Poor Communication Costs the Tech Industry $50 Billion: ParallelStaff Launches Initiative to Bridge Global Gaps
DALLAS, TX, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ParallelStaff, a Dallas-based nearshore outsourcing and technology services provider, has announced a new initiative to address one of the tech industry's most costly and overlooked challenges: communication failures in IT projects. With estimates suggesting that ineffective collaboration leads to more than $50 billion in annual losses, the company focuses on improving team alignment and project execution through strategic nearshore partnerships.
project-failure
Studies have shown that 50% of IT projects fail due to breakdowns in communication, often rooted in unclear goals, inconsistent feedback, and misaligned stakeholder expectations. These issues are particularly pronounced in distributed and cross-border development environments. As software development outsourcing continues to grow, particularly among companies seeking speed and scalability, the ability to maintain effective communication has emerged as a mission-critical component of tech project management.
'Communication challenges are not just a soft-skill issue, they're a bottom-line problem,' said Miguel Hernandez, Vice President of Operations at ParallelStaff. 'Budget overruns, delayed releases, and even project abandonment are symptoms of deeper alignment issues. Our initiative is about restoring clarity and continuity in global development teams.'
A Cost Hidden in Plain Sight
Despite increased investment in agile development practices, companies are still facing major hurdles when it comes to coordinating between internal and external teams. The complexity of modern software systems, combined with geographic and linguistic barriers, often results in remote collaboration breakdowns that go unaddressed until project goals are missed or resources are exhausted.
When communication fails, companies often experience cascading effects: shifting requirements, duplicated efforts, missed dependencies, and frequent rework. These outcomes are not just inconvenient; they are the leading indicators of large-scale IT project failure. Tech executives have begun to recognize that even the best tools and methodologies cannot compensate for poor communication structures.
'Effective tech project management requires more than task tracking,' Hernandez explained. 'It demands real-time clarity across diverse teams, especially when leveraging software development outsourcing. The earlier we close those gaps, the greater the chance of delivering successful outcomes.'
The Case for Nearshore Outsourcing
To solve these communication bottlenecks, ParallelStaff is promoting a nearshore outsourcing model designed specifically to enable stronger collaboration and execution. Unlike offshore development models that operate in distant time zones with greater cultural differences, nearshore teams share similar working hours and business practices, making real-time engagement far more attainable.
With development professionals located in Latin America and fluent in English, ParallelStaff's nearshore outsourcing approach facilitates direct collaboration during core business hours. This structure supports daily standups, rapid iterations, and smoother cross-functional integration, which are cornerstones of software development best practices.
'Nearshore teams allow for faster resolution of blockers, more interactive sprint planning, and tighter feedback loops,' said Hernandez. 'This alignment is particularly critical for companies adopting or scaling agile development frameworks.'
A Scalable, Communication-First Solution
At the heart of ParallelStaff's approach is a focus on pairing technical excellence with communication competence. The company recruits, vets, and places developers based on both their coding expertise and their ability to operate effectively within client workflows and cultures.
Rather than offering generalized outsourcing solutions, ParallelStaff tailors its engagements to match the client's organizational structure and project lifecycle. Developers are embedded into existing teams to ensure shared ownership and proactive participation, an approach that enhances accountability and reduces misinterpretations that lead to costly rework.
