PSA: Stop Using These Fire-Prone Anker Power Banks Right Now
The company detected these issues after implementing new 'enhanced quality assurance protocols' for its past and current products. Anker described the issue as stemming from 'a single vendor' for the power cells of some of its products, but didn't reveal the vendor's name or what kind of new testing helped it discover the fault.
Anker has so many power banks under its ever-widening product umbrella you wouldn't be remiss if you looked at the included images and thought one of those was yours. The actual model numbers, including the one from the earlier June 13 recall, include:
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) previously noted the Model A1263 had resulted in 19 reported incidents resulting in two minor burn injuries. If you think you may be one of those with an affected unit, you need to go to Anker's recall page and submit a claim. You need to verify the serial number of your device and provide a picture of the power bank if it's available. Users will either receive a replacement external battery or a gift card equal to the cost of the unit. We don't have a good idea when most of those models were sold, but the company previously said it promoted its PowerCore 10000 between 2016 and 2022.
At this rate, it won't be long until Anker recalls become an annual event. Last October, the company clawed back several Anker 334 MagGo Battery (PowerCore 10K) models due to similar issues with overheating and fire risk. The CPSC noted the total number of units recalled in that case was closer to 2,100, though there were a reported 28 incidents of the banks overheating, catching on fire, or 'exploding,' resulting in two injuries where users received burns on their hands. This new, global recall could impact a much wider range of owners. The CPSC has not yet revealed how many units in total are being recalled.
Last December, Anker recalled close to 69,000 of two of its SoundCore and PowerConf Bluetooth speakers over similar overheating issues. Anker makes some of our favorite external chargers, but this rash of recalls makes it much more difficult to recommend. You're better off staying away from the company's older power bank models that could sport the deficient parts causing overheating, or else you may need to invest in a firefighter's uniform next time you want to charge your phone on the go.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
34 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Could Google's Veo 3 be the start of playable world models?
Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google's AI research organization DeepMind, appeared to suggest Tuesday evening that Veo 3, Google's latest video-generating model, could potentially be used for video games. In response to a post on X beseeching Google to 'let me play a video game of my veo 3 videos already,' and asking, 'playable world models wen?' Hassabis responded, 'now wouldn't that be something.' On Wednesday morning, Logan Kilpatrick, lead product for Google's AI Studio and Gemini API, chimed in with a reply: '🤐🤐🤐🤐' Both posts from the Google executives are little more than playful suggestions, and a Google spokesperson told TechCrunch the company had nothing to share at the moment. But building playable world models isn't outside the realm of possibilities for the tech giant. now wouldn't that be something… — Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) July 2, 2025 World models are different from video generation models. The former simulates the dynamics of a real-world environment, which lets agents predict how the world will evolve in response to their actions. Video gen models synthesize realistic video sequences. Google has plans to turn its multimodal foundation model, Gemini 2.5 Pro, into a world model that simulates aspects of the human brain. In December, DeepMind unveiled Genie 2, a model that can generate an 'endless' variety of playable worlds. The following month, we reported that Google was forming a new team to work on AI models that can simulate the real world. Others are working on building world models — most notably, AI pioneer Fei-Fei Li. Li came out of stealth last year with World Labs, a startup that has built its own AI system that generates video game-like, 3D scenes from a single image. Techcrunch event Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW Veo 3, which is still in public preview, can create video as well as audio to go along with clips — anything from speech to soundtracks. While Veo 3 creates realistic movements by simulating real-world physics, it isn't quite a world model yet. Instead, it could be used for cinematic storytelling in games, like cutscenes, trailers, and narrative prototyping The model is also still a 'passive output' generative model, and it (or a future Veo generation) would need to shift to a simulator that's more active, interactive, and predictive. But the real challenge with video game production isn't just impressive visuals; it's real-time, consistent, and controllable simulation. That's why it might make sense to see Google take a hybrid approach that leverages Veo and Genie in the future, should it pursue video game or playable world development. Google could find itself competing with Microsoft, Scenario, Runway, Pika and, eventually, OpenAI's video-generating model Sora. Given Google's planned moves in the world models space and its reputation for using its deep pockets and distribution muscle to steamroll rivals, competitors in this space would be wise to keep a close watch.
