
How does it feel to be an American? We asked, and you answered.
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Pride, betrayal, and duty: A veteran's call to lead by example
Ian Thomson, military veteran and entrepreneur, Cape Town, South Africa
Born abroad to American and Colombian parents, raised across cultures and continents, educated at Boston University, my identity was never simple. At 18, I consciously chose America; not out of obligation but out of admiration for its core values. My commitment deepened when I joined the Marines, eager to embody and defend the principles that drew me: liberty, equality of opportunity, and the promise of justice for all.
I finally felt that my American-ness was unquestionable when I first pinned on the Eagle, Globe, and Anchor at the end of officer candidate school, where the motto was 'ductus exemplo' — imploring us to lead by example.
Those ideals were tested when strict rules of engagement clashed with my conscience: facing an injured child in a war zone, I chose humanitarian compassion over military compliance (and I was proud that in that moment I served my country faithfully). It was a reminder of the paradox of law, that sometimes obedience becomes complicity, and disobedience becomes our duty. Rosa Parks broke the law —
and she was right.
Nazi concentration camp guards, tobacco executives, and Enron accountants all hid behind the law — and they were wrong. Morality does not reside in compliance; it resides in conscience.
Today, however, my American pride is tinged with a sense of betrayal — not solely by leaders acting in self-interest, but by my fellow Americans, whose silence and acceptance of falsehoods allow dangerous narratives pushed by our leaders to flourish. Recent events remind us how easily power cloaks itself in moral pretense.
This July Fourth, let's reaffirm our commitment to integrity and beat the odds that suggest our decline is inevitable. Preserving a nation worthy of its promise can't be relegated only to those wearing a uniform; it is the duty of all Americans who believe that through leading by example, with honesty and accountability, we can truly be free.
Finding America in conversations with strangers
Alex Chueh, writer, Cambridge
Our nation brims with stories about hopeful souls formulating plans that imbue life with purpose; striving, scheming, American dreaming. An American's initial impulse isn't
why?
, but
why not?
I learned this firsthand by hatching my own shamelessly ambitious project: meeting someone new every single day. Since Nov. 20, 2022, no day has gone by without me talking to a stranger. America responded with a resounding,
hell yeah!
Initially I prepared to get blown off. But most Americans I chatted up at coffee shops or city parks lit up with excitement, intuitively connecting with me. Time and again, these spontaneous conversations have gifted me with unforgettable stories and lifelong friendships.
Why has it worked? Americans are remarkably open, shockingly willing to unspool their lives to a stranger. (I learn at least one family inside joke a week.) From Iowa cornfields to the Maine coast, rifle clubs to yoga studios, and factory workers to literature PhDs, American openness transcends cultural divides. My journal holds endless scarcely believable examples: Yup, I really did get an impromptu shooting lesson from Appalachian teens eating at a roadside pizza shop.
No wonder I've found America a delightful place to meet people, and an even better place to be myself.
A plea for a better America
Reya Kumar, communications specialist, Boston
Every Fourth of July, I write an Instagram post about how I felt about America that year. It's a way to wrestle with my complicated relationship with my American identity. When I think about America, I'm caught between frustration at our failures and an unshakeable hope for what this country has the capacity to be.
I grew up saying the Pledge of Allegiance every morning at school, believing deeply in the promise of 'liberty and justice for all.' Even when I'm sorely disappointed in our leaders and systems, I could never imagine leaving. This country is too much a part of who I am, even when it breaks my heart.
This Fourth of July feels different. We're celebrating independence from a king while our president
But that's exactly why I refuse to write off this country. The most beautiful thing about America is that we have the capacity to change it. From abolishing slavery to winning marriage equality, our history is one of imperfect progress — messy, slow, but real.
Being American means holding two truths simultaneously: loving your country enough to demand better from it, and believing that better is possible.
Upholding American values: A daily fight against fear
Elliot, nurse, Hampshire County
My grandparents came here from Latin America with their two young sons and truly lived the American dream. I've heard stories of how my dad earned his pocket money in the garage of his childhood home, helping his dad machine munitions casings for the military when he wasn't working at the factory.
