logo
More than 14 million people could die from US foreign aid cuts, study finds

More than 14 million people could die from US foreign aid cuts, study finds

More than 14 million of the world's most vulnerable people, a third of them small children, could die because of Donald Trump administration's dismantling of US foreign aid, research has projected.
The study in the prestigious Lancet journal was published on Tuesday as world and business leaders gather for a UN conference in Spain this week hoping to bolster the reeling aid sector.
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) had provided over 40 per cent of global humanitarian funding until Mr Trump returned to the White House in January.
Two weeks later, Mr Trump's then-close advisor, Elon Musk, boasted of having put the agency "through the woodchipper".
The funding cuts "risk abruptly halting, and even reversing, two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations," warned study co-author Davide Rasella, a researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal).
"For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," he said in a statement.
Looking back over data from 133 nations, the international team of researchers estimated that USAID funding had prevented 91 million deaths in developing countries between 2001 and 2021.
They also used modelling to project how funding being slashed by 83 per cent — the figure announced by the United States government earlier this year — could affect death rates.
The cuts could lead to more than 14 million avoidable deaths by 2030, the projections found.
That number included over 4.5 million children under the age of five — or about 700,000 child deaths a year.
For comparison, about 10 million soldiers are estimated to have been killed during World War I.
Programmes supported by USAID were linked to a 15 per cent decrease in deaths from all causes, the researchers found.
For children under five, the drop in deaths was twice as steep at 32 per cent.
USAID funding was found to be particularly effective at staving off preventable deaths from disease.
There were 65 per cent fewer deaths from HIV/AIDS in countries receiving a high level of support compared to those with little or no USAID funding, the study found. Deaths from malaria and neglected tropical diseases were similarly cut in half.
After USAID was gutted, several other major donors including Germany, the UK and France followed suit in announcing plans to slash their foreign aid budgets.
These aid reductions, particularly in the European Union, could lead to "even more additional deaths in the coming years," study co-author Caterina Monti of ISGlobal said.
But the grim projections for deaths were based on the current amount of pledged aid.
Researchers emphasised this could rapidly come down if the situation changes.
Dozens of world leaders are meeting in the Spanish city of Seville this week for the biggest aid conference in a decade. The US, however, will not attend.
"Now is the time to scale up, not scale back," Professor Rasella said.
Before its funding was slashed, USAID represented 0.3 per cent of all US federal spending.
"US citizens contribute about 17 cents per day to USAID, around $64 per year," said study co-author James Macinko of the University of California, Los Angeles.
"I think most people would support continued USAID funding if they knew just how effective such a small contribution can be to saving millions of lives."
AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Modern Family star Julie Bowen thought she was ‘gonna die' after her health diagnosis at 29
Modern Family star Julie Bowen thought she was ‘gonna die' after her health diagnosis at 29

News.com.au

time6 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Modern Family star Julie Bowen thought she was ‘gonna die' after her health diagnosis at 29

Julie Bowen is opening up about her health. The Modern Family star, 55, told Michael Rosenbaum on Tuesday's episode of his Inside of You podcast that she has sick sinus syndrome, a type of rhythm disorder that affects the heart's natural pacemaker, per the Mayo Clinic. Bowen's condition is called hypervagotonia, which is increased activity in the vagus nerve, according to the National Institute of Health. 'I have a low resting heart rate,' she explained, noting that her pacemaker is 'set so that it can't go below 45.' Before the pacemaker, Bowen's resting heart rate was in the 30s, when the 'normal' resting heart rate is between 60 to 100 beats per minute for women. The Hysteria! star's sister diagnosed her condition while the two were on a getaway. Bowen shared that her sibling, Annie Luetkemeyer, had just graduated from medical school and 'was at that time in her life when she, I guess, she always carried around a stethoscope. And we were on vacation, and she was like, 'I wanna listen to this.'' 'She was like, 'That is not what they've been telling you, and it's not runner's heart or whatever. That means you need to go to a cardiologist,'' the Happy Gilmore star remembered. 'I was like, 'I'm fine,'' the actress shared, adding that her sister 'would not let it go.' A month later, Bowen shot the pilot for the NBC series Ed alongside Tom Cavanagh. The comedy/drama ran from 2000 to 2004. 'I shot the pilot of Ed and immediately had to go get a pacemaker afterwards,' Bowen said. 'I was like, 'Oh my God. My life is over. This is so weird. I'm gonna die.' I don't know what I thought it was, because I was 29.' 'You're lucky you didn't die before that,' Rosenbaum, 52, responded. 'They said I wouldn't probably die of it, but I'd start passing out,' Bowen clarified. 'There was a vague feeling … whenever I was relaxed, really relaxed, I'd be, like, watching TV or movie.' The Hubie Halloween star described it felt like she'd 'been holding my breath for a while, that feeling of, like, light-headedness. And they said, 'You're gonna be driving a car, and you're gonna pass out, and you're gonna kill somebody.' And I was like, 'Oh, well, then give me the Goddamn pacemaker.'' Bowen has had the batteries replaced three times; however, she admitted, 'I forget about it all the time.' These days, the Boston Legal star hasn't let her condition slow her down one bit. In fact, she's starring in the upcoming sequel to the beloved 1996 sports comedy Happy Gilmore. Bowen is reprising her role as Virginia Venit, the love interest of Adam Sandler's Happy Gilmore, but didn't know if she'd be asked back for round two. 'I thought, 'Well I won't be in it,'' Bowen told The Hollywood Reporter in June. 'And that was OK — it was like Virginia Venit, it's been 30 years, he's got a hottie. He's got some little bitty on the side, like a cart girl,' she continued. 'As a matter of fact my children told me, before I was even told officially that there was a Happy Gilmore sequel, my now 18-year-old said, 'Mum, I hear they're doing a sequel and he's with Sydney Sweeney as a cart girl.'' Bowen teased, 'I went, I'm hurt and I so respect that move. Of course, why wouldn't you? So when I got the call that I was actually in it, I was like, 'Are you sure? Come on.'' Although Sweeney, 27, isn't in the film, the sequel is set to have a slew of new faces, including Bad Bunny, Margaret Qualley, Benny Safdie, Travis Kelce, Kym Whitley and Eminem. 'Seeing Bad Bunny on set I was just like, 'Oh, I can't actually look you in the eye, I'm going to have to walk away,' and I did,' Bowen recalled. 'I think he was offended and I had to circle back and now I made it worse. I'm the kind of person who doesn't want to meet her heroes because I think I'm just going to be a jackass.'

