define the final tax incentives, it's unclear if a given state plan would be more or less advantageous. Many states also offer other tax deductions and credits related to education.
A custodial Roth IRA, meanwhile, is a Roth retirement account managed by a parent or guardian for the benefit of their under-18 (or 21, depending on the state) child. When they reach adulthood, the accounts are rolled over to a standard retirement vehicle.
And depending on how withdrawals are taxed, they may not be that advantageous to many savers, says Sam Taube, lead investing writer at personal finance site Nerdwallet.
If withdrawals are taxed at the long-term capital gains rate, 'this would effectively be the same tax treatment as a passively-invested brokerage account, except that in a normal brokerage account, all sales of investments that have been held for more than one year are taxed at the long-term capital gains rate, regardless of what you're using the money for,' says Taube. In that way, the MAGA account would actually be less advantageous, because it limits when beneficiaries can use the funds and what they can be used for.
Aside from what funds invested in the accounts can be used for, one of the main differences between the proposed MAGA accounts and existing accounts for kids is the $1,000 the federal government is proposing to give children born from 2025 through 2028 says Taube. But similar funding options exist at the state level in some places.
Taube points to Colorado's First Step Program, which gives a $100 contribution to a 529 plan at birth, and matches $1,000 contributions during an eligible account's first five years of funding. Parents can check out the National Conference of State Legislatures for more information on what their states offer.
Something to watch out for, says Taube, is that some state 529 programs have income limits, and the funds can only be spent on educational expenses, limiting their usefulness.
'The proposed MAGA accounts, in their current form, may offer a little more flexibility, both in terms of income-based eligibility and in terms of what the money can be spent on,' says Taube. 'But it's not one-or-the-other. Given that the proposed MAGA accounts are not 529 plans, parents could take advantage of both.'
Overall, it's 'hard to say' what the effect of the GOP's broader proposed $5 trillion tax bill will be on Americans' personal finances, says Taube. The current proposal calls for eliminating certain tax cuts, while expanding others. It also taxes private university endowments, which could lead to additional costs passed onto students. The bill also calls for cutting Medicaid benefits, which would likely financially harm low-income Americans.
The GOP tax bill is still being debated, and needs to pass both the House and Senate before President Donald Trump can sign off on it, something that could take months.
Republicans are under something of a ticking time bomb to pass their bill. The last time Trump was in office, the sweeping tax legislation he signed into law came with an end date: Most of the provisions, especially those related to individual tax cuts, would expire at the end of 2025.
That includes lower tax rates for many Americans, as well as a more substantial estate and gift tax exemption and other tax breaks.
As it stands, Republicans are torn on a few of the provisions, including deep cuts to Medicaid and the state and local tax deduction known as SALT.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Johnson eyes Wednesday re-vote to take up crypto, Defense spending bills
Johnson eyes Wednesday re-vote to take up crypto, Defense spending bills

Politico

time29 minutes ago

  • Politico

Johnson eyes Wednesday re-vote to take up crypto, Defense spending bills

Speaker Mike Johnson said he hopes to try again Wednesday on a procedural vote that would allow the House to take up a slate of cryptocurrency bills after GOP hard-liners tanked the measure Tuesday afternoon. Republicans are 'still having conversations, answering questions for people,' Johnson told reporters leaving the Capitol. Asked how he might win over conservative holdouts, the Louisiana Republican said 'it's a priority of the White House, the Senate and the House to do all of these crypto bills.' House conservatives are calling on GOP leaders to amend a Senate-passed bill to regulate so-called stablecoins or package it with two other digital assets bills that were slated for floor votes this week in a bid to force the Senate to take all of them up together. But Johnson said leaving the Capitol Tuesday that 'we have to do them in succession,' suggesting that GOP leaders won't seek to directly link the bills in one package. A combined package that ties the Senate's stablecoin legislation with the two other bills — a sweeping crypto market structure bill and a third measure that would ban a central bank digital currency — would likely be dead on arrival in the upper chamber. 'We cannot stuff these into one package,' one senior House Republican said, noting that it would trigger a host of issues.

