Gandapur's Punjab visit stirs ticket controversy
A well-placed PTI source, speaking to The Express Tribune, claimed that the nature of the PTI convoy, led by CM Gandapur to the residence of Afridi, appeared "extraordinary".
He said the event gave the impression that the "powers that be" had made an exception for this rally, but later developments suggested a more complex picture. The parliamentary party dinner at Afridi's farmhouse revealed the visit's true purpose, namely, to rally support from party MPAs in Afridi's favour.
He noted that within PTI, there are two opinions on the ticket's awarding, with the dominant view being that it involved foul play.
The lavish dining and lodging arrangements raised concerns within the party. Afridi is accused of bribing his way to a Senate nomination, allegedly sidelining a loyal party worker, who according to the source has been nominated for the portfolio of party information secretary K-P. It was further alleged that the Gandapur-led provincial government fully backed Afridi. The issue will be taken up with Imran Khan in Tuesday's meeting, with an effort to reverse the decision.
Speaking to The Express Tribune, Opp Leader Malik Ahmed Khan Bhachar said the event was organised by the K-P CM and the provincial government.
However, he rejected the impression that the police extended a "red carpet" to the convoy. "The convoy, being led by a sitting chief minister and cabinet members, was entitled to police security. There were arrests and baton charges against our workers ... so the suggestion that the event enjoyed the establishment's blessings is incorrect, at least in this regard."
K-P Information Minister Barrister Saif was approached for comments but was not available.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Israel bombs Syria army headquarters
Listen to article Israel bombed the Syrian army's headquarters in Damascus on Wednesday after warning the Islamist-led government to leave the country's Druze minority alone, as authorities announced a ceasefire in the community's southern heartland after deadly sectarian clashes. Syrian government forces entered the majority-Druze city of Sweida on Tuesday with the stated aim of overseeing a ceasefire agreed with Druze community leaders following days of fighting with local Bedouin tribes. However, witnesses reported that the government forces joined with the Bedouin in attacking Druze fighters and civilians in a bloody rampage through the city. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights war monitor said that the violence in Sweida province since Sunday had left more than 300 people dead, including government forces, local fighters and 27 Druze civilians killed in "summary executions... by members of the defence and interior ministries". The Syrian presidency vowed to investigate the "heinous acts" in Sweida and to punish "all those proven to be involved". On Wednesday, state media said a fresh ceasefire had been agreed, announcing "the deployment of security checkpoints" in Sweida city. A previous truce declared on Tuesday appeared to have had little effect on the ground. The fighting was the most serious outbreak of violence in Syria since government forces battled Druze fighters in Sweida province and near Damascus in April and May, leaving more than 100 people dead. The Islamist-led authorities have had strained relations with Syria's patchwork of religious and ethnic minorities since they toppled longtime leader Bashar al-Assad in December. Israel, which has its own Druze community, has presented itself as a defender of the group, although some analysts say that is a pretext for pursuing its own military goal of keeping Syrian government forces as far from their shared frontier as possible.
Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
ECP urges K-P oath ahead of Senate vote
In a procedural move ahead of the July 21 Senate elections, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has written to the registrar of the Peshawar High Court (PHC), requesting the appointment of an officer under Article 255(2) of the Constitution. The step aims to facilitate the swearing-in of members elected to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's reserved seats before polling day. The letter stresses that both the Senate election and the oath-taking were constitutional requirements, urging pre-poll formalities to be completed in time. Following judicial intervention, reserved seats in the K-P Assembly were redistributed among political parties, including PTI, PML-N, JUI-F, ANP and PPP, creating a bottleneck as elected candidates were unable to assume their offices due to the absence of a quorum. The ECP's direct appeal to the PHC is aimed at removing the procedural roadblock. Meanwhile, the provincial law department has formally submitted a summary to the Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur, requesting an assembly session.
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
The ‘TACO' trade's expiry date?