Review: Was the newest Jurassic Park sequel really necessary?
Review: Was the newest Jurassic Park sequel really necessary?

News.com.au

time6 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Review: Was the newest Jurassic Park sequel really necessary?

With the welcome return of those stomping, chomping dinosaurs and another hitout for AI avenger M3GAN, there's scares aplenty on the big screen this week JURASSIC WORLD REBIRTH (M) Starring: Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali, Rupert Friend. Same fight, with more convincing bite With Jurassic World Rebirth we reach instalment number seven in the lucrative series spawned by Steven Spielberg's 1993 dinos-on-the-rampage classic Jurassic Park. We know enough by now to acknowledge that first blockbuster breakthrough will never be bettered. The formula that keeps serving up humans as possible snacks for prehistoric predators just doesn't allow the wiggle room for expansion or variation. Therefore the filmmakers are compelled to relentlessly double-down on the authenticity of the action scenes. And it is in this one department that Rebirth truly excels. When the stompin' and the chompin' commences, you will be daunted and intimidated in thoroughly convincing fashion. Just bear in mind that aside from an early dino-centric feast – after a scientist ill-advisedly drops a chocolate-bar wrapper in his lab – there is something of a wait to be endured before Rebirth gets busy with the good stuff. Much of the first hour is spent mulching copious amounts of set-up and exposition as we get to know who will be edging towards and running from the gnarly stars of the show. The most prominent players in proceedings are Zora (Scarlett Johansson) and Duncan (Mahershala Ali), two good buddies who have parlayed a past in military special-ops into a shady side-hustle doing the same kind of thing for major corporations. Zora, Duncan and a mixed bag of lesser lights gradually find themselves on a secret assignment to an equatorial zone that (after the ravages posed by climate change) is now the only place on the planet that dinosaurs can feasibly survive. The principal task of this mob is to extract select strains of dino DNA from three different species so that a dodgy pharmaceutical boss (Rupert Friend) can roll out a suite of miracle drugs for billions of bucks. To be frank, the storylines traversed by Rebirth (which are the work of Jurassic Park's original screenwriter David Koepp) lead nowhere in particular, and do not exactly have you rooting for the survival or otherwise of any one character. However, once the fates conspire to have the entire cast stranded on a remote island, director Garth Edwards lets rip with a steady supply of truly exciting set pieces awash with both genuine aggression and vivid atmosphere. On a technical level, the lighting and cinematography standards on display during the special-effects sequences are next-level great, and deserve to be witnessed on the biggest screen available. Jurassic Park Rebirth is in cinemas now M3GAN 2.0 (MA15+) General release The babysitting bot who turned out to be an AI-powered equivalent of Annabelle is back. Only this time – like Arnie In Terminator 2 – the once-dreaded doll M3GAN just might be fighting for a greater good. If you remember the first movie (a major hit a few years ago), you will recall that M3GAN's sinister software was eventually deactivated on account of sustained bad behaviour and a body count that hit triple figures. Now she has been reluctantly switched on once more by her long-suffering programmer Gemma (Alison Williams) to combat the deadly threat posed by the new AI assassin AMELIA (aka Autonomous Military Engagement Logistics and Infiltration Android). Some long-overdue coding modifications for the title character means she can renew her over-protective relationship with Gemma's teenage niece Cady (Violet McGraw). This sequel is at its strongest when playing strictly for ridiculous laughs instead of creepy chills, and for the most part, its desire to jauntily jolt its audience is effectively completed. Not sure they should go to the well a third time, however. RIVIERA REVENGE (PG) Selected cinemas While it is getting continually more difficult getting a Hollywood comedy made and released these days, the love of the French for laughs with a lightness of touch remains undiminished. Yes, most of them are as unsurprising as they are inoffensive. Nevertheless, the better ones pay their way courtesy of good casting chemistry and attractive production. So proves to be the case for Riviera Revenge, a concoction as fluffy as a souffle, but not without its bursts of sweetly addictive flavour. Veteran star Andre Dussolier plays Francois, a retired military general who finds himself waging a whole new battle late in life when he suspects his beloved wife of 40 years (a wonderful Sabine Azema) may once have had an affair with a mutual friend (Thierry Lhermitte). Some decent chuckles are earned the right way here thanks largely to the lively lead performers, and the sun-dappled coastline of the Cote D'Azur looks as stunning as ever.

