logo
Meghan Markle's 'Lack of Confidence' Shows in As Ever Lifestyle Brand

Meghan Markle's 'Lack of Confidence' Shows in As Ever Lifestyle Brand

Newsweek5 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Meghan Markle's As Ever online shop sold out its second batch of products in minutes with the shortage of supply reflecting "a lack of confidence in their own product," a PR expert told Newsweek.
Just days ago, the Duchess of Sussex said she did not want another lightning-fast sell out that would leave customers "fatigued."
Yet that is exactly what happened after her As Ever online shop—featuring an apricot spread, a rosé or a crepe mix among others—restocked on Friday, June 20, despite a 10-fold increase in supply. No figures have been released for the number of products sold.
Meghan Markle attends a holiday dinner for The Welcome Project in Celebration of Community at Our Place, in Venice, L.A., on October 26, 2024.
Meghan Markle attends a holiday dinner for The Welcome Project in Celebration of Community at Our Place, in Venice, L.A., on October 26, 2024.
Eric Charbonneau/The Archewell Foundation via Getty Images
Mark Borkowski, a U.K.-based PR expert, told Newsweek it reflected a lack of confidence in her own ability to sell despite the success she has so far achieved.
"Nobody wants to be left with a load of stock you can't shift," he said. "So it shows to a certain extent a lack of confidence in their own product because if they believed in it, they would go into overproduction or a greater production line.
"It shows they're still unsure about the very thing that would seem to be quite successful.
"Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of supply and demand would think they are surprised by their success."
Afua Hagan, a U.K.-based royal expert, told Newsweek: "It's a good thing for her because obviously people love what she's selling and love what she has on offer.
"But I think she needs to up the inventory because obviously you don't want everything to sell out really quickly. You want more people to be able to have it and maybe she's underestimated how popular her products would be.
"Obviously, you're scaling as a business and still trying to start small and work her way into a big inventory but I think she does need to do that because obviously the products are so popular."
And Nick Ede, a U.K.-based brand and culture expert, told Newsweek: "Obviously they've said they increased the inventory 10 times, but you wonder how large that inventory actually was.
"You actually want to, as a customer, as a consumer, go onto a website and feel you can buy the product.
"That spin of it's sold out and there's a demand for it becomes a bit obsolete because people want it there and then. We're in a world now where we can go onto Amazon and get something delivered the next morning that we've just purchased.
"I think they need to get it right. If they do it a third time I would have a real issue."
What Meghan told 'Aspire With Emma Grede' Podcast
Meghan's first batch of As Ever products sold out in minutes on April 2 and as recently as last week Meghan indicated she had "exponentially increased" supply to avoid a repeat.
She told the Aspire with Emma Grede podcast, which dropped on June 17: "I knew that I had a decision to make which came down to, what is our timeline to be able to restock these products that we had?
"Well, we can restock what we had at those same quantities but then I'll have another sell out and I don't want that for people.
"I think scarcity is great if it happens organically at the onset but at a certain point, even being consumer-minded, I would be fatigued if that kept happening and I was going to a website.
"So I said, 'OK, let's take this opportunity to grow, to have exponentially more skews as well as more inventory.'
"And that's what we've been doing right back to making sure we could scale up to that level and have the quality meet the quantity which was very key."
Obviously, selling out is not all bad, though, and the As Ever account celebrated on Instagram: "Cheers, dears! Wishing you a wonderful weekend! You've certainly made ours wonderful. We sold out...again!
"Sign up to be the first to order our debut As ever Napa Valley Rosé July 1st at 8 a.m. PT."
Analysis
The question of whether selling out is good or bad is a complicated one. On the one hand, a major brand like Nike might consider it a good thing to rapidly sell out a new line, creating buzz and a sense of exclusivity.
On the other hand, major brands have numerous existing lines available for anyone content to simply buy another of their products. It would, in that sense, be inconceivable for a company like Nike to, like As Ever, go two-and-a-half months with nothing on sale.
Meghan appears to have started with a stall at a farmer's market where her children sell produce and gradually, in stages, realized the need to do something far bigger.
She told Grede: "I went from [being] about to onboard a CEO and a small team to having Netflix as my partner.
"That takes it to a completely different level and goes very far beyond my ideas of 'oh I can sell locally, I could maybe be at a farmers' market,' I thought that would be cute."
And the farmers' market was not a throw away idea. In fact, Meghan later said she and Prince Harry do have a stall at a farmer's market where their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet sell their homegrown vegetables in order to learn about money.
She told the podcast: "So, you start from seed and you watch it grow and they [Archie and Lilibet] wait but with that it's like, 'now do you want to sell your harvest and do you want to share it with our community and also what do you want to do with those funds once you have them?'"
In other words, the idea has already gone through at least four concepts: a stall at a farmers' market, a small team with a CEO, the version that launched with Netflix as a partner in April and now the "exponentially increased" supply which also sold out in minutes.
The time may have come for Meghan to see where the business is actually headed in the long term and get it to that destination before it loses momentum.
George Clooney sold his Casamigos tequila business for $1 billion in 2017, showing there is money to be made for stars who can shift product.
Borkowski said Meghan's comments about not wanting to sell out in minutes days before she did just that showed "a certain amount of naivety," though he also acknowledged increasing supply might not be as straightforward as it sounds.
"What is this business?" He said. "If this business is from her own land it will only have a limited amount of product to supply that global demand.
"So, therefore, if she was to get involved in another supply chain, would that supply chain have the same credentials?
"And would we be picking over it to say it's another complete and utter farce and it becomes another stick to attack her with."
Meghan also acknowledged that issue when she described "making sure we could scale up to that level and have the quality meet the quantity."
If there is significant demand, though, then the opportunity may be big enough to justify the risk.
Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on Twitter at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page.
Do you have a question about King Charles III, William and Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@newsweek.com. We'd love to hear from you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Democrat on How Trump's Tariffs Could Reshape Key Iowa Race
Exclusive: Democrat on How Trump's Tariffs Could Reshape Key Iowa Race