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Last Chance: Get a new phone for $1,000 off on any Verizon myPlan account, no trade-in
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR Verizon is offering $1,000 off any device on a myPlan account — including entry-level plans — without a trade-in, but you must add a new BYOD line and claim the offer in-store. The new line is free for 36 months, but you'll still pay around $7–$10 a month in taxes and fees. The deal is a great fit for those who need both a device upgrade and a new line that can be used with their old device, but may not make sense if you have no use for an extra line. T-Mobile has been stealing Big Red's thunder for a while now, but a recent, independently backed report claims that the Uncarrier has officially dethroned Verizon as the best network in the US. For its part, Verizon has been working hard to retain existing customers and attract new ones through a variety of customer service improvements, free swag like concert tickets and gift cards, and some impressive promotions — including a free line for 36 months for select customers. Another standout promo is the ability to get $1,000 off a new phone on any Verizon myPlan account, including the entry-level Welcome tier, all with no trade-in required. Considering how rare this kind of offer is for lower-tier plans, it's a heck of a deal. That said, this deal is about to expire. Of course, there are a few small catches. While the new device can be applied to any myPlan account, you'll need to add a new BYOD line. The new line is actually free for the next 36 months, though you will still need to pay taxes and fees, which typically come out to around $7–$10 a month. The other catch is that this offer is only available in-store, so you'll have to visit your nearest Verizon retail location. Is this deal really worth it? Let's be honest, Verizon isn't doing this out of kindness. With T-Mobile on its heels, it is losing subscribers, and a healthy influx of line activations is something it can use to bolster its numbers for its investors. Still, if you need to upgrade a device and want a secondary line for a family member—like a child or grandparent—this could be a great deal. You could use the $1,000 credit for your own upgrade and then give your old phone to the new BYOD line. But what if you just want the $1,000 credit and have no need for a secondary line? Even if the line fees and taxes are only $7 a month, you'd still be paying $252 over 36 months for a line you might not use. Still, you'd be saving about $748 in total, which could be worth it for some. I'll admit, my household considered this promo, but for us, it made more sense to finish paying off our current phones and leave Verizon before any further price hikes. Ultimately, whether you should consider this promotion comes down to whether or not you want to further tie yourself to Verizon. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Why The U.S. May Confront Non-Tariff Attacks Against Tech Firms
TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump smiles during a phone conversation with Mexico's President ... More Enrique Pena Nieto on trade in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on August 27, 2018. President Donald Trump said Monday the US had reached a "really good deal" with Mexico and talks with Canada would begin shortly on a new regional free trade pact."It's a big day for trade. It's a really good deal for both countries," Trump said."Canada, we will start negotiations shortly. I'll be calling their prime minister very soon," Trump and Mexican negotiators have been working for weeks to iron out differences in order to revise the nearly 25-year old North American Free Trade Agreement, while Canada was waiting to rejoin the negotiations. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) I recently explained in Forbes that Trump trade negotiators could leverage the planned withdrawal of anticompetitive federal regulations to obtain a cutback in foreign anticompetitive market distortions (ACMDs) that harm American firms and consumers. A July 2 nonpartisan letter to senior Administration officials from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), joined by senior policy scholars, strikes a similar theme in calling on the Administration to target foreign governments' non-tariff attacks (NTAs) on America's leading technology companies. The letter recommends a 3-pronged negotiating strategy to counteract NTAs. Administration adoption of that strategy could bestow substantial benefits on U.S. producers, workers, and consumers. The NTA Problem As the letter explains, a new form of trade restriction is emerging that existing legal frameworks fail to address: non-tariff attacks (NTAs). NTAs are a specific type of ACMD that is growing in significance. Unlike traditional tariffs or known non-tariff barriers (NTBs), NTAs are disguised as legitimate domestic policies. Their true purpose is to target leading U.S. technology firms, undermine innovation, extract financial and intellectual assets, and weaken America's strategic position in the global tech race. Three features distinguish NTAs from traditional NTBs: As the U.S. seeks to rebalance trade relations, rolling back these unfair practices should be a top priority in negotiations. The ITIF has documented over 100 cases where U.S. trading partners have adopted policies aimed at limiting American tech firms' operations or siphoning their revenues. The European Union led this effort with its Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA), which targeted major U.S. firms while largely sparing local competitors. In 2024 alone, regulatory fines on American companies in the EU totaled nearly $6.7 billion. Other countries are following suit: Brazil with similar regulations, India targeting U.S. firms under its data protection law, and Japan restricting dominant U.S. smartphone platforms. Although often framed as consumer protection, privacy, or digital sovereignty, these policies impose selective burdens that disadvantage American firms and empower foreign rivals. They also often harm the enacting countries themselves by disrupting ecosystems that support small and medium-sized businesses dependent on global platforms. These attacks also pose national security risks. U.S. tech firms are vital to innovation and defense sector competitiveness. By diverting investment from R&D, mandating tech transfers, or exposing sensitive capabilities, NTAs erode the strength needed to compete with China's state-led technology push. The consequences are severe: This problem is most pressing in the U.S.-China context. While America applies overt targeted measures like export controls, other nations exploit NTAs to undermine U.S. firms more subtly and effectively. These tactics distort markets far more powerfully than tariffs and shift global leadership toward China just as the U.S. needs unity and strength. Policy Recommendations Addressing NTAs is essential for preserving U.S. technological strength, protecting national interests, and maintaining U.S. leadership in the global digital economy. Current trade negotiations present a golden opportunity to confront the growing NTA threat and reinforce the foundations of American innovation and security. Keep in mind that NTAs do more than just harm American industry and national security – by harming our high tech companies, they present broad threats to overall American welfare. High tech firms are hugely beneficial to the American consumer. They provide high-quality, low-cost services to Americans (think Google or YouTube), are a huge sector in our economy, create jobs and wealth for Americans at large, and drive innovation that improves lives and the American consumer experience. In sum, countering NTAs is key to maintaining a dynamic, innovative U.S. economy. Appropriately, the ITIF letter highlights 3 vital criteria for confronting the NTA problem: 1. Make NTAs a top agenda item in all trade negotiations. 2. Secure binding agreements to block discriminatory digital regulations. 3. Set up systems to detect and respond to emerging NTAs. The Trump administration may wish to consider making these suggestions key features of its trade negotiating strategy. Success in rooting out NTAs would be a 'win-win-win' for American firms, workers, and consumers.
