Musk's X denies French allegations of fraudulent data extraction, algorithm abuse
'French authorities have requested access to X's recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform in order for several 'experts' to analyze the data and purportedly 'uncover the truth' about the operation of the X platform,' X said, adding that they denied the demands since they 'have a legal right to do.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Russia's air attack on Kyiv leaves five people injured, Ukraine's military says
MOSCO: A Russian air attack on Kyiv has left at least five people injured and damaged a residential building, the head of the military administration of the Ukrainian capital, Tymur Tkachenko, said on Monday on the Telegram messaging app.
ArabGT
3 hours ago
- ArabGT
Alpina Updates Its Logo But Does It Leave Legacy Behind?
Following BMW's acquisition of Alpina in 2022, the storied German brand is entering a new era—one that begins with a reimagined logo. Though the transition was long anticipated, the official unveiling of the updated emblem marks a turning point in Alpina's identity, signaling a shift that aligns with BMW's broader digital and design strategy ahead of 2026. A Minimalist Redesign for a Digital World Gone is the traditional red-and-blue crest that once defined Alpina's visual presence. In its place is a streamlined black-and-white design featuring only the iconic throttle and crankshaft symbols, now enclosed within a sleek, single-lined circle reminiscent of BMW's own badge. The result is a logo that trades intricate detail for a clean, modern aesthetic—one more compatible with digital interfaces and screen-based branding. While the revised logo omits the BMW name, future marketing materials are expected to use the 'BMW Alpina' co-branding, whereas the vehicles themselves will bear only the new Alpina emblem. Why Change Now? On the surface, the logo revision may seem cosmetic, but it represents a deeper strategic direction: Establishing a future-ready visual identity suitable for digital and mobile applications Reinforcing the integration between BMW and Alpina, while preserving the latter's individual legacy Preparing the brand for the next generation of luxury EVs, set to debut starting in 2026 BMW continues to position Alpina as a unique luxury offering—bridging the space between BMW's flagship lineup and Rolls-Royce. The updated branding will appear on upcoming models such as future iterations of the B7 and X7, each carrying the refined design language and high-end personalization Alpina is known for. Mixed Reactions from Enthusiasts Among Alpina fans, the new logo has sparked both excitement and unease. While some embrace the modern look and digital sensibility, others view the loss of the traditional crest as a dilution of the brand's character. For many, the original emblem wasn't just design—it was a symbol of German engineering heritage and bespoke craftsmanship. A Strategic Move for a Modern Future The redesigned Alpina logo has already been officially registered with the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA), confirming BMW's intent to implement it across new vehicles, and possibly within heritage service programs for classic Alpina models. While the new logo may not carry the visual gravitas of its predecessor, it encapsulates a forward-looking vision. It's a symbol of transition—less ornate, but loaded with intent. For a brand long associated with handcrafted performance, this design evolution reflects not only a shift in visual language, but also a clear message: the future of prestige is as much digital as it is mechanical.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
For the sake of peace, America should recognize Palestine
After an unexpected delay due to Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran last month, the UN will finally convene a crucial high-level meeting in New York this week. Scheduled for Monday and Tuesday at the foreign minister level, the meeting aims to discuss the long-promised but still unrealized political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the two-state solution. The idea is not new. It envisions two states — Israel and Palestine — living side by side in peace. While Israel has been recognized by the global community, including Arab nations and the Palestinians themselves, the state of Palestine still lacks full recognition by the UN Security Council. That recognition is a necessary step before Palestine can be admitted as a full UN member. Three permanent members of the UNSC — France, the UK and the US — have so far blocked that recognition. But change is coming. President Emmanuel Macron, whose government is co-chairing the UN conference with Saudi Arabia, has announced that France will recognize Palestine when the UN General Assembly meets this fall. The UK has expressed similar intentions, conditioned on there being a 'wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution.' Without a political horizon for Palestinians and a realistic long-term solution, we will only be kicking the can down the road. Both France and the UK understand the urgent need for an end to the Israeli revenge war on Gaza, accomplishing the release of detainees on both sides, followed immediately by an urgent effort to carry out the more important challenge of finding a political solution. Before the end of September, it is expected that 150 of the UN's 193 member states will have recognized the state of Palestine on the June 4, 1967, borders. This leaves the US as the lone major holdout. Leaders from both major American political parties, including President Donald Trump, have supported the idea of a two-state solution. Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, despite his staunch support for Israel, even visited Ramallah last year and met with senior Palestinian leader Hussein Al-Sheikh. Yet, paradoxically, the US has announced that it does not plan to attend the UN meeting on the two-state solution. The reasons remain unclear. One possibility is that Washington is reacting to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's fiery rhetoric. After Macron's announcement, Netanyahu claimed that recognizing Palestine would endanger Israeli security. 'A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel,' he said. 'Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel.' Nothing could be further from the truth. If any side is attempting to negate the other, it is Israel seeking to erase Palestine, not the other way round. The current Palestinian leadership, based in Ramallah and led by President Mahmoud Abbas, has consistently opposed the Oct. 7 attacks and Hamas' militaristic approach. This leadership favors diplomacy and has long supported the two-state vision, as outlined in the 1988 Palestinian Declaration of Independence. That declaration explicitly envisioned a Palestinian state next to Israel. If any side is attempting to negate the other, it is Israel seeking to erase Palestine, not the other way round. Daoud Kuttab It is important to recall that Netanyahu himself has historically enabled Hamas, seeing it as a tool to divide and weaken the secular Palestinian national movement. The world now recognizes this cynical strategy for what it is. But Western leaders too often ignore this reality. Recognition of Palestine at the UN is not a 'reward for terror.' It is a recognition of an inalienable right: the right of self-determination. That principle is foundational to the very idea of the UN and the international order it represents. If Washington continues to pay lip service to a two-state solution while boycotting discussions intended to realize it, the implications will be stark. The current position suggests that American leaders — whether consciously or not — are aligning themselves with a vision of Jewish supremacy in the Middle East. That is a dangerous path. It will only prolong the conflict and isolate the US from the global consensus, which is increasingly united against apartheid, occupation and permanent discrimination. Palestinians and Israelis have two — and only two — realistic options: two states for two peoples or one democratic state with equal rights for all. All other ideas mean that America (and any other holdouts on Palestinian recognition) support apartheid by not opposing the current situation. As leading Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem stated in a report back in 2011, Israel has been conducting 'a regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid.' In 1948, Israel expelled 750,000 Palestinians and has refused to allow them to return ever since. Many of those refugees ended up in Gaza and we have seen what the absence of justice for Palestinians has produced. Continuing on this path of ignoring the Palestinian reality and denying the political rights of Palestinians under whatever religious or domestic political consideration will never work. Neither will the fantasy of permanently expelling or suppressing the 7 million Palestinians living between the river and the sea ever succeed. On May 15, 1948, within minutes of its declaration as a state, the US recognized Israel. It is high time that America recognized the other half of the two-state solution. The sooner Washington genuinely embraces the two-state solution and joins the world in recognizing the state of Palestine — including the principle of it being an independent, democratic nation living peacefully alongside Israel — the sooner peace in the Middle East can become a reality.
