Underdelivery: AI gadgets have been a let-down but needn't be
Typically, tech conferences offer a glimmer of these futuristic toys. Not all of them end up hitting the market, but it's where we can dream a little about new pocket devices or household robots taking on a greater role in our lives.
So it was a little disappointing last week at Asia's biggest artificial intelligence conference, Taiwan's Computex, to find hardly any mention of consumer-facing tech. Most keynotes focused on enterprise applications of AI, such as agents or automated manufacturing. Walking around the exhibitors' hall, the only thing that caught my eye were wireless computer mice shaped like cats.
Also Read: AI as infrastructure: India must develop the right tech
A few things seem to have changed. For starters, there's the reality that hardware engineering presents an entirely different set of physical challenges compared to tinkering with AI software. And a global trade war also makes it a risky time to launch a new gadget when it's unclear if consumers are interested. Companies also may be starting to pick up on the fact that while Wall Street is awash with global hype on an AI boom, it isn't exactly a selling point on Main Street.
If anything, some of the executives speaking at the conference threw cold water on the next generations of these AI-first consumer products.
Asustek Computer co-chief executive officer Samson Hu told Bloomberg News that it will take another year or more for AI-powered PCs to go mainstream because the technology isn't quite there yet and macroeconomic uncertainty is impacting people's spending. There have been few compelling use cases for AI PCs so far, despite the mountain of promotion.
Meanwhile, the graveyard of AI hardware that was supposed to transform our lives is already growing. The Humane Ai Pin wearable device—launched last year to much hype about how it was going to replace the smartphone—got brutal reviews and turned out to be a fire hazard. The startup, run by two former Apple employees, stopped selling its Ai Pin earlier this year and was sold for parts.
The Rabbit R1 assistant [a stand-alone hand-held AI assistant device] is another cautionary tale of the false promises of these gadgets.
But that doesn't mean the future of AI consumer products is not on its way. OpenAI made a major announcement last week that it is working with legendary iPhone designer, Jony Ive, to launch something that takes AI into the physical realm for consumers. But even the might of OpenAI's technology and Ive's design prowess make whatever it is they have in mind a far-from-certain bet.
Also Read: Dave Lee: Apple must make peace with developers for AI success
There were perhaps some lessons for the future of such devices from the gathering in Taiwan. During his keynote speech, Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon said that AI computers are at a phase where they will require the work of outside developers to make them appeal to consumers.
The iPhone, for example, didn't take off right after it was launched. But it became essential to so many people because of the myriad apps developers built on top of it that we now use to hail taxis, order food or move around new cities. 'Really, the developer ecosystem is going to make this shift to AI PCs," Amon said. He's right, and the same is true beyond just AI computers.
For any revolutionary AI hardware device, especially a smartphone killer, the more that global developers lead the charge to meet peoples' needs and solve small everyday problems, the more likely they are to succeed.
In this economy, maybe that doesn't mean repackaging the same old gadgets with shiny new AI labels. It means iterating and perfecting real use cases that incorporate the buzzy technology into devices and make our lives easier. And this will inevitably be a collective effort.
Also Read: Can AI truly transform businesses? Yes, if adopted thoughtfully
AI is already transforming our world in small ways. I find asking ChatGPT to quickly translate phrases for me while on the go a lifesaver when I need to navigate a new country. But I hardly want to shell out money to carry around a new device simply to access ChatGPT.
The more the tech industry tries to slap AI onto everything and market it as a panacea for all our problems, the more I get a snake-oil salesman ick.
The future of AI hardware won't come in a magical new gadget, it will be built by tackling these tasks one-by-one and not all at once. ©Bloomberg
The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Weapons of Math Destruction: What do Olympiad gold medals mean for the AI race?