Markets have spent months assuming Trump would never go through with his tariff threats. That's the trade: 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' But when that bet becomes the rally's only pillar, it starts to look less like a strategy and more like a liability. Doesn't it? The second Trump presidency hasn't even settled in fully, yet the S&P 500 has already notched fresh record highs. The Nasdaq, riding another AI-fuelled wave, is in uncharted territory. European markets, despite being squarely in the crosshairs of the new tariff regime, have so far dipped only modestly. Canadian equities are touching peaks. And Mexican markets are barely bruised. All this even as the US president threatens to slap 30pc tariffs on EU and Mexican imports, 50pc on Brazilian goods, and 35pc on Canadian products not covered under USMCA. That's quite a disconnect. A market that shrugs off the potential for retaliatory tariffs, disrupted supply chains, and impaired corporate margins isn't just complacent; it's inviting mispricing. And in doing so, it risks triggering the very outcome it's discounting. For now, investors appear convinced that Trump is simply posturing to extract concessions. They point to April's Liberation Day tariffs – harsh in tone but ultimately watered down – as evidence that headline risks will fade just like they did the first time. But the danger is that this resilience, which Wall Street likes to see as strength, could instead embolden Tariff Trump. If equity markets refuse to flinch, why wouldn't the administration escalate? That's the so-called doom loop that the international financial press has only just started wondering about. Markets bet on moderation. The administration sees no market pushback and leans harder into protectionism. Retaliation follows. Growth forecasts fall. Asset prices catch up to reality. And just like that, a rally built on faith, not fundamentals, loses its anchor. Already, cracks are beginning to show. Brazilian equities are down 5pc in recent days. European and Mexican indexes have softened. But US stocks remain euphoric. The S&P's recovery from its April low was the second-fastest in 75 years. And forward earnings multiples are now well above long-term averages. The AI boom may justify some of this optimism. But not all of it. Not in the face of a global trade reconfiguration. The US trade deficit with the European Union alone was $235.9 billion last year, second only to China. But the bilateral trade volume was larger – $975 billion with the EU versus $582 billion with China. Yet market participants still seem more worried about China than Europe. That's a miscalculation. Trump's rhetoric about Europe 'ripping off' America has been consistent. The EU is not a sideshow – it's the main event. And if Washington makes good on its 30pc tariff threat, there is little doubt Brussels will respond. In that case, the April rally will not hold. Most analysts featured on Bloomberg, Reuters, etc, remain overweight US equities, for now. But even they concede that uncertainty around who ultimately bears the tariff costs – corporates, consumers, or governments – could lead to sharp dispersion in returns. That's another way of saying the index-level calm could be masking sector-level chaos. And it's not just about tariffs anymore. There's a broader budgetary calculus at play. Trump's new spending proposals, especially in defence and infrastructure, have widened the fiscal gap. Tariffs offer a convenient revenue patch; politically defensible and populist in tone. But they're also economically disruptive and globally destabilising. If markets continue to reward this behaviour, expecting it to be dialled down at the eleventh hour, they may soon find themselves with fewer places to hide. Volatility will return. Pricing models will adjust. And the TACO trade – already on borrowed time – will face its reckoning. This isn't to say protectionism is guaranteed. Trump, like any politician, has limits. Barclays analysts still believe his tolerance for financial market stress is 'limited.' But that's not a reliable brake. It's reactive, not proactive. By the time the stress shows up, the damage may already be done. The real risk here is behavioural. Markets are conditioning the administration into thinking they can absorb shock. That's dangerous. Because it means when the shock finally lands, it will do so without a cushion. So far, the market's optimism has come cheap. But if Europe retaliates in kind, and tariff averages climb well above the 10-15pc threshold markets are quietly baking in, growth assumptions will need to be slashed. And with them, forward earnings, risk appetite, and portfolio allocations. In short, this isn't 2018 redux. The economic landscape is more fragile, the geopolitical stakes higher, and investor positioning more crowded. This time, if Trump doesn't chicken out, Wall Street might. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
