Court D-Day arrives for Antoinette Lattouf over ABC sacking
Journalist Antoinette Lattouf will today learn her fate after she sued the ABC over their decision to take her from the air in the wake of a series of pro-Palestine social media posts.
Ms Lattouf sued the ABC in the Federal Court after she was sent home for the final two days of a five-day stint on ABC Radio's Sydney Mornings program in the lead up to Christmas in 2023.
Ms Lattouf was called up as a fill-in host for five shifts starting on Monday, December 18, but was told not to come in for the final two shows.
She had claimed she was unlawfully dismissed after sharing a post on social media by Human Rights Watch reading: 'HRW reporting starvation as a tool of war.
'The Israeli government is using starvation of civilians as a weapon of war in Gaza'
She says that she was sacked after sharing the post about the Israel-Gaza war and as a result of a flurry of emails from pro-Israel supporters.
Justice Darryl Rangiah is due to hand down his findings in the Federal Court on Wednesday morning.
The ABC argued that Ms Lattouf's employment was not terminated and that when she was told that she was not required to appear on air on Thursday, December 21 and Friday, December 22, it was not motivated by her political opinions.
Antoinette Lattouf sued the ABC for unlawful termination. Picture: NewsWire/Flavio Brancaleone.
Ms Lattouf's legal team argued that she was rendered 'pretty much unemployable' as a result of the saga having been accused of misconduct by the ABC.
She argues that she suffered 'significant pain, hurt, humiliation and distress as a result of the egregious treatment meted out to her by the ABC' and that her 'reputation was sullied'.
Ms Lattouf was asking the court for $100,000 to $150,000 for non-economic loss.
In the Federal Court her legal team alleged former ABC chair Ita Buttrose, then-managing director David Anderson and head of content Chris Oliver-Taylor made the decision to axe her after receiving a host of complaints about her pro-Palestinian politics.
During the blockbuster trial, the court heard that Ms Buttrose fired off an email to managing editor David Anderson on Tuesday, December 19.
'Has Antoinette been replaced. I am over getting emails about her,' Ms Buttrose said in the email.
Former ABC chair Ita Buttrose. Picture: NewsWire / Nikki Short
During her evidence, Ms Buttrose denied that this was proof that she wanted Ms Lattouf fired.
'If I wanted somebody removed, I'd be franker than that,' Ms Buttrose told the court at the time.
The court heard that Mr Anderson replied: 'Antoinette will finish up on Friday. It's a managed exit given the situation. I can explain more tomorrow.'
Ms Buttrose followed it up with another email at 9.59pm: 'I have a whole clutch more of complaints. Why can't she come down with flu? Or Covid. Or a stomach upset? We owe her nothing, we are copping criticism because she wasn't honest when she was appointed.
'Managed exit. Really.
'I don't like emailing you late but I am wrapping present. We should be in damage control not managed exits David.'
Ex-ABC managing director David Anderson. Picture: NewsWire / Nikki Short
Much of the case centred on what Ms Lattouf was told in a telephone conversation with her boss, then ABC Radio Sydney content director Elizabeth Green, on the afternoon of Monday December 18 – the day of the first of her five shifts.
Ms Green told the court that she told Ms Lattouf: 'Obviously as an ABC presenter, you need to be impartial, that includes on social media. I wouldn't give anyone any ammunition for complaints, so would be best if you don't post anything related to the Israel/Palestine situation on social media while you're with us.'
While Ms Lattouf told the court that she was told by Ms Green: 'It's probably best that you keep a low profile on Twitter and maybe don't tweet anything.'
The court heard that following the discovery of some of Ms Lattouf's social media posts, Mr Oliver-Taylor texted Mr Anderson on Wednesday, December 20 saying that Ms Lattouf had: 'breached our editorial policies while in our employment.
'She also failed to follow a direction from her producer not to post anything while working with the ABC. As a result of this, I have no option but to stand her down.'
Ms Lattout was paid for all five shifts.
'On Wednesday, 20 December 2023, Ms Lattouf was advised that she would not be required to present on Thursday, 21 December 2023 and Friday, 22 December 2023, being the last two shifts of the engagement,' the ABC's lawyers said in its submissions to the court.