Large language models (LLMs) are widely known for their ability to churn out essays and other forms of text in seconds. But for years, researchers have been using math problems that involve advanced reasoning as a test of what artificial intelligence (AI) systems are truly capable of. The race to build AI systems that rival human intelligence has led to several claims of mathematical breakthroughs, along with questions about the validity of certain benchmark tests. But this week provided a clearer sign of progress, as two AI models – developed by OpenAI and Google DeepMind – achieved scores high enough to win gold medals at the International Math Olympiad (IOM) 2025, a prestigious math competition for high school students. This is the first time any AI model has achieved such a high level of success on these kinds of problems. Every year since 1959, countries from around the world send their brightest 'mathletes' to compete at the IMO. The Olympiad takes place in two sessions, and participants are expected to solve three challenging math problems in each session. The duration of each session is 4.5 hours. The AI models solved five out of six math problems under the same conditions as human participants. Each problem carries seven points. They cover topics such as algebra, combinatorics, geometry, and number theory. The two AI models scored 35 out of 42 points, which was the cut-off this year for winning a gold medal. Both OpenAI and Google DeepMind used experimental AI reasoning models. Reasoning models are different from LLMs because they are said to work through a problem step-by-step before finally arriving at an answer. India also bagged three gold medals, two silver, and one bronze at IOM 2025. Among the three gold-medal winners were Kanav Talwar and Aarav Gupta from Delhi Public School (DPS) Faridabad, while their schoolmate Archit Manas took home the bronze. 'It's both surprising and impressive that AI systems can now solve IMO-level problems. However, the exact methods these AI systems use to arrive at their solutions remain somewhat unclear,' Kanav Talwar told The Indian Express. Talwar is the only member of the Indian contingent who outperformed both AI models, scoring two points higher than them. 'This is not unexpected. AI systems work on large amounts of training data, so if they are fed enough Olympiad-level problems and their solutions, the AI system can memorise patterns (e.g., spotting cyclic quadrilaterals in geometry) for solving certain scenarios,' Aarav Gupta, another gold medal-winner, said. What's behind the rivalry between OpenAI and Google DeepMind? This year was the first time IOM organisers officially worked with tech companies to allow their AI models to take part in the competition. While Google was part of this inaugural cohort, OpenAI wasn't. The final scores achieved by the AI models were certified by IMO judges, and companies were reportedly asked to wait a few months before publishing the results in order not to steal the spotlight from the human medal-winners. However, OpenAI was the first to go public with the results. The Microsoft-backed AI startup on Saturday, July 19, announced that its unreleased AI model had achieved a gold medal-worthy score, but the results have not been certified by IMO judges. Instead, OpenAI relied on third-party, former IMO medallists to verify and grade the AI-generated solutions. Google, on the other hand, used a general-purpose model called Gemini Deep Think at the competition. The experimental model has 'an enhanced reasoning mode for complex problems that incorporates some of our latest research techniques, including parallel thinking. This setup enables the model to simultaneously explore and combine multiple possible solutions before giving a final answer, rather than pursuing a single, linear chain of thought,' Google said. Gemini Deep Think's results have been officially certified by the IMO. 'We can confirm that Google DeepMind has reached the much-desired milestone […] Their solutions were astonishing in many respects. IMO graders found them to be clear, precise and most of them easy to follow,' said Dr Gregor Dolinar, the president of IMO. While Google has said this version of its Deep Think model will be made available to AI Ultra subscribers after testing, OpenAI has said it does not plan to release an AI model with this level of math capability for several months. Why are IMO gold medals a big deal for AI companies? Despite the rivalry between OpenAI and Google DeepMind, both their AI models essentially tied with the same final score. But their performances also underscore how rapidly AI models are evolving. Last year, Google DeepMind announced that its AI tools, AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry, had achieved an IMO score equivalent to a silver medal. But these AI tools were specially fine-tuned for solving math problems. They also relied on human experts to first translate the problems from natural language into formal programming languages such as Lean and vice versa. The computation for the proofs also took significantly more time. 'This year, our advanced Gemini model operated end-to-end in natural language, producing rigorous mathematical proofs directly from the official problem descriptions – all within the 4.5-hour competition time limit,' Google said. Researchers behind OpenAI and Google's IMO efforts this year also claimed that the gold-medal results showed how far AI reasoning models have come in solving problems that cannot be easily checked or verified. While AI models may be approaching elite human mathematical reasoning, India's math talents believe that they still cannot match the emotion and creativity involved. 'IMO participants not only solve problems but also experience the unique emotions, excitement, and mental challenge that come with the exam environment which is what makes the IMO truly special,' Talwar said. Archit Manas also agreed that AI models could probably find it hard to solve mathematical problems that require truly new ideas. 'For example, an AI model trained on pre-IMO 2007 ideas would find it hard to solve IMO 2007/6,' he told The Indian Express. Where could mathematical AI models be used? The achievements of AI models at this year's IMO suggest that it could be used to crack unsolved research problems in fields like cryptography and space exploration. But LLMs are also prone to stumbling on simple questions like whether 9.11 is bigger than 9.9. Hence, they are said to possess 'jagged intelligence' which is a term coined by Andrej Karpathy, a founding member of OpenAI. 'AI can help mathematicians solve problems and take care of the more mundane computational elements in their work,' Talwar said. 'Maybe AI can be used for checking proofs and even for brainstorming, but in my opinion, AI being able to replace mathematicians is a long way off,' Gupta opined. When asked if they would recommend using AI tools to train for future Olympiads, Talwar said, 'Maybe in the future, AI can help in math Olympiad preparation in a way that is analogous to chess, where the AI could suggest better ideas on specific problems.'
