Ted Cruz Trolls 'Fact-Free' Tucker Carlson With 'Objective Fact'
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
After the heated and combative interview between Republican Senator Ted Cruz and right-wing media host Tucker Carlson went viral online, Cruz accused the conservative commentator of being "utterly fact-free" in his views on Iran and U.S. foreign policy.
Why It Matters
Cruz's clash with Carlson took place during a two-hour interview that Carlson later posted on X, where the former Fox News host challenged Cruz over his support for regime change in Iran.
The two debated a range of issues, focusing on U.S. involvement in Iran and Carlson's claim that Cruz prioritizes Israel too heavily in his foreign policy.
Their exchange came amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran, which were sparked when Israel launched airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and military targets, killing several senior scientists and officers. Iran quickly retaliated, most recently hitting a major Israeli hospital in a strike the Israeli government said crossed a "red line."
Senator Ted Cruz, chairman Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, leads the committee's questioning of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Chair and CEO Lisa Su, CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator and Microsoft...
Senator Ted Cruz, chairman Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, leads the committee's questioning of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Chair and CEO Lisa Su, CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator and Microsoft Corporation President and Vice Chair Brad Smith in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on May 08, 2025 in Washington, DC. More
Photo byWhat To Know
In a post on X on Thursday, responding to commentator Matt Walsh's commentary about the interview, Cruz wrote, "I agree that it was interesting. But it would have more so had Tucker not been utterly fact-free."
"'I've never heard of Iran trying to kill [President Donald Trump]!' [high-pitched laughter]," Cruz wrote, mocking the former Fox News host.
The Texas senator then brought up a Department of Justice indictment, writing that "it's an objective fact." The indictment charges Farhad Shakeri, an Iranian operative, with plotting to assassinate Trump.
1/x @MattWalshBlog I agree that it was interesting. But it would have more so had Tucker not been utterly fact-free.
'I've never heard of Iran trying to kill Trump!' [high-pitched laughter]
It's an objective fact. Here's the DOJ indictment: https://t.co/vkFJDNb8S2 https://t.co/cX6nTbRI3m — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) June 19, 2025
During the interview, Carlson pressed Cruz on fundamental knowledge of Iran, beginning with a question about the country's population. When Cruz said he didn't know, Carlson replied, "You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?"
The former Fox News host posted the clip online and it quickly went viral, drawing tens of millions of views and sparking widespread debate among those on both sides of the political aisle.
Cruz defended his record and turned the conversation toward the threat posed by Iran, citing the DOJ's indictment of Farhad Shakeri. "You're the one who claims they're not trying to murder Donald Trump," Cruz told Carlson, referencing the alleged plot.
"You're the one who can't figure out if it was a good idea to kill General Soleimani and you said it was bad," Cruz added.
Carlson countered that Cruz was downplaying the implications of advocating for military action without understanding the country in question.
"You're a senator who's calling for an overthrow of the government and you don't know anything about the country," Carlson said.
In a follow-up exchange, Cruz said the U.S. is currently helping Israel conduct strikes on Iranian targets. "We are carrying out military strikes today," he said.
Carlson interrupted to point out that Israel was leading the campaign, to which Cruz replied, "With our help. I said 'we'—Israel is leading but we're supporting them."
When Carlson asked if Cruz knew Iran's population, the senator replied that he didn't "sit around memorizing population tables," prompting Carlson to say: "You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?"
Carlson's rhetoric toward Trump has been increasingly critical, with the longtime supporter—who headlined large rallies with the Republican during the 2024 campaign—this week suggesting that the president was breaking his pledge to keep the United States out of foreign entanglements.
Trump clapped back at Carlson on social media, calling him "kooky."
During an event at the White House later Wednesday, Trump said that Carlson had "called and apologized" for criticizing him, saying Carlson "is a nice guy."
What People Are Saying
Trump posted on Truth Social on Monday night: "Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'"
Steve Bannon, former chief strategist to Donald Trump, said on his show, "The War Room": "Come on, man. We have to have an adult conversation. We're not going to let the shills at Fox—the same exact crowd that said the same thing about the Iraq War—force the President of the United States into a corner. He needs a range of options."
Jon Stewart, host of The Daily Show, commented on his weekly podcast: "You've got Tucker Carlson going, 'Why are we going to war with Iran again?' And I'm like, 'Yeah, you tell him, brother!' That's how f---ing upside down we are right now."