'That is, the ABC altered the work that Ms Lattouf was required to undertake on the last two shifts by not requiring her to undertake any work – as it was contractually expressly entitled to do.'
The ABC has asked the court to dismiss Ms Lattouf's lawsuit.
Originally published as Court D-Day arrives for Antoinette Lattouf over ABC sacking
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
18 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Anthony Albanese pays tribute to former Labor prime minister John Curtin for standing up to US, UK
Anthony Albanese will pay homage to former Labor prime minister John Curtin as not just the leader who founded Australia's alliance with the US, but one who stood up against allied super powers, in pointed comments amid concerns over Australia's relationship with America. Mr Curtin's leadership, which lasted between 1941 to 1945, lasted during the Pacific War and the bombing of Darwin and Broome by the Japanese. He died while in office, before peace was declared. In a speech to mark the 80th anniversary of Mr Curtin's death on Saturday, the Prime Minister will credit the Labor figure with forging Australia's long-held alliance with the United States. However Mr Albanese will also note Mr Curtin's decision to stand up to the US and the United Kingdom, then led by Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill his decision not to send Australian troops to then Burma, now Myanmar, in what would have been days before it fell to the Japanese. 'Hundreds if not thousands of Australians would have been killed, or taken prisoner. It would have been a disaster every bit as crushing to national morale as the fall of Singapore,' Mr Albanese is expected to tell attendees at Sydney's John Curtin Research Centre. Mr Albanese will note that while the Australian-US alliance 'ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin's leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it'. Instead, he will say that Mr Curtin had the 'confidence and determination to think and act for ourselves'. 'Because Curtin's famous statement that Australia 'looked to America' was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another. Or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new,' he will say. 'It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region. It followed the decision Curtin had made in 1941 that Australia would issue its own declaration of war with Japan. 'Speaking for ourselves, as a sovereign nation.' His remarks come as the Albanese government is currently under pressure by the Trump administration to amp up defence spending to 3.5 per cent, comes amid concerns of fragile global stability and claims from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth that China would imminently invade Beijing. Mr Albanese has frequently rejected US pressure to amp up defence spending, stating that investment will be calculated according to Australia's needs. Labor is also under pressure to negotiate a tariff carveout, however on Friday he said he believed the levy applied to non steel and aluminium imports would remain at 10 per cent after Donald Trump's July 9 deadline. Mr Albanese is also set to champion to 'rights and the role of middle powers and smaller nations' and speak to the importance of collective responsibility in the Indo-Pacific, despite fears of China's increasing aggression in the area. Ensuring that the 'sovereignty of every nation is respected and the dignity of every individual is upheld' is another priority. He will say his government will continue to rebuild Australia 'standing as a leader and partner in the Pacific,' deepen economic engagement in South East Asia, while 'patiently and deliberately working to stabilise our relationship with China'.
ABC News
23 minutes ago
- ABC News
Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance
Anthony Albanese will use a speech lionising Labor Prime Minister John Curtin to champion Australian independence within the US alliance, saying the legendary wartime leader is remembered 'not just because he looked to America' but because he 'spoke for Australia'. The speech comes at a delicate moment in Australia's key strategic relationship, as the federal government grapples with an unpredictable White House, along with uncertainties over the Administration's tariffs, the AUKUS pact, and America's trajectory under Donald Trump. On Saturday night the Prime Minister will deliver a speech at the John Curtin Research centre marking the 80th anniversary of the former Prime Minister, who is often called the 'father' of the Australia-US alliance. Successive Labor Prime Ministers have claimed the Alliance as a signature achievement for ALP foreign policy, and have lavished praise on Curtin for turning to America in the wake of the United Kingdom's catastrophic defeat in Singapore in 1942. While Mr Albanese will praise the Alliance as a 'pillar' of Australian foreign policy and the nation's 'most important defence and security partnership' he will also say that it was 'product' of Curtin's leadership and 'not the extent of it.' "Curtin's famous statement that Australia 'looked to America' was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another, or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new,' he's expected to say. 'It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region." The Prime Minister will also say that Curtin recognised that Australia realised that its security 'could not be outsourced to London, or trusted to vague assurances from Britain.' 