Now I worry that my 93-year-old grandmother will be stopped and something about her — her accent, the way she dresses, the color of her skin or hair — will give some power-hungry bureaucrat the excuse to say she doesn't belong.
I'm also a transgender nurse, who works in transgender health care. I spend every day reassuring my patients that we are still here, still providing the lifesaving care they need, as long as we possibly can. Then I go home and wonder if I'll still have access to the care I need in 3 months, 6 months, a year.
Some days I live in panic that America can't come back from this, at least not an America I can be proud to belong to.
Most days I try to make my little pocket of America a place that lives up to its values. That means volunteering for community meals; honking support for the protesters and the picket lines; attending the local civic association meetings, even when they bore me out of my mind; and comforting my partner when
It means doing something, doing anything, doing everything I can, to feel like there could be good in this place, despite the evidence.
The dream isn't dead
Jon Dickinson, tech entrepreneur, Portsmouth, N.H.
My first memory was being one of three kids under five, gloriously crammed into an 800-square-foot rental with my parents and a dog.
My parents worked multiple jobs to make ends meet. My grandparents and aunt helped raise us, offering laughter, love, and structure.
With little time to supervise, my parents gave us independence, as long as we did our chores and followed the rules. Freedom came with responsibility. Strict discipline ensured I respected boundaries.
I was expected to be courteous, hold a job, save money, and pay for college. Weeks after graduating college, I moved from Wisconsin to Boston with a suitcase, $375, and full confidence I'd find success. I couch-surfed and slept on floors for a few months. I worked retail by day and was a bouncer at night to make ends meet. When I finally landed a job in tech, I poured everything into the opportunity, became successful, and bought a business.
I honor my parents by showing my children the same mettle and passion they showed me. My work has taken me all over the US, where I've made amazing friends and been involved in exciting projects.
Some say the American dream is dead. I don't buy it. Too many are distracted by media outrage, virtue signaling, and curated personal narratives. Opportunities exist for everyone but are won only when you hold yourself accountable for your own success.
Our country is becoming what immigrants once tried to escape
Juan Wulff, student, Needham
I grew up in Venezuela missing school because of protests and riots, watching my parents' universities crumble, and hearing constant talk about inflation and the economy. So when I immigrated to the United States at age 8, the latter part of 'Venezuelan American' felt like a new, fresh part of my identity.
At school I memorized the Pledge of Allegiance, caught up on American media, and made American friends with my American accent. Later, when my parents were naturalized, I finally felt
really
American.
Since then, I have fulfilled my parents' American dreams and will go to college. Yet I am entering a university fighting for its existence with a federal government that is trying to silence it. I live in an America where my people are hated, disappeared, and separated from their loved ones. I am American in an America I no longer recognize, one that looks like the place from which I escaped.
A young first-generation American still hopeful for its opportunities
Michael Barbalat, high schooler, Newton
My parents and grandparents came to this country from the Soviet Union. When they arrived, they didn't have job guarantees, they didn't have a plan, they didn't even speak much English.
But they believed America would give them a chance to start again. And it did. I grew up hearing their stories at the dinner table and, even as a kid, I understood that being here meant being able to speak your mind, choose your own path, and live without fear.
For me, being American means having the freedom to think for yourself. It means being able to build your life in a way that feels right to you, without having to follow a predetermined path. It's not always easy, it's not promised, and it's definitely not perfect, but there's something unique and amazing about the idea that in this country your future is, in many ways, up to you.
Optimistic that brighter days are ahead
Casey Tylek, military veteran and research scientist, Leominster
I'm as proud to be an American as I ever was. I carry on the tradition of this country, in being a perpetual optimist, never believing that something can't be done or accomplished.
Whether it was in the taverns in the 1700s where independence was born, the Wright brothers believing they could fly, scientists working to put men on the moon, or Martin Luther King Jr. taking on the most powerful government on earth in pursuit of equal rights, this country has always inspired the idea that there are better days ahead, and is full of people working to accomplish that.
Whether your beliefs align with the current leaders, or clash with them — America will move forward with constant innovation and tranquility.