Key benefits of ParallelStaff's model include:• Seamless integration with agile development challenges and workflows• Reduced friction in remote collaboration due to time zone and language alignment• Access to a curated network of experienced software professionals
• A flexible model that scales as business needs evolve
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Interest in ‘elbows up' merchandise waning ahead of Canada Day, businesses say
When Rachael Coe decided to launch an 'elbows up' merchandise line at her store in Yarmouth, N.S., in March, she said it was an immediate bestseller. Within a week, Coe said her Timeless Memories shop had already made 400 sales. By the end of the first month, she had sold 2,500 products ranging from T-shirts to hoodies to car decals. Demand for items bearing Canada's rallying cry against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and annexation threats was so high that Coe launched a website to keep up with the surge. 'It was a response from all over Canada,' she said. 'We reached every single province then we started covering worldwide. Our 'elbows up' merch went everywhere.' Many Canadian businesses hopped on the patriotic trend that also saw Ontario Premier Doug Ford wearing a 'Canada is not for sale' ball cap ahead of a January meeting with Canada's premiers and prime minister. But Coe's sales started slowing down by May. And despite a slight boost ahead of Canada Day, she said the 'elbows up' line is now selling at similar rates to the classic red-and-white merchandise she sells every year around this time. Although business owners say they are selling more Canada-themed products this year leading up to July 1, many have also noted a decline in 'elbows up' merchandise sales. The rallying cry, initially embraced as a grassroots movement at the height of cross-border trade tensions and Trump's musings about making Canada the 51st state, has shifted to a more generic expression of Canadian pride amid continued tensions, retailers and experts say. Others note that the phrase 'elbows up' has increasingly been used in a partisan context, contributing to the marketing shift. Stephanie Tomlin, Toronto-based owner of the online business Shop Love Collective, said she saw an explosion in 'elbows up' merchandise sales in March, selling as many as 10 or 15 products per day. Similarly, her sales began to stagnate in May. Leading up to Canada Day, she said she's selling 'quite a bit more' merchandise compared with previous years, but that's due to interest in Canada-themed products across the board. 'I think the climate in Canada is a little bit more settled after the election and that … we feel like we will never be the 51st state,' Tomlin said, adding that Canadian patriotism is becoming less combative as annexation talks have died down. Howard Ramos, a professor of sociology at Western University, said 'elbows up' became 'more partisan than it used to be' when Prime Minister Mark Carney embraced the phrase in his election campaign ads in late March. 'It's just added to how the expression is dying down as a pan-Canadian claim,' he said. 'Now you see on social media, especially from Conservative handles, the use of 'elbows up' in a sarcastic way to criticize Mark Carney or Liberal policies.' Negative online comments about the 'elbows up' movement have discouraged Coe from promoting her products on Facebook. But when she's interacting with customers in her Yarmouth shop, she said the phrase isn't as divisive. 'It's not a political term, and it simply means that you're defending your country, and everyone should be defending our country, just like you would defend (against) a goal in hockey,' Coe said. Danielle McDonagh, owner of Vernon, B.C.-based Rowantree Clothing, said she stopped promoting her 'elbows up' merchandise on a large scale when she noticed the phrase being interpreted as an 'anti-Conservative' and 'boomer' movement. For McDonagh, increased concern about the political climate in the United States has also chipped away at the lightheartedness of the 'elbows up' movement. 'I think some of the levity is gone for me,' she said. While sales of her 'elbows up' products have dropped by about 90 per cent since hitting 1,000 in the first month, she said she continues to promote the merchandise in small batches at local markets in Vernon. Business owners say their customers continue to prioritize supporting the Canadian economy, as they are routinely answering questions about where their products are manufactured. And the push to buy Canadian isn't just coming from this side of the border. Coe said many American tourists arriving by ferry from Maine visit her shop in search of Canadian merchandise. '(Tourists) want to support us just as much as Canadians want to support us,' Coe said. McDonagh said her business sees similar interest from Americans. 'I'm shipping a lot of Canada-centric merchandise to the States, which I just love,' McDonagh said. 'People chat with me on my site and say … we're supporting you.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
The businesses that are, and aren't, shifting production under Trump's tariffs
New York-based manufacturer Gear Motions purchases the majority of its parts from U.S. suppliers, with roughly 4% of inputs imported from other countries. It's a small fraction, but with a 10% base tariff in effect since early April, President and CEO Dean Burrows said his company, which specializes in custom cut and ground gears, will have to pass down those price increases to customers. That's not for lack of trying to find new suppliers. 'We have not been able to find a U.S. source that can make the product, and we have searched globally,' Burrows said. Tariffs are meant to fix that, with the Trump administration aiming to 'reverse the decades of globalization that has decimated our industrial base,' according to an April White House press release. But reviving the U.S. manufacturing base would take years, and economists have doubts that President Donald Trump's tariffs will be enough to bring it back to its former glory. Meanwhile, many U.S. manufacturers that rely on imports may be more likely to pass on tariff costs to consumers than reshore their supply chains. Nearly one-third of U.S. manufacturers' intermediate inputs are imported from other countries, according to a 2022 report from the Commerce Department. 'In the short run, it's going to hurt manufacturers. It's going to hurt the factory owners. It's going to hurt the workers,' said Nancy Qian, an economics professor at Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management. 