When one vote costs everything
When one vote costs everything

Politico

time34 minutes ago

  • Politico

When one vote costs everything

Presented by Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben When all but five Republicans voted earlier this month for DONALD TRUMP's 'big, beautiful bill,' the president once again flaunted his ability to strongarm his party into submission — even if it costs them their jobs. Democrats, enraged by stinging defeats in November, plan to focus their midterm messaging on the legislation's cuts to Medicaid and tax breaks for the richest Americans as they fight to retake a majority in one or both chambers. And ELON MUSK, infuriated that the law will add trillions to the national debt, has promised to use his vast wealth to start his own 'America Party' and primary conservative Republicans who voted for the bill. To be successful, Democrats would need to recreate the 1994, 2010 or 2018 midterms, in which the minority party successfully crafted a political message around a major piece of legislation. In 1994, the GOP took back control of Congress for the first time in 40 years on a message against former President BILL CLINTON's agenda. In 2010, Republicans seized on outrage over the Affordable Care Act to flip 63 House seats and six Senate seats, and in 2018, Democrats used the GOP's unsuccessful ACA repeal effort to net 40 seats in the House. (They weren't as successful in the Senate, where Republicans maintained control.) Former Democratic Rep. CHRIS CARNEY credits his vote for the ACA in 2010 for his ouster from the Pennsylvania district he'd represented for two terms — and cautioned that Republicans may have cause for concern next year. 'I took that vote knowing I was going to lose,' Carney said in an interview with West Wing Playbook. 'But to be a good member of Congress, you have to be willing to lose your seat for things that are important. And the Republicans who voted for the BBB probably understood that they run the risk of losing their seat by voting for it.' This interview has been edited for length and clarity. What similarities and differences do you see between the ACA and the BBB in terms of the degree of electoral liability they pose to the lawmakers who voted for them? Do you think the megabill will be the defining piece of legislation for the midterms? Both the ACA and the BBB were organizing principles for the opposition party. The Tea Party movement used Obamacare as a way to rally forces against Democrats who voted for it, and, in fact, against Democrats who didn't vote for it. Democrats this time will use the BBB probably in the same way. The real question is: How well can Democrats message against it, and how well can Republicans defend it? Back in 2010, I don't think we were given exactly the tools we needed to defend decisions to vote for it. How worried should House Republicans be as they approach 2026? As a member, you have to decide what you're willing to lose your seat over. I took the vote in 2010 knowing full well that I was going to lose in November. But for me, a bill that created that much health care was important, and as it turned out, 33,000 families and individuals in my district got health care who never had it before. As a member of Congress, you are exquisitely aware of the electoral impact your votes have. I'm sure that Republicans in Kamala Harris and Joe Biden districts are making that same calculation: Is it more important that I appease Donald Trump and take the vote for him, or do I take a vote that may preserve my reelection in the next cycle? How should Democrats seize on this moment? It's important that Democrats message in an effective way: Talk about how the BBB reduces health care while providing tax cuts to the very rich — those bread-and-butter issues resonate. As the BBB is gone through with a fine-tooth comb, there are going to be a lot of things in there that the Democrats can take advantage of in terms of messaging. The question is, can they be effective in the messaging, and can they be consistent in the messaging, and can they sustain the messaging? If they can do all those things, I think 2026 might be a tough year for Republicans, certainly in the House. If you talk about it in terms of Medicaid, a specific program, that's a little bit harder to sell than if you talk about it generally as health care, which it is. There are quite a few similarities between the situation in Washington in 2010 and today — but one new variable is Musk. What do you make of his threats to primary conservative Republicans? Who, in your opinion, are the winners and losers if the America Party comes to fruition? If the America Party actually becomes a thing, the Republican Party will lose more of its votes, and certainly lose the votes it gained in 2024. I don't think that there are many Democrats that would be supportive of Elon Musk's party, but I think that there are a number of libertarian and Trump-curious voters that might be turned off by how he's governed since he's been in office in his second term, and what the Republicans in Congress have done. If the America Party does end up forming, I think it hurts Republicans far more than it hurts Democrats. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Who was the first president to have his Cabinet appointee rejected? (Answer at bottom.) Agenda Setting YOU CAN STAY: Senate Republicans will scale back the White House's request for $9.4 billion in spending cuts as they look to shore up their votes, our JORDAIN CARNEY and CASSANDRA DUMAY report. Sen. ERIC SCHMITT (R-Mo.), who is leading the recissions effort with the White House, said Republicans will restore a $400 million cut to the global AIDS program known as PEPFAR, bringing the total amount of cuts to $9 billion. Senate Majority Leader JOHN THUNE said he expects the PEPFAR switch to be the only change made to the package, adding that there was a 'lot of interest' among his caucus in funding the GEORGE W. BUSH-era program, which has been credited with saving tens of millions of lives. RURAL FOOD ACCESS HIT: The Department of Agriculture has cut nearly all funding for a dozen rural centers that support farms and food businesses across the country, our MARCIA BROWN reports. Funding for Regional Food Business Centers, established under the Biden administration, has been frozen since January. The department has not provided the centers with a reason aside from saying that the funding was under review for its alignment with Trump administration priorities. USDA confirmed the end of the program later today, saying that the centers 'should not have been established in this manner in the first place.' TWIDDLING OUR THUMBS: Despite employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau still getting paid, the bureau has in practice been mostly inoperable for nearly six months, AP's KEN SWEET reports. CFPB employees say they essentially spend the workday not doing anything, forbidden from doing any work by directive from the White House. One current employee told AP that outsiders would be amazed at how little work gets done. Conversations between colleagues are seldom out of fear that they would be possibly violating the directive. The agency's press office doesn't respond to emails. WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT ETHICS CHANGES AT DOJ: The Justice Department is ramping up its efforts to strip law enforcement officials with civil service protections intended to insulate their work from political interference, NYT's DEVLIN BARRETT reports. On Friday, a new batch of more than 20 career employees at the department and its component agencies were fired, including the attorney general's own ethics adviser, JOSEPH W. TIRRELL. The rest included senior officials at the U.S. Marshals Service, as well as prosecutors and support staff who once worked for JACK SMITH when he was a special counsel prosecuting the president. Some DOJ veterans say the move represents a pattern of the administration ignoring and eventually demolishing longstanding civil service legal precedents meant to keep politics out of law enforcement work, and to give more leeway to Trump's loyalists. A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment. Knives Out LIKE HE NEVER LEFT: Former national security adviser MIKE WALTZ pledged today to push for reform at the United Nations, following in the administration's footsteps in slashing the size of the federal government, our AMY MACKINNON reports. Waltz, who Trump nominated as his ambassador to the organization, said that the administration was conducting a number of reviews of the UN to examine how it is spending its funds, calling for the body to refocus on its founding principles. What We're Reading 'We're not buying it': Trump ties Ukraine aid to America First (POLITICO's Eli Stokols and Dasha Burns) Federal Workers' 'Emotional Roller Coaster': Fired, Rehired, Fired Again (NYT's Eileen Sullivan) The government wants AI to fight wars and review your taxes (WaPo's Douglas MacMillan, Faiz Siddiqui, Hannah Natanson and Elizabeth Dwoskin) Event Planners Are Cancelling on Trump-Era Washington. Is This a Sign of Things to Come? (POLITICO's Michael Schaffer) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER That would be former President ANDREW JACKSON, who had his nominee for Treasury secretary, ROGER TANEY, rejected in 1834 as part of inter-party disagreements over the National Bank.

