
Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups
Last week's air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former U.S. intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world's deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts.
The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend that could allow governments or combatants to use life-saving aid to control hungry civilian populations and advance war aims.
In South Sudan and Gaza, two for-profit U.S. companies led by American national security veterans are delivering aid in operations backed by the South Sudanese and Israeli governments.
The American contractors say they're putting their security, logistics and intelligence skills to work in relief operations. Fogbow, the U.S. company that carried out last week's air drops over South Sudan, says it aims to be a 'humanitarian' force.
'We've worked for careers, collectively, in conflict zones. And we know how to essentially make very difficult situations work,' said Fogbow President Michael Mulroy, a retired CIA officer and former senior defense official in the first Trump administration, speaking on the airport tarmac in Juba, South Sudan's capital.
But the U.N. and many leading non-profit groups say U.S. contracting firms are stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without commitment to humanitarian principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones.
'What we've learned over the years of successes and failures is there's a difference between a logistics operation and a security operation, and a humanitarian operation,' said Scott Paul, a director at Oxfam America.
''Truck and chuck' doesn't help people,' Paul said. 'It puts people at risk.'
Fogbow took journalists up in a cargo plane to watch their team drop 16 tons of beans, corn and salt for South Sudan's Upper Nile state town of Nasir.
Residents fled homes there after fighting erupted in March between the government and opposition groups.
Mulroy acknowledged the controversy over Fogbow's aid drops, which he said were paid for by the South Sudanese government.
But, he maintained: 'We don't want to replace any entity' in aid work.
Fogbow was in the spotlight last year for its proposal to use barges to bring aid to Gaza, where Israeli restrictions were blocking overland deliveries. The United States focused instead on a U.S. military effort to land aid via a temporary pier.
Since then, Fogbow has carried out aid drops in Sudan and South Sudan, east African nations where wars have created some of the world's gravest humanitarian crises.
Fogbow says ex-humanitarian officials are also involved, including former U.N. World Food Program head David Beasley, who is a senior adviser.
Operating in Gaza, meanwhile, Safe Reach Solutions, led by a former CIA officer and other retired U.S. security officers, has partnered with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed nonprofit that Israel says is the linchpin of a new aid system to wrest control from the U.N., which Israel says has been infiltrated by Hamas, and other humanitarian groups.
Starting in late May, the American-led operation in Gaza has distributed food at fixed sites in southern Gaza, in line with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stated plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations.
Since then, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded in near daily shootings as they tried to reach aid sites, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Witnesses say Israeli troops regularly fire heavy barrages toward the crowds in an attempt to control them.
The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instances, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces.
It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward, and the U.S. says it's not funding it.
In response to criticism over its Gaza aid deliveries, Safe Reach Solutions said it has former aid workers on its team with 'decades of experience in the world's most complex environments' who bring "expertise to the table, along with logisticians and other experts.'
Last week's air drop over South Sudan went without incident, despite fighting nearby. A white cross marked the drop zone. Only a few people could be seen. Fogbow contractors said there were more newly returned townspeople on previous drops.
Fogbow acknowledges glitches in mastering aid drops, including one last year in Sudan's South Kordofan region that ended up with too-thinly-wrapped grain sacks split open on the ground.
After gaining independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has struggled to emerge from a civil war that killed nearly 400,000 people. Rights groups say its government is one of the world's most corrupt, and until now has invested little in quelling the dire humanitarian crisis.
South Sudan said it engaged Fogbow for air drops partly because of the Trump administration's deep cuts in U.S. Agency for International Development funding. Humanitarian Minister Albino Akol Atak said the drops will expand to help people in need throughout the country.
But two South Sudanese groups question the government's motives.
'We don't want to see a humanitarian space being abused by military actors ... under the cover of a food drop," said Edmund Yakani, head of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, a local civil society group.
Asked about suspicions the aid drops were helping South Sudan's military aims, Fogbow's Mulroy said the group has worked with the U.N. World Food Program to make sure 'this aid is going to civilians.'
'If it wasn't going to civilians, we would hope that we would get that feedback, and we would cease and desist,' Mulroy said.
In a statement, WFP country director Mary-Ellen McGroarty said: 'WFP is not involved in the planning, targeting or distribution of food air-dropped' by Fogbow on behalf of South Sudan's government, citing humanitarian principles.
Longtime humanitarian leaders and analysts are troubled by what they see as a teaming up of warring governments and for-profit contractors in aid distribution.
When one side in a conflict decides where and how aid is handed out, and who gets it, 'it will always result in some communities getting preferential treatment,' said Jan Egeland, executive director of the Norwegian Refugee Council.
Sometimes, that set-up will advance strategic aims, as with Netanyahu's plans to move Gaza's civilians south, Egeland said.
The involvement of soldiers and security workers, he added, can make it too 'intimidating' for some in need to even try to get aid.
Until now, Western donors always understood those risks, Egeland said. But pointing to the Trump administration's backing of the new aid system in Gaza, he asked: 'Why does the U.S. ... want to support what they have resisted with every other war zone for two generations?'
Mark Millar, who has advised the U.N. and Britain on humanitarian matters in South Sudan and elsewhere, said involving private military contractors risks undermining the distinction between humanitarian assistance and armed conflict.
Private military contractors 'have even less sympathy for a humanitarian perspective that complicates their business-driven model," he said. 'And once let loose, they seem to be even less accountable.'
