logo
Still Frustrated? Everything iOS Needs to Fix (But Hasn't)

Still Frustrated? Everything iOS Needs to Fix (But Hasn't)

Geeky Gadgets05-06-2025
Apple's iOS is often celebrated for its sleek design and seamless integration within the Apple ecosystem. However, beneath its polished surface lie several limitations that restrict customization, functionality, and overall user experience. The video below from Sam Beckman provides more insights into the most prominent shortcomings of iOS, highlighting areas where it falls short compared to Android's more adaptable and user-friendly approach.
Watch this video on YouTube. Customization: Limited and Constrained
iOS provides only minimal options for personalizing your device, resulting in a rigid and uniform experience. The home screen is tightly bound by Apple's grid system, which forces app icons into predefined positions. Unlike Android, where you can freely place icons, resize widgets, or use third-party icon packs, iOS users must rely on cumbersome workarounds to achieve even basic customization. This lack of flexibility leaves users with fewer ways to make their devices feel truly personal.
The dock, a central element of the interface, is similarly restrictive. It remains static, offering no options to adjust its appearance or functionality. While Apple introduced the App Library to help organize apps, its rigid categorization system often complicates app management. The absence of an alphabetical grid further exacerbates this issue, making it difficult to locate specific apps quickly. In contrast, Android's home screen design and robust customization tools empower users to tailor their devices to their unique preferences, offering a more dynamic and personalized experience. User Experience: Aesthetic Over Usability
While iOS is often praised for its simplicity, this focus on aesthetics sometimes comes at the expense of usability. One notable example is the absence of a universal back gesture. On Android, users can swipe from the edge of the screen to navigate back, regardless of the app. In iOS, navigation relies on app-specific gestures or back buttons, which vary widely between apps. This inconsistency disrupts the otherwise smooth user experience and can lead to frustration.
Another usability issue lies in the system vibration toggle. Unlike Android, which provides quick toggles for vibration and other settings in its notification shade, iOS buries this option deep within the Settings menu. This design choice makes adjusting basic preferences unnecessarily time-consuming, especially for users who frequently switch between silent and vibrate modes. These examples highlight how iOS prioritizes visual appeal over practical functionality, leaving users with a less intuitive experience. Keyboard Functionality: Falling Behind
The iOS keyboard has long been a source of frustration for many users. Autocorrect often misinterprets context, leading to unnecessary and disruptive corrections that can slow down typing. Cursor placement is another weak point; moving the cursor to edit text feels clunky and less intuitive compared to Android's more precise controls, such as the ability to drag the cursor with a dedicated handle or use gestures for fine adjustments.
While third-party keyboards like Gboard offer some improvements, they cannot fully integrate with iOS due to system restrictions. This lack of integration limits their functionality, leaving users with a subpar typing experience. For a platform as advanced as iOS, the keyboard's shortcomings stand out as a missed opportunity to enhance usability and productivity. Clipboard Management: A Missed Productivity Tool
Clipboard functionality on iOS is notably limited, retaining only the most recently copied item. In contrast, Android offers a system-level clipboard manager capable of storing multiple copied items, allowing users to access and reuse them as needed. This feature is particularly valuable for multitasking and productivity, as it streamlines workflows that involve frequent copying and pasting.
