
Bob Vylan dropped by talent agency - as BBC expresses 'regret' over streaming of Glastonbury performance
The BBC has said it regrets not pulling the live stream of Bob Vylan's "unacceptable" Glastonbury set - as Ofcom said the broadcaster had "questions to answer".
The corporation has faced mounting criticism over airing the performance on Glastonbury 's West Holts Stage, during which the rap-punk duo's frontman Bobby Vylan led chants of, "free, free Palestine", and "death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]".
Sir Keir Starmer condemned the remarks as "appalling hate speech", while festival organiser Emily Eavis said they "crossed a line" - and media watchdog Ofcom has now also released a statement raising concerns.
On Monday morning, a spokesperson for the prime minister did not directly answer when asked if he still had confidence in BBC director-general Tim Davie.
Sky News understands the band have since been dropped by representatives United Talent Agency.
2:32
During Bob Vylan's set on Saturday, they performed in front of a screen that showed several messages, including one that said Israel's actions in Gaza amount to "genocide".
Footage from the performance shows some of the crowd joining in with the chants.
Amid criticism afterwards, the BBC said there had been a warning on screen about potential "strong and discriminatory language", but described the comments as "deeply offensive".
On Monday, a spokesperson released an updated statement, saying the comments were antisemitic and the performance should have been taken off air.
"The BBC respects freedom of expression but stands firmly against incitement to violence," the statement said. "The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves. We welcome Glastonbury's condemnation of the performance."
A judgement to issue a warning on screen while streaming online was in line with editorial guidelines, the spokesperson added, and the performance has not been made available to view on demand.
"The team were dealing with a live situation but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen.
"In light of this weekend, we will look at our guidance around live events so we can be sure teams are clear on when it is acceptable to keep output on air."
Ofcom's reaction
An Ofcom spokesperson said: "We are very concerned about the live stream of this performance, and the BBC clearly has questions to answer.
"We have been speaking to the BBC over the weekend and we are obtaining further information as a matter of urgency, including what procedures were in place to ensure compliance with its own editorial guidelines."
In a statement shared on Instagram on Sunday, Bobby Vylan said: "Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place.
"As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us."
The latest developments follows severe condemnation from the prime minister, who said there was "no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech".
Sir Keir also referenced a previous statement that Belfast rap group Kneecap, who were on stage after Bob Vylan, should have been removed from the line-up after one member was charged with a terrorism offence.
"I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence," he said.
Ms Eavis, whose father Michael co-founded the festival, said in a statement that Bob Vylan had "very much crossed a line".
She added: "Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence."
The Israeli embassy posted on X in the hours after the set, saying it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric".
It said the slogan used "advocates for the dismantling of the State of Israel".
In a separate post on X on Sunday, Israel's foreign ministry published graphic footage following the attack by Hamas on the Nova festival in Israel on 7 October 2023, and the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said it would be formally complaining to the BBC over its "outrageous decision" to broadcast the performance.
Speaking to Sky News' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips on behalf of the government, Health Secretary Wes Streeting described the chant as "appalling", especially at a music festival - "when there were Israelis at a similar music festival who were kidnapped, murdered, raped, and in some cases still held captive".
He added that while "there's no justification for inciting violence against Israelis... the way in which Israel's conducting this war has made it extremely difficult for Israel's allies around the world to stand by and justify".
Lucy McMullin, who was in the crowd for Bob Vylan, told Sky News: "When there's children and civilians being murdered and starved, then I think it's important that people are speaking out on these issues.
"However, inciting more death and violence is not the way to do it."
Police have said they are reviewing footage of both the Bob Vylan and Kneecap sets to assess whether any criminal offences were committed.
