Congress to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell amid political firestorm over Jeffrey Epstein files
Tennessee Republican Tim Burchett introduced a motion to compel Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence in a Florida prison for crimes related to the Epstein case, to testify before the House oversight committee.
The move appears to skirt an announcement early on Tuesday that officials from the Department of Justice are also planning to meet with Maxwell.
'We got to send a message to these dirt bags,' Burchett said in a statement posted on X, referring to the list of clients and other Epstein enablers who are assumed to be included in the remaining Epstein files, the details of which are not publicly known.
We've just got to get to the bottom of this thing, folks. It's four years and we don't need to tolerate this stuff any more.
Soon after Burchett's announcement, Mike Johnson, the Republican House speaker, said he was shutting down operations in the chamber early, sending lawmakers home before a five-week summer recess.
They were scheduled to leave Washington for their districts on 24 July and be out through the month of August, but will now leave a day earlier.
The decision comes as Democrats and a handful of Republicans continue to press for files related to Epstein, sending regular legislative schedules into chaos.
'We're not going to play political games with this,' Johnson said at a news conference.
Separately, a New York judge has ordered that the Trump administration must send more documents to support its call to release secret grand jury testimony from the 2021 Maxwell prosecution.
T he Epstein issue has plagued the Trump administration. Picture: AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Judge Paul Engelmayer said New York federal court would like to 'expeditiously' resolve the Trump administration's request, but that it could not do so due to a number of missing submissions, including 'why disclosure is being sought in the particular case' and 'what specific information is being sought for disclosure', he wrote.
Engelmayer said the government must file a memorandum of law no later than 29 July and ordered Maxwell and the victims to file their positions on the proposed disclosure by 5 August.
The Epstein issue has plagued the Trump administration as the president's own supporters buck him and clamor for more information, and as details continue to emerge about Trump's personal connections with Epstein, who was a friend of his for many years until they fell out.
Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had sent Epstein a lewd drawing along with a suggestive dialogue between the two men. The Trump administration responded by suing the newspaper and its owner, Rupert Murdoch.
Epstein issues splits Capitol Hill
The issue has also riven Capitol Hill. On Tuesday, the Republican-led House of Representatives, led by Trump ally Johnson – who recently undermined the president by calling for the release of all files, only to back down several days later – voted to start its summer holiday early in order to avoid Epstein-related votes planned for Thursday.
Burchett said he had introduced the motion directing James Comer, chair of the committee, to authorize and issue a subpoena for Maxwell. Comer was 'down with it', Burchett said. 'I believe he's going to issue the subpoena. He's a stand-up guy.'
He also acknowledged that he would receive 'blowback, and folks up here are going to be mad at me, but ultimately and with all sincerity, I'm gonna answer my creator on this issue'.
Burchett told Axios that he did not consult Trump before calling on the committee to subpoena Maxwell. He has previously written to Comer urging him to bring Maxwell in to testify.
'She's the last one standing,' he told the publication. 'There's nobody else alive that can tell us anything.'
He also said he believes Maxwell could 'tell us the operation, how it went down, who were the supporters of it … Ultimately I'd like to see justice.'
Justice department sending US deputy attorney general to meet Maxwell
The announcement came hours after the justice department said it was planning to send Todd Blanche, the US deputy attorney general, to Florida to meet with Maxwell. Lawyers for Maxwell said on Tuesday evening in a court filing that they had spoken to Blanche, Reuters reported.
Last week, Trump directed the attorney general, Pam Bondi, to ask a court to release all relevant grand jury testimony in Epstein's case.
Maxwell attorney David Oscar Markus confirmed on X 'that we are in discussions with the government and that Ghislaine will always testify truthfully'.
On Tuesday morning, Blanche also released a statement, posted by Bondi, saying that he plans to meet with Maxwell 'in the coming days'.
Blanche's statement also defended the department's early July release, saying it was 'as accurate today as it was when it was written'.