While third-party clipboard apps are available for iOS, they often come with drawbacks such as clunky interfaces, additional permissions, or subscription fees. These limitations make it difficult for users to achieve the same level of efficiency that Android's native clipboard management provides. For users who rely on their devices for work or creative tasks, this shortcoming can be a significant hindrance. Notification Handling: Clean but Restrictive
iOS notifications are visually clean and well-organized, but they lack practical features that enhance usability. For instance, there is no quick swipe-to-dismiss option for notifications, requiring users to interact with each one individually. This can be particularly frustrating when managing multiple notifications at once. Additionally, notifications disappear from the lock screen after an hour, increasing the likelihood of missing important alerts.
Spam filtering for calls and messages is another area where iOS lags behind. Android devices, particularly those from Google, use advanced AI to block unwanted communications more effectively. In comparison, iOS's spam filtering feels less robust, leaving users more vulnerable to spam calls and messages. These limitations highlight how iOS's notification system, while visually appealing, lacks the functionality needed to meet the demands of modern users. Home Screen Design: Stuck in the Past
The iOS home screen, while functional, remains largely unchanged and uninspired. The inability to freely position icons or use third-party icon packs limits users' ability to personalize their devices. Although Apple introduced widgets to add some versatility, they remain less dynamic and customizable than those on Android. For example, Android widgets can be resized and interact with apps in more meaningful ways, offering greater utility.
The App Library, intended to simplify app organization, often complicates it instead. Apps are sorted into rigid, predefined categories, and the lack of a universal alphabetical grid makes finding specific apps unnecessarily tedious. This rigid approach contrasts sharply with Android's more flexible and user-centric design, which prioritizes ease of use and customization. Navigation Gestures: Inconsistent and Frustrating
Navigation gestures on iOS, while an improvement over older methods, still lack the consistency and intuitiveness found on Android. The absence of a universal back gesture is particularly frustrating. On Android, the back gesture works seamlessly across all apps, creating a cohesive and predictable experience. In contrast, iOS relies on app-specific navigation methods, which vary widely and disrupt the overall flow of using the device.
This inconsistency can make navigating iOS feel disjointed, especially for users who are accustomed to Android's more uniform approach. Addressing this issue would significantly enhance the user experience, making navigation more intuitive and efficient. Final Thoughts
While iOS excels in design and ecosystem integration, its limitations in customization, functionality, and user experience are difficult to overlook. From rigid home screen layouts to inconsistent navigation gestures, these shortcomings hinder the platform's overall usability. Addressing these issues would not only improve the iOS experience but also bring it closer to the flexibility and functionality that Android users have long enjoyed. For Apple to remain competitive, it must prioritize these improvements in future updates, making sure that iOS evolves to meet the needs of its diverse user base.
Master iOS customization with the help of our in-depth articles and helpful guides.
Source & Image Credit: Sam Beckman Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Revealed: The huge financial impact of Elon Musk's row with Donald Trump
Revealed: The huge financial impact of Elon Musk's row with Donald Trump

