Opinion- Iran's resilience, Israel's disarray: Who won?
Israel entered this confrontation with the intention of toppling the Iranian regime in a single night - eliminating top leaders, including the Supreme Leader and the President, and paving the way for exiled figure Reza Pahlavi to assume power.
Backed and publicised by the West, Pahlavi himself admitted that these ambitions failed, blaming US President Donald Trump for abandoning the plan. Israel also aimed to dismantle Iran's nuclear programme and provoke internal uprising.
Yet Tehran stood firm, its leadership intact, its nuclear capability preserved, and its people — regardless of their political stance — unified in opposition to what they saw as foreign aggression.
However, one cannot ignore the painful blows dealt by Israel. It exposed significant weaknesses in Iran's air defence, destroyed drone launch sites and carried out deep infiltration operations.
That Mossad managed to establish a three-storey drone factory in the heart of Tehran is a staggering indicator of internal vulnerability. And yet, despite this, Iran managed to strike back with unexpected resilience, shaking Israel's confidence in its famed defence systems and targeting strategic facilities.
Disappointingly, several Arab countries acted as a shield for Israel's defence - serving as a real 'Iron Dome.'
This episode reinforced a long-standing truth: the world only respects strength. Prime Minister Netanyahu's decision to accept a ceasefire before fulfilling his grand vision of neutralising Iran's nuclear ambitions is an implicit admission of failure. The cost of continuing outweighed the potential gains.
Israel, for the first time, found itself forced to retreat from a direct military confrontation without achieving its objectives. The war exposed vulnerabilities in its internal cohesion and confirmed that Israel's deterrence narrative is far from invincible. The idea that it can easily subdue Iran has been severely undermined.
While the current round may have ended, the tension is far from over. Israel will remain uneasy as long as Iran holds on to its sovereign decision-making power and nuclear capability. The failure to dismantle the Iranian regime or nuclear facilities, and the rallying of the Iranian people around their leadership, are outcomes that Tel Aviv did not anticipate.
Nonetheless, the confrontation revealed alarming security gaps in Iran. The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in what was claimed to be an Iranian safe zone, the mysterious crash of President Raisi's aircraft, the killings of nuclear scientists, and the exposure of internal drone factories all point to a deeply compromised intelligence environment.
More worrying still is the wider regional context. The silence - or worse, complicity of many Arab states has become strikingly apparent. Israel has not only penetrated these governments politically, but also garnered their open or covert support. Once forced to conceal their collaboration, some Arab regimes now show it openly, even proudly, though they lack the legitimacy to justify such alignment.
It is telling that the ceasefire was reportedly requested by Israel itself, realising that prolonging the battle could lead to collapse from within. With an estimated two million Israelis having emigrated since the beginning of Al Aqsa operation, and rising dissent within the Knesset and public, internal pressures are mounting. The damage in Tel Aviv, despite tight media restrictions, has not been witnessed since 1948.
Iran's strikes successfully targeted key Israeli intelligence and military centres, including the Mossad HQ in Herzliya, military intelligence units and Haifa Port — effectively dismantling Israel's 20-year deterrence narrative.
Had Israel succeeded in its plan to dismantle Iran's regime and nuclear programme, Netanyahu would have emerged as the architect of a new Middle East, having eliminated the resistance axis and reshaped the region. For now, Iran has managed to halt that trajectory.
Above all, the Iranian people deserve recognition. The same nation that once resisted the Shah's tanks has again closed ranks, temporarily setting aside internal disputes to defend national sovereignty. It is a reminder that legitimacy ultimately stems from the people.
So, who won? While Iran's performance may inspire admiration, one cannot claim it has achieved total victory.
Likewise, Israel has suffered a strategic setback. What is clear, however, is that the war is not over. This is but an uneasy pause. As long as Iran remains strong, scientifically advanced, and nuclear-capable, this fragile truce could collapse at any moment.
