‘I feel underqualified' — New hire considers quitting her job less than a month in, as she's 'left to struggle without much help'
In a recent anonymous post on Reddit's 'Ask Singapore' forum, she opened up about her rocky start, sharing, 'I feel underqualified for the role, left to struggle without much help, and don't think I could add any value to the company. I feel like quitting already.'
Under her post, many kind-hearted Redditors reassured her that feeling lost or overwhelmed in the first few weeks of a new job is incredibly common, and reminded her that it often takes time to find one's footing in a new environment.
One wrote, 'It took me 7 months to understand my role and make sense of what I am doing… Just be patient with yourself if it's not a toxic role… If it hits your core and it's tough 24/7, then find a job now and quit once you have a new one.'
Another encouraged her to stay on a little longer, saying, 'Try and stay for 6 months!!! I think feeling overwhelmed in the first month is quite normal for many, but it gets better.'
A third chimed in with a practical reminder, writing, 'Unless your mental health is /severely/ affected right now, stay on. You would NOT want to be jobless and have bills to pay that just keep coming.'
Others, meanwhile, offered practical advice. One suggested, 'Learn the ropes of your role and responsibility even in your free time. Invest time in learning, and your adjustment will take less time. It helps big time if you can find some kind of a mentor; talk to your supervisor/manager and request a buddy system.
Tell them the faster you learn, the more productive you will be. Just keep hustling; you'll look back at this thread and just laugh at it.' How long does it take to settle into a new job?
According to Rednax Recruitment , it usually takes around three to six months for someone to really feel comfortable and settled in a new job. That period gives new employees the chance to learn what their role involves, get a feel for what their boss and company expect from them, and adjust to the overall work culture.
But it's important to remember that this timeline isn't the same for everyone. How quickly someone settles in can depend on a bunch of things. For example, some people pick up new skills faster by jumping right in and doing the work, while others might need more time with training or guidance. The company culture also matters because if it is a friendly and supportive place, it is easier to feel at home faster. On the other hand, a high-pressure or fast-paced environment might make things more challenging.
Read also: Man finds out his colleague earns S$500 more than him, asks if he should speak up or stay silent
Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
13 minutes ago
- Business Times
Warburg said to co-lead pursuit of Global Switch with SC Capital Partners
[LONDON] Private equity firm Warburg Pincus has joined SC Capital Partners in pursuing a potential acquisition of data centre operator Global Switch Holdings, people with knowledge of the matter said. The SC Capital-Warburg Pincus consortium has been in talks with other potential investors to join them, said the people, who asked not to be identified as the information is private. Singapore-based SC Capital is working with Goldman Sachs Group on the possible Global Switch offer, and has lined up about US$3 billion in a loan facility, the people said. Global Switch is working with Morgan Stanley and UBS Group on the potential sale, the people said. An earlier attempt to sell its UK operations was put on hold, the people said. The owners of Global Switch are seeking a deal valued at US$6 billion to US$7 billion including debt, they said. Deliberations are ongoing and there's no guarantee they will result in a transaction, the people said. Global Switch owns and operates data centres across Europe and Asia, including in Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Paris and Singapore. Its owners, which include Chinese steelmaker Jiangsu Shagang Group and Avic Trust, bought control of the group from British billionaire brothers David and Simon Reuben in a series of transactions starting in 2016. Founded in 2004, SC Capital is an Asia-Pacific real estate investment firm. It operates in eight markets with total investment amounted to US$6 billion, according to its website. CapitaLand Investment last year bought a 40 per cent stake in SC Capital for S$280 million. CapitaLand said it would also invest at least S$524 million in strategic capital. Representatives for Global Switch, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, SC Capital, Warburg Pincus and UBS declined to comment. A representative for Shagang Group did not respond to requests for comment. BLOOMBERG
CNA
13 minutes ago
- CNA
Suspected fake Eu Yan Sang health supplements sold online; TCM firm files police report
SINGAPORE: Traditional Chinese medicine firm Eu Yan Sang has urged customers to buy its products only through authorised channels after it found suspected counterfeit health supplements under its brand being sold online. It said the "isolated incidents" involved reports of purchases made from suspicious websites and misleading social media advertisements that falsely use its "branding, product images, and promotional content to deceive consumers". Eu Yan Sang, in a media release on Monday (Aug 4), said that the three affected products reported are: Vitality Plus, Prostate Guard and Spot Whitening capsules. So far, it has received five separate customer reports across different retail locations, involving purchases and advertisements on suspicious websites and social media advertisements misusing the company's branding. Eu Yan Sang has since warned consumers of the practice by publishing alerts on its website, in stores and on social media platforms. Both the police and Health Sciences Authority (HSA) have been formally alerted, it said. Eu Yan Sang also said it is working with social media platforms Meta and TikTok to remove fraudulent listings and content. The firm also said customers are advised not to consume any questionable products, adding that they may take such items to any Eu Yan Sang stores for verification. Affected customers can also call or email the firm on this issue. Eu Yan Sang said investigations are ongoing, "with continued collaboration with relevant stakeholders to eliminate counterfeit listings". It added that consuming counterfeit health products may pose serious health risks. "Eu Yan Sang strongly urges consumers to purchase only through official and authorised channels."
CNA
13 minutes ago
- CNA
Two men to be charged over suspected fradulent GST claims involving S$181 million in fake sales
SINGAPORE: Two men suspected to be involved in a Goods and Services Tax (GST) missing trader fraud will be charged on Tuesday (Aug 5). Missing trader fraud is a fraudulent scheme targeting Singapore's GST system. It typically involves fictitious transactions orchestrated by a network of individuals and businesses designed to claim GST refunds or avoid tax obligations illicitly, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) states on its website. The two men are alleged to have fabricated sales to make claims from the tax authority, the Singapore Police Force and IRAS said in a joint news release on Monday. The pair, aged 40 and 73, are said to have set up four shell companies and used them to operate a fraudulent business between November 2017 and April 2018. The men allegedly sold goods from one company to the other companies at inflated pricing, amounting to around S$181 million (US$140 million), the authorities said. It is believed that the sales and purchases among the companies are sham transactions, created to facilitate the claiming of GST from IRAS, they added. The two men will face four charges each of fraudulent trading. The 40-year-old will have added charges in relation to his successful and failed attempts to deceive IRAS: three counts of attempted cheating, one of forgery and three of cheating. He allegedly submitted three fraudulent GST refund claims to IRAS in an attempt to cheat it into disbursing S$11.8 million and complete the fraud. He also purportedly forged a supplier's invoice submitted to IRAS to get it to approve the GST registration application of one of the shell companies. He made three fraudulent GST refund claims under the electronic tourist refund scheme by deceiving IRAS into disbursing a GST cash refund of more than S$140,000, when the purchases under the refund scheme did not take place. If convicted of fraudulent trading, the men could face a jail term of up to seven years or a fine, or both, for each charge. The 40-year-old could face up to 10 years' jail and a fine if found guilty of forgery. The penalty is the same for each charge of cheating or attempt to cheat. "The police and IRAS take a serious stance against tax offences and will take stern enforcement action against perpetrators of such fraudulent arrangements," the authorities said. GST-registered businesses that claim input tax on any supply that they know or should have known to be part of a missing trader fraud arrangement will be denied input tax and be subjected to a 10 per cent surcharge on the input tax denied. 'Businesses are therefore strongly advised to perform due diligence checks and take appropriate actions to address the risks identified to avoid participating in transactions suspected to be part of a missing trader fraud arrangement,' they added.