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Exclusive: Democrat on How Trump's Tariffs Could Reshape Key Iowa Race

Christina Bohannan, an Iowa Democrat making her third go at the battleground congressional seat held by GOP Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks, told Newsweek in an interview that tariffs have emerged as a major issue for voters in the district. Bohannan came close to flipping Iowa's 1st Congressional District last year—losing by only 799 votes despite President Donald Trump carrying the district by more than eight percentage points against then Vice President Kamala Harris. The Iowa Democrat also ran in 2022. Now, Bohannan is making her third go at the district in the 2026 midterms, when Democrats are hoping a 2018-style blue wave will carry them to victory in key races across the country. Democrats will need to win seats like this to retake control of the House of Representatives next November. Trump's tariffs are likely to loom over key races next year, but the issue could be particularly important in the Hawkeye State. Trump says tariffs are necessary to bring back jobs to the U.S. and close the trade deficit. But exports of agricultural goods are a lifeline for farmers in states like Iowa. On Thursday, the president said he signed a trade deal with China, but the full impact of how that deal may affect farmers remained unclear. Bohannan emphasized tariffs as a key challenge facing Iowa in an interview with Newsweek, in which she discussed her campaign. Bohannan said she views tariffs as a "significant issue" facing Iowa. "I've already talked to some farmers who are very worried about the effect of tariffs and the trade war with China," she said. "What we see is that China in the past has bought a lot of farm products from Iowa, and now China is seeking out other trading partners besides Iowa and besides the U.S., like Brazil for example." The U.S. has landed in a trade war with China, which faced the highest tariffs under Trump's plan. This has affected farmers in the state, as China is the largest importer of soybeans from the U.S., importing more than $12 billion worth of the agricultural product in 2024. China has sought new trading partners, a move that could create economic uncertainty and losses for soybean farmers in states like Iowa. Once the trade relationships with Iowa farmers have been "severed," they will be hard to restore, Bohannan warned. Many residents in the district are also "already struggling to get by" due to the high cost-of-living, she said. Legislation supported by Republicans, such as Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" will only make those challenges worse, Bohannan said. Miller-Meeks told KHQA, a news station based in Quincy, Illinois, that Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" will address concerns, adding that tariffs are used as a "negotiating tactic," and that manufacturers and small business owners have for years raised concerns about China's "egregious trade practices." A poll that was published this week and released by the House Majority PAC showed Bohannan with an early lead over Miller-Meeks in the midterms, with 43 percent of voters supporting the Democrat and 39 percent backing the Republican. The poll surveyed 555 voters in the district from June 18-19, Politico reported. Bohannan outperformed Harris by eight points in Iowa's 1st District—which includes areas like Davenport and Des Moines suburbs, as well as large swaths of rural areas in southeast Iowa. The issue of winning back rural voters has been an existential question for the Democratic Party as they try to stop bleeding in Midwest and Great Lake states where their margins have diminished over the past decade. Iowa, which backed former President Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 but has also backed Trump, is emblematic of that challenge. Bohannan overperformed last year by cutting into GOP margins in some of the rural counties in the district. She told Newsweek that Democrats can win back rural voters by getting out and talk to them "where they are." "That sounds simple, but the fact is that a lot of times, candidates don't take the time to go out to rural areas and small communities to connect with voters," she said. "They go to the bigger cities and do big events, but they don't take the time to really go to these communities and talk to people and listen to people." She attributed those efforts to her performance in 2024. "I actually spent time in these areas. I met with people to talk about what was happening in their public schools. What was happening with childcare and with water quality, and elder care in their communities," she said. "People got to know me and got to trust me. They understand that I come from a very small rural community just like theirs. My family had to make very hard decisions about filling prescriptions after my dad got sick and lost his insurance or putting food on the table." National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) spokeswoman Emily Tuttle, in a statement after Bohannan announced her campaign: "When will Christina