'And that's on top of the pain the workers will feel when they go to the store and need to pay more for their imported (items).' Why shifting to US suppliers isn't always an easy solution Trump's tariffs are meant to position the U.S. as a 'global superpower in manufacturing' by drawing in new factories and manufacturing investments. 'The president has said early and often that the best way to avoid tariffs is to just come here and produce," Trump's top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, told CNBC in early April. 'We're going to get to a place where America makes stuff again.' But moving supply chains to the U.S. can be costly. Nearly two-thirds of 380 surveyed companies say building a new domestic supply chain would at least double their current costs, according to an April CNBC survey. Sixty-one percent said it would be more cost-effective to relocate to a lower-tariffed country. 'If the U.S. continues its focus on China, it will be successful in moving production out of China to some extent, but it won't move so much of it back to the U.S.,' Qian said. 'There are many other countries out there that can manufacture at costs lower than the U.S.' Even if tariffs boost U.S. manufacturing, it'll take years for new factories to get up and running. That could leave U.S. companies searching for domestic suppliers struggling in the meantime. Take 000Skin, a beauty company launched by Hannah Chang earlier this year. While 000Skin is based in New York, Chang has been sourcing the containers for her skin care products in China, where she says manufacturing capabilities are unmatched. 'I think people are not aware how much work and infrastructure even creating a plastic jar takes,' Chang said. But rising import costs from tariffs have thrown her for a loop. Chang has looked for alternative suppliers in the U.S., but says she has yet to find options that match the quality and price of what Chinese manufacturers can supply. She's considered shifting to a Mexican producer, but said it's been difficult finding one willing to work with smaller businesses. 'I'll probably just continue to look at China-based partners,' Chang said, adding that she's considering raising prices to cover at least some of the 30% tariff rate. Courtney Rivenbark looked into working with U.S. manufacturers when she created her apparel and jewelry brand, Coco Clem, in 2018. The high production costs turned her away, and she eventually pivoted to a partnership with a Chinese factory she said aligned with her ethical and environmental goals. 'China is just very advanced with their machines and equipment and technology,' Rivenbark said. 'The whole supply chain exists in China – the knits, the yard, the GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) certified organic cotton yarn.' After Trump announced new tariffs earlier this year, Rivenbark said she compared pricing from China with U.S. manufacturers. She said it would cost her three times more to create the same sweater in the U.S., and local manufacturers didn't have the technology to create certain garments in plus sizes. 'I would move (production to the U.S.) if the infrastructure was here,' Rivenbark said. But 'it's just so much more expensive. ... I'm not really interested in moving it outside of China because of a potential short-term policy switch.' How many factories, jobs are coming to the US? That's not to say tariffs aren't pressuring some businesses to increase their investments in the U.S. Whether those moves will lead to a dramatic influx of manufacturing jobs is another question. Cra-Z-Art – a New Jersey-based manufacturer that produces toys, activities and school supplies – in March announced plans to grow production space by 50% to 1.5 million square feet to combat the cost of tariffs. Lawrence Rosen, chairman of Cra-Z-Art, said it's too early to say how many jobs the move will create, but the company is looking to use automation 'wherever possible' to reduce direct labor costs. 'I need to control my 102-year-old company's destiny by controlling its future and not relying on global tariffs when things could change daily,' Lawrence said. 'By manufacturing in the USA, we save on freight, we save with automation. ... With automation, we can produce many of our products at a similar cost compared to increased costs with even 10% tariffs on freight.' A White House website claims Trump's policies have spurred trillions of dollars in new U.S. manufacturing investments that are 'fueling job growth, innovation, and opportunity across every corner of the country.' A number of those investments were in the works before Trump took office. A $5 billion investment from automaker Stellantis, for instance, includes plans to restart an idled plant in Belvidere, Illinois, to make trucks, a deal first announced in 2023. While there were talks of delays in 2024, the company in January confirmed that it would stick to the 2027 opening agreed to in union negotiations years prior. And a spokesperson for German medical technology company Siemens Healthineers, another company listed on the website, told USA TODAY that several of the initiatives included in its $150 million investment in new and expanded U.S. facilities have been underway for 'well over a year," although projects were accelerated to address rising economic and geopolitical uncertainty. Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, doesn't expect to see much reshoring tied to tariffs. 'For a business to set up a factory in the United States, that's a 10-year investment or longer,' Strain said. 'How can a business possibly know whether or not that would be profitable if tariff rates are changing every week?" Some data suggests the domestic manufacturing industry has actually taken a hit from tariffs, with trade policy uncertainty prompting some companies to tighten their purse strings. Economic activity in the manufacturing sector contracted in May for the third consecutive month to reach its lowest level since November, with both orders and output contracting, according to a survey by the Institute for Supply Management. Meanwhile, the manufacturing sector lost about 8,000 jobs between April and May despite an overall increase in employment, according to the Labor Department. Susan Helper, an economics professor at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio who served on the White House staff in both the Obama and Biden Administrations, believes tariffs can be a useful tool, but the uncertainty surrounding trade policy has been 'a real problem.' "I think what companies are doing is just not investing anywhere in anything and just waiting to see how things shake out,' she said.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Tariffs are meant to boost US manufacturing. Is America ready?