- The Guardian
Read More
Trump sues Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Post
24 minutes ago
- Irish Post
US-Japan trade deal signals risk for Ireland and the EU
THE United States' recent trade deal with Japan may be seen as a political success in Washington, but for Ireland and the EU, it's a major shift in global trade dynamics. The agreement introduces a 15% tariff on Japanese exports to the US, replacing a previously threatened 25% tariff on cars. While that appears to offer Japan temporary relief, it still marks a harsh rollback of more than a decade of progress on global trade cooperation. For Ireland, a small, open economy heavily dependent on international trade, especially with America, the implications are serious. The food and drink sectors are especially at risk. Exports like butter and whiskey could become less competitive if slapped with steep US tariffs, especially when compared to similar products from Northern Ireland or Britain, which already secured a more lenient 10% tariff arrangement in an earlier deal. Though far from perfect, that deal now appears favourable compared to what the EU may soon face. The European Commission is currently in negotiations with Washington, aiming to avoid a looming 30% tariff the U.S. has threatened to impose from August 1. In response, the EU has approved a list of countermeasures worth €93 billion in tariffs on US goods, set to take effect on August 7 if no deal is reached. Ireland's exposure is particularly high. The Irish government initially flagged €12 billion of imports at risk from inclusion in the EU's countermeasure list. Following negotiations, this has been trimmed by €2.4 billion, with nearly €1 billion worth of sensitive Irish imports, like pharmaceutical components, being removed. Thirty specific agri-food products valued at €33 million, including purebred horses, sugar, molasses and some chocolate products, were successfully excluded following intensive lobbying. Still, this relief is partial at best. Ireland's pharmaceutical sector, one of its most critical exports to the US, remains vulnerable. President Trump's vocal focus on drug pricing seems to suggest that pharmaceuticals will become tariff targets. Additionally, Japan's concession to accept US vehicle safety standards sets a worrying precedent. It hands regulatory influence to Washington and pressures Europe to follow suit, potentially undermining EU regulatory sovereignty. The investment dimension of the US-Japan deal adds to EU concern. The $550 billion in Japanese capital earmarked for US infrastructure represents a massive diversion of resources. If similar terms were demanded of the EU, Ireland could be forced to channel investment into projects that prioritise US interests. The EU's previous lack of a unified response to US tariffs has only emboldened the current American administration. When the US imposed a blanket 10% tariff on numerous countries earlier this year, the EU's limited and fragmented reaction did little to deter further measures. As a result, the US continues to apply pressure on major economies individually, knowing few are willing to risk short-term economic pain in defence of long-term principles. Simon Harris, Ireland's Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, emphasised that while Ireland supports reaching a negotiated deal, it is also crucial to prepare credible countermeasures to protect EU interests. 'This is not escalatory,' Harris noted. 'It's a continuation of our calm, measured preparation.' However, the risks remain severe. Seamus Coffey, chairperson of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, has warned of major uncertainty in the lead-up to the tariff deadline. He noted that Irish companies, especially pharmaceuticals, are pausing investments, in anticipation of potential disruption. While some diversification of supply chains is underway, the short timeframe limits effective risk mitigation. Ireland's limited leverage in global trade negotiations, coupled with its deep reliance on US trade, makes it particularly susceptible to shifting tides.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Taoiseach ‘hopeful' EU-US tariff deal will be done this weekend
A preliminary deal on trade tariffs between the European Union and the United States would 'hopefully be signed off before the weekend is over,' Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said. EU negotiators are trying to land a deal that would avert higher rates of import duties which US president Donald Trump has threatened on goods coming from Europe. Speaking on Friday, Mr Martin said it would be 'foolish' to put any bet on when a deal would be signed off by the EU and Mr Trump. Work was continuing to get a 'framework agreement' over the line, which would comprise the broad outline of a tariff deal, allowing further details to be worked out later. READ MORE [ What would a 15% tariff deal mean for Ireland? Opens in new window ] 'We're certain there will be detailed discussions afterwards in respect of line by line, in terms of many, many products. And so this will continue notwithstanding a framework agreement, [which] hopefully will be signed off before the weekend is over,' he said. 'Part of the reason for the intensity of those negotiations is to try and tie up as much as we can,' he said. The current outline of a draft agreement would see the EU accept blanket tariffs of 15 per cent on future trade with the US, up from a 10 per cent levy Mr Trump introduced in early April. The European Commission, the EU's executive arm leading the negotiations, wants any future tariffs on pharmaceuticals to be capped at that level. The EU is also seeking to have higher 25 per cent tariffs the US has put on EU-made cars to be reduced to that rate. National governments appear willing to stomach an across-the-board tariff of 15 per cent, to end the uncertainty Mr Trump's threats of potentially much higher levies has caused the European economy, or an escalating trade war if no deal is agreed. 'There has been a degree of volatility in all of this, which has been unsettling for investment and that's a concern I have,' Mr Martin said. The EU wanted to secure some 'certainty' around US tariffs targeting specific sectors, outside of the blanket rate, he said. The EU was not anxious to have to turn to possible retaliation, such as counter-tariffs on US products, he said. Speaking in Luxembourg, the Fianna Fáil leader said he hoped 'sense will prevail' in the ongoing negotiations concerning pharmaceutical products. The sector has avoided US tariffs to date, though Mr Trump previously promised they are coming in a bid to force companies to relocate manufacturing capacity and jobs to the US. Getting a deal on pharma products was 'of equal significance' to the US side, he said. Any 'significant disruption' of the heavily intertwined pharma supply chains would be damaging to the US, and potentially lead to shortages of medicines, Mr Martin said. Access to the European market had been of huge benefit to US pharma multinationals, he said. 'It's a two-way street ... unilateral action on the part of one [side] could ultimately damage the companies themselves and patients and consumers,' he said. Europe had to look at what it could do to increase trade within the bloc, to compensate for the knock-on impact of US tariffs on transatlantic trade, he said.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
South Park creator jokes he's ‘terribly sorry' over premiere that drew White House anger
The new episode also took aim at Paramount and its $16 million recent settlement with Trump just hours after Parker and Stone signed a five-year deal with the company for 50 new episodes and streaming rights to previous seasons ©Associated Press South Park co-creator Trey Parker had the briefest of responses on Thursday to anger from the White House over the season premiere of the animated institution, which showed a naked President Donald Trump in bed with Satan. 'We're terribly sorry,' Parker said, followed by a long, deadpan-comic stare.
