Weskoppies power restored after being cut off
In the statement released by the Gauteng Department of Health (GDoH), the department said it reached an agreement with the metro.
'The GDoH wishes to notify the public that the electricity supply at Weskoppies Hospital has been restored following an agreement with the City of Tshwane. The department's contingency plans ensured that services continued as per normal amid the electricity supply disconnection. We reiterate that patient care was never compromised during the hours in which the facility had to rely on its backup system of five generators and a solar system,' the statement read.
The disconnection took place on May 5 when the metro led by Mayor Dr Nasiphi Moya, under the Thswane Ya Tima campaign, paid a visit to the hospital.
At the time, it owed R1.2-million to the city for consecutive months on non-payment.
The GDoH had stated that the money owed to the metro for March and April's electricity usage was underway at the time of the disconnection, and that not enough time had passed for the payment to reflect.
The delay was due to the transition to the new financial year, and the department said it had been in the process of paying multiple amounts to various service providers.
The move by the metro garnered mixed reactions from the public, who believe that this was a step too far, and cutting power to mentally-ill patients is a decision that should have been avoided.
Moya, however, remained adamant that government institutions that fail to honour their debts with the metro can expect a visit from them any day.
She has since addressed the backlash, saying that the decision was not taken lightly, though enforcing credit control is their responsibility.
The mayor acknowledged the vital role that hospitals play and assured residents that patient care was considered before the disconnection.
'I want to assure residents that the hospital's backup power systems remained fully operational during the disconnection, and patient care was not compromised. This was confirmed by the GDoH in its own public statement. I would not have allowed the disconnection if it would have left the facility without power and the subsequent impact on patient care,' Moya said.
Moya said the city did not act without due process out of good faith and had previously agreed not to proceed with disconnection, recognising the GDoH's financial year-end in March.
She said the metro accepted the GDoH's assurance that payment would be made in early April, and despite multiple follow-ups, no payment was received, leaving them with no alternative.
'Government departments currently owe the city more than R1.6-billion for services rendered. The city is beginning a recovery from a long period of financial distress, and our ability to deliver quality services to millions of residents depends on consistent revenue collection from all customer groups. Ensuring that everyone, including government departments, honours their financial obligations, is essential to sustaining service delivery for our residents,' Moya said.
She said the metro will continue to enforce credit control to create a culture of payment and accountability, and that no account in arrears would be spared, whether private, business or government.
Watch here:
The fourth stop for Tshwane Ya Tima is in the CBD. This facility owes the City of Tshwane R1 million. We've switched them off.
We encourage all customers who have outstanding bills with the city to settle them. @CityTshwane pic.twitter.com/0FS22OqAOO
— Dr Nasiphi Moya (@nasiphim) May 5, 2025
Do you have more information about the story?
Please send us an email to bennittb@rekord.co.za or phone us on 083 625 4114.
For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East
For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Closing the funding gap — how SA can respond to US aid cuts
South Africa still lacks an action plan after the withdrawal of US aid for HIV and related health services. But when funds do arrive, how will they be managed? The answer may lie in the District Health Programme Grant. The government's extended silence on how it plans to solve the funding crisis created by the withdrawal of US aid has thrown much of the health sector in South Africa into despair. It has been five months since the withdrawal of the aid amounting to about R7-billion per year. It covered the salaries for 15,000 health workers, of whom 8,000 are community health workers, 2,000 are nurses, and 300 are doctors working in 27 of South Africa's high HIV priority districts. As a result, volumes of high-risk populations have lost access to care, while overstretched healthcare workers are facing increased pressure amid ongoing staff shortages. Recently, the Global HIV Treatment Coalition and civil society organisations wrote a strongly worded letter to the government demanding action on a fully costed emergency plan. They accused the state of not taking concerted action. They are not wrong: The government has still not made a clear plan available to the public, although there is consensus on the urgent need to strengthen the emergency response. Plans have been developed internally in the National Department of Health, and a national technical support unit has been established in the office of the health department's director-general to support the integration of services. It is understood that several provinces are being supported to develop provincial transition plans that can be translated into concrete action. But ongoing discussions with the National Treasury have made little meaningful progress in closing the funding gap. The Treasury has indicated that any new funding will either be part of the adjustment budget or as an emergency allocation. At this stage, it is still unclear how much money, if any, will be allocated. There is another challenge that is yet to be considered. When the funding does