'We needed an Australian foreign policy anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition,' he will say. The Prime Minister will also praise Curtin for withstanding pressure from both Roosevelt and Churchill to send Australian troops returning from the Middle East to Burma, rather than back home to defend Australia. He'll say if the US and UK had got their way 'hundreds if not thousands of Australians would have been killed, or taken prisoner' as Japanese forces took Burma, and John Curtin's assertion of sovereignty prevented 'a disaster every bit as crushing to national morale as the fall of Singapore.' The Prime Minister will also seek to frame his government as the inheritor of Curtin's economic agenda, comparing the government's moves to bolster manufacturing to Curtin's wartime industrial program. While the Albanese government has doubled down on the AUKUS pact and its ambitious plan to develop nuclear powered submarines with the United States, it has also expressed deep frustration over the Trump Administration's Liberation Day tariffs, pushed back against Washington's demand that Australia radically increase defence spending and fretted privately about the impact of the massive cuts to US aid programs. And while Mr Albanese has had three phone calls with Donald Trump he is yet to have a face-to-face meeting with the US President after Mr Trump departed the G7 in Canada early ahead of US strikes on Iran. Professor James Curran from the University of Sydney told the ABC the speech was 'easily the most significant' one Mr Albanese had delivered in office. 'It's significant not just for the way in which Albanese invokes the Curtin legend, but the time in which he is doing it – when Australia is again under significant pressure from a great power to adopt policy courses not necessarily in Australia's interests,' he said. 'He says Curtin's wartime leadership was fundamentally about the defence of Australian sovereignty, that it was about safeguarding Australia's security in the Pacific, and that Curtin, like other Australia leaders before him, was all too aware that great powers can play fast and loose with Australian interests. That it was simply not an option to rely on assurances from London or Washington as the basis for making Australian policy.' Professor Curran said Mr Albanese was using the Curtin story to send a signal to both Washington and to Australians that 'being in a close alliance does not mean you cannot stand up for Australian self-respect and self-regard.' '(Also) that leadership is as much about tending to the domestic hearth and what we have built here as it is in safeguarding the continent's security,' he said.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Why 'racist' preacher couldn't be charged by police
An Islamist preacher who called Jewish people "vile" couldn't face criminal sanctions but new laws might soon allow police to lay charges for similar comments. A ruling in the Federal Court described Wissam Haddad's speech as containing "fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic" tropes and making "perverse generalisations" about Jewish people. But police did not have scope to lay criminal charges when the incident was assessed, a senior officer has revealed. "The legal advice was it wouldn't reach the threshold for prosecution," NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson told a state parliamentary inquiry on Friday. The prospects of prosecution would change under laws taking effect in August, he added, although the legislation was not retrospective. Mr Haddad has been ordered by the court to remove the sermons from social media and not publicly repeat similar statements. The change targets intentional incitement of racial hatred, while existing laws dealt with publicly threatening or inciting violence. "The difficulties in the legislation are well known within the Jewish community, which is why the civil action was commenced under a different threshold," Mr Hudson said. The new law would "fill that gap", he said. Its narrow focus on race has drawn criticism but the law may be expanded to protect other groups in the future. The inquiry examining anti-Semitism in NSW was set up in February after incidents including the firebombing of a non-religious childcare centre near a synagogue and a Jewish primary school in Sydney's east. The state Labor government used the incidents as part of its justification for also expanding anti-protest laws to ban rallies outside places of worship. Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism Jillian Segal clashed with politicians at the inquiry over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests she labelled "intimidatory" and "sinister" from city centre streets. Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating" and risked creating a perception in the Jewish community that the state was letting them down. "These sorts of calls that ultimately aren't grounded in law and reality can have a pernicious effect," he said. Ms Segal did not accept that characterisation but acknowledged she had not attended the protests. She relied on experiences detailed by those in the vicinity who had felt intimidated. "It was really the vehemence and the violence for what was being advocated that I was objecting to," Ms Segal said. "We should be able to go to our city and not feel that. "They were being jostled, they weren't allowed to cross, there was shouting … and they were angry they could not access the shops that they wished to." Moriah College principal Miriam Hasofer told the inquiry her school was spending $3.9 million a year on security, a figure that had nearly doubled since October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel. "Education is constantly disrupted, our teachers are drained, our wellbeing team is overstretched," she said. "Our leaders are operating like a counter-terrorism unit and this has become our normal." The Jewish school, in Sydney's