‘Oh my god, let it go!' The ABC show getting (almost) too close to dangerous animals
'We don't exist separate to nature,' says Jones, who lives with a strictly indoor Maine Coon cat named Bubbles and a freshwater prawn called Prawn Connery.
'All natural history documentaries are made on the back of research from people like those featured in this program,' says Jones. 'I think it's important to not shy away from how we get information, which sometimes means that you're uncomfortable. But that's how we find out things that will protect the species.'
In the series, marine ecologist Nicolas Lubitz remarks that the work of biologists is '95 per cent boredom, 5 per cent chaos'.
Jones agrees: 'The majority of the work that a scientist does will be based in an office or a lab, in front of a computer. And so what you see [in the series] is the high point of the year when they actually spend time with the animals. Fieldwork is addictive. I think it fuels the rest of their year.'
In the first episode, Jones joins Lubitz and his team on a perilous expedition tagging bull sharks off the coast of Townsville, during which she becomes visibly distressed as the thrashing fish is roped.
'I was scared, but I expected to worry more about myself,' says Jones. 'But the way in which they subdue a shark is by catching it and then turning it upside down, and then it goes into a sleepy state. And to see this animal so completely vulnerable – I'm just a complete softie. And this is probably why I'm a broadcaster and not a scientist. I'm just like, 'Oh my god, let it go! Let it go!''
In Moreton Bay near Brisbane, the seagrass-munching dugong stole her heart. 'They were surprisingly muscular. They have really dense whiskers, triple the thickness of a cat whisker. And their breath smells like grass.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Aussie TV networks hit the jackpot with one type of show
The Floor, for example, uses scale and visual spectacle to enhance its appeal: 100 contestants, plus a massive floor that lights up and can be enlivened by snazzy graphics. In singing its praises, Nine added that the show's success reaffirms 'the importance of our local content'. Well, yes, insofar as this version is made here and has an Australian host and contestants. But, as with many of our game shows, it's an adaptation of an imported format: it, Deal or No Deal and The Traitors are originally Dutch. An array of others – The 1% Club, Tipping Point, The Chase, Taskmaster, House of Games – are English. These productions have proliferated as commercial channels have basically abandoned investment in drama and comedy. Game shows aren't as much of a gamble, and they don't cost as much to make, especially ones that have been developed and road-tested elsewhere. Most require only a single set, so there's no need for expensive location shooting or months of writers' rooms brainstorming. And multiple episodes can be shot in a day. Seasons can be as short or long as the networks require and the enterprise can be jazzed up with celebrities, like Tipping Point's tennis special before Wimbledon, or Sandra Sully dropping in to try her luck with the golden briefcases on Deal. Loading In the current crop, there are some originals, such as Nine's The Hundred, developed by Screentime with host Andy Lee. In addition to Spicks and Specks, the bouncy music quiz hosted by Adam Hills and inspired by Britain's Never Mind the Buzzcocks, the ABC has had a hit with local creation Hard Quiz and recent success with Guy Montgomery's Guy Mont Spelling Bee which was imported from New Zealand. (Yes, Montgomery started the show in his homeland so we can't really claim it as our own). Both of these shows are built around refreshingly idiosyncratic presenters. On Hard Quiz, Gleeson plays the grumpy anti-host. He doesn't welcome contestants and chat to put them at ease. Instead, he pokes fun at them and their special subjects. But after 10 seasons played in a tone carefully calibrated never to cross the line between funny and nasty, its contestants front up knowing what they're in for and ready to give as good as they get. On Spelling Bee, Montgomery presents a nerdy persona slyly undercut by his witty scripts and lightning-fast ad-lib responses. Along with a clever concept and challenges that encourage viewer engagement – such as yelling the answers from the couch – an appealing host is a fundamental requirement for a successful game show. Others currently in the mix offer different qualities, but they're more conventional: Corser comes across like a smoothly amused ringmaster; Jefferies plays a brash ocker bloke; Emdur's an amiable everyman; Hills, a twinkly-eyed pal. In keeping with Deal's tone of barely contained hysteria, Grant Denyer is like an excitable, battery-powered bunny, while Woodbridge has a peppy geniality that recalls the spirit of the country's game-show master, Tony Barber. Given the value-for-money attributes of game shows, it's no surprise that SBS is poised to get back into the action with Big Backyard Quiz, an original format created by Screenwest and NITV which it tested with a special last year and has now green-lit for a series (premiering July 12). Hosted by Narelda Jacobs and Steven Oliver, the playful production is tailored to meet the broadcaster's brief, focusing on Australian history and aspects of it you might not have learned at school. Within this group, though, and reflective of the straitened times for free TV, the prizes ain't what they used to be: no one's going home a millionaire. The grand prize on 1% Club and Deal is $100,000; on The Floor, the season winner pocketed $200,000; on Tipping Point, it's $20,000, unless the player can manoeuvre that elusive double-jackpot counter to drop. On the public broadcasters, there's no money to be won – though Hard Quiz' s big brass mug is clearly a cherished trophy. But even though the monetary incentives have shrunk, the endurance of this type of TV clearly hasn't lost its appeal for TV networks or many viewers. And, especially as free-to-air fights for ongoing relevance, bragging rights have their value too.