Republicans press leaders of Georgetown, Berkeley and CUNY on antisemitism complaints
Republicans press leaders of Georgetown, Berkeley and CUNY on antisemitism complaints

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Republicans press leaders of Georgetown, Berkeley and CUNY on antisemitism complaints

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans on Tuesday grilled the leaders of Georgetown University, the City University of New York and the University of California, Berkeley in the latest hearing on antisemitism in higher education, accusing the schools of failing to respond adequately to allegations of bias or discrimination. In their appearance before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, the three university leaders said that they had taken disciplinary action where appropriate and stressed the importance of protecting free speech. UC Berkeley Chancellor Rich Lyons pushed back on the suggestion that antisemitism was more present on college campuses than anywhere else. 'If somebody is expressing pro-Palestinian beliefs, that's not necessarily antisemitic,' he said. The hearing was the ninth in a series Republicans have held to scrutinize university leadership over allegations of antisemitism on campuses after a wave of protests following Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Widely criticized testimony before the committee by the presidents of the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University in 2023 contributed to their resignations. At Tuesday's hearing, Democrats blasted Republican committee members for their focus on antisemitism while not speaking out on the dismantling of the Education Department , which is tasked with investigating antisemitism and other civil rights violations in schools. 'They have turned this hearing room into a kangaroo court, where they spend our time litigating a predetermined outcome to do nothing, actually, to help Jewish students, just make public theater out of legitimate pain,' Rep. Mark Takano , D-CA. Republicans said the university leaders have allowed campus antisemitism to run unchecked. 'Universities can choose to hire antisemitic faculty, welcome students with a history of antisemitism, accept certain foreign funding, and let the behavior of antisemitic unions go unchecked,' Michigan Rep. Tim Walberg , committee chair, said in his opening statements. 'But we will see today they do so at their own risk.' The hearing was periodically interrupted by protesters, who shouted pro-Palestinian slogans before being removed by Capitol police. Rep. Randy Fine, R-FL, berated the college presidents and said they were responsible because of the attitudes they had permitted on their campuses. Republicans pressed the three college leaders on whether they had disciplined or fired faculty and employees for behavior they said was antisemitic. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., pressed CUNY Chancellor Félix Matos Rodríguez on the employment of a law professor who worked on the legal defense of Mahmoud Khalil , a Palestinian activist the Trump administration attempted to deport over his role in protests at Columbia University. Stefanik pushed Matos Rodríguez to answer whether the professor should be fired. Without responding directly, Matos Rodríguez defended CUNY and said antisemitism had no place at the school. He said any student or employee who broke CUNY rules would be investigated. University leaders also emphasized the importance of free speech on campuses for students and faculty. Interim Georgetown President Richard Groves said that as a Jesuit university, fostering interfaith dialogue and understanding was a key part of the school's mission. He said the university has not experienced any encampments or physical violence since the Hamas attack in October 2023. 'Given our Jesuit values, we expose students to different viewpoints on the Middle East,' Groves said. 'In addition to speakers on Gaza, we've hosted IDF soldiers, families of Israeli and Palestinians who've lost their lives. U.S. families of U.S. hostages in Gaza. Georgetown is not perfect, and as events evolve, we've had to clarify rules of student behavior.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store