It's philosophical question time for Stokes and England
If you didn't know, cults typically form around strong, charismatic leaders; demand unquestioning loyalty; and manipulate the behaviour of their members. Philosophies, on the other hand, encourage dialogue, free thinking and the occasional questioning of those in charge.
You can make your own mind up as to the proportion of each which prevails currently within the team, but there is an inflexibility of strategy and method in the current series against India that has made Ben Stokes' England seem like a cult, and a worryingly predictable one at that.
This is how it goes. Prepare unyielding, shirtfront pitches; set toy-town boundary sizes to aid scoring rates; bowl first when you win a handy toss even when batting looks the sensible call; watch your opponent rack up mountains of runs; then chase whatever they make as if it was a straightforward proposal.
Except that it isn't, not when India score the first-innings' totals they have been – 471 at Leeds and 587 in Birmingham. England may have brought off a great heist in that first Test, where they chased down 371 in the fourth innings after India had dominated most of the match, but they failed in the next at Edgbaston, India having increased the large amount of runs they scored at Headingley by more than a hundred.
England's stated refusal to play for draws makes a nice soundbite of intent but it is naive. In this last Test, the draw was their only option to avoid defeat after India stretched their lead to 608 runs following an epic performance from Shubman Gill, India's captain, after he alone made 430 runs in the match.
Yet none of England's batters except Joe Root prioritised defence, as if the challenge of batting out 106 overs on a still reliable pitch (the overs left in the match when England began their second innings) without scoring at four runs an over was mission impossible.
As worrying as the defensive techniques of England's batters was the lack of bite from their bowlers. Even without their main man, Jasprit Bumrah, who was rested, India's leather-flingers completely out bowled England's, though maybe that should not come as a surprise.
Playing on flat, nothing pitches is what they do back home in Mumbai and Delhi, so they are better prepared for such surfaces, as Akash Deep showed.
Using the old-fashioned virtues of hitting the seam on an awkward line and length, Deep took ten wickets – which makes it a mystery as to why he was overlooked for the opening Test.
The kind of seam bowler most counties used to have in abundance, Deep varied his angle on the crease, but otherwise just nagged away in a fashion only Chris Woakes, in England's current attack, has the concentration and repeatable action to emulate. Unless, that is, they give Essex's Sam Cook another go.
At 36, and without much recent cricket, Woakes may be rested for Lord's, a ground where his record exceeds even that of Sir James Anderson. Indeed, many feel there could be a total refresh among England's pace bowlers for the third Test now that Jofra Archer and Gus Atkinson are in the squad.
A fit and firing Archer, as he was in 2019, is a massive asset, but can he reach that level of performance after the ailments (stress fractures to elbow and back) which have kept him from Test cricket for four years? Nobody knows. Also, his presence in the last few Indian Premier Leagues means there is no mystique around him, a powerful psychological force when peddling pace and fire. More Trending
Neither he nor Atkinson (injured during the one-off Test versus Zimbabwe seven weeks ago) have many match miles in their legs, which is a risk in a series where games have so far lasted until the final session of day five. Also, the forecast is for a hot week.
That and another dead pitch will mean a large workload for somebody to shoulder. In the past Stokes has done much of that donkey work but his recent injuries mean he needs to be looked after as much as Archer and Atkinson. But you cannot spread the cotton wool everywhere.
One answer may be to inject a bit of spice into the Lord's pitch, which means getting the hosepipe out between now and Thursday (something Gill is expecting following his comments after Edgbaston about dead surfaces destroying the essence of the game).
But with Bumrah certain to return, and with Deep and Mohammed Siraj also a threat when the ball moves about, a lively pitch risks exposing Bazball's batters to that trickiest of things for them, knowing where neutral is and having more than one gear. Rediscover that and suddenly there is more than one way to win a Test – and that is a philosophy.
For more stories like this, check our sport page.
Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
MORE: Black Sabbath's Back to the Beginning was monumental – but I left disappointed
MORE: For SEND parents, scrapping EHCPs would be like cutting our oxygen
MORE: 12 best early Prime Day deals to shop on Amazon now – from beauty, fashion to home gadgets
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Stamina, skills and hunger: how do England solve a problem like Shubman Gill?
Two games into the series we have already witnessed something very special from Shubman Gill. In the second Test at Edgbaston he produced a real rarity: an individual performance that defines and dominates a game. Not just piling on the runs, but forcing his opponents to toil in the field until they felt exhausted and out of options. That fatigue affects batters' mental clarity and their decision-making – what to play, when to leave – as well as their movement and their footwork. Reducing England to 25 for three at the end of the second day went a long way to deciding the match. As well as India bowled with the new ball, it was Gill's remorselessness that created the conditions for it to happen. We have to pay testament to his stamina, his skill and his hunger – not just for runs, but to set an example as the new captain of a young team. Captaincy can affect a player's form detrimentally, but it seems to have focused him and his three highest Test scores have been made in the past three weeks. We are coming to the end of a period that has been dominated by the so-called Fab Four – Virat Kohli, Joe Root, Steve Smith and Kane Williamson – and the search has been on for players who can take over. Gill has shown he can fill those boots and in a wonderfully orthodox style: he plays all formats and is brilliantly adaptable, but with a foundation of classic technique. He has not just been making his own reputation, he is making history. No touring player has scored as many runs in a Test as the 430 at Edgbaston – only Graham Gooch against India at Lord's, in 1990, has bettered it – and his 585 puts him 23rd on the list of highest individual tallies in Test series in England, two games in. Even Don Bradman's world record of 974 in the 1930 Ashes looks under threat. He was given the opportunity to dictate the game because England chose to bowl first. The opportunity to stretch and tire opponents and then benefit from scoreboard pressure and fatigue, as well as the opportunity to bowl on a possibly deteriorating pitch towards the end of the game, is why people win the toss and bat. England will be reflecting on that decision as they consider ways of reducing Gill's impact on the remainder of the series. I remember Smith's performances on the Ashes tour I went on as batting coach in 2017-18, when he scored two unbeaten centuries and a double century, ending the series with an average of 137.40. At times it felt like we just could not get him out, it was soul-destroying. He always seemed to have an answer. After a while it really does get to you and we had two very experienced frontline bowlers in Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad. Gill is used to the cast of bowlers England used in the first two matches, he knows their plans, their trajectories, their variations, their pace. If fatigue was not already going to force Ben Stokes to change his bowling group, the need to find fresh ways to challenge the India captain would have done it anyway. If Chris Woakes can put himself through a third match in a row I would keep him in, because his batting could play a part. He bowled a good new-ball spell on the first day at Edgbaston when he was a bit unlucky and Lord's is a happy hunting ground for him. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion Brydon Carse and Josh Tongue have been selected because they bowl with good pace, height and bounce and can present problems even on flat surfaces. They have done OK, but they have come up against top-class batting that has been ruthless – Stokes doesn't like that word but India probably do. Now England need a point of difference: it's going to be 30C in London, probably not great conditions for swing, and Jofra Archer has to be the man. But picking Archer, after one first-class game in four years, is a risk and with Stokes also needing to bowl in short bursts England then need a couple of people who can really put in a shift. What surprises me about their squad, aside from the three seamers who played the first two games, is the extraordinary lack of first-class overs in it: Gus Atkinson has come back in for the third Test having not played since the game against Zimbabwe in May and joins Jamie Overton, who would add extra depth to England's batting but has played one T20 game since May and one first-class match this season. To pick either of them alongside Archer feels like a risk, particularly when it is going to be hot and dry and England have to be braced for long periods in the field. For that reason Sam Cook has to come in, though he is someone who offers control, plenty of stamina and lots of overs, but not always a cutting edge. Cook may struggle at Old Trafford and the Oval given the nature of the pitches and this could be the one where he uses the slope cleverly and bowls lots of overs. Woakes and Cook can then provide control with Archer the ace up England's sleeve, someone fresh and fast, and something new for Gill to try to deal with.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Fritz defies Khachanov fightback and line-call blooper to reach Wimbledon last four
