Uber Threatens to Leave One State Over New Bill
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Uber says it may shut down operations in Colorado if the state passes new rideshare safety legislation, a move that would mark one of its most aggressive responses to state-level regulation in years.
Why It Matters
The proposed law, House Bill 1291, would create one of the strictest oversight regimes in the country for ride-hailing platforms. Uber's threat reflects the growing tension between local governments seeking tighter safety standards and tech companies warning of stifling overregulation. The outcome in Colorado could influence how other states regulate app-based labor models.
What To Know
HB-1291, introduced by Representative Jenny Willford, passed the Colorado House 59-6 and recently advanced in the Senate. The legislation mandates regular background checks for drivers, requires all rides to be recorded, and bans the exchange of food and drinks between riders and drivers, among other measures.
Willford, a Democrat, cited her own experience of being sexually assaulted by a rideshare driver.
Uber claims it already conducts background checks and offers a safety button, as well as other safety measures, but says the bill's provisions go too far, particularly with continuous recordings and restrictions on driver-passenger interactions.
"HB25-1291 is a deeply flawed proposal, which if implemented would leave us no choice but cease operations in Colorado," an Uber spokesperson told Newsweek.
"It threatens user privacy by requiring every trip to be recorded, imposes major technical and financial burdens, and offers no clear safety benefit in return. We support real, evidence-based safety policy – not legislation that checks a box but fails to deliver. As written, this bill not only misses the mark, it risks doing more harm than good."
A stock photo of rideshare apps on a phone screen.
A stock photo of rideshare apps on a phone screen.
5./15 WEST/Getty
Uber's threat to exit Colorado echoes its previous confrontations with regulators. In 2016, it pulled out of Austin, Texas, after the city enacted stricter background checks, but returned only after the Texas Legislature overrode local rules. The company also threatened to leave Minneapolis in 2024 due to wage regulations, but a last-minute compromise kept them in place.
For Colorado, this isn't the first high-profile conflict with Uber.
In 2017, the company was fined $8.9 million by the state for allowing individuals with serious criminal convictions or suspended licenses to drive for the platform. At the time, Uber blamed an error in background screenings, but now touts "robust" background checks of its drivers.
Meanwhile, Lyft hasn't threatened to leave the state if the bill becomes law. A spokesperson told Newsweek the company believes a compromise can be reached between legislators and rideshare companies.
What People Are Saying
An Uber spokesperson told Newsweek in a statement: "Uber has led the industry on safety from day one—backed by technology, transparency, and real accountability. We don't just talk about safety; we build it into the core of our platform with robust background checks and features like Audio and Video Recording, an Emergency Button, PIN verification, and RideCheck."
Representative Jenny Willford told Newsweek in a statement: "The bottom line is one sexual assault is one too many, but for Uber, 8,900 aren't enough to take action. This is a cynical and disheartening move by a multi-billion dollar company to turn their back on survivors rather than implement real safety measures. We have worked with Uber in good faith for months and accepted many of their amendment requests - including a full rewrite of the bill.
"For years, Uber has checked the box on safety, but time after time failed to deliver for victims. It's clear Uber won't stand up for safety so they can continue to maximize profits rather than address the horrible incidents that change the lives of riders and drivers forever."
A Lyft spokesperson told Newsweek in a statement: "We believe there is a compromise that can be reached that would be beneficial for both riders and drivers, but there are still several aspects of the bill that would make implementation extremely problematic. At the very least, it would have a drastic, negative impact on those who use the platform in a way that does not help achieve the goal of the legislation. We encourage Senate officials to collaborate with us on a bill that addresses these realities and avoids the unintended consequences the current version creates."
