
Can You Get Too Many Vaccines? - Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta - Podcast on CNN Audio
CNN 5 Things
CNN 5 Cosas
Terms of Service with Clare Duffy
Chasing Life On your computer On your mobile device Smart speakers US World Politics Business
Can You Get Too Many Vaccines? Chasing Life 14 mins
Proponents of vaccines have contended with waves of skepticism and controversy in recent years, and even if you're first in line for your booster, the doses have stacked up in a way that inspires questions. Today, Dr. Sanjay Gupta sets the record straight on whether you can ever be too vaccinated. He also answers a question related to menopause and the supplement, creatine. Welcome to Paging Dr. Gupta. Thanks so much for joining us. I've come to think of this time as my office hours, a place I really look forward to hearing from you, hopefully answering your questions no matter how big or small, and we're gonna be doing this every week. So let's get straight to the first question. 'Hi Sanjay, my name is Maggie, and I'm calling from Montreal, Canada. Thank you for your show. The topics are always of interest and your show is always number one on my list. My question is regarding creatine, but specifically, hydracreatine. I'm a 55-year-old postmenopausal woman, and I wanted to know if the claims about it providing benefits to our brains -- and helping cognitive fatigue and improving bone health -- [are] true. And, should I consider taking this? Thank you for considering my questions, and have a great day. 'Maggie, thanks so much for that message. How kind. And I am delighted to try and humbly answer your question as best I can. First of all, creatine. Let's start with the basics here. This is all the rage. A lot of people are talking about it. It is not an amino acid, but it is a compound that comes from three amino acids. So it's arginine, glycine, and methionine. Arginine. Glycine. Methionine Creatine is sometimes thought of as an amino acid itself, but technically, again, it is not. It is not one of the 20 amino acids that are the building blocks of all proteins, okay? So there are 20 amino acid that make up all your proteins. Creatine, is not one of them, but again, is a compound that sort of is derived from three of them. It is fundamentally used by your body for energy, and it's mostly found in your body's muscles, but also in your brain. Now the way that your body gets it: One way is your body can make a small amount of creatine. It does this in the liver and the kidneys and to some extent in the pancreas. You can also get it from the food that you eat, seafood, red meat -- though to be clear, at levels far below those found in synthetically made creatine supplements. And I think this gets to the heart of your question. So Maggie, when you ask whether you should consider taking hydrocreatine, for example, it sounds like you're probably talking about creatine hydrochloride. One of the many different formulations of creatine supplements. When it comes to creatine hydrochloride, the claims are that it has better bioavailability, meaning you take it, and it's more easily distributed throughout your body, more easily absorbed, might lead to less weight gain as compared to the most common creatine formulation, which is creatine monohydrate. But, you know, creatine hydrochoride is typically more expensive because it is somewhat newer. It has not been as extensively studied as creatine monohydrate. There haven't been many studies comparing them head-to-head. So it's hard to give a straight answer on whether or not one of those is better than the other. But when it comes to creatine monohydrate, the creatine that I think is more common, it is one of the most studied supplements out there. Some studies have shown that it could have benefits including improved performance during cognitive tasks, improved exercise performance, improved muscle performance. Creatine supplementation -- and this is important -- but creatine supplementation in and of itself does not build muscle, but because it is used by yourselves to produce energy, it might allow you to work out harder, work out longer. So you might gain muscle when it is paired with good workouts and a well-balanced diet, making sure of course, that you're adding resistance training, like weightlifting and sprinting. At any age, Maggie, at any age, You should be doing resistance exercises as much as you can tolerate and slowly building up. And yeah, maybe that even means sprinting every now and then instead of just jogging or fast walking, just throwing in some sprints, throwing in resistance exercises. My wife and I talk about this all the time. If you can start to lift some weights and you supplement that with creatine, supplement that a well-balanced diet, that's when you start to gain that muscle that can really make you look lean and fit. Now, Maggie, you mentioned that you were post-menopausal. I think it's important to point out that some women experience what is known as sarcopenia post-menopausal, meaning