Esther Rantzen and terminally ill preacher make case for assisted dying Bill
The House of Commons will have a debate and vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which will see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall completely.
Dame Esther, a staunch supporter of Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, has been a prominent voice in the conversation on assisted dying.
Last week, Labour MP and Bill opponent, Rupa Huq, pledged to be a voice for the voiceless, noting that the Childline founder and others' views are already well-known.
She added: 'We know that Esther Rantzen wants this. We know (broadcaster) Jonathan Dimbleby wants this.
'But our role is to be voice of the voiceless as well.'
Dame Esther, who is terminally ill with cancer, said the 'truly voiceless' are the terminally ill who face ' an agonising death' and their relatives.
She told the PA news agency: 'This is a crucial debate for the truly voiceless.
'They are the terminally ill adults for whom life has become unbearable and who need assistance, not to shorten their lives but to shorten an agonising death – and their loved ones who under the current law will be accused of committing a crime if they try to assist or even stay alongside to say goodbye.
'These are the truly vulnerable and voiceless who depend on our lawmakers to change our current, cruel, messy criminal law.
'All this Bill allows is choice for desperately ill adults who are dying anyway but want the confidence of knowing that they can ask for help to choose what we all hope for; a quick, pain-free death with good memories left behind as their legacy for those they love.
'Please allow us terminally ill the dignity of choice over our own deaths. A change in the law cannot come in time for me, but will transform the final days of generations in the future. Those who disagree with assisted dying under the new law will have the right to their own choice, please allow the rest of us to have the same right.'
Dame Esther's words came as a group of terminally ill and bereaved people shared their stories at a press briefing alongside the Labour Bill sponsor, Ms Leadbeater, on Thursday.
Church of England lay preacher Pamela Fisher, who is terminally ill with cancer, made an impassioned speech against the religious arguments made by some who oppose assisted dying.
She said: 'I completely reject the assumption that the sanctity of life requires terminally ill people to undergo a distressing and painful death against their will. I disagree with those that say it is God alone who decides how and when we die.
'Yes, life is a gift from God to be honoured, but it's nonsensical to say that assisted dying is wrong because suffering is part of God's plan for us.'
The Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Vincent Nichols – who is opposed to assisted dying – has previously argued that the suffering of human beings is 'an intrinsic part of our human journey, a journey embraced by the eternal word of God, Christ Jesus himself'.
Meanwhile, Anil Douglas, whose father took his own life having suffered with multiple sclerosis, recalled the trauma of finding him.
He said a six-month police investigation followed, and told the press conference: 'The law in this country failed my father.'
He added: 'The (current) law leads people like my father to make lonely and dangerous decisions. It does not protect against coercion. It does not offer protections or choice for dying people.
'It does not offer terminally ill, mentally competent adults with six months or less to live, the chance to choose a safe and compassionate death when even the very best palliative care is not enough. It leads to lonely, dangerous, traumatic deaths.'
Bill opponents have argued it is not robust enough to protect the most vulnerable against coercion, and others who might choose assisted dying because they feel they are a burden.