arrive, there will need to be consensus on how the money is coordinated, incubated and managed. Here, the answer may already be in our back pockets in the form of the District Health Programme Grant. The grant is a mechanism for funding South Africa's public health efforts, particularly relating to HIV, TB and other communicable diseases. As an existing instrument, this grant programme could help address issues linked to the funding gap and lay the foundation for the sustainable integration of activities previously funded by the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar). Why the District Health Programme Grant could work The District Health Programme Grant presents an ideal mechanism that can be used to strengthen governance and ensure that the funding, plans and activities, down to a district level, align with national campaigns and priorities. The grant would need to be amended to ensure that there is improved management of the conditionalities so that the funds invested meet their purpose. Conditional grants are funds allocated to provinces with the primary purpose of ensuring that national priorities are implemented consistently across the country. They facilitate targeted service delivery, equity, accountability and performance monitoring. The District Health Programme Grant, which has a budget of about R25-billion, already has a large HIV component, so additional funding for the HIV and TB services that are needed could easily be allocated to this grant. And if the health department amended the grant mechanism to allow for the contracting in of service providers, such as the Pepfar implementing agents, which are mostly South African NGOs previously funded by the US government, the country would be able to use the capacity built up over time in these organisations to strengthen the delivery of HIV and TB services. The concern, however, is accountability. In the current set-up of the grant, provinces can act more autonomously, and the grant's conditionalities are poorly managed. For the system to be more effective, there needs to be a greater emphasis on cooperative engagement, where two-way reporting between the national and provincial levels can take place. Amending the grant to include stronger accountability mechanisms would help the health department to better coordinate and manage it. The clock is ticking The funding gap comes at a time when the health department has launched two ambitious campaigns to tackle HIV and TB. The Close the Gap campaign aims to enrol a record number — an additional 1.1 million — of people living with HIV on life-saving antiretroviral medicine this year. Along with teenage girls and young women, the initiative prioritises an estimated 600,000 men who know their status but are not on treatment. This campaign aligns with the country's strategy to end TB by 2030. This year, the health department also hopes to accelerate TB case-finding by scaling up testing to five million TB tests to reduce the high rate of infections and deaths. The linkages between the campaigns make sense. TB is the leading comorbidity for people living with HIV. HIV is also the leading contributor to TB mortality, accounting for an estimated 55% of TB deaths, according to the World Health Organization's data on TB in South Africa. The campaigns are evidence-informed and well considered. However, the ambition is not matched by budgets that can support and ultimately enable its success. In addition to the R7-billion Pepfar funding gap, there is a funding gap of at least R600-million in TB to sufficiently fund the required five million tests needed for the campaign. Funding pressures at the provincial level are also constraining the scaling up of the capacity required to administer the tests. A recent analysis by the South African National Aids Council situation room, which every month evaluates the HIV response as part of the Close the Gap campaign, suggests that while there are increases in the number of people being initiated on HIV treatment, the pace is not fast enough to mitigate the losses SA experiences in retaining patients in care. This has resulted in negative growth in many high-prevalence districts. Similarly, in the first TB provincial managers' programme meeting coordinated by the national TB programme, reports of poor performance against the testing targets underpinned the underlying frustrations many are experiencing. South Africa has made incredible progress in expanding access to healthcare in the last 30 years. These include significant declines in maternal mortality, decreases in the under-5 mortality rates, and significant declines in the incidence of TB. Much of this success, particularly in the last decade, is the result of the mass rollout of lifesaving antiretroviral treatment to about six million of the estimated eight million people in SA living with HIV. The abrupt withdrawal of US aid has put at least some of this progress under threat. As we look to the mid-year adjustments budget, we don't just need new money to plug the gap; we also need a sensible framework for spending that money. Channelling the funds through a tweaked District Health Programme Grant is a financial solution that will both provide some quick relief and mitigate the impact that the funding gap will have on universal health coverage more broadly in the long run.
eNCA
4 days ago
- eNCA
Health Department tables budget that targets infrastructure and staffing
The Health Minister tabled a R64.8-billion budget, outlining plans to strengthen public hospitals, tackle disease burdens, and begin long-term infrastructure investment across the country. This comes amid pressure to prepare the system for National Health Insurance and address backlogs worsened by corrupt spending and population growth. Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi discussed the department's priorities and spending plans with eNCA.