you start to lose muscle mass. The loss of muscle mass and the corresponding power, that happens as we grow older. But it also happens when muscles are not activated, such as after an injury, or just because you start to let your workout programs falter. Creatine supplements, along with resistance training, can help offset that sarcopenia, which could potentially help with your bone mass and bone strength. If you're going to use it, do check with your doctor, at least mention to your doctor to make sure you don't have any contraindications. The general recommendations are 3 to 5 grams per day. Studies show that a higher dose of creatine probably does not offer an advantage. You might in fact be putting more stress on your kidneys. Two things, and these are really important. Despite extensive research on creatine, and again, it is one of the more studied supplements out there, although admittedly it is hard to do really good quality studies on supplements. But despite the research that exists, evidence for use among females, including postmenopausal females, is understudied. So we just don't have as much data on that. We aren't sure how it might affect your health long-term, or again, which formulation, hydrochloride or monohydrate, is going to be better. And, keep in mind, Maggie, that the FDA, at least in the United States, does not regulate dietary supplements like creatine in the same way that it regulates prescription medications or even over-the-counter medications. So it is possible that the supplement you buy does not match what it says on the label. And the supplement might contain other ingredients or contaminants that could potentially be harmful for you. So you've got to buy these things from a really reputable source. That's really important. Make sure the bottle has some seal of approval. From a third party, like USP or NSF. Maggie, thanks again for your very kind message. Means the world to me, and I hope my answer helps you. When we come back, how much is too much when it comes to vaccines and our bodies? We're back and joining us is my producer, Kyra. Kyra, what do we have? Hey, Sanjay. So childhood vaccines have really been on a lot of people's minds lately, just given the recent headlines and news. So our next question is coming from Riggan in Bentonville, Arkansas. And he's asking about vaccine safety and, specifically, wanting to know if there are any studies that have looked at the total load of all recommended childhood vaccines. 'Thanks, Kyra. And yes, Riggan. A really important question, a common question. I think what Riggan is fundamentally asking about is the total load or the total number of substances that elicit an immune response when a child takes the vaccines. And I think the implicit concern here is that, look, my kid's getting a lot of shots. Could all those vaccines overwhelm the immune system? I get it. Again, I hear this question a lot from lots of people in our neighborhood even. There are studies that look at this. So that's the first thing you should know. Peer-reviewed journals, pediatrics, Journal of the American Medical Association, they don't support the hypothesis that multiple vaccines overwhelm the immune system. What matters more is not so much the number of vaccines, but the number of immunological components known as antigens. Think about this: Antigens are what stimulate the body to make antibodies, which help fight off an infection, help fight off something, if it encounters it in the future. Vaccines have these antigens in them. In the case of virus vaccines, it's usually viral proteins. In the cases of bacterial vaccines, it is bacterial proteins. If you add up all the immunological components that are in vaccines today, it's around 180, and that targets around 15 diseases. To give you some important context, back in the 80s and 90s, the amount of immunological components was closer to 3,000. And at that point, it was targeting around eight or nine diseases. So, you know, it's just over 5 percent in terms of immunologic load today versus in the 80s or 90s. So despite the fact that kids are getting more shots for more diseases, the overall antigen load, immunologic loads on the body is much smaller than it used to be. In part, the reason is because we have become better as a society at purifying the proteins that make these antigens, so you don't have to give as much of an antigen load. In the past, people might've even received live virus as part of a vaccine. Nowadays, that is very unlikely to happen. The one vaccine, smallpox, had about 200 when it came to this immunological load. Again, today's vaccine's in totality closer to 180. We can make purer, safer vaccines, thanks to advances in technology, such as that protein purification. So again, I hope that helps answer the question. I understand the concern. My kid's getting so many shots. What's that doing to their immune system? It's a very fair question to ask, but part of the reason I wanted to give you the context of what things used to be like 