What Happens Next
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump will make a decision on whether or not to have the United States join Israel's war with Iran "within the next two weeks."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislation for Mecklenburg County transit plan takes vital step in NC House
RALEIGH, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — The bill that could eventually lead to the funding of Mecklenburg County's transit plan easily passed its second reading on Wednesday. The P.A.V.E. Act allows Mecklenburg County to hold a ballot referendum for voters to decide on a one-cent sales tax increase to improve roads, buses, and rail transit. After the second reading passed 102-6, it will go to a third reading and then to the State Senate. PREVIOUS: CATS board approves transit plan with expanded rail service, 'better bus' program The bipartisan bill's primary author is Republican Mint Hill Rep. Tricia Cotham, who is joined by Mecklenburg County Democrats Mark Belk, Becky Carney, Carla Cunningham, Aisha Dew, Beth Helfrich, Jordan Lopez, Nasif Majeed, and Julia Greenfield. 'Just like any good piece of legislation where others have had an input, it's not perfect, but it is a tremendous start,' said Rep. Tricia Cotham. Cotham took the House floor Wednesday afternoon to explain why she believes her fellow lawmakers should proceed with the P.A.V.E. Act. 'As you all know, traffic adds to frustration, congestion, and just grumpy people, we see it every day, and I believe and I know this will help,' she said. North Mecklenburg communities are celebrating the latest step on Wednesday as they prepare for a commuter rail from Uptown. Cornelius Mayor Woody Washam calls the bill a 'game-changer' that will bring 'real improvements that folks will feel right away.' The funding would create a new governing authority and allow for the construction of the Red Line, Silver Line, extension of the Blue Line, a 'better bus' program, and road improvements. The bill requires that the net proceeds of the bill be distributed as follows: 40% to the county's eligible municipalities, which can only be spent on roadway systems 60% to the metropolitan public transit authority to be used only for a public transportation system, specifically including microtransit services All of the county's municipalities but Matthews have shown support for the plan. 'I wish that we could go back to the drawing board and renegotiate a better deal on behalf of our residents,' said Matthews Commissioner Ken McCool. Matthews leaders have been outspoken against the idea from the beginning because there likely won't be enough funding to bring the light rail east. Commissioner McCool took his concerns to Raleigh this week. 'I'm disappointed, but at the end of the day, if this passes the Senate and goes to the governor's desk, the voters will ultimately decide and the voters of Mecklenburg County will have their choice to see what they want to do with this,' he said. The commissioner plans to challenge Cotham for her District 105 seat in 2026, saying the transit bill played a role in motivating him. Queen City News reached out to Cotham for comment on the transit bill's progress and McCool's announcement. We are waiting to hear back. The House will take one more vote before the bill makes its way to the Senate for approval. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lara Trump is 'thinking' about a US Senate bid. What's her connection to North Carolina?
Following North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis' announcement that he will not run for reelection, Lara Trump is reportedly considering a campaign for his seat. In a statement on the subject, Tillis, who has served as a key holdout on President Donald Trump's sweeping legislation on taxes, Medicaid, border resources and more, stated leaders who want bipartisan solutions have become an "endangered species" in Washington. "It's not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election," Tillis said in a statement. Trump advisers told news outlet Axios that Lara Trump is "thinking" about a campaign for Tillis's seat. Here's what we know about Lara Trump and the possibility of a campaign. Lara Trump, whose birth name was Lara Lea Yunaska, was born Oct. 12, 1982, in Wilmington, North Carolina, and raised in Wrightsville Beach. Previous reporting: Lara Trump speaks in Wilmington Lara Trump also attended college in North Carolina, graduating from N.C. State University with a degree in communications. Lara Trump is married to Eric Trump, Donald Trump's second-oldest son. The couple met in 2008 and were married in November 2014 in a ceremony at Mar-a-Lago. Lara and Eric Trump had their first child, Eric "Luke" Jr., in 2017 and their second, Carolina Dorothy, in 2019. 'Vote for grandpa': Trump introduces grandchildren at rally in Wilmington Currently, Lara Trump hosts the Fox News television show "My View with Lara Trump." New York Magazine explained that previously, Lara Trump was a producer for the show "Inside Edition" until she left to help with Donald Trump's presidential campaign in 2016. Lara originally joined Fox News as a paid contributor in 2021, but was let go in 2022 after the network stated it would not employ people connected to an active presidential campaign. In March 2024, Lara was unanimously elected co-chair of the Republican National Committee, along with N.C. GOP chair Michael Whatley. She resigned from the role in early December. 'Remove every Democrat': Lara Trump campaigns for the president in Wilmington Tillis announced on Sunday, June 29, that he would not be running for reelection. 'Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!' Trump said on his social media platform, Truth Social. As well as stating Lara Trump is "thinking" about a campaign, Trump advisers also told Axios that Lara Trump "would have a hard time saying no if asked by her father in law," though they'd be surprised if "she wants to leave the amazing gig she has at Fox." Iris Seaton is the trending news reporter for the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at iseaton@ This article originally appeared on Wilmington StarNews: Is Lara Trump from North Carolina? How is she related to Donald Trump?