From photos to fitness data, recording our lives is changing how our brains work
From photos to fitness data, recording our lives is changing how our brains work

ABC News

time7 hours ago

  • ABC News

From photos to fitness data, recording our lives is changing how our brains work

Do you have more photos on your phone than you know what to do with? Apart from taking up valuable space, experts have another reason why you should think twice before whipping your phone out to capture that special moment. Taking photos might actually make it harder to recall the very thing you want to remember. Over the past two decades, researchers have been teasing out how a steep increase in "lifelogging" influences how we think, act and make sense of our past. Julia Soares, who studies the impact of digital technologies on memory at Mississippi State University, has identified several areas where our digital devices affect how our brain works. An overstuffed photo app might be just the beginning of a profound cognitive shift. Lifelogging involves digitally recording aspects of your daily life: things like photos as well as fitness, travel and health metrics. Dr Soares says such data collection may have benefit — a number of studies have found it can help support memory recall and quality of life — but it depends on how intentional someone is about analysing and reviewing their data. "I have a couple of studies where we've found that taking photos can impair memory," Dr Soares says. "So your memory specifically for objects that you photographed compared to objects that you don't photograph." This phenomenon — called the "photo-taking-impairment effect" — has been demonstrated multiple times in a particular type of experiment. Imagine two groups of people at the entrance to an art museum, about to wander through. One group is instructed to take photographs of the artworks they see, while the other group is told to take no photographs at all. Once they're done walking through the museum, the two groups are quizzed about visual details of the artworks they've looked at, like whether the Moon in Vincent Van Gogh's The Starry Night is full or a crescent. In multiple different versions of this experiment, scientists have observed that people who don't take photos tend to have better recall for what they've seen. They get more questions right about the visual details of the artworks compared to the photo-taking group. It's not fully clear why those who take more photographs in these experiments tend to remember less, Dr Soares says. Down the track, when photographs are used as a prompt to help people remember, they can be a "highly effective memory cue". But it may be that in the moment, the act of taking the photograph distracts somebody from fully capturing the event in their internal memory. This research has influenced how Dr Soares herself takes photographs. "I do try to make sure that when I take a photo, I'm in the mindset of thinking, 'How is this going to cue my retrieval later on?' It should be something that I want to remember alongside the photo." It's not just our visual memories that we're outsourcing by snapping them on our phones. There are also fitness and biometric tracking, voice memos, emails, travel data and chat logs. Dr Soares says if all this information isn't used deliberately, people can just end up with pointless piles of data. "If you're not paying attention to the data, then it just collects up." But used well, lifelogging can also be a powerful too help us make positive behaviour changes. "You can come to some really useful insights by collecting all of this data," she says. Kunal Kalro began recording his health data more than a decade ago after his father died from heart disease. Kunal started out tracking his daily step count and workouts using a fitness band. Before long he was also collecting heart rate variability, temperature, sleep quality and even macronutrient intake. "It helps you change your behaviour patterns," says the 38-year-old, who still tracks his health data today. "If you're having a few nights of poor sleep because you're watching a TV show late at night … you see your daily scores fall. He says tracking his data has helped him uncover patterns of behaviour he wasn't aware of, like the relationship between his coffee consumption and sleep. "I can notice and I will see the difference in my heart rate variability overnight when I'm sleeping if I've had caffeine after midday versus before," he says. "For me anyway, it's less about memory recall, but more about making something a little bit more consciously present. I feel way more in sync with my body." Lifelogging on our smart devices isn't the only way our seemingly instant access to digital technology is changing our ability to think and recall. Dr Soares has also looked at what we think we know, which is influenced by search engines such as Google and the ability to save and search up information on our devices. She says there is evidence to show that people can overestimate what they know after using the internet, and fail to distinguish between the knowledge in their head and the knowledge that they can access with search engines. In some experiments, researchers found search engine use during a quiz led to an increase in "cognitive self-esteem" — an increased belief in one's own ability to remember information and perform well on future quizzes. "Even if they ask them really carefully, 'What do you know? What is in your brain?', people can sometimes overestimate what they know as a result of using internet search," Dr Soares says. Despite the evidence that snapping photos can negatively affect our memories, and that having Google in our pocket is distorting our sense of our own knowledge, Dr Soares doesn't think you should throw your phone away. "These digital technologies that take off clearly have some type of utility for people," she says. "But [we need to] inform people about the ways to effectively use these technologies alongside their cognitive system." Listen to the full episode of Brain Rot about life-logging and its effects, and follow the podcast for more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store