Speaking to Sky News, women and equalities minister Baroness Jacqui Smith said the comments "clearly" over-stepped the mark.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Wimbledon fans make feelings clear after change to BBC coverage - 'It stinks'
Wimbledon fans tuning into the competition on Monday were not totally happy with the BBC's coverage of Carlos Alcaraz's tense first round win against Fabio Fogini Wimbledon fans have been left torn after spotting a major update to the competition's iconic scoreboard on the BBC. The latest edition of the competition got underway in SW19 on Monday. Reigning men's champion Carlos Alcaraz was among those in action as he took on Italian star Fabio Fogini. And fans tuning into the game were left surprised as they noticed a subtle tweak to the BBC's live coverage. Usually, the channel's coverage displays the scoreboard as the number of sets won per player, as well as the scores in the one currently in play. That is at odds with the coverage of the Australian Open, French Open and US Open that displays the scores in each set. But this time around, the BBC brought their coverage in line with other tournaments by displaying each set's scores. And fans struggled to make their minds up over whether the change was positive or not. One said: "Sacred grass, classy whites. Tennis' purest theatre. It's Wimbledon time. With sleek new scoreboard graphics,' another said: " Wimbledon score graphics are so fresh. Minimalist, elegant and instantly iconic." Some fans were completely against the change however. One fan wrote on Twitter: "The new Wimbledon graphic stinks,' with another adding: 'New Wimbledon score graphics? Not sure I like it…' The scoring was not the only alteration, with the player's names also being listed in seeding order. While the new graphics got fans talking, the main headline was certainly the tennis. Alcaraz only just squeezed through against Fogini, winning three sets to two, while a fan also fainted in the middle of the pair's showdown. The reigning men's singles champion offered his water bottle in an effort to aide her recovery. Alcaraz has now been sent a warning by Oliver Tarvot, who he will take on in the next round. He said: 'As a kid, it's what you dream of. I came here when I was a little kid. It's what you work for. Obviously, it's a pretty long-term goal. 'But for it to happen so suddenly has been really special. I've come here and not really set myself any expectations. I'm quietly confident that I can win against anyone. Alcaraz isn't an exception to that. 'Obviously, he's done an incredible amount in the tennis world. He's a difficult guy not to respect. But just go out there and try and treat it like another match.' Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Western Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Lisa Nandy hits out at BBC leadership over Glastonbury live stream
The Culture Secretary said 'several' editorial failures 'becomes a problem of leadership', during a statement to the Commons on Monday. It came after rapper Bobby Vylan led crowds at the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of 'free, free Palestine' and 'death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)' on Saturday. Bobby Vylan performing at Glastonbury Festival (Ben Birchall/PA) Ms Nandy said the Government is 'exasperated' with the 'lack of account from the leadership', as MPs from across the chamber called for accountability. In a statement on the BBC and Glastonbury, she said 'problems with broadcasts' at the festival 'should have been foreseeable'. Labour MP Peter Prinsley (Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) said: 'How are Jews such as myself, in this country, to be reassured about the editorial processes of the BBC? And who on Earth will be held accountable for this error?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He makes an extremely important point about accountability, and that is something that is not lost on me as the Secretary of State, and something that I've impressed upon the BBC leadership as well. 'When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership.' Conservative former minister John Glen said: 'I think we all in this place understand the fine editorial judgments that the BBC and their staff have to make, but this is of a completely different order, and when people are losing faith in the great institutions of this country, could I urge the Secretary of State, in her follow-up conversations that … the BBC actually identified accountability to individuals?' He added: 'Somebody didn't follow that guidance, and I think the country expects people to be held individually to account for why they fail to do their job properly.' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think people do expect people to be held to account for the way that they do their jobs, be that on the front line or at senior levels. It's a point that I've made to the BBC. 'They will have heard what he said and what (Mr Prinsley) said as well about accountability, and it's a point that I will continue to press.' Jim Allister, TUV MP for North Antrim, described the live stream as 'an appalling pro-terrorist broadcast', adding: 'The BBC deliberately chose not to cut the broadcast, perhaps therefore it's time for Government to consider cutting the licence fee?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He will know that this Government supports the BBC. We believe it is an important institution. 'That is why we are so disappointed that this has happened, why we have been so exasperated with the lack of account from the leadership, not just about this, but about a previous Gaza documentary and a number of other issues as well. 'The BBC is one of the most important institutions in our country, and that is the reason why it is held to the highest of standards.' Conservative MP Dame Caroline Dinenage, who chairs the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said: 'I wonder if the Secretary of State could say what explanation the BBC has given for why this live stream wasn't cut? 'Now it can't be for lack of staff on the ground. They took a reported 400 people to Glastonbury at the weekend. What were they all doing?' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think she's right to raise the question of what the number of staff who were present at the Glastonbury Festival, or working on the broadcast, were doing. 'But I do think this also raises very, very serious questions at the highest levels of the BBC about the operational oversight and the way in which editorial standards are understood and reflected in the decisions that are made by individual staff.' Shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew called for an independent inquiry, claiming the BBC 'has repeatedly failed to call out antisemitic rhetoric, when it emerges under the guise of political commentary, and has faced serious allegations of minimising attacks on Jewish communities'. Ms Nandy replied: 'What I want to see from the BBC, and I know he shares this, is rapid action to make sure this cannot happen again.' She also claimed an Independent MP was 'aligning himself with antisemites'. Ayoub Khan, MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, had accused the Government of 'hypocrisy' because it did not make a statement when Israeli football fans 'were chanting 'death to all Arabs'' in November last year. Ms Nandy said she 'could not disagree more', adding: 'I think every member of this House will utterly condemn chants of 'death to all Arabs' – it's disgusting and disgraceful.' She continued: 'The reason I have brought a statement to the House today is because our national broadcaster, which is funded by the licence fee, which is paid by the public in this country, has broadcast something that is deeply, deeply offensive to a community in this country, that has made many, many people feel and may actually have made them unsafe. 'Can I just say to him that as a longstanding supporter of justice for the Palestinians, he does nothing for the Palestinian cause by aligning himself with antisemites.' In a point of order, Mr Khan said: 'At no stage have I said in my question or statement that I was aligning myself to anyone at that Glastonbury event.'