Winton Machine, an Atlanta-based manufacturer, is desperate to hire. So far, there are few takers. CEO and co-founder Lisa Winton has been searching for a salesperson since March. A mechanist job has been open even longer, with less than a dozen applications over the past year – none of whom had the skillset required for the job. Winton has done what she can to attract workers, like forming a relationship with local technical colleges, offering applicants flexible hours and rehiring retirees. Still, keeping her staffing up has been a challenge. The push for more domestic manufacturing through tariffs, Winton worries, will only make matters worse. 'If more factories move into an area, who are they competing with? They're competing with other factories," she said. "Whether it be machinists or maintenance or assembly, all of the different types of jobs that are available – they have to come from somewhere.' President Donald Trump has said his tariffs, which range from a 10% baseline tariff on trade partners to 50% on steel imports, will have jobs and factories 'come roaring back.' 'The end game is to have production here. Any country that wants to produce here doesn't pay a tariff. That's the ultimate solution,' Trump's top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, told ABC News in early April. It's not clear that America is prepared for that shift. Building new manufacturing facilities can take up to 10 years, depending on the industry, and experts say the country's infrastructure isn't primed to handle additional factories. Meanwhile, a manufacturing labor shortage could mean new factories have a hard time filling roles. 'If the Trump administration's vision is to bring manufacturing back to America en masse – not just in a few sectors, but en masse – that vision isn't realistic," said Nancy Qian, an economics professor at Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management. Why building factories will take time It's not clear how many businesses will shift production to the U.S. because of tariffs. Those that do reshore face a lengthy process. 'Most companies do not make a decision to onshore or to build a new factory or plant lightly,' said Erin McLaughlin, a senior economist at the Conference Board, a nonprofit business-research group. 'This is something for most companies that they strategize many years in advance.' First, companies must figure out where to build. The location needs to be close to transportation corridors, good water supplies and on a stable electric grid – something easier said than done with current U.S. infrastructure, which earned a C in its 2025 report card from the American Society of Civil Engineers, according to McLaughlin. Then, companies must purchase the land, obtain proper permits and inspections, design their factory, purchase equipment and select a construction team. Only then can they start construction. The process generally takes three to 10 years, depending on the industry, McLaughlin said. Certain projects can be done in less time, although the timeline can be challenged by growing competition for sites with access to a stable electric grid, according to Jeff Bischoff, chief sales officer at Lexington, Kentucky-based designer-builder Gray. 'Power generation is not keeping up right now with demand,' Bischoff said. 'All the utilities are doing their best to try to keep up and get ahead of that. But it's a several-year process.' Trump has acknowledged that infrastructure changes will be necessary, and believes it would take roughly two years to get his vision for manufacturing up and running. 'You've got to build a thing called a factory. You have to build your energy. You have to do a lot of things,' Trump said on April 7, adding that he would give businesses approvals for electric plants in 'record timing.' But McLaughlin believes a two-year turnaround for bolstering the U.S. manufacturing sector could be optimistic. Even if executive orders speed up federal approvals, she said, factories would likely still need to worry about state and local permits. More complications could arise if the Trump administration continues to crack down on immigration, with roughly 20% of manufacturing workers in the U.S. foreign-born, according to labor market analytics firm Lightcast. An even higher share – roughly 30% – are foreign-born in construction. "We don't want to be over reliant on one trading partner for certain things,' McLaughlin said. But 'I don't think the U.S. is prepped and primed for everything to be manufactured here.' Are tariffs worth the pain? Trump says the ultimate fruits of tariffs will be worth the pain. Experts disagree. Why manufacturers are struggling to hire Trump's push for more factories comes after a dramatic decline in manufacturing jobs. After accounting for roughly 22% of total nonfarm employment in 1979, manufacturing work makes up just 8% today. Even if tariffs were able to eliminate the entire U.S. trade deficit in manufacturing, that would still only bump that share up to about 10% of employment – still less than half of its share in the late 1970s, according to Robert Lawrence, a Harvard professor of international trade and investment and author of 'Behind the Curve: Can Manufacturing Still Provide Inclusive Growth?' 