Avoid buying a 400 sq ft new condo home - it's too small
The condo project with 941 units is tucked away in greenery – bordering Springleaf Forest and the Central Catchment Nature Reserve – yet less than a two-minute sheltered walk from the Springleaf MRT station on the Thomson-East Coast Line.
Imagine enjoying all the nature nearby and saving money by doing away with owning a car. Add to that Springleaf Residence's many facilities such as four different pools, a tennis court, a recreational half-basketball court, multiple pavilions designed to look like cocoons, 10 sky terraces, function rooms, dining pavilions, a grand lawn, a gym, a study room, as well as an arts and crafts room.
Amid today's lofty new private home prices, one can snare a unit at 99-year leasehold Springleaf Residence starting from a relatively modest indicative price of S$878,000 – far below prices of numerous Housing and Development Board (HDB) resale flats.
Small-sized homes
However, there is a catch. For S$878,000, one will possibly get a rather tiny new home – a 388 square foot one-bedroom unit. This price translates to S$2,263 per square foot (psf).
In perspective, the above one-bedder is smaller than some high-end hotel rooms here. Typically, hotel rooms cater to short stays of a possibly a few days and do not provide for kitchen areas or washing machines.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights
Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Meanwhile, smaller configurations of HDB two-room flexi flats in the latest Build-To-Order exercise are sized at about 431 square feet (sq ft) each, and Community Care Apartments, which cater to seniors who are 65 years or older, have open layouts of around 377 sq ft each.
Springleaf Residence is not alone among new condo projects in offering small-sized units. Wing Tai 's 99-year leasehold River Green, located in the River Valley enclave, has 420 sq ft one-bedroom units. A one-bedder at River Green comes with a balcony, while Springleaf Residence's one-bedder does not have a balcony.
The one-bedder unit at 99-year leasehold Canberra Crescent Residences in District 27 is 409 sq ft and has no balcony.
Certainly, many developers have been shrinking unit sizes across various configurations. New condos may have three-bedders, which are popular with families, of about 800 sq ft each – less than that of around 960 sq ft or more of new HDB four-room flats.
Given escalating psf prices of new condos, developers understandably build compact homes to keep absolute prices affordable.
Take the indicative starting prices of S$1.618 million for a 786 sq ft three-bedder and S$2.448 million for a 1,227 sq ft four-bedder at Springleaf Residence.
The monthly household employment income including employer CPF contribution of the 80th percentile of resident employed households in 2024 was S$21,488. The above three-bedder and four-bedder prices work out to about 6.3 times and 9.5 times of the annualised income of the 80th percentile of resident employed households.
While Singapore has high-quality HDB homes, many locals aspire to condo living for lifestyle reasons. However, is buying a new condo unit of about 400 sq ft or less a compelling proposition?
For sure, the number of one-person households in the Republic has grown. Between 2014 and 2024, the number of one-person resident households rose by 75 per cent from 134,800 to 236,200. Among resident households, the proportion of one-person households climbed from 11.2 per cent in 2014 to 16.1 per cent in 2024.
Drawbacks of small units
Can a one-bedder 400 sq ft condo unit that is well-designed and has magic done to it by a skilled interior designer adequately meet a discerning high-earning single's needs?
Possibly not. Maybe the individual needs more space to store collectibles or pursue hobbies. Perhaps he or she wants to entertain family or friends in the privacy of their own home, notwithstanding the outstanding common facilities in the condo development.
Certainly, some condos boast facilities galore that a small unit's occupant can utilise. For example, any condo resident can use the development's function room to host a large gathering.
Still, some common facilities may be crowded or hard to book. And nothing beats one's home for privacy.
Also, a small home might feel claustrophobic when a person is confined to largely staying at home over an extended period for whatever reason. What about space to house an elderly parent temporarily?
Over time, a single person might find a partner. While it's cosy for two persons to share a 400 sq ft condo unit, each party may lack adequate personal space.