Translated by Badr al Dhafri
The original version of this article was published in Arabic in the print edition of the Oman daily newspaper on June 30.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
5 hours ago
- Observer
Iran committed to nuclear NPT, says Araghchi
TEHRAN: Iran on Thursday affirmed its commitment to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, as it accused Germany of "malice" over its criticism of Tehran's decision to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. "Iran remains committed to the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) and its Safeguards Agreement," Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a post on X. "The explicit German support for the bombing of Iran has obliterated the notion that the German regime harbours anything but malice towards Iranians," he added in response to a German foreign office post criticising the move. On Wednesday, Iran officially suspended its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, a move the United States described as "unacceptable". On June 25, a day after a ceasefire took hold, Iranian lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to suspend cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA. State media confirmed on Wednesday that the legislation had now taken effect. The law aims to "ensure full support for the inherent rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran" under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, with a particular focus on uranium enrichment, according to Iranian media. — AFP
Observer
5 hours ago
- Observer
The Evolving Role of Social Media in the Arab World: A Focus on Oman
Over the past two decades, social media has fundamentally transformed how people in the Arab world engage with each other, express themselves, and interact with institutions. While early discussions about the internet in the region were often framed through concerns about surveillance, censorship, and cultural values, the rise of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter (now X), Instagram, and WhatsApp has sparked a digital renaissance. Social media has reconfigured notions of civic participation, reshaped public discourse, and opened up new modes of knowledge production, particularly in the Arab Gulf region. In Oman, these changes have unfolded gradually yet decisively, creating what I refer to as 'digitally mediated citizenship'—a mode of civic engagement that is subtle, multimodal, and deeply embedded in cultural and religious values. In my own research on social media use in Oman, I have argued that social media platforms do more than enable communication; they offer new spaces for identity negotiation, moral reasoning, and public participation. Omanis use social media to challenge, adapt, and reaffirm cultural norms in a rapidly globalising environment. Unlike the more vociferous, often confrontational digital activism seen in other Arab contexts, Omani digital discourse tends to be polite, indirect, and carefully attuned to national values of respect, stability, and communal harmony. This does not mean it lacks influence. Rather, Omani social media users have developed a culturally nuanced form of activism that operates through hints, visual symbols, storytelling, and collaborative problem-solving. From the Arab Spring to Civic Dialogue The Arab Spring of 2010 marked a turning point in the regional perception of social media. Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook were hailed as tools of resistance and democratic awakening. In Egypt, Tunisia, and Syria, they were instrumental in mobilising protests and spreading awareness. However, in Gulf countries, social media played a different, more subtle role. Protests were limited in scale and largely peaceful, accompanied by widespread calls for reform through dialogue rather than revolution. Omanis, in particular, turned to social media not to disrupt but to engage — to highlight grievances, propose changes, and call for improved governance. Since then, social media has continued to evolve across the region, shifting from primarily being a tool of activism to a broader platform for civic expression, community building, and knowledge sharing. In Oman, this evolution is particularly evident in the way citizens interact with public institutions. Government ministries now maintain active social media accounts, respond to grievances, and even invite public feedback on policy decisions. Social media has become a space where the boundaries between state and society are negotiated in real time. It is both a mirror and a mould — reflecting social priorities whilst shaping public discourse. Everyday Politics and Micro-Engagement One of the most significant developments in Oman's digital landscape is the rise of what I term 'everyday politics' — the utilisation of social media to address everyday issues that are profoundly political, even if not framed overtly as such. For example, Omanis often use platforms like X and Instagram to raise awareness about environmental concerns, infrastructural needs, education reform, or issues affecting people with disabilities. These posts are often framed in moral or religious language, invoking values of justice, community, and stewardship. They are less about demanding rights and more about expressing responsibilities—a framing that aligns with Omani cultural values. Importantly, this form of digital engagement is deeply multimodal. Users do not rely solely on text; they combine images, videos, hashtags, and voice notes to create layered narratives that appeal to emotion, reason, and faith. My multimodal analysis of Omani tweets and Instagram posts reveals how citizens use visual symbols—such as national flags, Qur'anic verses, and traditional dress—not just to assert identity, but to anchor their arguments within shared cultural frameworks. This blend of digital modernity and cultural authenticity makes Omani social media a unique site of knowledge production and civic negotiation. Youth and the Reconfiguration of Authority Youth are central to Oman's social media revolution. With over 70% of the population under the age of 35, young Omanis are both the primary users of social media and the main drivers of digital innovation. They utilise these platforms not only for entertainment but also to engage with pressing social issues, from unemployment to gender roles to climate change. This digital fluency has reconfigured traditional notions of authority. Young people, once expected to defer to elders and government officials, now have platforms where their voices can be amplified and respected. This shift is not without tension. Generational divides are evident in how different age groups interpret what is appropriate or respectful online. Some older Omanis express concern about the erosion of traditional values, whilst younger users demand more transparency and responsiveness from institutions. However, what is notable is the mutual willingness to listen and adapt. In many cases, social media becomes a space where intergenerational dialogue unfolds, allowing the old and the new to coexist and learn from each other. The Role of Influencers and Digital Gatekeepers Another key aspect of Oman's evolving social media landscape is the rise of influencers. These individuals often occupy a hybrid space between citizen and institution, acting as gatekeepers of information, trends, and values. Unlike in some neighbouring countries where influencers are primarily entertainers or product promoters, many Omani influencers take on social roles — as cultural educators, charity organisers, or advocates for national unity. They help translate official discourse into everyday language and bring public concerns to the attention of authorities. However, this presents risks. The informal nature of social media means misinformation can spread rapidly, and not all influencers use their platforms responsibly. This has prompted calls for digital literacy campaigns and clearer regulations to ensure social media remains a space for constructive engagement rather than division. Towards a Digitally Grounded Future The role of social media in the Arab world — and in Oman specifically — is dynamic and continuously evolving. From the early days of the Arab Spring to today's more complex digital environments, these platforms have grown from spaces of mere expression to arenas of participation and co-governance. In Oman, the cultural emphasis on respect, community, and moderation has shaped a uniquely Omani approach to digital engagement — one that values dialogue over disruption, ethics over ego, and harmony over spectacle. Social media is not simply a communication tool; it is a site of cultural negotiation, civic learning, and social innovation. As Oman progresses towards its Vision 2040 goals — emphasising youth empowerment, technological integration, and active civic participation — social media will play a vital role in bridging traditional values with modern aspirations. The challenge now is to harness this power responsibly, ensuring that digital platforms remain inclusive, constructive, and rooted in the values that underpin the Omani spirit.