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Peter Russell-Clarke was a legend. But they don't make them like they used to
Kids today will never know the struggle. Once upon a time, we didn't know what a jus was. We were ignorant of the need for delicate and artistic plating skills, and of the meaning of the term mise en place. No one had ever taken a 'food journey'; it had never occurred to anyone that they needed one. And a croquembouche? Mind your language. The death on the weekend of Peter Russell-Clarke, one of Australia's original celebrity chefs, is a reminder that once upon a time television cooks and television cookery were simultaneously much simpler yet way more eccentric than the slick modern incarnations of the TV kitchen. Forty years from now, obituaries for our 21st century TV tong-wranglers will simply not be able to compete with lines like this, from our tribute to Russell-Clarke over the weekend: 'To reduce his life to a catch cry would be like calling Michelangelo a ceiling painter. Russell-Clarke was nothing less than a renaissance man with an Australian accent and a foul mouth.' Loading With no disrespect to Russell-Clarke's modern heirs, the obit writers of the future will not be facing such challenges of description. It was a different time, those years of our transition from the land of meat-and-three-veg to … whatever modern, migrant Australia was going to be, and our guides on the idiot box were a varied crew. To confirm just how different it was, hark back to the late 1950s when Australian television was home to programs such as A Woman's World, a daily ABC offering that began in the same year as television and was aimed squarely at housewives, which in 1956 is what most wives still were. On to these airwaves in the early 1960s wafted one Bernard King, if a word as gentle as waft can be used to describe the effect of Bernard King appearing on your TV set. King was, in the terminology of the time, flamboyant – as camp as a bombe alaska set on fire with a flamethrower held by Liberace. And when it came to 'food journeys', they didn't come much more glamorous than King's rise to fame. The story goes that King, to that point an entertainer rather than a chef, hosted a dinner party at his little Brisbane flat for none other than Vivien Leigh, then touring Australia doing Shakespeare. The host of A Woman's World was at that dinner, and was so taken with King's flair that she invited him on the show. Loading A kitchen star was born, and it all began with dinner for Scarlett O'Hara. He became a television institution by the 1970s and '80s: ask your Gen X friends and it will be a toss-up whether they remember him cooking and camping it up with Don Lane or delivering the most brutal put-downs as a judge on TV talent quests such as New Faces and Pot of Gold. He wouldn't be let near the gentle hug-it-out confines of MasterChef Australia without therapists and lawyers. Russell-Clarke entered the national consciousness in the 1980s as a kind of anti-Bernard King. Whereas King was all sashay and suave scarves, Russell-Clarke was like the word 'g'day' in human form. He was as dinky-di as King was impossibly arch. As with King, there was much more to him than met the eye. He was an artist more than he was a chef, before his TV program Come And Get It and his ubiquity as a TV pitch man made him the kitchen voice of a generation. MasterChef and My Kitchen Rules wouldn't have known what to do with him. Plenty of other famous men have influenced our kitchen lives over the years. The '90s brought us Iain 'Huey' Hewitson on Ten's Healthy, Wealthy and Wise, Geoff Jansz on Nine's What's Cooking? and Burke's Backyard. Millennials, and anyone else who spent afternoons at home in the noughties, will remember the comforting distractions of Ready Steady Cook. Loading But it is often the women we embrace as we look back on our kitchen comfort era, before it all became terribly serious and ambitious and competitive. There is the godmother of Australian cooking herself, Margaret Fulton, who parlayed her home economics background into a stature perhaps unmatched in the annals of Australian food. She summons memories of cookbooks and TV segments and commercials and magazine columns, but she was much more than that. She was, in a tradition still embodied by the great Maggie Beer, like a warm hug in a cosy kitchen. She remains an invisible presence in millions of kitchens, even those occupied by people too young to remember her. Somewhere along the line you have absorbed a cooking lesson from someone who absorbed it from Margaret. In the '90s, our horizons broadened through the unlikely vehicle of Bert