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
China + Trump's Abraham Accords Remake Middle Eastern Energy
The signing of the Abraham Accords during the first term of President Donald Trump marked a turning ... More point in America's Middle Eastern Policy as well as regional prospects. U.S. President Donald Trump's teasing about the possibility of more countries joining the Abraham Accords is one of the most important and least appreciated developments from the US-Israeli-Iranian war. While Cassandras prophesied destabilization of the Middle East, the expansion of the accords would lead to a less radical and more stable political environment and increased energy availability worldwide. There may be a welcome change in the global balance of power, as China and Russia recognize that the United States is not is a fitting result, since Iran supported the October 7th, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel to derail the Abraham Accords, more specifically, to prevent Saudi Arabia from coming on board. The Abraham Accords, the first Trump administration's most significant foreign policy accomplishments, sought to normalize relations between Israel and various Muslim-majority states. In doing so, it was hoped that outside influence and economic ties could slowly unravel the Gordian Knot that is Israeli-Palestinian relations and cool tensions. Iran's disruption of this process was both ideological and strategic, in escalation of its hegemonic ambitions and its 'ring of fire' strategy, designed to surround and attack Israel through numerous proxies, an approach which would be threatened by Trump's one believes a broken clock tells time twice a day, or the result was due to great strategic insight, Trump seems to have succeeded in his 'splendid little war'. Iran's nuclear and military capacity has been reduced, its network of proxies largely smashed, the friendly Assad regime in Syria gone, a quagmire resulting from regime change in Tehran avoided. The global economy dodged recession because the Strait of Hormuz was not closed, possibly with the assistance of China. America's position, both geopolitically and in the energy sector, has been strengthened following the strikes on Iran, to wit Brent oil prices hovering at a healthy $67 a barrel at the time of this writing. While doubts about the success of attacks against Iran's nuclear capabilities persist, and confusion about the feasibility of Iran's nuclear ambitions endures, there is less doubt about the results for Iran's patrons and Accords ExpandThe expansion of the Abraham Accords is the most likely immediate result of Iran's humiliation, and it heralds the erosion of Iranian power. One obvious candidate for expansion, in both my estimation and per the Israeli media, is Azerbaijan, a majority Shi'a Muslim secular state that already has an exemplary relationship with Israel, making it the perfect antithesis to Iran. Should Azerbaijan join the Accords, the European energy market would be the most significant immediate beneficiary, since Azeri energy could flow westwards without its existing cooperation with Israel acting as a Iran, being unable to confront Israel and the U.S., is picking a fight with Azerbaijan, spreading deepfakes and threats to 'retaliate' for Baku's alleged assistance to Jerusalem during the war. Azerbaijan's ascension to the Abraham Accords will prevent Iran from aggressive moves towards its independent neighbor, thus actively denying Tehran's strife to control the energy-rich Caucasus are other promising candidates for the Abraham Accords. Syria, assuming it opts to join, would serve as a dramatic example of a nation's ability to exit the Axis of Evil camp and embark on a path toward development. It would be a powerful way for Syria's President Ahmed al-Shaara to demonstrate that his claims of being a changed man in charge of a changing country are not simply rhetoric. Doing so would also allow the economic development of Syria's underutilized energy resources. It must be noted that Azerbaijan played an active role in facilitating talks between Turkey and Israel over the regime change in Asian states, including Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, which, like Azerbaijan, are largely secular majority Muslim countries with good relations with Israel, could also make excellent additions. They are, by and large, energy-exporting states dependent on commodity revenues. Hooking them into an emerging geoeconomic framework under the auspices of the Abraham Accords could economically help reinforce these states against encroaching Russian and Chinese influence, while simultaneously boosting development and ties to the amicable relations between Iran and China are paradoxically increasingly strained as the ... More relationship deepens. China's Pivot & The Abraham AccordsIn Tehran's hour of need, the 'Axis of Upheaval' folded under American pressure. Russia, bogged down in Ukraine, refused to act. Beijing could have credibly supported Iran in defense of its strategic partnership. Instead, China opted for low energy prices amid fears that further escalation would damage its economy. Now, in the aftermath of Trump's victory and China's difficult decision, the Middle East is in flux, and Beijing has both hard choices and opportunities ahead of abandonment of Iran at the first inconvenience isn't a total loss. While this action may convince some that China is a paper tiger, for others, especially Iran's Arab rivals, it is seen as a sign of prudence. China is far more reliant on Arab states for energy than it is on Iran. Furthermore, Beijing's only hope of expanding engagement with the Middle East now lies with the Arab states; and the Arab states, which are increasingly likely to join the Abraham Accords, are the key for China to normalize contacts with the region and sidestep Iranian aspirants to the accords, China already has close relations with Central Asian states and expressed an interest in investing in Syria. In Azerbaijan, China maintains a pragmatic, growing strategic partnership rooted in energy, infrastructure, and regional connectivity. Thus, China may even find strategic utility in supporting the Accords, not just for its Middle Eastern objectives, but also to mitigate against the controversies concerning Beijing's repression of the Muslim Uyghurs in China's Xinjiang Abraham Accords now transcend mere peacekeeping in the Middle East. They may become a coalition of nations with which the United States can reliably deal. Within this framework, Israel is a capstone asset. Still, also a litmus test: a Muslim country's ability to maintain harmonious relations with Israel is seen as indicative of its potential for constructive engagement with America. This strategic vision positions the Abraham Accords as a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy, leveraging Israel's role to foster a network of allied states, thereby enhancing American influence and energy security on the global stage. Ironically, this strategic vision is more recognized in Beijing and Tehran than in Washington, D.C.