40, 50 years ago is because you realize that the immunological load from all the vaccines today is not even 10 percent, just over 5 percent of what it used to be. That's all we have for today. Thank you so much for calling. Thank you so much for writing in. Thanks so much for joining us in my office hours on Paging Dr. Gupta. I really do love hearing from you all. You can send in your questions, maybe hear the answer right here. Just leave a voice memo and email it to asksanjay@cnn.com or give us a call the old fashioned way, 470-396-0832. Chasing Life is a production of CNN Audio. Our podcast is produced by Eryn Mathewson, Jennifer Lai, Grace Walker, Lori Galarreta, Jesse Remedios, Sofia Sanchez, and Kyra Dahring. Andrea Kane is our medical writer. Our senior producer is Dan Bloom. Amanda Sealey is our showrunner. Dan Dzula is our technical director. And the executive producer of CNN Audio is Steve Lickteig. With support from Jamus Andrest, Jon Dianora, Haley Thomas, Alex Manasseri, Robert Mathers, Leni Steinhardt, Nichole Pesaru, and Lisa Namerow. Special thanks to Ben Tinker and Nadia Kounang of CNN Health, and Wendy Brundige.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
9 hours ago
- CNN
What is CTE and why is it tied to the NY gunman?
CTE, or chronic traumatic encephalopathy, is in the news after sources say the Midtown Manhattan gunman cited the brain disease in a suicide note. CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta addresses some of the questions you may have.


New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Ukrainian mom-to-be expecting first child after multiple miscarriages killed in Russian strike at hospital ward: report
A 23-year-old Ukrainian woman who was expecting her first child after suffering several miscarriages was among 21 people killed when a Russian airstrike hit her hospital ward early Tuesday morning, her friends said. Diana Koshyk, who was seven months pregnant, had been moved to a maternity hospital in Kamianske so doctors could oversee the high risk pregnancy, but the safe haven was quickly transformed into a warzone after a Russian missile hit the ward, CNN reported. 'She loved children very much and was eagerly awaiting her own … and now Russia cut their thread of life,' longtime friend Anna Bunich told the outlet. Advertisement 4 Koshyk was seven months pregnant with her first child. Diana Koshyk/Facebook Bunich described Koshyk as a 'ray of sunshine,' and fellow friend Yana Belobrova noted that starting a family was a long-time dream of Koshyk and her husband. 'She and her husband wanted a child, but she had miscarriages … and then life smiled at her and she got pregnant, and she was already seven months, and then this happened,' the grieving friend said. Advertisement Haunting images from inside the hospital show windows shattered and beds broken from the impact of the missile blast. 4 A view shows the damaged ward in a hospital which was hit by a Russian missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the city of Kamianske, Dnipro region, Ukraine July 29, 2025. REUTERS The strike killed two other people inside the maternity ward and left another 22 injured — including patients, doctors, nurses and midwives, according to Ukrainian officials. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky joined the nation in mourning Koshyk and the other victims, calling for an end to Russian attacks against civilians. Advertisement 'The Russians could not have been unaware that they were targeting civilians in that facility,' Zelensky said in a statement. 4 Diana Koshyk, 23, was killed in Russian missile strike on maternity hospital in Kamianske, July 29, 2025. Diana Koshyk/Facebook 'And this was done after a completely clear position was voiced by the United States – a position supported by the world – that Russia must end this war and move to diplomacy,' he added. The attack was part of the deadliest assault on civilians in recent weeks after Russia fired more than 300 drones and seven missiles overnight, the Ukrainian Air Force said. Advertisement Along with the deaths at the maternity ward, a Russian strike at a prison in the Zaporizhzhia region killed 17 inmates, with Ukrainian officials slamming both attacks as a war crime under international conventions. 4 A woman cleans the damaged ward in a compound of hospital which was hit by a Russian missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the city of Kamianske, Dnipro region, Ukraine July 29, 2025. REUTERS Tuesday's strike is notably not the first time Russia bombed a Ukrainian maternity ward. Last month, a Russian drone hit a hospital in Odessa. Moscow has continued to ramp up its deadly attacks on civilians across Ukraine despite President Trump's call for the war to end by September or else Russia would be hit with harsh secondary tariffs by the US. Seeing no cooperation from Russia, Trump announced Monday that he was moving up his deadline to just '10 to 12 days,' indicating that his patience with the Kremlin has run out.


