logo
Travelling to Switzerland? Shopping may cost more as Donald Trump imposes 39% tariff

Travelling to Switzerland? Shopping may cost more as Donald Trump imposes 39% tariff

Mint4 days ago
Prices for the eponymous Swiss watches, Swiss chocolate and Swiss cheese could skyrocket in a week as a result of US President Donald Trump's trade war.
Switzerland, home to some the world's most recognisable luxury brands, now faces an upcoming 39 per cent tariff from the US Industry groups on Friday warned that both Swiss companies and American consumers could pay the price.
Trump signed an executive order Thursday placing tariffs on many US trade partners — the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and alliances — that's set to take effect next Thursday. The order applies to 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands.
In Switzerland, officials failed to reach a final agreement with the US after Trump initially threatened a 31 per cent tariff in April. Swiss companies will now have one of the steepest export duties — only Laos, Myanmar and Syria had higher figures, at 40-41 per cent. The 27-member EU bloc and Britain, meanwhile, negotiated 15 per cent and 10 per cent tariffs, respectively.
The Swiss government spent Friday — the country's National Day — reeling from the news. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter said that the 39 per cent figure was a surprise, because negotiators had hashed out a deal last month with the Trump administration that apparently wasn't approved by the American leader himself.
'We will now analyze the situation and try to find a solution," Keller-Sutter told reporters. 'I can't say what the outcome will be, but it will certainly damage the economy.'
The US goods trade deficit with Switzerland was USD 38.5 billion last year, a 56.9 per cent increase over 2023, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. Keller-Sutter said that she believes Trump ultimately chose the 39 per cent tariff, because the figure rounded up from the USD 38.5 billion goods trade deficit.
'It was clear that the president was focused on the trade deficit and only this issue,' she said.
For Swiss watch companies, whose products already come with price tags in the tens of thousands — if not the hundreds of thousands — of euros, a timepiece for an arm could cost a leg, too, come next week.
The 39 per cent figure was especially galling to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, because Switzerland in 2024 got rid of import tariffs on all industrial goods.
'As Switzerland has eliminated all custom duties on imported industrial products, there is no problem with reciprocity between Switzerland and the US,' the federation said in a statement. 'The tariffs constitute a severe problem for our bilateral relations.'
Swiss watch exports were already facing a prolonged slowdown, with significant declines in the United States, Japan and Hong Kong, according to the federation's June figures, the most recent available.
Swatch and Rolex declined to comment Friday. Representatives for Patek Philippe, IWC and Breitling didn't respond to requests for comment.
Multinational chocolatiers Nestlé and Lindt & Sprüngli said they have production lines in the US for American customers. But small- and medium-sized Swiss companies are predicted to suffer under the tariffs.
Roger Wehrli, chief executive of the Association of Swiss Chocolate Manufacturers. also known as Chocosuisse, said Switzerland exports 7 per cent of its chocolate production to the US.
It's not just the 39 per cent tariff that's the issue. Once the manufacturers factor in the exchange rate between US dollars and Swiss francs (USD1 to 1.23 francs on Friday), Wehrli said, it's close to a 50 per cent increase in costs for the Swiss companies. And that's a big number to pass on to American consumers, if the already-slim margins aren't further reduced.
'I expect that our industry will lose customers in the United States, and that sales volumes will decrease heavily,' he told The Associated Press.
Wehrli said that he wants Swiss chocolatiers to sell to other markets around the globe to make up the difference. Still, he hopes American customers remember that Swiss quality beats cheaper quantity.
'I think even if prices for Swiss chocolate increase due to the very high tariffs, I think it's worth (it) to buy Swiss chocolate," he said. 'It's worth (it) to really eat it consciously and to really enjoy it instead of eating a lot.'
Swiss pharmaceuticals powerhouse Roche says that it's working to ensure its patients and customers worldwide have access to their medications and diagnostics amid the Trump tariff war.
'While we believe pharmaceuticals and diagnostics should be exempt from tariffs to protect patient access, supply chains and ultimately future innovation, we are prepared for potential tariffs being implemented and confident in managing any impacts,' the statement said.
The company in April announced that it plans to invest $50 billion in the United States over the next five years, creating 12,000 jobs. The company already employs more than 25,000 people in the US.
Meanwhile, Novartis, another major Swiss pharmaceutical firm, said in a statement that it was reviewing Trump's executive order.
'We remain committed to finding ways to improve access and affordability for patients,' it said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Right to choose trading partners': Russia calls Trump's trade ‘threats' to India ‘not legal'
‘Right to choose trading partners': Russia calls Trump's trade ‘threats' to India ‘not legal'

Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Right to choose trading partners': Russia calls Trump's trade ‘threats' to India ‘not legal'