learn? Iowans have rejected her twice already, and now she has to run to the left to beat radical Bob Kraus and Bernie-bro Travis Terrell in the primary. There's no doubt whoever comes out of this liberal rat race will be sent packing when Iowans re-elect America First fighter Mariannette Miller-Meeks next fall." Christina Bohannan told Newsweek: "One thing that's so interesting about Iowans is that we are fair minded, and we are willing to give people a chance regardless of political party if we believe that you're authentic, and you're willing to put Iowa first. So, in 2024, 33,000 people who voted for Donald Trump in this district also voted for me. I won two counties here that Trump won handily. What we see here is that Iowans really want somebody who is going to put Iowa first." The race is expected to be one of the most competitive of the 2026 midterms. Both the Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball, two of the leading election forecasters, classify the race as a pure toss-up. Bohannan and Miller-Meeks are also set to face off against other candidates in primaries scheduled to be held on June 2, 2026. The general election is set for November 3, 2026. Related Articles Republicans' Chances of Flipping New Hampshire's Democratic Senate SeatClarence Thomas Wants Supreme Court to Reassess Landmark Voting LawFull List of Democrats Voting to Condemn Los Angeles Anti-Trump RiotsNew 2028 Democratic Front-Runner Surges Ahead of Kamala Harris-Poll 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Minimum Wage To Change in 15 States, Cities on July 1: Here's Where
Minimum Wage To Change in 15 States, Cities on July 1: Here's Where

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Minimum Wage To Change in 15 States, Cities on July 1: Here's Where

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Hundreds of thousands of workers across the U.S. are set to get a pay bump starting July 1, as minimum wage increases take effect in more than a dozen states, cities, and counties. According to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), more than 800,000 workers in Alaska, Oregon and Washington, D.C. alone will see their baseline pay go up next month. Another dozen local jurisdictions—mostly in California—will also implement increases. Why It Matters The pay hikes come as the federal minimum wage remains stuck at $7.25 per hour, unchanged since 2009. With the cost of living continuing to rise, many states and cities have raised their own minimums through legislation, ballot measures or inflation adjustments. This Oct. 24, 2016 file photo shows dollar bills in New York. This Oct. 24, 2016 file photo shows dollar bills in New York. Mark Lennihan/AP What To Know In Alaska, the minimum wage will rise by $1.09 to $13.00 an hour, an increase approved by voters through a ballot measure. EPI calculates the boost will affect 19,400 workers—about 6.3 percent of Alaska's workforce—and add an average of $925 per year to their paychecks. Washington, D.C. will raise its minimum by 45 cents to $17.95 an hour due to an automatic inflation adjustment, impacting an estimated 62,200 workers, or 7.5 percent of the city's workforce. The average worker there will earn about $727 more per year. In Oregon, about 801,700 workers—roughly 9.4 percent of the state's workforce—will see their minimum wage climb 35 cents to $15.05 an hour, also tied to inflation. That's an average annual increase of $420 per worker. Beyond those statewide and D.C. changes, minimum wages will increase in 12 cities and counties next month. That includes 10 cities and counties in California, with increases ranging from 45 to 59 cents an hour. New hourly rates will range from about $17.46 in Alameda to nearly $20 in Emeryville—one of the highest local minimum wages in the country. Cities including Berkeley and San Francisco will see their wages climb to $19.18 an hour, while workers in Los Angeles and surrounding areas will earn just under $18. Outside California, Chicago, Illinois, will boost its minimum wage by 40 cents, bringing it to $16.60 an hour. And in Maryland, Montgomery County will increase its minimum wage by 50 cents to $17.65 an hour. The EPI estimates that about 58 percent of workers benefiting from the July 1 hikes are women, while Black and Hispanic workers will also disproportionately gain. What People Are Saying "These minimum wage increases will put more money in workers' pockets, helping many of them and their families make ends meet," EPI state economic analyst Sebastian Martinez Hickey said. "The average increase in annual wages for a full-time, year-round worker resulting from these minimum wage hikes ranges from $420 in Oregon to $925 in Alaska." What Happens Next Calls to raise the federal wage persist. This month, Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri and Democratic Senator Peter Welch of Vermont introduced a bipartisan bill to lift the federal minimum to $15 per hour—more than double the current rate. Starting July 1, employers will have to ensure they review the changes made in different cities to minimum wage rates and pay their employees accordingly.