Observer
5 hours ago
- Observer
Women in Arab Media: Rising Voices, Persistent Barriers
Arab women have significantly impacted the media landscape, serving as presenters, journalists, writers, and leaders. In recent years, they have made notable progress across various media sectors, gaining more opportunities in print, radio, television, and digital platforms. Influential female figures have emerged, shaping public opinion and making their mark even in conflict reporting. Among these trailblazers, Shireen Abu Akleh stands out for her dedicated journalism that reshaped media coverage in Palestine. As a seasoned correspondent for Al Jazeera, she broadened international focus on Palestinian issues, highlighting the struggles and narratives of the Palestinian people. Her professional and thorough reporting aimed to present the Palestinian voice authentically. Shireen became a recognised figure in both Palestinian and Arab households, celebrated for her insightful and timely content. Her untimely death in 2022 was a significant loss to the journalistic community. In Egypt, Lamis El Hadidi has emerged as a key media personality known for her in-depth coverage of political and social issues. With a neutral and professional approach, she has effectively spotlighted corruption and injustice within Egyptian and Arab communities, particularly concerning vulnerable groups. Lamis is also dedicated to advocating for women's rights and promoting tolerance in Arab societies. While many Arab women face significant hurdles in media employment due to deep-rooted gender biases, Oman presents a different narrative marked by progressive changes and supportive frameworks. A trailblazer in this regard is Muna Mahfoudh, recognised as Oman's first female television presenter. Starting her career during a time when women's representation in media was scarce, Muna encountered numerous challenges, including societal doubts and limited opportunities. However, her determination, along with community and government support for gender equality, allowed her to succeed as a respected media figure. Building upon this foundation, Omani women are increasingly thriving in diverse media roles, from journalism to digital platforms. Pioneers like Rahma Hussain Al Issa and Muzna Al Musafer are leading the way. Muzna, Oman's first female film director, has profoundly impacted the media landscape through her work in filmmaking, mentorship, and cultural advocacy. Her acclaimed films, such as Niqaab and Cholo, have received international accolades, with Cholo winning Best Script at the Abu Dhabi Film Festival in 2013. Beyond directing, she mentors aspiring filmmakers, conducts workshops, and organises screenings to promote Omani cinema. Her active participation in regional film festivals and discussions about Gulf cinema's future further enriches Oman's media community, reflecting the country's cultural diversity. This progress is further supported by government initiatives aimed at promoting gender equality and empowering women. The Basic Law and labour regulations aligned with international standards have created a favourable environment for women's workforce participation. Huda Hamad, an Omani writer and journalist, has remarked on the remarkable evolution of women's representation in Omani cultural media. Women are taking on various roles, indicating a commitment to gender inclusivity. Despite ongoing challenges, such as balancing work and personal life, there is a clear movement towards greater inclusion. Initiatives like the 'Tasmu' programme by the Royal Academy of Management are vital for enhancing women's leadership skills across sectors. Launched in 2024, Tasmu aims to develop the leadership capabilities of Omani women across the public and private sectors, and civil society, aligning with Oman Vision 2040's goal of fostering an environment where women can excel. Complementing these efforts, programmes like Sidrah 3.0 empower young Omani women to effect change in their communities. Sidrah 3.0, a transformative six-month youth leadership development programme, recently celebrated the graduation of 61 participants from nine governorates. The programme emphasises leadership, problem-solving, and entrepreneurship, preparing participants to thrive as future leaders and aligning with Oman Vision 2040's objectives. Through these combined efforts, Omani women are not only breaking barriers in media but are also shaping the nation's future across various sectors.
