Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp laid to rest
This story was updated to clarify that the nēhu was on Tuesday
Hundreds of people are at the nēhu, or burial service, for Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp.
Kemp, 50, died last Thursday, prompting an outpouring of grief from fellow MPs and the public who lamented the loss of a staunch adovacate for rangatahi and South Auckland.
The Tāmaki Makaurau MP was taken to lie at Hoani Waititi Marae in West Auckland until Saturday morning, before travelling to Opaea Marae just north of Taihape.
Takutai Tarsh Kemp has been laid rest on the grounds behind Opaea Marae.
Photo:
Pokere Paewai / RNZ
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi told the service at Opaea Marae Kemp was a "peaceful, soft, but strong leader for her people".
Opaea Marae trustee Cyril Mako said preparing to host the masses in such a short time was tough but many whānau pitched in to prepare today's nēhu (burial).
Opaea Marae spokesperson Cyril Mako.
Photo:
RNZ / Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira
Mako told RNZ he was expecting between 800 and 1200 people to attend - a tall order for a small marae like Opaea.
"If you'd been here five years ago we weren't actually functioning," he said.
"It's an old marae, our toilet block had been pulled down and we were basically closed for a period of time."
Mako said they had to rely on the help of nearby marae - their whānau - to help with kai preparation and housing people who travelled for the burial service.
Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp was laid to rest on Tuesday.
Photo:
Pokere Paewai / RNZ
"They jumped at it, and we really appreciate it because we couldn't have done it ourselves."
Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins and other party members were welcomed onto the marae just after 9am.
Speaking at a post-cabinet media conference, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said he would not be attending the tangi, but the National Party would be well represented.
Luxon also ruled out announcing a date for the Tāmaki Makarau by-election, triggered by Kemp's death, saying he wanted the week to be focussed on her.
Kemp's MP car at the marae.
Photo:
Pokere Paewai / RNZ
Speaking to media, Hipkins said he would not criticise the prime minister for not attending but the death of a sitting member of Parliament was rare.
The nēhu, or burial service, began at 11am and the day is being streamed live online.
The burial was at Opaea Marae.
Photo:
Pokere Paewai / RNZ
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Youth MPs stand by original speeches in wake of 'politically neutral' row
one Youth MP says. Photo: RNZ / Alexander Robertson The government is rejecting accusations it is censoring Youth MPs , however, some of the young people aren't buying its reasoning for making changes to their speeches. The Ministry of Youth Development says the changes focus on clarity, keeping Youth Parliament non-partisan and protecting them from legal risk with the final decisions left to young people. However, the email sent to one Youth MP carries the subject line "changes required", and stated the ministry "have had to make some changes". Labour says the government is undermining the whole point of the Youth Parliament which is only held every three years. Youth MP and Year 12 student Lincoln Jones, of Auckland, said they had received Standing Orders to follow but some Youth MPs were chosen to give speeches during the general debate in the House and these had to be submitted to the ministry. The Youth MPs were then sent speeches edited by the ministry's staff. "Things that were removed were things that criticise or spoke about existing legislation, government policy, government ministers." They were also told topics or questions to Ministers were not to be fact or opinion and had to be "politically neutral", leaving them wondering what they could talk about. "So there was a lot of unexpected rules and things in place that we did not see coming ... lots of the key content in our speeches had been cut because they did not fit I guess what the ministry was looking for." Jones who is due to speak in the House on Wednesday morning, said he will be delivering an unedited version of his speech and knew others intended doing the same. "We'll be speaking as the rangatahi of New Zealand." He said they all understood they had to abide by standing orders, however, all the changes that had been requested were changes that might have criticised the government. One of his friends was pushing for literacy programmes for young people but this had been deemed "anti-rich". Jones said the 123 Youth MPs represented diverse opinions from across the spectrum and did not speak with a single voice. "We thought we would have the freedom to be able to voice our own concerns and opinions and not be censored as such." Youth Minister James Meager said there was no censorship, instead the ministry was trying to ensure the Youth MPs were protected from any future social media abuse or legal problems. Speaking to Morning Report , he referred to two emails that had been sent as guidance to the Youth MPs, including one that had advised them they weren't protected by privilege, unlike current MPs. Asked if he had seen what had been redacted in the speeches, he said he hadn't but the Youth MPs he had heard on Tuesday had been "robust, they were challenging and they were direct and I thought they were all really good". He was worried some of the Youth MPs might say things that ended up online and exposed them to being "trolled online". Meager said the Youth Parliament was a taxpayer-funded initiative and the participants shouldn't be aligned with political parties. "There is no censorship ... ultimately it's up to them as to what they say ... and the ministry will continue to support them if there is any fallout from here." A wide range of views had been expressed by those who gave speeches yesterday and the young people were clear on trying to challenge existing policies, Meager said. Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins says it's against the spirit of Youth Parliament to have young parliamentarians censored. Hipkins accused the government of undermining the Youth Parliament with its instructions that it shouldn't be criticised and Ministers shouldn't be named. "Parliament is political and young people are entitled to be political as well. I think this is censorship and I think young people should be entitled to be free to say what they want within the confines of the law. "Censoring legitimate political debate completely cuts against the point of Youth Parliament." Labour leader Chris Hipkins Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Teenagers had received emails from the ministry headlined "Changes required" which would sound "very like a direction". Parliament doesn't hear from young people very much and they should be allowed free rein with the opportunity only given to them once every three years.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Memo to Shane Jones: What if NZ needs more regional government, not less?
By Jeffrey McNeill of Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Analysis - If the headlines are anything to go by, New Zealand's regional councils are on life support. Regional Development Minister Shane Jones recently wondered whether "there's going to be a compelling case for regional government to continue to exist". And Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is open to exploring the possibility of scrapping the councils. This has all been driven by the realisation that the government's proposed resource management reforms would essentially gut local authorities of their basic planning and environmental management functions. Various mayors and other interested parties have agreed. While some are circumspect, there's broad agreement a review is needed. At present, each territorial council writes its own city or district plan. Regional councils write a series of thematic plans addressing different environmental issues. All the plans contain the councils' regulatory "rules" that determine what people can or cannot do. Under the coming reforms, the territorial and regional councils of each region would have only a single chapter each within a broader regional spatial plan. Their function would, for the main part, involve tweaking all-embracing national policies and standards. Further, all compliance and monitoring - now a predominantly regional council activity - is to be taken over by a national agency (possibly the Environment Protection Authority). This won't leave much for regional councils to do, compared with their broad remits now. In truth, regional councils have been targets since they were created as part of the Labour government's 1989 local government reform. Carried out in lockstep with the drafting of the Resource Management Act (passed in 1991), this established two levels of local government. City and district councils were to be responsible for infrastructure and the built environment. The new regional councils were more opaque, essentially multi-function, special-purpose authorities, recognising that some government actions are bigger than local but smaller than national. In the event, they became what in many countries would be thought of as environmental protection agencies. Their boundaries were drawn to capture river catchments, reflecting their catchment board antecedents, which looked after soil erosion and flood management. Other functions were drawn from other government departments. Air-quality management came from the old Department of Health. Coastal management was partly inherited from the Ministry of Transport, shared with the Department of Conservation. Public transport and civil defence were tacked on, given their cross-territorial scale and lack of anywhere else to put them. All their various functions have meant regional councils determine who gets to use the region's resources - and who misses out. And political decisions are a surefire way to make enemies. For example, the Resource Management Act applied the presumption that no one could discharge any contaminant into water unless expressly allowed by a rule or a resource consent. Regional councils therefore required their territorial councils to upgrade their rubbish dumps and sewage treatment systems. Similarly, farmers could no longer simply take water to irrigate or empty cowshed effluent straight into the nearest stream as of right. The necessary infrastructure upgrades were expensive. Ironically, these attempts to minimise the immediate impacts of such demands on water users saw urban voters and environmental groups criticise the councils and the government for being too soft on "dirty dairying" and other polluters. Parochialism also plays a part, as does the feeling in some rural communities that they're forgotten by their regions' cities, where most voters live. The perceived poor handling of events such as last year's Hawke's Bay flooding and the 2018 Wellington bus network failure have not helped. The government even replaced Environment