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Revealed: The huge financial impact of Elon Musk's row with Donald Trump

Why you can trust Sky News Elon Musk's Tesla faces the loss of billions of dollars in government subsidies, following his explosive fallout with Donald Trump, after the president cut state support for green industries. Subsidies have been central to Tesla's rise from upstart manufacturer to the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) producer in less than 20 years. But analysis by Sky News' Data & Forensics team reveals the president's cuts could leave a significant gap in its future earnings, raising questions about its business model and market valuation. Revenue from state subsidies accounted for at least 38% of Tesla's profits of $7.1bn in 2024 as the company banked $2.8bn from trading "regulatory credits", a state-level subsidy paid to encourage production of electric vehicles. Accounts for the first quarter of this year meanwhile show Tesla earned $595m from regulatory credits, almost 50% more than its net earnings of $409m, suggesting that without the subsidy Tesla would be operating in the red. Tesla's total revenues in 2024 were $98bn, of which automotive sales made up $72bn. Tesla has also benefited from a federal tax credit of $7,500 available to consumers buying any electric car. If applied to all of the more than 630,000 Tesla cars sold in the US last year, it would have been worth $4.7bn in discounts. The federal tax credit was axed in Mr Trump's flagship tax and spending bill, while California's powers to issue credits as part of zero-emission vehicle schemes were revoked last month, threatening state-level schemes across the country. Amid the public fallout between Mr Trump and the man who helped bankroll his election campaign, the president renewed his efforts to cut green industry subsidies. In a Truth Social post Mr Trump said: "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and, without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back to South Africa." Speaking to reporters on the White House lawn, where previously he had posed with Mr Musk alongside a selection of Tesla models, the president added: "Elon hates that the electric vehicle mandate is going to be terminated." Tesla's worldwide sales have also declined in the face of increased competition and consumer unease about Mr Musk's previous support for the president. Gordon Johnson, an investment analyst and prominent Tesla sceptic, told Sky News: "The changes that Trump is proposing have significant implications - negative implications - for Tesla's fundamentals. "If all of these government programmes were taken away, Tesla would go into losing money and burning cash and the stock would implode." Ross Gerber became one of Tesla's earliest investors after having what he calls "an amazing epiphany" when he saw the Tesla S-Class for the first time. "I thought, 'wow, this could actually change the way we travel'," he said. Now he is selling his Tesla stock and considering offloading his Tesla Cybertruck because of the hostility it attracts. "Elon's playing a very dangerous game," he added. Green incentives drove Tesla's growth Tesla has long benefited from subsidies offered in the US, and by governments around the world, to incentivise the take-up of electric vehicles and low-carbon technologies. In America, regulatory credits are an incentive intended to encourage car manufacturers to meet targets for EV production. Several states, led by California, use them to enforce a "zero-emission vehicles mandate", under which manufacturers are required to produce a certain proportion of EVs as part of their overall output. Because Tesla only makes electric vehicles, it earns credits at no cost and profits from selling them to manufacturers producing petrol and diesel vehicles, which need them to meet any shortfall against state targets. Around a dozen US states and numerous European governments, including the UK, operate similar programmes. In June, however, the president signed resolutions removing California's authority to set mandatory targets - a move that endangers similar programmes in other states. Tesla customers also benefited from the federal grant of $7,500 available to buyers of any electric car. Mr Johnson said: "The $7,500 subsidy that you get if you buy an electric car - that doesn't go to Tesla. But removing it means Tesla's cars immediately increase by $7,500 in value which would have significant implications for their demand." "The EV subsidies are just crucially important," Mr Gerber said. Tesla also has a burgeoning energy business selling domestic and commercial solar that could be impacted by the withdrawal of a tax credit worth up to 60% of the cost of a system. Tesla's energy division generated $10bn in revenue last year. Cuts and