Crucially, while buying a small one-bedder condo home is good from an affordability view point, purchasing a small home for owner-occupation could mean that one may need to trade up to a larger place fairly soon.
Transacting homes incurs costs such as buyer's stamp duty, which ranges from 1 to 6 per cent of the purchase price or market value of a home.
A local homeowner also has to time the sale of the existing home and the purchase of a new one right in order to avoid being caught with paying additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD).
Sure, a small new one-bedder condo unit may offer a good entry point for a local who can buy an investment home without incurring ABSD.
However, while small one-bedder condos located in the Central Business District (CBD) might draw tenants who work long hours in CBD offices and travel extensively, perhaps small one-bedder condo units outside the CBD have weaker appeal.
Think too of how selling a small one-bedder condo home in the resale market could be challenging, especially if the end-product of what one bought off-plan ahead of a unit's completion turns out to look and feel smaller than what one envisaged.
The Urban Redevelopment Authority has guidelines for non-landed residential developments governing the maximum number of dwelling units for a development and the required mix of home sizes.
For example, condo developments outside the Central Area should have a maximum of 20 per cent of homes with nett internal area of 50 square metres (538 sq ft) or less.
Should there be a minimum size for a condo unit to ensure better liveability?
Perhaps not. Instead, potential homebuyers need to mind the downsides of buying small condo units. Spurn units that are around 400 sq ft or less each and developers will stop building increasingly smaller condo homes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
9 hours ago
- Business Times
SG60: Property valuation amid growing real estate sophistication
THE SG60 Singapore real estate market is a mature one, marked by a large number of buyers and sellers, landlords and tenants, financiers, lawyers, appraisers and brokers; considerable data transparency; and a breadth of options across all real estate types. Reflecting growing sophistication, public housing now includes standard, plus and prime, and the public-private hybrid executive condo. Similarly, private housing covers apartments and condominiums, landed terrace, semi-detached, detached, bungalows and the hybrid strata landed. New asset types emerge from time to time: real estate investment trusts (Reits) where real estate and financial markets intersect, fractionalised real estate using cryptocurrency, data centres to support the new economy, high-specification buildings for biotech companies, student housing, foreign workers dormitories, co-living, co-working spaces, and so on. Against such a backdrop, valuing this array of real estate assets becomes increasingly complex. Property valuations underpin many household and commercial transactions, such as how much banks lend money for a house purchase and the extent to which CPF Ordinary Account balances can be used. They are the basis for gauging a chunk of a company's net asset value (NAV). Valuations also act as a 'check' against overpaying for corporate real estate acquisitions. For example, a Reit buying an asset often uses the formal valuation of the asset as the benchmark to determine the acquisition price and secure shareholder approval. Likewise, a valuation provides a guide to the 'right' price for the disposal of an asset in the books. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up 'Open source' policy Singapore has an 'open source' policy when it comes to property transactions. There is a free public database of prices from public agencies such as the Housing and Development Board (HDB) and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). For the past three years from 2022 to 2024, the total volume of both HDB and private homes sold averaged well over 40,000 units per annum. It is not difficult to interpolate or extrapolate from this rich data set to gauge what a typical property might be worth. Portals such as Edge or SRX also offer free property 'valuations' driven by artificial intelligence (AI). But these 'lay' approaches to valuation typically work well with what are often called 'conventional' properties – HDB resale flats, apartments and condominiums – where the drivers of value are generally well understood, the market is sizeable and data is plentiful. But, there are a host of properties that characterise the SG60 real estate market that will not be easily analysed in the same way. Take a simple example: The value of strata shops in a mall is a function of its micro location (what level is it on, and what direction does it face?), its neighbours (is it near a popular supermarket?), its size (there is such a thing as a discount for large units), and its shape (regular shaped shop units are easier to fit out with little wastage). For such a property, there are generally fewer comparable