The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How a £1.5bn ‘wildlife-boosting' bypass became an environmental disaster
Lorries thunder over the A14 bridge north of Cambridge, above steep roadside embankments covered in plastic shrouds containing the desiccated remains of trees. Occasionally the barren landscape is punctuated by a flash of green where a young hawthorn or a fledgling honeysuckle has emerged apparently against the odds, but their shock of life is an exception in the treeless landscape. The new 21-mile road between Cambridge and Huntingdon cost £1.5bn and was opened in 2020 to fulfil a familiar political desire: growth. One of Britain's biggest infrastructure projects of the past decade, it was approved by the secretary of state for transport over the heads of locally elected councillors. National Highways, the government-owned company that builds and maintains Britain's A roads, promised that the biodiversity net gain from the construction project would be 11.5%; in other words, they pledged the natural environment would be left in a considerably better state after the road was built than before. But five years on from the opening of the A14, the evidence is otherwise, and National Highways has admitted biodiversity and the environment have been left in a worse state as a result of the road project. Empty plastic tree guards stretch for mile after mile along the new road, testament to the mass die-off of most of the 860,000 trees planted in mitigation for the impact of the road. Culverts dug as a safe route for animals such as newts and water voles are dried up and litter-strewn, while ponds designed to collect rainwater and provide a wildlife habitat are choked with mud and silt. With concerns that the rollback of environmental protections in Labour's planning and infrastructure bill will make it easier for developers to destroy nature, Edna Murphy, a Liberal Democrat on Cambridgeshire county council, is calling for MPs on the environmental audit committee to investigate the multimillion-pound failure of the A14 project. 'National Highways has resisted attempts by local representatives to discover what it is up to,' Murphy said. 'We have struggled over years to find out basic facts about the death of nearly all of the 860,000 trees that were originally planted and what has happened subsequently in terms of replanting. 'How can they be allowed to get away with this? How can anyone have confidence in promises about environmental mitigations in any national infrastructure projects in the future?' Murphy and her Lib Dem colleague Ros Hathorn believe the failure of the environmental improvements created in mitigation for the A14 are a shocking example of how powerful developers make environmental pledges in order to gain planning permission, which are then not upheld. They began asking questions of National Highways in 2021 when it became obvious from the scale of the tree die-off that something had gone wrong. They asked for details of how many trees were planted, how many had died, and for regular reports on the tree planting. A slide presentation in 2022 to Murphy and Hathorn indicated 70% of the 860,000 trees originally planted had died. In late 2023, Martin Edwards, a National Highways project manager, suggested to local councillors the die-off may have been only 50%. He said two re-plantings had taken place since the die-off, both of which had also subsequently failed. He blamed this on the policy to replant the same tree in the same place 'and keep your fingers crossed'. Edwards insisted that lessons had been learned and that in 2023 National Highways had carried out a full soil survey and a three-month tree analysis. This revealed they had planted the wrong species in the wrong place, and provided valuable lessons about the most appropriate season in the year to plant a tree, he said. Nicole Gullan, principal ecologist at the ecology consultancy Arbtech, said she was surprised by the approach: 'Tree planting on this scale should have been underpinned by ecological due diligence, including soil sampling, hydrological and geotechnical surveys, and an adaptive management plan to address potential failures. Proper reporting and mapping of planting locations is also essential for long-term monitoring and accountability.' A third replanting of 165,000 trees – at an estimated cost of £2.9m – took place over the autumn and winter of 2023-2024. National Highways promised to share details of their surveys and a new planting plan with Cambridgeshire council's biodiversity team. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion But in a report this June, council officers said the information had never been passed to them despite repeated requests. 'Documents that were provided to the group were basic overviews and did not contain the detailed information requested,' the officers said. 'The council therefore did not have evidence of where and why the planting had failed, which would be crucial to inform the replanting strategy, ensuring improved planting success.' Today, parts of the A14 where trees should be thriving still resemble a desert, and the whereabouts of the 165,000 new trees remain a mystery. 'The council does not know where replanting has taken place,' officials said, adding that officers had driven along the route to try to find them, but only found a few limited areas where replanting appeared to have taken place. Some residents have begun planting their own saplings. Vhari Russell from Brampton said she had grown various different trees in her garden in pots and planted all of those into the A14 embankment. 'I think we've probably put in 150,' she told local reporters. National Highways, which has been reprimanded by the office of roads and railways for failing to fulfil a key metric on biodiversity gain, has admitted that the A14 project has left nature worse off despite having pledged to improve it. In an evaluation report National Highways said the impacts on biodiversity 'were worse than expected', as were the impacts on the water environment. National Highways has faced no sanction for these failures. From 2026, biodiversity net gain will be mandatory for big infrastructure such as the A14 road. But Becky Pullinger, head of land management for the Wildlife Trusts, said developers had to be held to account once the mandate came in, so that recreated habitats had a fighting chance of survival. A recent report showed that only a third of ecological enhancements promised by housebuilders were fulfilled. Pullinger said the example of the A14 showed how important it was that harm to wildlife was avoided in the first place, reducing the need for compensation planting. 'The failures highlight the challenges of trying to recreate mature habitats: it takes years, if not decades, for saplings to turn into woodland and provide much needed spaces for the wildlife [affected] by development,' she said. A National Highways spokesperson said: 'We take our responsibility to the environment very seriously. The A14 upgrade project was not limited to just improving the road; our ongoing environmental work remains a long-term project that we will continue to monitor and support. Between October 2023 and April 2024 – the optimum planting season – 165,000 trees and shrubs were planted. These comprised 16 different species specially selected to enhance the surrounding areas and habitats. Our latest survey showed that nearly 90% of these trees have survived. Nationally, we continue to monitor, evaluate and adapt our practices to respond to a rapidly changing climate to meet the challenges that it brings.'