The Kremlin on Tuesday hit out at US President Donald Trump's recent remarks targeting India over its continued trade ties with Russia, calling such pressure tactics 'not legal'. Responding to Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said, 'We hear many statements that are in fact threats, attempts to force countries to cut trade relations with Russia. We do not consider such statements to be legal.' In a sharp rebuke of Trump's stance, Peskov added, 'We believe that sovereign countries should have and do have the right to choose their own trading partners, partners for trade and economic cooperation, and to choose for themselves the forms of trade and economic cooperation that are in the interests of a particular country.' The comments came days after Trump, in a July 31 post on Truth Social, vowed to impose steep tariffs on India for what he described as 'obnoxious' trade barriers. His threat included an unspecified 'penalty' for buying Russian crude. New Delhi has called Trump's threats 'unjustified' and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two major economies.

Epstein Files: FBI blacked out Trump's name in documents after March review, says report
Epstein Files: FBI blacked out Trump's name in documents after March review, says report

First Post

time7 minutes ago

  • First Post

Epstein Files: FBI blacked out Trump's name in documents after March review, says report

This large-scale effort involved nearly 1,000 agents who were tasked with sifting through over 100,000 pages of documents in March. read more In a sweeping review of internal records tied to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) redacted the names of President Donald Trump and other high-profile individuals, according to a recent Bloomberg report. This large-scale effort, conducted earlier this year, involved nearly 1,000 agents who were tasked with sifting through over 100,000 pages of documents in March. Sources cited by Bloomberg revealed that agents were specifically instructed to flag any references to Trump, with his name ultimately blacked out to prevent what the FBI described as an 'unwarranted invasion of privacy.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The directive came as part of a broader reassessment of Epstein-related files led by the Justice Department. The review concluded that there was no evidence of criminal activity involving Trump. However, the decision to redact his name has sparked debate, particularly among Trump's MAGA supporters, who have been vocal about their demands for the release of the remaining Epstein files. Both the president and senior White House officials have resisted these calls, arguing that further disclosures are unnecessary and expressing a desire to move on from the issue. The controversy traces back to February, when the White House distributed binders filled with mostly public Epstein-related materials to far-right influencers, framing it as part of a transparency initiative. At the time, US Attorney General Pam Bondi described the release as the 'first phase' of making documents public, adding that additional files, including the highly speculated client list, were 'sitting on my desk,' as she told Fox News. However, frustration over delays in accessing requested files prompted Bondi to push the FBI to reassign hundreds of agents to the case. This led to the intensive March effort, where agents worked around-the-clock shifts to prepare documents for potential public release, with a specific focus on flagging Trump's name. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Bloomberg, the review uncovered 'numerous references to Trump' alongside mentions of other prominent figures. Before any potential public disclosure, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) officers processed the flagged documents, applying redactions under exemptions designed to protect personal privacy. Trump's name was withheld because he was a private citizen during the initial Epstein investigation in 2006. Investigators cited FOIA provisions that guard against releasing information that could constitute an 'unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.' In May, during a Justice Department briefing, Bondi informed Trump that his name appeared multiple times in the Epstein files, according to a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report. She also noted that other high-profile individuals were mentioned, but clarified that no so-called 'client list' had been uncovered. The White House initially dismissed the WSJ report as 'fake news,' but an unnamed official later confirmed to Reuters that Trump's name did appear in some files, though it did not suggest any wrongdoing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By July, the administration shifted its stance, stating that 'no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' The Justice Department pointed to a lack of new findings and ongoing privacy concerns as reasons to halt additional releases.

US Tech Jobs Under Fire? Marjorie Greene Demand Ban On Indian Work Visas Amid Tariff Tensions
US Tech Jobs Under Fire? Marjorie Greene Demand Ban On Indian Work Visas Amid Tariff Tensions

Time of India

time7 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US Tech Jobs Under Fire? Marjorie Greene Demand Ban On Indian Work Visas Amid Tariff Tensions

Far-right US congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has called on Donald Trump to halt the H1B visa programme for Indian nationals, claiming they are replacing American workers. Her remarks followed Trump's social media post threatening steep tariffs on Indian goods due to India's oil trade with Russia. Greene doubled down, urging an end to US funding for Ukraine and blaming former Democratic presidents for the ongoing war. The H1B visa debate has resurfaced, with powerful voices in Trump's circle offering conflicting views.#MarjorieTaylorGreene #TrumpIndiaTensions #H1BVisaBan #IndiaUSTrade #UkraineWarFunding #FarRightPolitics #TechJobsCrisis #USImmigrationDebate #ElonMuskH1B #TrumpVsIndia Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store