transactions. Whatever data exists will not easily yield insights into its 'correct' value because of the varied factors that can influence how market participants perceive their worth. The more specialised the property – think a cement plant in Jurong, your neighbourhood petrol station or the Singapore Flyer – the more difficult the valuation assignment. Enter the property valuer. Laymen can claim to be 'experts', especially in residential property valuation – since most of us own or live in one and will inevitably hold an opinion on its value. But, the property valuer is licensed by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) and undergoes formal tertiary training comprising a three or four-year university course in real estate or its equivalent. Such a course typically covers four pillars of foundational real estate knowledge – law, building technology, urban planning and economics – that collectively underpin the theory and practice of valuation. Beyond academics, the aspiring valuer must be a member of the Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers (SISV), the sole body representing valuation professionals with a history spanning 40 years, before being eligible for licensing. SISV members are subject to the institute's regulations and disciplinary protocols to act professionally and ethically, in accordance with its practice standards. Because the value of a property is often the subject of ubiquitous coffee-shop talk, the true importance and complexity of valuation is often underappreciated, more so in the context of the growing sophistication of the SG60 property market. Here are some examples. In October 2024, a 60-year leasehold site tender at Media Circle in one-north was not awarded because the sole bid of S$461 per square foot per gross floor area (psf GFA), by a Frasers-led consortium, was deemed too low. Media reports had indicated that analysts preliminarily assessed the land at between S$650 and S$1,100 psf GFA. The gap is significant but, arguably, a big part of the divergence can be explained by the zoning of this parcel for long-stay service apartments (or 'SA2' in URA's parlance), a 'pilot housing typology for occupants seeking long-term rental accommodation' of three months or more. Strata subdivision for individual unit sale – which would enable the developer to get his money back earlier – is also not permitted. The valuation challenge in this case is the novel nature of this typology that currently has no direct benchmarks to go by, and that requires perhaps a different operating model compared to conventional service apartments and hotels. Such cases can only be properly analysed by experienced professional valuers, although the level of the final bid vests solely in the developer who, for whatever reason, may prefer to bid at a premium or discount to the value arrived at by the valuer. It is commonly asserted that valuers interpret the market and do not make the market. In other words, they are price takers, and not price setters. Underlying this assertion is the premise that markets are generally efficient, and that buyers and sellers, taken as a collective, behave rationally. So, if there is a large body of bona fide transactions supporting, say, property prices at a particular level, the valuer's role is to 'let the market speak'. Take another example. Commercial properties are being transacted at a gross rental yield of 3 per cent (that is, gross rent as a percentage of value) – which may just about cover interest cost, including spreads, and, therefore, appear low, considering the risks that accompany real estate investment. Why then do market participants accept this level of yield? They are certainly not uninformed or ignorant. There could be various reasons, including the 'Singapore premium' arising from all the oft-cited strengths of Singapore's economy, the robust local currency, the history of upward trending prices over the long term, and so on. Whatever the reasons, that 3 per cent yield is widely believed to be the appropriate 'market' rate and sets the benchmark for how similar properties ought to be valued. But to be defensible, valuations need to be grounded on 'comparables', which are past transactions of similar properties. This process often gives rise to the divergence between what is known as the 'private' market and 'public' market. This is perhaps best illustrated by the hefty discount that asset-heavy listed property companies are trading as a percentage of the company's NAV. The property company's NAV itself is often assessed by the valuation of that company's real estate. The idea is that if the NAV is, say, $1 billion, then the market capitalisation of that company should not deviate sharply from the NAV. This is because rather than trading in the company's shares at undervalued prices, shareholders can be better served by winding up the company, selling off the assets (at or close to valuation) and distributing the net sales proceeds – that is, effectively the NAV – to them. In practice, private and public markets sometimes