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jeremy won't be happy! Far-left MP Zarah Sultana asks supporters to join 'Team Zarah' as name of new party she is launching with Corbyn remains unannounced
Far-left MP Zarah Sultana has asked supporters to 'Join Team Zarah' after Jeremy Corbyn was said to be 'furious at being blindsided' by her announcement of their new political party. The Coventry South representative re-distributed a sign-up form on her X account this afternoon insisting 'we're going to build something special'. It followed her dramatic decision to quit Labour on Thursday night and declare she would be 'co-leading' a new left-wing party with Mr Corbyn. The ardent pro-Palestinian MP is a long-term critic of Keir Starmer, and was already sitting as an independent after being stripped of the whip. But the move to announce the party's inception appeared to catch Mr Corbyn by surprise with the former Labour leader said to be 'furious and bewildered'. He commented on the development yesterday afternoon to insist 'discussions are ongoing' - saying Ms Sultana would 'help us build a new alternative' but seemingly stopping short of endorsing her as a 'co-leader'. Ms Sultana has urged people to 'join our team' via the 'Team Zarah' sign-up form adding 'we need your support'. The MP is so far some 15,000 signatures off her 51,200 sign-up target. Ms Sultana has urged people to 'join our team' via the 'Team Zarah' sign-up form adding 'we need your support' She shared a link to the form as an opportunity to 'sign up here and stay updated' and accompanied it with an extract from a Guardian article referencing her decision to 'quit [Labour] to co-lead a left-wing alternative with Jeremy Corbyn'. There still appears to be no decision on what the name of the new party will be - with with the form shared under the url 'action network', asking for supporters' name, email, phone number and home address. The sign-up page reads: 'We don't have billionaire donors or press baron friends. That's why need your support. 'Wherever you live, join our team for a brighter future.' Ms Sultana is pictured opposite Parliament wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh. Options mooted for the name of the new party have so far included 'Real Change' and 'Peace and Justice Project'. Mr Corbyn had been hinting strongly he wanted to form a new party - with polls suggesting it could attract 10 per cent of the left-wing vote and inflict major damage on Labour. In an interview on Wednesday the 76-year-old claimed there was a 'thirst' among voters 'for an alternative view to be put'. Since the General Election and his expulsion from Labour last year, Mr Corbyn has been part of the Independent Alliance, a loose grouping of independent MPs with left wing political views. In her announcement of the new party on Thursday, Ms Sultana had said: 'Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country.' She said 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper' and the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. 'A year ago I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and list 400,000 children out of poverty,' the former Labour MP added. 'I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. 'Now, the Government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much', she said. In a post on social media yesterday afternoon, Mr Corbyn said: 'Real change is coming. 'One year on from the election, this Labour Government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now. Appearing on ITV's Peston on Wednesday - after opposing plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group - Mr Corbyn said he was working with groups 'all around the country' 'Congratulations to Zarah Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. 'The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. Discussions are ongoing – and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. 'Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope.' Appearing on ITV's Peston on Wednesday - after opposing plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group - he said he was working with groups 'all around the country'. 'That grouping will come together. There will be an alternative view and there will be an alternative put there which is about a society that deals with poverty, inequality and a foreign policy that's based on peace rather than war,' Mr Corbyn added. Asked if he would like to lead the party he said: 'I'm here to work, I'm here to serve the people in the way I've always tried to do.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
The Tory newbies who fear they could be the last