competition challenge Tesla's 'Technoking' The withdrawal of subsidies is one of many challenges Tesla and its self-appointed "Technoking" Mr Musk face to its dominance in a market it helped create. It is only 18 years since the first Tesla Roadster rolled off a production line to the delight of early adopters and the scepticism of America's established car manufacturers. Mr Musk's packaging of battery electric vehicles as not just virtuous but desirable and reliable too worked spectacularly, driven in large part by his personal popularity and profile on social media. His drive helped the company overcome the enormous technical challenges of establishing a mass vehicle manufacturer from scratch, and he was quick to exploit the advantages of placing production in China where an entire auto industry had been directed at electrification. "When I started with Tesla, there were no EVs, and it was Elon making EVs," recalls Mr Gerber. "And now, 10 years later, there are EVs everywhere. They're the fastest growing segment of the car market." Tesla's growth was aided by governments around the world offering subsidies and tax breaks to consumers and companies to accelerate the transition to low-carbon transport. By the turn of the 2020s, the company was established as the world's largest manufacturer of EVs, accounting for three-quarters of all those sold in the US. It was also firmly entrenched as one of the most important tech stocks in the world, its fluctuations as likely to be triggered by the chief executive's Twitter feed as production updates. In December 2024, Tesla's market value peaked at over $1.5trn, placing it among the most valuable companies in the world, but its indisputable success spurred rivals who have started to cut into its market share. While European and American legacy auto manufacturers have flooded Tesla's premium electric niche with competition, considerably cheaper Chinese EVs have overtaken all of them in recent years. Last year Chinese carmaker BYD passed Tesla's global market share for fully electric vehicles, according to market intelligence firm TrendForce. China is also a crucial market for Tesla, accounting for more than half of its non-US car sales, but that share is now falling. Calls for boycotts against Mr Musk prompted by his previous support for Mr Trump saw sales decline in other markets too. Year-on-year sales in the first four months of 2025 fell by 58% in Germany, 44% in France, and 62% in Australia. Sky News reached out to Tesla for comment on our findings but did not receive a response. Investors divided over Musk The combination of increased competition, the withdrawal of subsidies, and hostility from the president and potential customers has caused some investors to call time on Tesla. Despite being an early supporter, Mr Gerber, president of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, has been reducing his firm's holdings in recent months. "We've had to sell more Tesla stock and we're going to continue to sell more," he said. "The stock's wildly overvalued and, still just on a business level, has lots of issues." Tesla's valuation nosedived in the first few months of 2025 after Mr Musk joined Mr Trump's administration. By mid-March, its market value had essentially halved. Although the stock has rallied slightly since Mr Musk first suggested he would exit the government, the share price is two-thirds of its December peak. Other investors are far more positive, arguing that Tesla's worth should be judged not just on sales and productivity, but the value of Mr Musk's talent for innovation, particularly in the potential of AI and self-driving technology that he considers the next frontier for the automotive industry. Tesla trialled its self-driving RoboTaxi in Austin, Texas, in June with mixed results. Several incidents triggered an investigation by the US road safety agency, but many investors are undeterred. Dan Ives, senior analyst at prominent wealth management firm Wedbush Securities, is a long-term advocate whose view has not been changed by recent events. "The Trump feud is not getting in the way of this in our view. We believe Tesla remains the most undervalued AI play in the market today," Mr Ives wrote in a recent report with fellow Wedbush analyst Sam Brandeis. Mr Ives acknowledged in an interview with Sky News that state and federal tax breaks are "the roots of Tesla" without which the company would not be where it is today. But he said the larger part of its success is "innovation in everything they built". "It's the biggest disruptive technology company in the world, along with Nvidia," he said. Mr Gerber remains unconvinced and fears Mr Musk's pivot to politics has irreparably damaged the brand he built. While he can offload the stock, he has struggled to find a buyer for the Cybertruck he bought just last year.