Knickmeyer reported from Washington. Mednick reported from Tel Aviv, Israel.
The Associated Press receives financial support for global health and development coverage in Africa from the Gates Foundation. The is solely responsible for all content. Find 's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at .org.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
30 minutes ago
- India.com
Starving, Terrified And Trapped In Gaza Tunnels – What This Israeli Hostage Said On Camera That Has Shaken The Nation, Cornered Netanyahu
New Delhi: Tel Aviv's summer sky darkened with rage and grief on Sunday night. Crowds swelled in Rabin Square. Hoarse with frustration, their eyes were fixed on the giant screens playing something no one could process. It was a new hostage video from Gaza, showing two emaciated Israeli captives. Barely holding back tears, 24-year-old Evyatar David stared at the camera and said, 'What I am doing now is digging my own grave. Every day my body becomes weaker and weaker. I am walking directly to my grave. There is the grave where I am going to be buried in. Time is running out to be released and be able to sleep in my bed with my family.' Released by Hamas, the video showed David and fellow hostage Rom Braslavski, a 21-year-old German-Israeli dual national, visibly malnourished and mentally drained. It was the third such clip in a week. Their sunken faces and trembling hands became the lead story in every Israeli newspapers, including Hebrew-language daily Maariv, which called it a look into 'hell in Gaza'. Israel's largest paid newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth described David as 'malnourished, emaciated and desperate'. Haaretz did not mince words. 'Netanyahu is in no rush,' read its headline, capturing what many in Israel now believe that politics is outweighing lives. David's family issued a gut-wrenching statement. 'The deliberate starvation of our son as part of a propaganda campaign is one of the most horrifying acts the world has seen. He is being starved purely to serve Hamas's propaganda,' they said. The footage did not only rattle the Israeli society. It shook the prime minister himself. Benjamin Netanyahu's office confirmed he had watched the video and spoken to the families of both captives. The statement from his office described the prime minister as being in a state of 'profound shock'. That conversation with the families, according to the prime minister's office, came with reassurances, 'The efforts to return all our hostages are ongoing.' The images sparked appeals. Netanyahu reached out to Julien Lerisson, head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in the region, and pleaded for help. 'Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke with the head of the Red Cross delegation in our region… and requested his involvement in providing food to our hostages and providing them with immediate medical treatment,' said the official statement. World leaders echoed that urgency. The European Union (EU) foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas wrote on X, 'Appalling. These images expose the barbarity of Hamas.' She further said, 'All hostages must be released immediately and unconditionally. Hamas must disarm and end its rule in Gaza.' Despite France's recent criticism for announcing to recognize Palestine, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot called the hostage videos 'despicable' and 'unbearable'. His statement added to the mounting pressure, 'They must be freed, without conditions. Hamas must be disarmed and excluded from ruling Gaza.' As night deepened in Tel Aviv, 60,000 lives weighed heavily on Israeli consciousness, the estimated number of Palestinians killed in Gaza during Israel's relentless airstrikes and ground offensives. Most of the casualties are believed to be women and children. On the other side, October 7, 2023, remains etched in blood. Around 1,200 people died in Hamas's surprise assault on southern Israel. Around 250 were taken hostage. Of those, 49 remain in captivity. The Israeli military believes 27 of them may no longer be alive. Truce pauses in late 2024 and early this year saw the return of 100 to 150 hostages. For the families of those still underground, every tick of the clock now lands like a blow. Time is running out not only for David and Braslavski, but for the soul of a nation waiting to breathe again.


News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Israeli Minister Sparks Anger By Praying At Sensitive Jerusalem Holy Site Al-Aqsa Mosque
Tensions soar in Jerusalem after Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir openly prayed at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, a site sacred to both Muslims and Jews. His visit, under heavy police guard, was condemned by Jordan, Palestinian leaders, and Islamic authorities as a direct violation of the long-standing status quo governing one of the world's most volatile religious sites. News18 Mobile App -


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Over 2 million jobs at risk in apparel manufacturing sector due to Trump tariff
The Indian apparel and textile industry is facing a potential crisis with the latest tariff rates announced by the U.S. government, which industry leaders warn could lead to over 2 million job losses and a significant downturn for the sector. The new US tariff rate for India has been set at 25%, placing it at a significant disadvantage against major competitors like Bangladesh and Vietnam, which have been placed in lower tariff brackets of 20%. Indonesia and Cambodia have an even lower rate of 19%. The Indian apparel industry was comfortably placed with the originally announced reciprocal tariff structure as it enjoyed tariff advantage vis-à-vis major competitor countries. The liberation day tariff announced originally by the Trump administration against India was 26% whereas it was 37% against Bangladesh, 46% against Vietnam, 44% against Sri Lanka and 145% against China. The US is the top destination for garment exports from India occupying 33-34% of share, having exports worth $5.333 billion in 2024-25. India commands 6.1% share in their global import of apparel worth US$85.8 billion The Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) expressed serious concern, stating that the new tariff structure compounds an already challenging situation. CITI Chairman Rakesh Mehra said, 'The latest U.S. tariff announcement, following which the tariff rates have been substantially reduced for many countries, including Bangladesh, against whom we compete for a larger share of the U.S. market, will compound the difficulties for India's textile and apparel exporters as we will be handicapped by a severe duty disadvantage.' The industry's concerns are echoed by the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC). Mithileshwar Thakur, AEPC's secretary general, noted that the new tariffs "changes everything."