diverge quite significantly, again for a host of reasons, such as management's (in)ability to grow the business, shareholder fights, high debt levels which may raise the risk of default, and a lack of liquidity. But one main reason is that NAV is anchored historically, that is, valuation is based on past transactions, and is typically done once or twice a year for financial reporting purposes, and therefore tend to adjust much more slowly. By contrast, stock prices are forward-looking and public markets are generally far more efficient, rapidly reacting (or some might say, overreacting) to market 'noise'. Valuation extends not just to capital values or prices, but also to rentals. There's been some public discussion of high rentals for clinics and beloved food and beverage stores. These rentals have been blamed for retail closures and driving costs higher for ordinary people. One executive from a very large landlord has responded recently with a very thoughtful LinkedIn piece on why such perceptions may not do justice to the reality on the ground. For public rental tenders, the routine use of price-quality (PQ) criteria in tender evaluation helps to mitigate the effects of pure price competition. To bring in a valuation perspective to this matter, in the case of clinics, a single high rental bid does not represent the market as a whole. These 'outliers' do occur from time to time and could represent a wide range of possibilities: temporary exuberance, some commercial advantage accruing to the winning bid not recognised by the rest of the market, enormous competitive pressures, and so on. A valuer asked to appraise such properties would arrive at values which are more aligned with the general market, rather than figures which deviate hugely from investor expectations. Of course, for parties transacting a deal, the valuation of the property – be it for sale or purchase, taxation, or an initial public offering – is best seen as a guide rather than the correct 'answer' to how much the property is worth. Breathtaking technological advances in large language models raise the question if valuers will be collateral damage from the all-conquering AI wave. Even complexity cannot be a bulwark against the AI tsunami. Deep implications But for now, the licensed property valuer's training, nous, and judgement set him apart. Just as important, his affiliation with SISV – with its standards of professional practice and ethical conduct – enables him to extend his role beyond the layman's approach of interpolating or extrapolating publicly available data on property prices. He applies his knowledge and experience to a wide variety of situations – increasingly novel and challenging – that have implications on marital choices, childbearing, household wealth, business decisions and public policy options. The writer is first vice-president, valuation & general practice division, Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers
CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
Wealth Wise - Public resale flat prices rise at slower pace in second quarter of 2025
According to flash estimates from HDB, prices for public resale flats rose at a slower pace of 0.9 per cent in the second quarter of 2025. It marks the third consecutive quarter of moderating price growth, and is the lowest quarter-on-quarter growth since Q2, 2020. The resale price index for Q2 2025 eased from 1.6 per cent in the previous quarter and 2.6 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2024. Lance Alexander and Daniel Martin learn more from Eugene Lim, Key Executive Officer, ERA Singapore
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Avoid buying a 400 sq ft new condo home - it's too small
[SINGAPORE] Springleaf Residence, which is jointly developed by GuocoLand and Hong Leong, speaks to my heart. The condo project with 941 units is tucked away in greenery – bordering Springleaf Forest and the Central Catchment Nature Reserve – yet less than a two-minute sheltered walk from the Springleaf MRT station on the Thomson-East Coast Line. Imagine enjoying all the nature nearby and saving money by doing away with owning a car. Add to that Springleaf Residence's many facilities such as four different pools, a tennis court, a recreational half-basketball court, multiple pavilions designed to look like cocoons, 10 sky terraces, function rooms, dining pavilions, a grand lawn, a gym, a study room, as well as an arts and crafts room. Amid today's lofty new private home prices, one can snare a unit at 99-year leasehold Springleaf Residence starting from a relatively modest indicative price of S$878,000 – far below prices of numerous Housing and Development Board (HDB) resale flats. Small-sized homes However, there is a catch. For S$878,000, one will possibly get a rather tiny new home – a 388 square foot one-bedroom unit. This price translates to S$2,263 per square foot (psf). In perspective, the above one-bedder is smaller than some high-end hotel rooms here. Typically, hotel rooms cater to short stays of a possibly a few days and do not provide for kitchen areas or washing machines. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Meanwhile, smaller configurations of HDB two-room flexi flats in the latest Build-To-Order exercise are sized at about 431 square feet (sq ft) each, and Community Care Apartments, which cater to seniors who are 65 years or older, have open layouts of around 377 sq ft each. Springleaf Residence is not alone among new condo projects in offering small-sized units. Wing Tai 's 99-year leasehold River Green, located in the River Valley enclave, has 420 sq ft one-bedroom units. A one-bedder at River Green comes with a balcony, while Springleaf Residence's one-bedder does not have a balcony. The one-bedder unit at 99-year leasehold Canberra Crescent Residences in District 27 is 409 sq ft and has no balcony. Certainly, many developers have been shrinking unit sizes across various configurations. New condos may have three-bedders, which are popular with families, of about 800 sq ft each – less than that of around 960 sq ft or more of new HDB four-room flats. Given escalating psf prices of new condos, developers understandably build compact homes to keep absolute prices affordable. Take the indicative starting prices of S$1.618 million for a 786 sq ft three-bedder and S$2.448 million for a 1,227 sq ft four-bedder at Springleaf Residence. The monthly household employment income including employer CPF contribution of the 80th percentile of resident employed households in 2024 was S$21,488. The above three-bedder and four-bedder prices work out to about 6.3 times and 9.5 times of the annualised income of the 80th percentile of resident employed households. While Singapore has high-quality HDB homes, many locals aspire to condo living for lifestyle reasons. However, is buying a new condo unit of about 400 sq ft or less a compelling proposition? For sure, the number of one-person households in the Republic has grown. Between 2014 and 2024, the number of one-person resident households rose by 75 per cent from 134,800 to 236,200. Among resident households, the proportion of one-person households climbed from 11.2 per cent in 2014 to 16.1 per cent in 2024. Drawbacks of small units Can a one-bedder 400 sq ft condo unit that is well-designed and has magic done to it by a skilled interior designer adequately meet a discerning high-earning single's needs? Possibly not. Maybe the individual needs more space to store collectibles or pursue hobbies. Perhaps he or she wants to entertain family or friends in the privacy of their own home, notwithstanding the outstanding common facilities in the condo development. Certainly, some condos boast facilities galore that a small unit's occupant can utilise. For example, any condo resident can use the development's function room to host a large gathering. Still, some common facilities may be crowded or hard to book. And nothing beats one's home for privacy. Also, a small home might feel claustrophobic when a person is confined to largely staying at home over an extended period for whatever reason. What about space to house an elderly parent temporarily? Over time, a single person might find a partner. While it's cosy for two persons to share a 400 sq ft condo unit, each party may lack adequate personal space. Crucially, while buying a small one-bedder condo home is good from an affordability view point, purchasing a small home for owner-occupation could mean that one may need to trade up to a larger place fairly soon. Transacting homes incurs costs such as buyer's stamp duty, which ranges from 1 to 6 per cent of the purchase price or market value of a home. A local homeowner also has to time the sale of the existing home and the purchase of a new one right in order to avoid being caught with paying additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD). Sure, a small new one-bedder condo unit may offer a good entry point for a local who can buy an investment home without incurring ABSD. However, while small one-bedder condos located in the Central Business District (CBD) might draw tenants who work long hours in CBD offices and travel extensively, perhaps small one-bedder condo units outside the CBD have weaker appeal. Think too of how selling a small one-bedder condo home in the resale market could be challenging, especially if the end-product of what one bought off-plan ahead of a unit's completion turns out to look and feel smaller than what one envisaged. The Urban Redevelopment Authority has guidelines for non-landed residential developments governing the maximum number of dwelling units for a development and the required mix of home sizes. For example, condo developments outside the Central Area should have a maximum of 20 per cent of homes with nett internal area of 50 square metres (538 sq ft) or less. Should there be a minimum size for a condo unit to ensure better liveability? Perhaps not. Instead, potential homebuyers need to mind the downsides of buying small condo units. Spurn units that are around 400 sq ft or less each and developers will stop building increasingly smaller condo homes.