Dirty Jobs host Mike Rowe sounds alarm about his fear gripping backbone of America's workforce
Dirty Jobs host Mike Rowe sounds alarm about his fear gripping backbone of America's workforce

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Dirty Jobs host Mike Rowe sounds alarm about his fear gripping backbone of America's workforce

Mike Rowe, the former host of Discovery Channel's Dirty Jobs, sounded the alarm on the nation's shortage of blue collar workers in the face of emerging technology. Speaking at the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit, Rowe suggested that trade-based jobs may be the solution to the artificial-intelligence driven jobs apocalypse. 'We've been telling kids for 15 years to code. "Learn to code," we said,' he told audience members. 'Yeah, well AI is coming for the coders.' It is not, however, 'coming for the welders... the plumbers, the steamfitters or the pipefitters' or even 'the electricians' as these industries face major labor shortages. Rowe even claimed that BlackRock CEO Larry Fink once told him the nation needs 500,000 more electricians over the next few years. 'Not a week goes by that the Blue Forge Alliance, who oversees our maritime industrial base - that's 15,000 individual companies who are collectively charged with building and delivering nuclear-powered subs to the Navy ... calls and says "We're having a hell of a time finding tradespeople. Can you help?" 'I said, "I don't know man... how many do you need?" He says 140,000,' Rowe recounted, telling audience members how there is an urgent need for at least 80,000 technicians right now. 'These are our submarines,' he emphasized. 'Things go hypersonic, a little sideways with China, Taiwan, our aircraft carriers are no longer the point of the spear. They're vulnerable. 'Our submarines matter, and these guys have a pinch point because they can't find welders and electricians to get them built.' Rowe went on to say that the automotive industry is in need of 80,000 collision repair and technicians, while the energy sector needs somewhere between 300,000 to 500,000 more employees. Manufacturers are also having trouble finding workers, with about 400,000 jobs currently unfilled, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'That's the underlying thing that I hope people really take from this conference,' he said, adding: 'There is a clear and present freak out going on right now.' 'I've heard from six governors over the last six months. I've heard from the heads of major companies. It's like a memo went out and people are realizing, "You know something, we need to tend to this."' Rowe then concluded his speech by telling 'young men and women in this state that a bright future awaits if they... learn a skill that's in demand. 'That's going to resonate politically, that's going to resonate practically. It's gonna move the needle,' he vowed. Rowe's speech comes just weeks after the New York Times reported on manufacturers' concerns attracting and retaining workers. It noted that some companies need to use specialized equipment that requires employees to have extensive training and familiarity with the software - which is becoming increasingly harder to find as fewer young people attend vocational school. 'For every 20 job postings that we have, there is one qualified applicant right now,' lamented David Gitlin, chairman and chief executive of Carrier Global - which produces air conditioners and furnaces. But his job will likely see a growth in demand with the rise of artificial intelligence, as the massive data centers are built with cooling systems called chillers. In total, Gitlin estimates that each AI data center would require four technicians to maintain a single chiller. And as these data centers grow, more and more white-collar workers may soon find themselves without a job. Earlier this month, Ford Motors CEO Jim Farley even predicted that artificial intelligence will ' replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US.' 'AI will leave a lot of white-collar people behind,' he told Walter Isaacson at the Aspen Ideas Festival, shortly after Amazon CEO Andy Jassy announced future workforce cuts were likely as the company continues to implement AI in its operations. More recently, it was announced that Indeed and Glassdoor, the hiring and public HR platforms that have transparently connected employers with online applicants, will replace six percent of its staff with AI. Most of Indeed and Glassdoor's layoffs are expected to hit US workers, particularly in research and development, HR, and sustainability teams, according to an internal memo obtained by Indeed CEO Hisayuki 'Deko' Idekoba said the cuts include some leadership shakeups. He wrote in an email to staff that 'AI is changing the world.' 'We must adapt by ensuring our product delivers truly great experiences for job seekers and employers,' he added.

Zuckerberg says Meta will build data center the size of Manhattan in latest AI push
Zuckerberg says Meta will build data center the size of Manhattan in latest AI push

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Zuckerberg says Meta will build data center the size of Manhattan in latest AI push

Mark Zuckerberg proclaimed that Meta would spend hundreds of billions of dollars on developing artificial intelligence products in the near future and, to that end, construct a data center planned to be nearly the size of Manhattan. The parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp is among the large tech companies that have struck high-profile deals, and doled out multimillion-dollar pay packages to AI researchers in recent months – some as high as $100m – to fast-track work on machines that could outthink humans on many tasks, a concept known as 'super-intelligence' or 'artificial general intelligence'. Its first multi-gigawatt data center, dubbed Prometheus, is expected to come online in 2026, while another, called Hyperion, will be able to scale up to 5 gigawatts over the coming years, Zuckerberg said. 'We're building multiple more titan clusters as well. Just one of these covers a significant part of the footprint of Manhattan,' the billionaire CEO said. This article includes content provided by Facebook. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. He also pointed to a report from industry publication SemiAnalysis that Meta was on track to be the first AI lab to bring a gigawatt-plus supercluster online. Zuckerberg touted the strength in the company's core advertising business to justify the massive spending amid investor concerns on whether the expenditure would pay off. 'We have the capital from our business to do this,' he said. The company, which generated nearly $165bn in revenue last year, reorganized its AI efforts last month under a division called Superintelligence Labs after setbacks for its open-source Llama 4 model and key staff departures. It is betting that the division will generate new cashflows from the Meta AI app, image-to-video ad tools and smart glasses. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria said Meta was investing aggressively in AI as the technology has already boosted its ad business by allowing it to sell more ads and at higher prices. In recent weeks, Zuckerberg has personally led an aggressive talent raid for the Meta Superintelligence Labs, which will be led by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang and ex-GitHub chief Nat Friedman, after Meta invested $14.3bn in Scale. Meta had raised its 2025 capital expenditure predictions to between $64bn and $72bn in April, aiming to bolster the company's position against rivals OpenAI and Google.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store