The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Project to reinterpret slave trader statues in London launched
Plaques have been unveiled on the statues of slave traders in London which reveal the 'enormous wrongdoings' of the men as part of a new project to reinterpret them. The City of London Corporation has launched Revealing The City's Past, its project to reinterpret the statues of slave traders former lord mayor William Beckford and former MP Sir John Cass. It reflects a commitment to historical accountability by the City Corporation for its role in the transatlantic trade in enslaved African people, the City Corporation said. At the City Corporation's Guildhall headquarters, plaques unveiled on Monday and fixed to the Beckford and Cass statues, acknowledge and condemn the men's role in the transatlantic trade in enslaved African people, the City Corporation said. The project's steering group, including Culture&, Creative Arts Social Consultancy, and the City Corporation, worked with the City Corporation's staff and local residents, and consulted inter-generational and accessibility panels to enable content from a range of different perspectives. Featuring texts by artist and heritage professional, Rachael Minott, the plaques are accompanied by poems from John Agard and Courtney Conrad. The project's digital platform offers visitors and online audiences a deeper exploration of the City's historic ties to slavery, the City Corporation added. The project's content brings Caribbean diaspora voices to the forefront and encourages reflection on how the legacy of enslavement continues to shape shared spaces, the City Corporation said. William Beckford was a two-time lord mayor of London in the late 1700s who accrued wealth from plantations in Jamaica and held African slaves. Sir John Cass was a 17th and 18th century merchant, MP and philanthropist who also profited from the slave trade. In January 2021, the City Corporation's primary decision-making body, the Court of Common Council, voted to remove the statues. However, after the then government later introduced its Retain and Explain policy, advising that public memorials should remain in place with added historical context, the City Corporation reconsidered. The Court of Common Council voted to keep the statues and develop the Revealing The City's Past project in response. Policy chairman of the City of London Corporation, Chris Hayward, said: 'This project has brought together many talented people, most importantly, voices from the Caribbean diaspora who have historically been excluded from the narrative on Beckford and Cass's legacy and wealth. We are deeply grateful for their expertise, creativity, and insight. 'The enormous wrongdoings of Beckford and Cass are laid bare by this project, leaving no doubt about the contempt in which these two men should be held. 'Against the wishes of many, these statues remain. 'Here at Guildhall, two slave traders still stand but we do not stand with them. 'We are fully committed to race equity and to making our spaces safe and welcoming for all.' Chairman of the City of London Corporation's culture, heritage, and libraries committee, Brendan Barns, said: 'These statues represent prejudice, cruelty, and greed. 'It cannot be denied that the City's links to slavery are a stain on our history, and we should never attempt to erase or gloss over the past. 'With the installation of these plaques and the creation of a wealth of online resources, we are taking positive action to educate current and future generations about this evil form of commerce.' Chief executive officer and artistic director of Culture&, Dr Errol Francis, said: 'Culture&'s involvement in this project to 'retain and explain' the statues in the City of London's Guildhall has called upon a wide range of our skills as well as our lived experience as people with ancestral links to the atrocities associated with the legacy of William Beckford and Sir John Cass. 'We have helped convene the inter-generational advisory panel, choose designers, commission poets, work on the editing of historical texts, and more still. 'We hope that this work will go some way towards explaining how London's merchants and politicians were involved in profiteering from the enslavement of Africans. 'We are aware of the historical importance of this work, from which we hope that the learning will inform the future policy and practice around contested heritage.'