Taylor Fritz survived a mid‑match dip, a bold fightback from his opponent and even another line‑calling malfunction as he beat Karen Khachanov 6-3, 6-4, 1-6, 7-6 (4) on Tuesday to reach the semi-finals at Wimbledon for the first time. The American coasted through the first two sets with some imperious serving, not facing a single break point, only to dip markedly in the third to allow Khachanov back into the match. However, after falling a break behind early in the fourth set, the No 5 seed rediscovered his focus and played a near flawless tie-break to advance to a clash with the defending champion, Carlos Alcaraz. 'It's an amazing feeling,' said Fritz, who hit 16 aces. 'Having played the quarter-finals here twice and lost in five [sets] twice, I don't think I could have taken another one. I'm really happy I'm going to get to play the semis here. I'm feeling great to get through it. The match was going so well for me for two sets, I've never really had a match just flip so quickly, so I'm really happy how I came back in the fourth set and got it done. I think momentum was not going to be on my side in the fifth.' Another malfunction in the electronic line-calling system occurred at the start of the fourth set, when a forehand from Khachanov, which landed four feet inside the baseline, was called 'fault'. The umpire, Louise Azemar-Engzell, stopped the point, got on the phone to reset the system and the point was replayed. Fritz ended up being broken as Khachanov moved ahead. However, the American broke back for 2-2 and from then on the two men raised the level and began to play outstanding tennis. The Russian held serve at 5-5 from 0-30, thanks to a brilliant lunging volley. Fritz was impregnable on serve again, though, and in the tie-break he began with a 138mph ace, hit two more and finished it off with a smash into the open court. Four years ago, after he lost against Alexander Zverev here in the third round, Fritz wrote a note on his girlfriend's phone, saying: 'Nobody in the whole world is underachieving harder than you, you are so good but 40 in the world, get your shit together.' Now, he is in the top five, reached his first grand slam final at the US Open last year and is one match away from a first Wimbledon final. 'At the time, my ranking was slipping,' he said. 'I was coming back from a surgery and I felt like I was not playing to the level I felt like I should be playing. That note was never supposed to be public. I was ranting to my girlfriend about it, she said: 'Write it down, look at it.' I'm really happy with how I've turned my career around over the last four years or so. I've put in a lot of work and it's good to see the results.' Standing between Fritz and a first Wimbledon final is Alcaraz, who ended British interest with an impressive victory against Cameron Norrie. The pair have played each other twice, both on hard courts, with Alcaraz winning both times. The Spaniard has won the title in each of the past two years here but Fritz believes that if he can find his level, he has a fighting chance. 'I'm happy that we're not playing at the French Open on clay with the French Open balls because that would be an absolute nightmare,' he said, laughing. 'I think grass is very much so an equaliser. So, trust in how I'm playing. I truly know the way that I played the first two sets today, there's not much any opponent on the other side can do.' And as an American, Fritz says he has already experienced the most pressure he is ever likely to face, when beating Frances Tiafoe to reach the US Open final last year. 'It's given me a lot of confidence in those moments and situations, just having been there, that I can do it again,' Fritz said. 'I've played the pressure matches. I don't think anything's going to get more stressful than me playing Frances in New York for a spot in the final.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Inside Jofra Archer's four-year England comeback: The gruelling sprinter's training regime he undertook to get 'ripped', what he's really like off the field and why he DOESN'T need to bowl 90mph
It was the latest incident in what has felt at times like a farcical comedy sketch to get the country's premier fast bowler finally back where he belongs. Jofra Archer, 18 months in to a two-year plan to ready him for this winter's Ashes assault, was back bowling with his England team-mates, but not quickly. Or even with the correct hand. Instead, he had his left-arm spin on the go on the outfield during lunch on the second day of the Edgbaston Test. The ECB have been planning for this moment for a year and a half and insist that their prized asset, hidden away for so long, is primed and ready to unleash hell on opposition batsmen - no matter how he chooses to warm up.