Donald Trump Blasts $30 Billion Iran Nuclear Deal Report: 'Hoax'
Donald Trump Blasts $30 Billion Iran Nuclear Deal Report: 'Hoax'

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Blasts $30 Billion Iran Nuclear Deal Report: 'Hoax'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has rejected as a "hoax" media reports that his administration was considering a $30 billion deal to assist Iran in developing civilian nuclear facilities. The reports by CNN and NBC News that the Trump administration was looking at economic incentives for the Islamic Republic to halt its uranium enrichment follow the U.S. military bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. Newsweek has contacted the Iranian foreign ministry for comment. President Donald Trump at the White House, on June 27, 2025, in Washington D.C. President Donald Trump at the White House, on June 27, 2025, in Washington It Matters Trump announced a ceasefire this week between Iran and Israel following U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites that followed Israel's Operation Rising Lion aimed at curbing Tehran's ability to make an atomic weapon. Although Trump said the U.S. had obliterated Iran's ability to make a bomb, preliminary intelligence suggests otherwise. Trump's dismissal of the CNN and NBC reports comes amid concern about just how incapacitated Iran's nuclear capacity is. What To Know CNN and NBC reported that the Trump administration had investigated financial incentives for Iran in return for it halting its uranium enrichment. This included releasing billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets and helping it build a civilian nuclear program in a potential "$30 billion" deal. The preliminary proposal is one of several the Trump administration is considering although there is no guarantee any would proceed, the outlets reported, citing unnamed sources familiar with the discussions. But Trump hit back on Truth Social, in a post that said the reports were "fake news" which pushed a "ridiculous idea." "It's just another HOAX put out by the Fake News in order to demean," added the post. "These people are SICK!!!" Any such deal as reported by CNN and NBC would be a major policy reversal for Trump who during his first term, pulled the U.S. out a 2015 nuclear deal struck with Iran under the Obama administration. Trump also threatened to drop any sanctions relief for Iran after its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared victory in the war against Israel and downplayed the significance of U.S. attacks. Trump said on Friday he had been working on sanctions relief for Iran but railed at the supreme leader's "lie" and statement "of anger, hatred and disgust." Following Trump's orders to attack Iran, the U.S. Senate rejected a Democrat-pushed resolution introduced by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) that aimed to rein in the president's ability to use military action against the Islamic Republic without congressional approval. In a statement to Newsweek, National Iranian American Council (NIAC) President Jamal Abdi said despite the "disappointing" result of the vote, Trump had no authorization for war with Iran and the American people don't want him to start one. "We saw a near majority do the right thing and stand up against war and for democracy," Abdi said. "We will continue to press the case that war with Iran is against U.S. interests and U.S. security, and redouble our work to prevent the conflict from reigniting." A state funeral was held on Saturday in Iran for dozens of military commanders and nuclear scientists who were killed during the 12-day conflict with Israel which had sought to destroy the Islamic Republic's ability to make a nuclear bomb. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump on Truth Social: "Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea." Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi on X: "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei." What Happens Next Questions remain over Iran's nuclear capabilities after the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi said it is still not known how much highly-enriched uranium and the centrifuges needed to purify it, were destroyed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store