What Happens Next
The Senate is now considering the bill. If passed, it will head to Governor Jared Polis's desk for a signature—and potentially push Uber to follow through on its threat to leave the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Wants Nuclear Weapons To Strike Fear Into America
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China—which possesses the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal—is using its rapid nuclear development to deter adversaries, namely the United States and its Asian allies, and gain a strategic advantage without resorting to war, a think tank reported on Wednesday. "China has consistently adhered to a nuclear strategy of self-defense, always maintaining its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security, and does not engage in an arms race," China's Embassy in Washington, D.C., said in a statement to Newsweek. Newsweek has contacted the Pentagon for comment via email. Why It Matters Estimated figures from the U.S. Defense Department and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute show that China has built a nuclear stockpile of at least 600 warheads—an increase of 100 in one year. While the East Asian power is set to possess more than 1,000 warheads by 2030, this would still place Beijing far behind Moscow and Washington. As part of China's ongoing military modernization, President Xi Jinping has ordered the acceleration of strategic deterrence force development. Beijing has also said it was "forced" to join the exclusive nuclear club—which currently includes nine nations—in response to nuclear threats, to end nuclear monopoly and to prevent a nuclear war. What To Know In a report titled "Implications of Chinese Nuclear Weapons Modernization for the United States and Regional Allies," the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C., said China's rapid nuclear modernization seeks to create political and psychological effects that lead to "enormously important strategic and military effects" rather than to win a nuclear exchange. The authors—John Lee, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, and Lavina Lee, a senior lecturer in the Department of Security Studies and Criminology at Macquarie University in Australia—argued that these effects were fully aligned with what they described as China's "evolving notions" of strategic stability, strategic deterrence and strategic capabilities. According to the report, Beijing views strategic stability as a condition that supports the advancement of China's geopolitical and development objectives. Strategic deterrence, meanwhile, involves not only dissuading an adversary from pursuing specific actions or policies but also constraining that adversary while China advances its own objectives. "The modernizing nuclear arsenal exists to enable China to attack the adversary's plans (strategies) and allies, bringing China one step closer to subduing the enemy and winning without fighting," the authors cited the Philippines, Japan and South Korea as examples. Chinese military vehicles carrying nuclear-capable DF-41 intercontinental ballistic missiles roll during a parade to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the founding of Communist China in Beijing on October 1, 2019. Chinese military vehicles carrying nuclear-capable DF-41 intercontinental ballistic missiles roll during a parade to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the founding of Communist China in Beijing on October 1, 2019. Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo In the case of Manila, China employed "implied nuclear threats" to dissuade the Philippines from joining or militarily integrating into Washington-led efforts against Beijing in the event of a Taiwan Strait conflict. China has threatened to take self-governed Taiwan by force. Meanwhile, China's "nuclear psychological warfare" will produce strategic effects for Japan—which is protected by the U.S.'s extended deterrence, also known as the nuclear umbrella—that "exacerbate the sense of insecurity for Japan and the U.S.-Japan alliance," the report said. For South Korea, which focuses primarily on the nuclear threat from North Korea, China's nuclear modernization is not yet seen as a direct problem or serious challenge. However, Beijing could employ "implied nuclear threats" if Seoul agreed to host American nukes. What People Are Saying The Hudson Institute's report concluded: "Stated differently, as China speeds ahead with nuclear modernization, the U.S. and its allies need to persuade Beijing that doing so only accelerates U.S. and allied conventional rearmament, which makes a successful Chinese military victory over Taiwan even less likely and more costly." The Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., told Newsweek: "China abides by the policy of no first use of nuclear weapons under any circumstances and at any time, and commits unconditionally not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states or nuclear-weapon-free zones. China is the only nuclear-weapon state to adopt such a policy. China will continue to be firmly committed to safeguarding its legitimate security interests and upholding world peace and stability." What Happens Next Both China and the U.S.—as well as other major nuclear powers—are likely to continue modernizing their nuclear arsenals.
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran Issues Update on Nuclear Enrichment
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the country still has the experts, technology and equipment to restart uranium enrichment despite damage to its facilities. He confirmed in an interview with the Financial Times newspaper that Tehran had been preparing to activate a site near Isfahan when it was hit in U.S. strikes toward the end of the 12-day war with Israel. Araghchi said he did not know the location of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, which had been relocated before the U.S. military intervention ordered last month by President Donald Trump. Newsweek has contacted the U.S. State Department and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for comment. Why It Matters Negotiations over Iran's nuclear program remain stalled following strikes by Israel and the United States. The bombing of key nuclear facilities has deepened Iran's mistrust of Washington and reinforced its resolve to continue enrichment. In this photo released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves to the crowd during a ceremony commemorating military personnel, nuclear scientists and other... In this photo released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves to the crowd during a ceremony commemorating military personnel, nuclear scientists and other people who were killed during Israeli airstrikes in June, in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, July 29, 2025. More Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP What To Know "Buildings can be rebuilt. Machines can be replaced, because the technology is there. We have plenty of scientists and technicians who used to work in our facilities," Araghchi said. "But when and how we restart our enrichment depends on the circumstances." Western and Israeli officials said the strikes seriously damaged Iran's nuclear sites but did not destroy them, only delaying its program. Trump previously said the U.S. had hit and "completely obliterated" the