It is a year today that the survivors of the 2024 Tory election disaster began to make their way to Westminster. Among the 121 Conservative MPs were 26 first-timers. Having lost so much talent last July, many of these now represent the party's best hopes for the future. But with the Tories down to just 17 per cent in the polls, some fear that the intake of 2024 could be the last one of any great size or significance. 'I didn't sign up to slog my guts out for five years, just to lose in 2029' says one. From bitter defeats often emerge impressive figures. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown first won their seats in 1983; William Hague's defeat in 2001 gave us David Cameron, George Osborne and Boris Johnson. The nature of the 2024 result meant that most of those 26 newbies were chosen for traditionally safe seats, some of which were being vacated by retiring cabinet ministers. Many newbies have long cultivated a political career and harbour hopes of serving in ministerial office. More than half are ex-councillors. 'A good crop,' is the verdict of one veteran MP. The first major decision made by this new intake was who to back for leader. Having only just arrived in parliament, they found themselves immediately buttonholed by various teams, asking for their support. Only one, Ben Obese-Jecty, decided to initially publicly back eventual victor Kemi Badenoch; Andrew Snowden later switched from Priti Patel. Seven of the group went for Robert Jenrick; five for James Cleverly. For some, this was an indication of a generational divide within the Conservative family. The Jenrick cluster remains close-knit in parliament: Jack Rankin and Katie Lam share an office while Lam and Nick Timothy work closely on grooming gangs. Sensibly, Badenoch offered jobs to the new intake as soon as the contest finished in November. Nine became whips; the others made Parliamentary Private Secretaries (PPSs). Initially, there was an air of excitement among many, discovering parliament's novelties. One or two quickly became identified as 'characters'. Lincoln Jopp MC, is, at 57, the oldest. 'Great fun at the pub', is the verdict of one; 'A good future Chief Whip,' says another, 'because if he asked me to do something, I'd do it.' Shivani Raja, a 30-year-old former beauty queen, caused a stir by flipping Leicester East. John Cooper, Alister Jack's old spad who replaced him in Dumfries and Galloway, is praised among the intake for his low-key style and sharp mind. 'There's a lot of love for John', says one MP. Two names are often cited as being stand out stars: Lam and Timothy. Both, unsurprisingly, have prior Westminster experience as special advisers in the Johnson and May governments. Rebecca Paul meanwhile earned plaudits opposing elements of Kim Leadbeater's Bill to legalise assisted dying – something which all but four of the new intake opposed at Third Reading. Obese-Jecty meanwhile switched from being a whip to a PPS and has become a vocal critic of Reform UK on social media. An esprit de corps quickly developed. Aphra Brandreth, daughter of Gyles, has helped organise some of their regular dinners at favoured Italian haunts like Osteria and Sartoria. The eight new female Tory MPs formed a WhatsApp group too. Some 22 of the 26 signed a letter backed by the Next Generation Tories in September, urging the party to do more for young voters. Yet the subsequent pushback from senior Conservatives has frustrated those who feel they lack an outlet to channel their energies, at a time when older colleagues are less willing to play their part. Some have joined dining societies. Those on the right who are considered 'sound' were invited to attend the 92 Group dinner with Kemi Badenoch at the beginning of April. The biggest psychological shift among the new MPs came, unsurprisingly, in May. 'Some colleagues had been deluding themselves', reflects one of their peers. But the spectacle of watching 676 Conservative councillors lose across the country shook those in parliament. In Kent, the six Tory MPs watched as they lost 57 of the 62 previously held wards. It has added to the jumpiness and unease among much of the new intake, whose average majority is just 2,616. More than half have very marginal seats – a winning margin of five per cent or less – compared to one in five MPs across the House. Lam has the biggest, in Weald and Kent, with a majority of 8,422 and margin of 16.6 per cent. David Reed, MP for Exmouth and Exeter East meanwhile won by just 121 votes – a margin of 0.2 per cent. Both are on track to lose their seats to Reform, along with 14 of their peers, according to last month's YouGov MRP poll. In this scenario, just eight of the new intake hold on with Greg Stafford, MP for Farnham and Bordon, set to lose to the Lib Dems. So will they stick with Badenoch or gamble on change? There is no clear consensus at present. Having survived a near wipeout, the emphasis on patience from the leadership has not landed well. 'It's not about promotion,' said one. 'We're genuinely worried about the future of the party.' Another new MP says that they are preparing to put a letter in, ahead of 2 November, when Badenoch can be subject to a challenge under the rules of the 1922 committee. Ambitious, uneasy and a little restless, expect the new intake to make even more waves in their second year of parliament.