'Even in its most successful form, this is barely noticeable,' Lawrence said. Other experts warn that even that level of growth could exacerbate the hiring challenges manufacturers face today. Manufacturers have been struggling to fill jobs for years, including during a post-pandemic construction boom, when supply chain issues pushed more manufacturers to build facilities closer to home. The number of manufacturing establishments in the U.S. increased by more than 11% between the first quarter of 2019 and the second quarter of 2023, according to a 2024 report from Deloitte. Despite the growth, manufacturing jobs have remained essentially flat since 2019, discounting a pandemic-era dip. That's partially due to automation; factories today need fewer workers. But nearly half of manufacturers say attracting and retaining talent has been a major challenge, according to a first-quarter survey from the National Association of Manufacturers. Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows there were 381,000 manufacturing job openings as of April. By 2033, manufacturing could have 1.9 million unfilled jobs – roughly half of open positions – due to a skills and applicant gap, according to Deloitte. 'We absolutely do not have enough people ready to take these jobs,' said Rachel Sederberg, senior economist at Lightcast. 'That is going to be a very significant challenge if more and more manufacturing – or more and more of anything – comes back to the U.S.' One issue is that manufacturing workers are aging out of the workforce. Just over one-third of manufacturing employees in the U.S. are 55 or older and nearing retirement, according to a recent report from Lightcast, which is expected to make the shortage even more acute. And attracting new talent to backfill these positions hasn't been easy. As factories turn to more automation, manufacturers say they're having trouble finding talent with the right skillset to manage the more advanced technology. 'Not every manufacturing job today requires a degree, but every single manufacturing job today requires skills,' said Carolyn Lee, executive director of the Manufacturing Institute, a nonprofit focused on workforce development and education within the industry. Lee said obtaining those skills can take anywhere from a day or two for a forklift certification to up to four years of education and apprenticeship programs for maintenance technicians, one of the most in-demand manufacturing jobs today. There are some signs of renewed interest in trade jobs. Enrollment in public two-year institutions that focus on vocational programs was up 14% year-over-year in 2024, outpacing the 3% growth in public four-year schools, according to a May 12 Wells Fargo report. But Lightcast found there are still not enough students learning relevant skills to keep up with job demand. For instance, there were just 400 machinist program completions in Texas in 2023 compared to roughly 16,000 related job openings in the state. Research suggests manufacturing's reputation as dirty and dangerous has made the industry less appealing to younger Americans, especially amid a period of low unemployment. The Deloitte report says 'a different set of expectations' among millennial and Generation Z workers, many of whom were pushed to go to college instead of working in the trades, has made it difficult for manufacturers to attract and retain workers. 'The consensus among American manufacturers is this generation of Americans just don't want these jobs anymore," said Qian of Northwestern. Fear of lower wages may also be keeping workers away. Manufacturing work today can pay well, and some research finds it tends to pay better than other sectors that don't require college degrees. But as of 2018, the average hourly earnings for manufacturing employees fall short of average overall employee earnings, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. What kind of jobs would more manufacturing create? There's a reason so many American companies rely on factories abroad; operating in the U.S. tends to be more expensive. For one, labor costs are higher. Take the average annual machine operator salary, which is nearly $45,000 in the U.S. compared to $15,000 in China and less than $5,000 in Vietnam, according to the Reshoring Institute, a nonprofit that supports expanded U.S. manufacturing. And tariffs are expected to hike production costs for many domestic manufacturers, since companies will need to pay more for inputs shipped in from other countries. That could leave manufacturers increasingly turning toward automation to trim costs. 'If you need to pay anyone you employ as a factory worker an average of $36 an hour with benefits, then you are inclined to hire very few of them and instead buy automated equipment and robots,' said Farok Contractor, a professor at Rutgers' management and global business department. Winton of Winton Machine said she's already seeing an increased demand for automation from her company, which designs and produces factory automation for manufacturers in HVAC, aerospace, construction and other industries. Winton still expects to see jobs created if manufacturing gets a boost through tariffs. She just believes automation will allow fewer, high-quality positions as opposed to a large influx of manual labor. Already, manufacturing is relying on more college-educated workers; nearly 32% of civilian manufacturing workers had at least a bachelor's degree in 2023, up from 22% in 2006, according to a USA TODAY analysis of the Census Bureau's American Community Survey data. 'I need the people to build all the parts and pieces and the engineers to design and the software to build this factory automation,' Winton said. 'I think we have the people. Do we have the skillset? That's the question.'