Canterbury's elected council with appointed commissioners in 2010 over performance concerns, particularly in water management. Yet the regional council model has largely survived intact - with two exceptions. The Nelson-Marlborough Regional Council was replaced by the Nelson City and Marlborough and Tasman District unitary councils in 1992, as a token sacrifice to the conservative wing of the National government, which vehemently opposed the new regions. The genesis of the Auckland Council super-region can be traced to the 1999-2008 Labour government's frustration at getting a unified position from the city's seven councils on where to build a stadium for the 2011 Rugby World Cup. Not everyone is happy with the resulting metro-regional solution. If regional government is indeed put to rest, it will be another phase in this piecemeal evolutionary process. But the new model will still require central government to have a significant regional presence - and commensurate central government funding. But central government has had a regional-scale presence for a long time. Police, the fire service, economic development and social welfare agencies all have their own regional boundaries. Public health and tertiary training and education are also essentially regional. All these functions are inherently political. And in many other countries, they are are delivered by regional governments. Maybe, once the implications are looked at more closely, leaving regional councils intact will seem the easier and cheaper option. Indeed, there is a counter argument that we need more regional government, not less. The current impulse for local government change - including district council amalgamation - continues an ad hoc process going back more than 30 years. As I have argued previously, the form, function and funding of local government need to be considered together. The regional level of administration will not go away. But the overriding question remains: who should speak for and be accountable to their communities for what are ultimately still political decisions, whoever makes them?
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Opposition reacts to shoplifting crackdown as retailers celebrate overdue changes
Labour Party justice spokesperson Duncan Webb. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Retailers say the government's crackdown on shoplifters is overdue, despite the opposition blasting the law as confused. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced instant fines and tougher sentences for shoplifting offences. It's the latest in a slew of changes to the justice system, this time an instant ticket of up to a $1000 for those caught shoplifting. Under the proposed law, shoplifters caught stealing lower-value goods could be stung for up to $500. The maximum punishment for theft would go up to a year in prison for goods worth $2000 or less, or seven years for more serious cases. On Auckland's Queen Street, Queens Arcade property manager Ian Wright said it was a positive change. "These recent initiatives that the government's bringing in are what we've been asking for for a long time, and certainly was missing in the last regime," he said. "It's exciting, it's all about holding people to account, and this is just another step in the right direction." He had seen his share of crime in the area. "There are these recidivist offenders, and I think some of these new initiatives are really going to make the difference where, if you can clamp down on those are remove those from our communities, it's going to make the whole place a lot safer and the crime will drop." Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announce the new infringement regime. Photo: RNZ / Calvin Samuel Labour Justice spokesperson Duncan Webb was unconvinced. "I just think it's hotchpotch and confused," he said. "I just don't think it's effective. It's making noises and saying 'we're doing something' when, in fact, you've still got to have the police to attend and enforce, we're not seeing that." Webb thought the government was posturing. "They're sort of lording it as 'oh, we're going to get tougher on shoplifters,' in fact, between one and two thousand dollar offences, the penalty is going down," he said. "That's what I mean, it's confused." Webb said under the new regime, the government had taken what was three bands of offending and turned it into two. "In doing that, the band between $1000-$2000, which currently is seven years imprisonment maximum, now becomes one year imprisonment maximum." He said resourcing the police force was vital. "We need more cops on the street, but also better resourced cops," Webb said. "It's no good them sitting at their desks, doing emails and filling forms, they've got to be freed up from that so that they can actually do frontline police work." Police faced a backlash earlier this year after RNZ revealed an internal memo suggesting lower-level retail crime - like shoplifting - would not be investigated. The new regime added an aggravating factor for high-value theft carried out in an "offensive, threatening, insulting, or disorderly" manner. Sandringham Business Association chair Jithin Chittibomma said the fines would make offenders think twice. "Yes, surely there will be people that don't care," he said. "But I'm sure there will be people that do care about their future, and even if it is a 10, 20 percent reduction, I'll take that too." Legislation for the new infringement regime was expected to be introduced in the next few months. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