CNN
13 hours ago
- CNN
Dramatic lifestyle changes can fight early-stage Alzheimer's, study says. Here's how
Source: CNN As her memory faded from Alzheimer's disease in her late 50s, Tammy Maida began to lose track of her life. Car keys, eyeglasses and her purse disappeared multiple times a day. Key characters in novels she was reading were forgotten. Groceries were left in the garage. Keeping the books for the family's businesses became impossible. 'I honestly thought I was losing my mind, and the fear of losing my mind was frightening,' Maida told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta in the 2024 CNN documentary 'The Last Alzheimer's Patient.' After 20 weeks in a randomized clinical trial designed to drastically change her diet, exercise, stress levels and social interactions, Maida's cognition improved. She was able to read and recall novels and correctly balance spreadsheets again. A blood test even found levels of amyloid, a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease, were retreating in her brain, according to the study published in June 2024. 'I'm coming back. It was really good — like I was prior to the disease being diagnosed,' Maida, now 68, told a researcher on the study. 'An older but better version of me.' Maida's cognition showed additional improvement, however, after she completed a total of 40 weeks of intensive lifestyle changes, said principal investigator Dr. Dean Ornish, a clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and creator of the Ornish diet and lifestyle medicine program. Ornish gave a study update on Tuesday at the 2025 Alzheimer's Association International Conference in Toronto. While not everyone in the 26-person interventional group benefited, 46% showed improvement in three of four standardized tests, he said, including one that measures changes in memory, judgment and problem-solving as well as the ability to function at home, practice hobbies and practice personal hygiene. 'An additional 37.5% of people showed no decline in cognition during those 40 weeks,' Ornish said. 'Thus, over 83% of patients improved or maintained their cognition during the five-month program.' The new findings mirrored those of other studies on lifestyle interventions, he said, including the recent US POINTER study, the largest clinical trial in the United States to test moderate lifestyle interventions over two years in people who are at risk but do not yet have Alzheimer's disease. 'Our study complements these findings by showing, for the first time, that more intensive lifestyle changes may often stop or even begin to reverse the decline in cognition in many of those who already have Alzheimer's disease, and these improvements often continue over a longer period of time,' Ornish told CNN. And unlike available medications for Alzheimer's, he added, lifestyle changes have no side effects, such as bleeding and swelling in the brain that may occur with the newest class of drugs. EmblemHealth, a New York-based insurance company, announced Tuesday that it will be the first health insurer to cover the Ornish lifestyle medicine program for patients who have early-stage Alzheimer's disease. The lifestyle intervention Ornish created — which he calls 'eat well, move more, stress less and love more' — has been tested before. In 1990, Ornish showed for the first time in a randomized clinical trial that coronary artery disease could often be reversed with nothing more than diet, exercise, stress reduction and social support. The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, declared in 2010 that Ornish's program for reversing heart disease was an 'intensive cardiac rehabilitation' and that it would be eligible for reimbursement under Medicare. Additional research has shown the same four-part program can lower blood sugars and heart disease risk in patients with diabetes, reduce prostate cancer cell growth, improve depression and even lengthen telomeres, the protective caps of chromosomes that are worn away by aging. During the Ornish intervention, one group of people consumed a strict vegan diet, did daily aerobic exercise, practiced stress reduction and engaged in online support groups. The rest of the participants were in a control group and were asked to not make any changes in their daily habits. Therapists led hour-long group sessions three times a week in which participants were encouraged to share their feelings and ask for support. Meditation, deep breathing, yoga and other ways to reduce stress took up another hour every day. The program also encouraged participants to