Daily Maverick
4 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Putting a price on health — five key takeaways from Minister Motsoaledi's budget vote address
Minister of Health Dr Aaron Motsoaledi's budget vote address laid out spending priorities for the 2025/26 financial year, including infrastructure, National Health Insurance, and gaps left by Donald Trump's canning of Pepfar funding. Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi tabled the 2025/26 health budget vote in Parliament on Wednesday, 9 July, laying out the spending priorities for the current financial year. His speech centred around strengthening infrastructure, reversing the impacts of yearslong austerity measures, and addressing the withdrawal of US aid funding for South African health programmes. Wednesday's proceedings followed a tumultuous 2025 Budget process, which saw Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's Budget speech delayed twice and only finalised on 21 May. 'This [health] budget is being presented at a very challenging time in the history of our country, including geopolitical events of recent days,' said Motsoaledi. 'However, I must assert that challenging as the moment is, there is a lot we should be excited about.' A National Department of Health budget of R64.8-billion was presented to the National Assembly for consideration. Below are five key takeaways from Motsoaledi's address. 1. Strengthening infrastructure Motsoaledi spent a significant portion of his 15-minute time allocation on infrastructure, saying it was 'one of the biggest problems that the public health system encountered'. He referenced the health ombud investigation into allegations of poor management at Helen Joseph Tertiary Hospital in Gauteng, which found problems with infrastructure and human resources at the facility. He noted that South Africa's eleventh academic hospital, the Limpopo Central Hospital, was under construction in Limpopo and was 26% complete. Other hospitals under construction are: Siloam District Hospital in Vhembe, Limpopo — 90% complete; Dihlabeng Regional Hospital in the Free State — 30% complete; Bambisana District Hospital in the Eastern Cape — 82% complete; Zithulele District Hospital in the Eastern Cape — 50% complete; and Bophelong Psychiatric Hospital in North West. 'In addition to the hospitals currently under construction, the National Department of Health has prioritised several key hospital projects placed strategically to strengthen South Africa's public health hospital network, particularly in high-demand areas in Gauteng, but also in underserved areas,' said Motsoaledi. 'These include 17 major hospital projects which have been identified for development. They are in various stages of design and development.' While the budget didn't necessarily cover all the funding needed for the department's 'massive infrastructure injection', Motsoaledi said officials were also speaking to international and local financial institutions about financing options. 2. Reinforcing HIV/AIDS, TB programmes The loss of US foreign development assistance, particularly funds provided for HIV programmes through the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (Pepfar), has been a major concern in the health sector over the past few months. Experts and activists have called on Motsoaledi and the National Department of Health to develop an emergency funding plan to prevent a loss of ground in the fight against HIV/Aids. 'In the aftermath of the withdrawal of Pepfar, we presented our plans to National Treasury and asked for help. At the same time, we approached other funders, both domestic and globally,' said Motsoaledi. He said the National Treasury had 'come to the party' by allocating R753.5-million. These funds will be used to provide: R590-million for provincial departments of health; R32-million for the National Department of Health; and R132-million for the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) to support health researchers around the country. The R132-million allocation for the SAMRC is part of a R400-million budget the Treasury has designated for health research over the next three years. Motsoaledi said the Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust had each pledged an additional R100-million to South Africa. 'This means we are going to have a total of R600-million offered to researchers, despite Pepfar having pulled the plug on their work,' said Motsoaledi. 'These amounts are intended to cover the most urgent needs, and further allocations may be considered later.' 3. Reversing austerity measures On top of the R64.8-billion budget allocation for health, the National Treasury had earmarked an additional R6.7-billion to 'reverse years of austerity measures which have crippled the public health system', said Motsoaledi. The National Health Council (NHC), made up of Motsoaledi, Deputy Health Minister Dr Joe Phaahla, provincial health MECs and representatives of the South African Local Government Association and the military, has elected to use the additional funds to: Hire 1,200 doctors, 200 nurses and 250 other health professionals at a cost of R1.7-billion; Acquire 1.4-million articles for public hospitals, including beds, mattresses, bassinets and new hospital linen at a cost of R1.3-billion; Permanently employ 27,000 community health workers who have been in the system for close to two decades, but were supported through NGOs, at a cost of R1.4-billion; and Start paying accruals that have accumulated over the years in oxygen supply, blood and blood products, laboratory services, medical equipment and pharmaceuticals. The NHC originally announced its intention to fund an additional 1,650 public sector health worker posts in April. 4. Reaffirming commitment to NHI In their presentations before the National Assembly, both Motsoaledi and Phaahla reaffirmed the National Department of Health's commitment to implementing the National Health Insurance Act. Motsoaledi said one of the main objectives in the health budget was 'to lay a strong foundation in preparation for improvement of the public health system of our country, in preparation for the National Health Insurance (NHI). There are people who believe that we have no plans, nor inclination to do that. We want them to listen very attentively today.' Phaahla said the department was well on the way to implementing the NHI Act, 'despite the court challenges by those opposed to equity and transformation. When this Act is fully implemented, the aspirations of a preventative health scheme run by the state and free medical care at the point of service, as espoused in the Freedom Charter, will be realised in full.' There are currently six legal challenges to the NHI Act. 5. Parties push back While the ANC expressed its support for Motsoaledi's health budget vote, not all parties were satisfied with the minister's priorities. Key among those raising objections were the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party and the DA. Moshome Motubatse, an MK party MP, said the party opposed the health budget vote. 'This budget fails to provide meaningful healthcare for the people of South Africa,' said Motubatse, noting that the allocation for the 2025/26 financial year was increasing by only 1% when accounting for inflation. 'It represents a cut in real terms, even as the demand [on health] continues to grow.' Dr Karl du Pré le Roux, a former rural doctor, spoke for the DA, the ANC's largest partner in the Government of National Unity. He said that while there was much justified criticism of the inequity between the public and private health systems in South Africa, there were also large disparities in the resourcing of different areas within the public health system. He said managerial incompetence, poor leadership and corruption were among the largest problems facing the public health sector. Du Pré le Roux added that NHI was not the best way to achieve universal healthcare in the country. 'Though your aims are noble, most academics, analysts and ordinary South Africans recognise that the implementation of the NHI legislation by a government health system that is riddled with incompetence, mismanagement and corruption at every level, will be a complete disaster,' said Du Pré le Roux. DM