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is Eve Jobs? Apple heiress to marry Olympian in lavish $6.7 mn wedding: Net worth, career and other details
Eve Jobs, daughter of Steve Jobs, is set to marry British equestrian Harry Charles in a lavish $6.7 million wedding in 2025. Their relationship blossomed after being seen together at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Eve, a model and equestrian, and Harry, a show jumper, are a power couple blending fashion, legacy, and athletic achievement. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Eve Jobs' Net Worth and career Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who is Harry Charles Eve Jobs, the daughter of the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, is preparing for what's expected to be one of the most lavish weddings of 2025. She is set to marry British Olympic equestrian Harry Charles, with the ceremony reportedly costing around $6.7 million. Their relationship first captured public attention during the 2024 Paris Olympics, where they were spotted together, sparking widespread generally private, Eve shares glimpses of her life on Instagram, including snapshots from her modelling campaigns, travels, and equestrian competitions. Recent appearances with Harry Charles have stirred public excitement, as anticipation builds for a star-studded wedding marked by luxury, elegance, and equestrian on July 9, 1998, in Palo Alto, California, Eve is the youngest of Steve Jobs' three children. Her older siblings, Reed (33) and Erin (29), are expected to play significant roles in the upcoming nuptials. At 27, Eve has carved a niche for herself in both high fashion and competitive equestrianism. Meanwhile, her 26-year-old fiancé, Harry Charles, is celebrated for his achievements in international show jumping, making them a power couple bridging legacy and athletic carrying the weight of her father's iconic legacy, Eve has cultivated her own path. Her estimated personal net worth ranges from $500,000 to $1 million, stemming from modelling contracts and equestrian pursuits. Her father, Steve Jobs, left behind a $10.2 billion fortune upon his death in 2011, providing Eve with the freedom to explore her passions love for horses began at Upper Echelon Academy in Wellington, Florida, a renowned hub for elite equestrian training. Her dedication evolved into competitive riding, a shared passion that laid the foundation for her relationship with Harry. In 2021, she graduated from Stanford University, balancing academics with her competitive equestrian modelling debut came the same year in Paris with Coperni. Since then, she has worked with top-tier fashion houses like Louis Vuitton and appeared on the cover of Vogue Japan. Eve's unique blend of luxury fashion and equestrian flair has made her a rising star in the global style Charles, born in 1999, is one of Britain's leading show jumpers. He represented Team Great Britain at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics and has competed in numerous FEI World Cup events. Following in the footsteps of his father, Peter Charles—an Olympic gold medallist in 2012—Harry is upholding a proud family legacy.
Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Siri-ously? AI Got Clever, Not Conscious
By 2025, artificial intelligence will be an influential social force, not just a technological trend. AI systems have composed code, authored legislation, diagnosed medical conditions, and even composed music. But it became clear that despite the fact that machines got better at speed, cleverness, and oddly creative powers, they were lacking one essential element of intelligence: common sense, empathy, and humanity. Technically, 2025 saw many breakthroughs. OpenAI's GPT-4.5 and Anthropic's Claude 3.5 became popular choices for solving complex problems in business. Google DeepMind's Gemini amazed researchers with its strong reasoning skills. Meta's open-source Llama 3 models made cutting-edge tools available to more people. AI agents like Devin and Rabbit R1 were introduced to handle tasks ranging from personal chores to business processes. Yet, beyond such revolutions, a grim reality set in: AI still does not really get us. Meanwhile, generative models flirted with creativity but faltered with ethics. Deepfakes, which were previously easy to detect, were now nearly impossible to distinguish from actual videos and created confusion during political campaigns in various nations. Governments scrambled to codify the origins of content, whereas firms such as Adobe and OpenAI inserted cryptographic watermarks, which were hacked or disregarded shortly struggled most with social and emotional knowledge. Even with advances in multimodal learning and feedback, AI agents were unable to mimic true empathy. This was especially evident in healthcare and education, where communications centered on the human. Patients were not eager to trust the diagnoses from emotionless avatars, and students were more nervous when interacting with robotic tutors that weren't year wasn't filled with alarm bells. Open sourcing low-barrier models initiated a surge in bottom-up innovation, particularly in the Global South, where AI facilitated solutions in agriculture, education, and infrastructure. India's Bhashini project, based on local-language AI, became a template for inclusive tech development. One thing is certain in 2025: AI is fantastic but fragile. It cannot deal well with deeper meaning, but it can convincingly simulate intelligence. While not intelligent enough to guide us, machines are now intelligent enough to astonish us. While at present humans enjoy the advantage, the gap is closing faster than we was less about machines outsmarting humans than about redefining what intelligence is. AI showed limits in judgment, compassion, and moral awareness, even as it exhibited speed, scope, and intricacy. These are not flaws; they are reminders that context is as vital to intelligence as computation. The actual innovation is not in choosing between machines and humans but in creating a partnership in which the two complement each other's strengths. Real advancement starts there.