prioritize good-quality sleep. Supplements were provided to everyone in the intervention group, including a daily multivitamin, omega-3 fatty acids with curcumin, coenzyme Q10, vitamin C and B12, magnesium, a probiotic, and Lion's mane mushroom. In addition to online strength training led by a physical trainer, people in the intervention attended hour-long video classes on vegan nutrition hosted by a dietitian. Then, to ensure a vegan diet was followed, all meals and snacks for both participants and their partners were delivered to their homes. Complex carbs found in whole grains, vegetables, fruits, tofu, nuts and seeds made up most of the diet. Sugar, alcohol and refined carbs found in processed and ultraprocessed foods were taboo. While calories were unrestricted, protein and total fat made up only some 18% of the daily caloric intake — far less than the typical protein intake by the average American, Ornish said. People in the intervention group who put the most effort into changing their lifestyle have the most improvement in their cognition, said Ornish, founder and president of the nonprofit Preventive Medicine Research Institute and coauthor of 'Undo It! How Simple Lifestyle Changes Can Reverse Most Chronic Diseases.' 'There was a statistically significant dose-response relationship between the degree of adherence to our lifestyle changes and the degree of improvement we saw on measures of cognition,' Ornish said. The 25 people in the study's original 20-week control group — who did not receive the intervention — had shown further cognitive decline during the program. They were later allowed to join the intervention for 40 weeks and significantly improved their cognitive scores during that time, Ornish said. It all makes sense, said co-senior study author Rudy Tanzi, an Alzheimer's researcher and professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston. 'If you picture a brain full of damage as a sink full of water, when you just turn off the tap, it takes a long time for that sink to slowly drain, right?' Tanzi told CNN in 2024. 'If you want the amyloid to go down in 20 weeks, as we found on one blood test, you're going to need a Roto-Rooter.' In the 2024 study, a blood test called plasma Aβ42/40 showed a significant improvement in the original intervention group. Aβ42/40 measures the level of amyloid in the blood, a key symptom of Alzheimer's. Tests that measure amyloid in different ways, however, did not show improvement, Dr. Suzanne Schindler, an associate professor of neurology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis who specializes in blood biomarkers told CNN at the time. There was no significant change in a test for amyloid called p-tau 181, considered to be a superior measure of Alzheimer's risk, said Schindler, who was not involved in the study. Nor was there any change in glial fibrillary acidic protein, or GFAP, another blood biomarker that seems to correlate reasonably well with Alzheimer's disease. 'If one of these markers improves, you typically see all of them improve, so the fact they did not makes me wonder whether this effect is real,' Schindler said. 'If they were to repeat the study with a much larger population for a longer period of time, perhaps more change could be seen.' Over the complete 40-week program, however, a number of people in the intervention group did continue to improve their Aβ42/40 scores, according to the study update. 'Changes in amyloid — as measured as the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio — occur before changes in tau markers such as p-tau 218, so this is not surprising after only 40 weeks,' Ornish said. For Ornish, who has watched members of his family die from Alzheimer's disease, the study's results are important for one key reason — hope. 'So often when people get a diagnosis of dementia or Alzheimer's, they are told by their doctors that there is no future, 'It's only going to get worse, get your affairs in order.' That's horrible news and is almost self-fulfilling,' Ornish said. 'Our new findings empower patients who have early-stage Alzheimer's disease with the knowledge that if they make and maintain these intensive lifestyle changes, there is a reasonably good chance that they may slow the progression of the disease and often even improve it,' he said. 'Our study needs to be replicated with larger, more diverse groups of patients to make it more generalizable,' Ornish said. 'But the findings we reported today are giving many people new hope and new choices — and the only side effects are good ones.' See Full Web Article