east, faced an average of one security incident per week in 2025, she said. A spate of high-profile attacks over summer included the targeting of a Jewish community leader's former home and the spray-painting of anti-Semitic slurs in various prominent locations. Mr Hudson said reports of anti-Semitism have increased. More than 1100 hate incidents have been reported so far in 2025 - a third of which were anti-Semitic, compared with just over one-fifth of 1300 incidents reported in 2023. An Islamist preacher who called Jewish people "vile" couldn't face criminal sanctions but new laws might soon allow police to lay charges for similar comments. A ruling in the Federal Court described Wissam Haddad's speech as containing "fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic" tropes and making "perverse generalisations" about Jewish people. But police did not have scope to lay criminal charges when the incident was assessed, a senior officer has revealed. "The legal advice was it wouldn't reach the threshold for prosecution," NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson told a state parliamentary inquiry on Friday. The prospects of prosecution would change under laws taking effect in August, he added, although the legislation was not retrospective. Mr Haddad has been ordered by the court to remove the sermons from social media and not publicly repeat similar statements. The change targets intentional incitement of racial hatred, while existing laws dealt with publicly threatening or inciting violence. "The difficulties in the legislation are well known within the Jewish community, which is why the civil action was commenced under a different threshold," Mr Hudson said. The new law would "fill that gap", he said. Its narrow focus on race has drawn criticism but the law may be expanded to protect other groups in the future. The inquiry examining anti-Semitism in NSW was set up in February after incidents including the firebombing of a non-religious childcare centre near a synagogue and a Jewish primary school in Sydney's east. The state Labor government used the incidents as part of its justification for also expanding anti-protest laws to ban rallies outside places of worship. Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism Jillian Segal clashed with politicians at the inquiry over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests she labelled "intimidatory" and "sinister" from city centre streets. Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating" and risked creating a perception in the Jewish community that the state was letting them down. "These sorts of calls that ultimately aren't grounded in law and reality can have a pernicious effect," he said. Ms Segal did not accept that characterisation but acknowledged she had not attended the protests. She relied on experiences detailed by those in the vicinity who had felt intimidated. "It was really the vehemence and the violence for what was being advocated that I was objecting to," Ms Segal said. "We should be able to go to our city and not feel that. "They were being jostled, they weren't allowed to cross, there was shouting … and they were angry they could not access the shops that they wished to." Moriah College principal Miriam Hasofer told the inquiry her school was spending $3.9 million a year on security, a figure that had nearly doubled since October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel. "Education is constantly disrupted, our teachers are drained, our wellbeing team is overstretched," she said. "Our leaders are operating like a counter-terrorism unit and this has become our normal." The Jewish school, in Sydney's east, faced an average of one security incident per week in 2025, she said. A spate of high-profile attacks over summer included the targeting of a Jewish community leader's former home and the spray-painting of anti-Semitic slurs in various prominent locations. Mr Hudson said reports of anti-Semitism have increased. More than 1100 hate incidents have been reported so far in 2025 - a third of which were anti-Semitic, compared with just over one-fifth of 1300 incidents reported in 2023. An Islamist preacher who called Jewish people "vile" couldn't face criminal sanctions but new laws might soon allow police to lay charges for similar comments. A ruling in the Federal Court described Wissam Haddad's speech as containing "fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic" tropes and making "perverse generalisations" about Jewish people. But police did not have scope to lay criminal charges when the incident was assessed, a senior officer has revealed. "The legal advice was it wouldn't reach the threshold for prosecution," NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson told a state parliamentary inquiry on Friday. The prospects of prosecution would change under laws taking effect in August, he added, although the legislation was not retrospective. Mr Haddad has been ordered by the court to remove the sermons from social media and not publicly repeat similar statements. The change targets intentional incitement of racial hatred, while existing laws dealt with publicly threatening or inciting violence. "The difficulties in the legislation are well known within the Jewish community, which is why the civil action was commenced under a different threshold," Mr Hudson said. The new law would "fill that gap", he said. Its narrow focus on race has drawn criticism but the law may be expanded to protect other groups in the future. The inquiry examining anti-Semitism in NSW was set up in February after incidents including the firebombing of a non-religious childcare centre near a synagogue and a Jewish primary school in Sydney's east. The state Labor government used the incidents as part of its justification for also expanding anti-protest laws to ban rallies outside places of worship. Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism Jillian Segal clashed with politicians at the inquiry over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests she labelled "intimidatory" and "sinister" from city centre streets. Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating" and risked creating a perception in the Jewish community that the state was letting them down. "These sorts of calls that ultimately aren't grounded in law and reality can have a pernicious effect," he said. Ms Segal did not accept that characterisation but acknowledged she had not attended the protests. She relied on experiences detailed by those in the vicinity who had felt intimidated. "It was really the vehemence and the violence for what was being advocated that I was objecting to," Ms Segal said. "We should be able to go to our city and not feel that. "They were being jostled, they weren't allowed to cross, there was shouting … and they were angry they could not access the shops that they wished to." Moriah College principal Miriam Hasofer told the inquiry her school was spending $3.9 million a year on security, a figure that had nearly doubled since October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel. "Education is constantly disrupted, our teachers are drained, our wellbeing team is overstretched," she said. "Our leaders are operating like a counter-terrorism unit and this has become our normal." The Jewish school, in Sydney's east, faced an average of one security incident per week in 2025, she said. A spate of high-profile attacks over summer included the targeting of a Jewish community leader's former home and the spray-painting of anti-Semitic slurs in various prominent locations. Mr Hudson said reports of anti-Semitism have increased. More than 1100 hate incidents have been reported so far in 2025 - a third of which were anti-Semitic, compared with just over one-fifth of 1300 incidents reported in 2023. An Islamist preacher who called Jewish people "vile" couldn't face criminal sanctions but new laws might soon allow police to lay charges for similar comments. A ruling in the Federal Court described Wissam Haddad's speech as containing "fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic" tropes and making "perverse generalisations" about Jewish people. But police did not have scope to lay criminal charges when the incident was assessed, a senior officer has revealed. "The legal advice was it wouldn't reach the threshold for prosecution," NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson told a state parliamentary inquiry on Friday. The prospects of prosecution would change under laws taking effect in August, he added, although the legislation was not retrospective. Mr Haddad has been ordered by the court to remove the sermons from social media and not publicly repeat similar statements. The change targets intentional incitement of racial hatred, while existing laws dealt with publicly threatening or inciting violence. "The difficulties in the legislation are well known within the Jewish community, which is why the civil action was commenced under a different threshold," Mr Hudson said. The new law would "fill that gap", he said. Its narrow focus on race has drawn criticism but the law may be expanded to protect other groups in the future. The inquiry examining anti-Semitism in NSW was set up in February after incidents including the firebombing of a non-religious childcare centre near a synagogue and a Jewish primary school in Sydney's east. The state Labor government used the incidents as part of its justification for also expanding anti-protest laws to ban rallies outside places of worship. Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism Jillian Segal clashed with politicians at the inquiry over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests she labelled "intimidatory" and "sinister" from city centre streets. Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating" and risked creating a perception in the Jewish community that the state was letting them down. "These sorts of calls that ultimately aren't grounded in law and reality can have a pernicious effect," he said. Ms Segal did not accept that characterisation but acknowledged she had not attended the protests. She relied on experiences detailed by those in the vicinity who had felt intimidated. "It was really the vehemence and the violence for what was being advocated that I was objecting to," Ms Segal said. "We should be able to go to our city and not feel that. "They were being jostled, they weren't allowed to cross, there was shouting … and they were angry they could not access the shops that they wished to." Moriah College principal Miriam Hasofer told the inquiry her school was spending $3.9 million a year on security, a figure that had nearly doubled since October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel. "Education is constantly disrupted, our teachers are drained, our wellbeing team is overstretched," she said. "Our leaders are operating like a counter-terrorism unit and this has become our normal." The Jewish school, in Sydney's east, faced an average of one security incident per week in 2025, she said. A spate of high-profile attacks over summer included the targeting of a Jewish community leader's former home and the spray-painting of anti-Semitic slurs in various prominent locations. Mr Hudson said reports of anti-Semitism have increased. More than 1100 hate incidents have been reported so far in 2025 - a third of which were anti-Semitic, compared with just over one-fifth of 1300 incidents reported in 2023.