fortified underground facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful and for civilian energy use, but international observers believe the country has enriched uranium far beyond what is needed for non-nuclear purposes. "The President has said repeatedly that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon," a State Department spokesperson told Newsweek last week. Missing Uranium Stockpile Western officials are raising alarms over the disappearance of what the IAEA estimates is more than 400 kilograms—nearly 900 pounds—of enriched uranium, removed by Tehran during the conflict. After declaring Iran non-compliant with its safeguarding obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the IAEA later pulled out its inspectors following Iran's suspension of cooperation in response to the Israeli attacks. The global nuclear watchdog said that since 2019, Iran has failed to comply on "undeclared nuclear material" and activities at "multiple undeclared locations." Later, under growing diplomatic pressure from the West, the agency identified a planned uranium enrichment site near Isfahan, one of Iran's major nuclear hubs. Araghchi confirmed the site was struck by U.S. bombs last month. Trump said last week he would hit Iranian nuclear sites again "if necessary," repeating his warning to Tehran that it should abandon its uranium enrichment ambitions. Iran says its forces are ready to respond to any new attack. Iran Sets Conditions Araghchi said Tehran remained open to resuming talks with Washington, but only under certain conditions—Iran wants U.S. compensation for damage done to its facilities in June. "They should explain why they attacked us in the middle of negotiations, and they have to ensure that they are not going to repeat that," he told the FT. Iran and the U.S. held several talks in the weeks before the military conflict, and it is continuing talks with France, the U.K. and Germany following a recent meeting in Turkey. What People Are Saying Iran's Foreign Minster Abbas Araghchi told the Financial Times on Thursday: "We can negotiate, they can present their argument, and we will present our own argument. But with zero enrichment, we don't have a thing." U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters in Scotland on Monday: "We wiped out their nuclear possibilities. They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it." A U.S. State Department spokesperson told Newsweek last week: "The Iranian leadership has a window of opportunity to choose a path of peace and prosperity for their people. We are ready to talk directly to the Iranians." What Happens Next Escalating threats and rising tensions with Iran could push the region closer to a renewed military confrontation.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Accounts 'Backdoor Way' to Privatize Social Security: Scott Bessent
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said new investment savings accounts for young Americans could help privatize Social Security. Speaking at an event hosted by right-wing news outlet Breitbart on Wednesday, Bessent described the president's new "Trump accounts"—which offer a one-time $1,000 government contribution paid into a special account—as a "backdoor for privatizing Social Security." Social Security—often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics due to its fundamental importance—is a federally administered social insurance system that pays out benefits, mostly for retired and disabled Americans. The comments have sparked fierce reaction from Social Security advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers. What Did Bessent Say? "But in a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security," Bessent said at the event. "Like, Social Security is a defined benefit plan paid out that—to the extent that if all of a sudden these accounts grow, and you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement—then that's a game changer too." He later clarified in a post on X that the new accounts "are an additive benefit for future generations, which will supplement the sanctity of Social Security's guaranteed payments." He added: "This is not an either-or question: our Administration is committed to protecting Social Security and to making sure seniors have more money." A Treasury Department spokesperson told Newsweek via email: "Trump Accounts are an additive government program that work in conjunction with Social Security to broaden and increase the savings and wealth of Americans. Social Security is a critical safety net for Americans and always will be. This Administration has not just fought tirelessly for seniors but is also fighting for the next generation. Under President Trump's leadership, more Americans will reap the benefits of our booming economy than ever before." U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks during a ceremony for U.S. National Day at the World Expo 2025 on July 19, 2025, in Osaka, Japan. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks during a ceremony for U.S. National Day at the World Expo 2025 on July 19, 2025, in Osaka, Japan. Tomohiro Ohsumi/GETTY What Are Trump Accounts? The accounts, which are seeded with a $1,000 contribution from the federal government, let parents of children born during 2025 through 2028 contribute up to $5,000 annually for each child, with additional contributions allowed from employers. The money must be invested in portfolios linked to U.S. stock indexes, following a structure similar to individual retirement accounts. Withdrawals are penalty-free after age 59½, or earlier if used to pay for college costs or a first home purchase. They were signed into law as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic spending legislation. Reaction There has been no shortage of reaction to Bessent's comments, particularly from groups that advocate for the preservation of Social Security benefits and retired and/or disabled Americans. "That is a terrible idea," said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works. "Unlike private savings, Social Security is a guaranteed earned benefit that you can't outlive. It has stood strong through wars, recessions, and pandemics. The American people have a message for Trump and Bessent: Keep Wall Street's hands off our Social Security!" "President Trump should promptly denounce Treasury Secretary Bessent's promotion of a 'backdoor' way to privatize Social Security," Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, adding that the American people "do not want their hard-earned Social Security benefits handed over to Wall Street." Democratic lawmakers also seized on Bessent's comments. "Like every Republican administration going back multiple generations, Trump and his billionaire cabinet want to privatize Social Security to give their Wall Street buddies a payday," Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden said. "This would be a disaster for seniors and for all Americans who will rely on Social Security for a dignified retirement, and it's a guarantee that Republicans would follow up privatization with brutal cuts that would drive vulnerable people into destitution." Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed said on X that privatizing Social Security would turn it "from a dependable safety net to a risky profit center for moneyed special interests at the expense of everyday Americans."