A mother fears that the worst of our culture has prevailed
Sophia Carroll, mother and writer, Concord
I was an exchange student to East Germany in 1994, soon after reunification, and people were so excited to meet their first American. My world was free from so much they had endured: widespread censorship, surveillance and arrests, the romanticizing of mindless factory work, economic stagnation, and corrupt officials who took orders from Russia. Layered structures of intimidation protected those with power by keeping regular people silent, stressed out, and poor.
Now half of America seems to be naïvely embracing similar treatment from our own government. I wish those who rage against illegal immigrants would ask themselves: Isn't it better to live in a country that people are sneaking into than one they sneak out of?
If we continue following Trump down his embarrassing gold-tone escalator, it will be a tragic fate for our once-great nation. People who live surrounded by fear are not free.
Conflicted, worried, but still proud
Joshua, data technician, Newton
I've long held contradictory feelings as an American. There is a great democratic heritage in this country to be proud of: the
But hypocrisy, inequality, and ignorance are American, too. We've fallen for demagogues and snake-oil salesmen before. Reconstruction was followed by a century of terror against freedmen; our democracy has been stunted by disenfranchisement; the financial oligarchy has now totally captured the state and is using it to claw back all the working-class gains of the past century.
Despite everything, despite feeling some days like America neither wants me, its native son, nor my wife, an immigrant, I'm proud of the America of Tom Paine and Sam Adams, of Frederick Douglass and John Brown, of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant, of Eugene Debs and John Reed, of Medgar Evers and Viola Liuzzo, of
Editors: Jim Dao, Rebecca Spiess. Digital editor: Rami Abou-Sabe. Audience engagement editor: Karissa Korman. Copy editor: Karen Schlosberg. Podcast: Katelyn Harrop and Shirley Leung.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Major SALT Deduction Cap Boost Passes Senate. Here's Who Would Benefit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Senate has passed a significant expansion to the federal deduction for state and local taxes (SALT), more than tripling the cap from $10,000 to $40,000 starting in 2025. Senators voted 50-50 on President Donald Trump's broad tax and spending bill on Tuesday, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tiebreaking vote. The increased SALT deduction cap would phase out for those earning above $500,000 and increase 1 percent annually until 2029, then revert to the current $10,000 limit in 2030. Why It Matters The move marks a dramatic reversal in policy on SALT deductions, one of the most contentious features of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and has implications for millions of taxpayers, especially those living in high-tax states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois and California where property and income taxes often far exceed the old $10,000 cap. Analysts have said the provision will most likely benefit wealthier Americans who have high property taxes, as taxes paid on income and property ownership are typically the largest for those who itemize their taxes. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (center), shown with Senator John Barrasso, the GOP whip (left), and Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, speaks to reporters after Senate passage of the budget reconciliation package of President Donald... Senate Majority Leader John Thune (center), shown with Senator John Barrasso, the GOP whip (left), and Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, speaks to reporters after Senate passage of the budget reconciliation package of President Donald Trump's signature bill of big tax breaks and spending cuts, at the Capitol in Washington on July 1, 2025. More J. Scott Applewhite/AP What To Know Prior to 2017, taxpayers who itemized deductions could fully subtract the amount paid in state and local income, property and sales taxes from their federal taxable income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act imposed a $10,000 cap on these deductions, a limit that mostly affected residents of states with higher tax rates. Along with raising the cap to $40,000 until 2029, the Senate bill also increases a tax break for pass-through businesses to 23 percent while clamping down on a frequently used tax loophole for certain pass-through businesses. The House bill had proposed the same higher limit and $500,000 income phaseout but for a longer period of time, rising 1 percent each year from 2026 to 2033. The House also blocked certain white-collar professionals from being able to use a popular SALT deduction workaround. While the Senate version appears to be cheaper for the federal government, given its shorter time frame, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said that "it's actually far more generous." The CRFB said the Senate's direct SALT relief is "roughly 10 percent larger than the House," adding that it estimated the Senate changes would cost $325 billion while the House bill would cost roughly $200 billion. Affluent homeowners and high-income individuals stand to benefit the most from the expanded cap, according to the Tax Foundation's May analysis. The Tax Foundation also warned that the Senate's provisions would cost about $320 billion more than an extension of the existing cap, and cost $150 billion more than a $30,000 cap. "The bill is already suffering from a math problem," Tax Foundation analysts wrote. "This is a recipe for worsening deficits at a time when Congress needs to be more concerned about the country's fiscal outlook." What People Are Saying Owen Zidar, a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University, told Newsweek: "The broader bill and the SALT cap increase are a boon for high-income taxpayers, especially high-income private business owners who got a special loophole that lets them avoid the SALT caps. Millions are estimated to lose health insurance coverage. The bill is very irresponsible fiscally. It's mortgaging our future for our children. "The increase in the deficits will put pressure on interest rates and crowd out productive investment, hurting economic growth." What Happens Next After being passed by the Senate, the GOP tax bill will now head to the Joint Conference Committee for reconciliation of differences between the Senate and House.