Newton, whose reincarnation as a morning variety show host/infomercial huckster on Ten's Good Morning Australia delivered new kitchen celebrities: the irrepressible Elizabeth Chong, born in China, and Dorinda Hafner, born in Ghana, who became household names alongside TV's greatest showman. Loading Their national celebrity suggested TV cooking was growing up, even as it retained its traditional unfussy and occasionally off-the-rails flair. With Bert at the helm, there was always time for cracking wise as you cracked eggs. It seemed Australia always preferred its TV cookery served with a decent side of corn. Everything changed in 2009. There is TV food BM and AM (Before and After MasterChef) and the elevation of food critics and five-star chefs as our arbiters of skill and taste changed the way we think about food on the telly, and indeed the way we think about food in general. We have gained much from it, but also perhaps lost a little along the way: our kitchen comedians, our jokesters and eccentrics wielding one-liners as deftly as they wielded whisks.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Aussie TV networks hit the jackpot with one type of show
The Floor, for example, uses scale and visual spectacle to enhance its appeal: 100 contestants, plus a massive floor that lights up and can be enlivened by snazzy graphics. In singing its praises, Nine added that the show's success reaffirms 'the importance of our local content'. Well, yes, insofar as this version is made here and has an Australian host and contestants. But, as with many of our game shows, it's an adaptation of an imported format: it, Deal or No Deal and The Traitors are originally Dutch. An array of others – The 1% Club, Tipping Point, The Chase, Taskmaster, House of Games – are English. These productions have proliferated as commercial channels have basically abandoned investment in drama and comedy. Game shows aren't as much of a gamble, and they don't cost as much to make, especially ones that have been developed and road-tested elsewhere. Most require only a single set, so there's no need for expensive location shooting or months of writers' rooms brainstorming. And multiple episodes can be shot in a day. Seasons can be as short or long as the networks require and the enterprise can be jazzed up with celebrities, like Tipping Point's tennis special before Wimbledon, or Sandra Sully dropping in to try her luck with the golden briefcases on Deal. Loading In the current crop, there are some originals, such as Nine's The Hundred, developed by Screentime with host Andy Lee. In addition to Spicks and Specks, the bouncy music quiz hosted by Adam Hills and inspired by Britain's Never Mind the Buzzcocks, the ABC has had a hit with local creation Hard Quiz and recent success with Guy Montgomery's Guy Mont Spelling Bee which was imported from New Zealand. (Yes, Montgomery started the show in his homeland so we can't really claim it as our own). Both of these shows are built around refreshingly idiosyncratic presenters. On Hard Quiz, Gleeson plays the grumpy anti-host. He doesn't welcome contestants and chat to put them at ease. Instead, he pokes fun at them and their special subjects. But after 10 seasons played in a tone carefully calibrated never to cross the line between funny and nasty, its contestants front up knowing what they're in for and ready to give as good as they get. On Spelling Bee, Montgomery presents a nerdy persona slyly undercut by his witty scripts and lightning-fast ad-lib responses. Along with a clever concept and challenges that encourage viewer engagement – such as yelling the answers from the couch – an appealing host is a fundamental requirement for a successful game show. Others currently in the mix offer different qualities, but they're more conventional: Corser comes across like a smoothly amused ringmaster; Jefferies plays a brash ocker bloke; Emdur's an amiable everyman; Hills, a twinkly-eyed pal. In keeping with Deal's tone of barely contained hysteria, Grant Denyer is like an excitable, battery-powered bunny, while Woodbridge has a peppy geniality that recalls the spirit of the country's game-show master, Tony Barber. Given the value-for-money attributes of game shows, it's no surprise that SBS is poised to get back into the action with Big Backyard Quiz, an original format created by Screenwest and NITV which it tested with a special last year and has now green-lit for a series (premiering July 12). Hosted by Narelda Jacobs and Steven Oliver, the playful production is tailored to meet the broadcaster's brief, focusing on Australian history and aspects of it you might not have learned at school. Within this group, though, and reflective of the straitened times for free TV, the prizes ain't what they used to be: no one's going home a millionaire. The grand prize on 1% Club and Deal is $100,000; on The Floor, the season winner pocketed $200,000; on Tipping Point, it's $20,000, unless the player can manoeuvre that elusive double-jackpot counter to drop. On the public broadcasters, there's no money to be won – though Hard Quiz' s big brass mug is clearly a cherished trophy. But even though the monetary incentives have shrunk, the endurance of this type of TV clearly hasn't lost its appeal for TV networks or many viewers. And, especially as free-to-air fights for ongoing relevance, bragging rights have their value too.