18 minutes ago
Iran's president orders country to suspend cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog IAEA
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- Iran's president on Wednesday ordered the country to suspend its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency after American and Israeli airstrikes hit its most-important nuclear facilities, likely further limiting inspectors' ability to track Tehran's program that had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. The order by President Masoud Pezeshkian included no timetables or details about what that suspension would entail. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signaled in a CBS News interview that Tehran still would be willing to continue negotiations with the United States. 'I don't think negotiations will restart as quickly as that,' Araghchi said, referring to Trump's comments that talks could start as early as this week. However, he added: 'The doors of diplomacy will never slam shut.' Iran has limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West — though as of right now Tehran has denied that there's any immediate plans to resume talks with the United States that had been upended by the 12-day Iran-Israel war. Iranian state television announced Pezeshkian's order, which followed a law passed by Iran's parliament to suspend that cooperation. The bill already received the approval of Iran's constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, on Thursday, and likely the support of the country's Supreme National Security Council, which Pezeshkian chairs. 'The government is mandated to immediately suspend all cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency under the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and its related Safeguards Agreement,' state television quoted the bill as saying. "This suspension will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists.' It wasn't immediately clear what that would mean for the Vienna-based IAEA, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. The agency long has monitored Iran's nuclear program and said that it was waiting for an official communication from Iran on what the suspension meant. A diplomat with knowledge of IAEA operations, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the situation in Iran, said that IAEA inspectors were still there after the announcement and hadn't been told by the government to leave. Iran's decision drew an immediate condemnation from Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar. 'Iran has just issued a scandalous announcement about suspending its cooperation with the IAEA,' he said in an X post. 'This is a complete renunciation of all its international nuclear obligations and commitments.' Saar urged European nations that were part of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal to implement its so-called snapback clause. That would reimpose all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East, and the IAEA doesn't have access to its weapons-related facilities. Iran's move so far stops short of what experts feared the most. They had been concerned that Tehran, in response to the war, could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons and allows the IAEA to conduct inspections to verify that countries correctly declared their programs. Iran's 2015 nuclear deal allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant, but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. The IAEA served as the main assessor of Iran's commitment to the deal. But U.S. President Donald Trump, in his first term in 2018, unilaterally withdrew Washington from the accord, insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Middle East. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran had been enriching up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. Israeli airstrikes, which began June 13, decimated the upper ranks of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and targeted its arsenal of ballistic missiles. The strikes also hit Iran's nuclear sites, which Israel claimed put Tehran within reach of a nuclear weapon. Iran has said the Israeli attacks killed 935 'Iranian citizens,' including 38 children and 102 women. However, Iran has a long history of offering lower death counts around unrest over political considerations. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, has put the death toll at 1,190 people killed, including 436 civilians and 435 security force members. The attacks wounded another 4,475 people, the group said. Meanwhile, it appears that Iranian officials now are assessing the damage done by the American strikes conducted on the three nuclear sites on June 22, including those at Fordo, a site built under a mountain about 100 kilometers (60 miles) southwest of Tehran. Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC analyzed by The Associated Press show Iranian officials at Fordo on Monday likely examining the damage caused by American bunker busters. Trucks could be seen in the images, as well as at least one crane and an excavator at tunnels on the site. That corresponded to images shot Sunday by Maxar Technologies similarly showing the ongoing work.


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's failures are turning Americans away from him
Most Americans now disapprove of Donald Trump's erratic, authoritarian and incompetent leadership, which has transformed the Republican Party into a cult of personality that rejects traditional Republican policies. Our country is suffering because of Trump's failures. The New York Times' average of dozens of polls shows Trump's popularity in his second term peaked on Jan. 20, the day he was inaugurated, with an approval rating of 52 percent. But once people saw how awfully Trump governed, his popularity went steadily downhill. Only 44 percent of Americans approve of his performance and 52 percent disapprove, as of July 1. In addition, a CNN poll found that only 44 percent of Americans approve of Trump's decision to attack nuclear sites in Iran, while 56 percent disapprove. Trump's approval ratings undoubtedly will drop further as growing numbers of Americans feel the effect of his harmful policies and governance. As a result, Democrats with the right messaging are likely to capture majority control of the House of Representatives and increase their strength in the Senate in the 2026 elections. Trump has radically transformed the Republican Party, which long branded itself as the party supporting small government, free enterprise, free trade, individual liberty, low taxes and nations threatened by the Soviet Union (and now Russia) and China. This is no longer the case. The president has made big government even bigger by stretching the power of the executive branch to control our economy, interfere in our lives and limit our freedom of speech and other rights. For example, Trump has declared eight national emergencies and issued 166 executive orders to act without seeking approval of Congress. He has ordered a massive increase in deportations of unauthorized immigrants and deprived some of due process of law; cut funding and barred foreign students from some colleges and universities with policies he dislikes; and federalized the California National Guard over the objections of the state's governor. These actions are being challenged in court. Trump's unpredictable and changing tariffs — imposed without necessary congressional approval — are doing the opposite of what he promised and are harming all Americans. They will raise prices on many items we buy and increase inflation by acting as a massive sales tax. They will hurt businesses and farms that import and export goods, due to retaliatory tariffs levied by other nations. All of this will increase the unemployment rate. In foreign policy, Trump has been more supportive of Russia than any past president, worsened relations with our traditional allies — even threatening to annex Canada, Greenland and the Panama Canal Zone — and cut support for Ukraine in its war against Russian invaders. And alarmingly, we've seen federal law enforcement agents detaining or arresting Democratic elected officials — including Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), New York City Comptroller and unsuccessful mayoral candidate Brad Lander, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) — on trumped-up accusations for challenging the administration's anti-immigrant policies. This is outrageous conduct we expect to see in dictatorships, not democracies. Because of his unpopularity, the 2028 presidential election is likely to see Republicans nominate a candidate who rejects Trump's most unpopular policies and offers a more traditional and stable style of leadership, like that provided by President Ronald Reagan. As a result, Trumpism — the contradictory, impulsive, extremist and vengeful policies and leadership style the president embraces — is likely to end after he leaves office. Trump is a unique combination of con man, reality television star, marketing genius, BS artist and social media influencer, with the ability to lure Americans to follow him against their own best interests, like the legendary Pied Piper. Neither Vice President JD Vance nor any other possible 2028 GOP presidential nominee shows any signs of replicating Trump's brashness and charisma to continue the MAGA movement. Trump was elected in 2024 by making extravagant promises, many of which he hasn't kept, including ending inflation on his first day in office, ending the war between Russia and Ukraine in 24 hours, ending the Israel-Hamas war and cutting energy prices in half. He said he would keep America out of wars, yet he joined Israel in attacking Iran. As Trump's failures and false promises become more apparent, Republicans would be wise to review the results of the 1932 election, when voters ended the failed presidency of Herbert Hoover and GOP congressional majorities during the Great Depression. Franklin D. Roosevelt swept to power with 89 percent of the Electoral College vote and 57 percent of the popular vote. Democrats won a 59-36 majority over Republicans in the Senate and a 310-117 majority over Republicans in the House (with the Farmer-Labor Party picking up five seats). No one should expect the 1932 level of success from Democrats when a new president and Congress are elected in 2028. But if Republicans refuse to turn their backs on the many failures of Trumpism, which by then will be painfully clear, they will go down to defeat. To avoid that fate, look for Republicans to stop being the party of Trump four years from now. A. Scott Bolden is an attorney, former New York state prosecutor, NewsNation contributor and former chair of the Washington, D.C. Democratic Party.