Trump urges congress to ‘kill' Voice of America as its leader defends gutting it
Mr Trump chimed in with a social media post, urging Congress to 'kill' the VOA. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES
Trump urges congress to 'kill' Voice of America as its leader defends gutting it
WASHINGTON - Ms Kari Lake, a close Trump ally and senior adviser to the US Agency for Global Media, urged Congress on June 25 to gut the Voice of America (VOA) and other federally funded news organisations she oversees, as lawmakers of both parties expressed concern about the move.
In a hearing on Capitol Hill that grew testy at times, Ms Lake defended proposed cuts to the global news organisations, while Democrats and some Republicans warned that they could make it impossible for the United States to disseminate information to countries with limited press freedoms, such as Iran, China and Russia.
'What is going out on VOA airwaves - it's outrageous, and it has to stop,' she told the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
She called independent reporting from international news agencies funded by the government 'corrupt' and 'biased', and made clear that President Donald Trump's goal was not to overhaul but to shut down the global media agency, which she called 'a rotten piece of fish'.
Mr Trump himself chimed in on June 25 with a social media post, urging Congress to 'kill' the VOA.
'Why would a Republican want Democrat 'mouthpiece,' Voice of America, to continue?' he wrote. 'It's a TOTAL, LEFTWING DISASTER - No Republican should vote for its survival. KILL IT!'
Mr Trump has accused the news group of spreading 'anti-American' and partisan 'propaganda', calling it 'the voice of radical America'.
In March, he signed an executive order that effectively called for the dismantling of the news agency, and put nearly all VOA reporters on paid leave, ceasing its operations for the first time since its founding in 1942.
Ms Lake, the former newscaster Mr Trump put in charge of the department that includes the international broadcast network, sent layoff notices last week to all but around 200 reporters and support staff at Voice of America and the parent agency she leads.
She has also withheld funding from other newsrooms that are separate nonprofits but receive federal dollars, such as Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia.
On June 25, she asked members of Congress to amend the laws requiring the existence of Voice of America and its aligned newsrooms, which have sought to fight the Trump administration's push to shutter them.
She argued that her agency was 'unsalvageable' and 'a threat to America's national security', asserting falsely that its reporters, including foreign nationals, had obtained security clearances, and that it had ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
Non-citizens cannot obtain security clearances for viewing classified information, and no reporters at the global media agency have such security clearances, said Ms Kate Neeper, a director of strategy who received a layoff notice last week.
Some executives may have security clearances to receive intelligence that would help them protect reporters who work in war-torn areas or in countries with repressive governments, Ms Neeper said.
'Congress should ask Ms Lake to provide proof for the mystifying allegations,' Mr Mike Abramowitz, director of Voice of America, said in a statement. 'If VOA is controlled by the CCP, then why are they rejoicing at its being shut down?'
Democrats and some Republicans voiced concern that in moving to dismantle the global media agency, Mr Trump was abandoning a useful tool of soft power.
Representative Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said there were 'systemic problems' in the agency, but that it remained necessary around the world.
'We need America's voice in Iran right now,' he said. 'We need to ensure the Iranian people hear the truth that we do not intend to harm them.'
Representative Young Kim, R-Calif, said she was worried that the cuts could affect journalists who 'spent decades building their credibility and trust with our audiences'.
'I just want to make sure that those talents are not eliminated and we are able to bring them back as soon as possible,' Ms Kim said.
Democrats pointed to a surge in Iranians tuning into Radio Farda, the Persian-language news service funded by the global media agency. Amid the recent war between Israel and Iran, they argued, the United States should continue to fund media organizations countering the misinformation disseminated by Iran and other countries, such as North Korea.
'Those regimes are actually cheering as we surrender another potent set of soft power tools and abandon the airwaves,' said Representative Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the panel. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
US Senate Republicans aim to push ahead on Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending Bill
WASHINGTON: US Senate Republicans will seek to push President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending Bill forward on Saturday (Jun 28) with a procedural vote that could kick off a marathon weekend session. The Bill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main first-term legislative achievement, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Nonpartisan analysts estimate a version passed by the House of Representatives last month would add about US$3 trillion to the nation's US$36.2 trillion government debt. Senate Republicans have been deeply divided over plans to partly offset that Bill's heavy hit to the deficit, including by cutting the Medicaid health insurance program for low-income Americans. Republicans are using a legislative manoeuvre to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold to advance most legislation in the 100-member chamber. Their narrow margins in the Senate and House mean they can afford no more than three Republican no votes to advance a Bill that Democrats are united in opposing, saying it takes a heavy toll on low- and middle-income Americans to benefit the wealthy. Trump has pushed for Congress to pass the bill by the Jul 4 Independence Day holiday. The White House said early this month that the legislation, which Trump calls the "One Big Beautiful Bill", would reduce the annual deficit by US$1.4 trillion. While a handful of Republicans in both chambers have voiced opposition to some of the Bill's elements, this Congress has so far not rejected any of the president's legislative priorities. A successful vote to open debate would kick off a lengthy process that could run into Sunday, as Democrats unveil a series of amendments that are unlikely to pass in a chamber Republicans control 53-47. TAX BREAKS, SPENDING CUTS Democrats will focus their firepower with amendments aimed at reversing Republican spending cuts to programs that provide government-backed healthcare to the elderly, poor and disabled, as well as food aid to low-income families. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer summarised the reasons for his party's opposition to the Bill at a Friday press conference by saying "it has the biggest cuts to food funding ever", and could result in more than 2 million people losing their jobs. He also highlighted the Republican rollback of clean energy initiatives ushered in by the Biden administration. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune stressed the tax-cut components during a Friday speech to the Senate. "The centrepiece of our Bill is permanent tax relief for the American people," he said as he showcased legislation that contains a new tax break for senior citizens and other taxpayers. The measure, Thune said, will "help get our economy firing on all cylinders again". It would also raise the Treasury Department's statutory borrowing limit by trillions of dollars to stave off a first default on its debt in the coming months. If the Senate manages to pass Trump's top legislative goal by early next week, the House would be poised to quickly apply the final stamp of approval, sending it to Trump for signing into law. But with Senate Republicans struggling to find enough spending cuts to win the support of the party's far right, Trump on Friday loosened the leash a bit, saying his Jul 4 deadline for wrapping it all up was "important" but "it's not the end-all". Among the most difficult disagreements Senate Republicans struggled to resolve late on Friday was the size of a cap on deductions for state and local taxes and a Medicaid cost-saving that could hobble rural hospitals.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
US immigrants scramble for clarity after Supreme Court birthright ruling
That outcome has raised more questions than answers about a right long understood to be guaranteed under the US Constitution. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - The US Supreme Court's ruling tied to birthright citizenship prompted confusion and phone calls to lawyers as people who could be affected tried to process a convoluted legal decision with major humanitarian implications. The court's conservative majority on June 27 granted President Donald Trump his request to curb federal judges' power but did not decide the legality of his bid to restrict birthright citizenship. That outcome has raised more questions than answers about a right long understood to be guaranteed under the US Constitution: that anyone born in the United States is considered a citizen at birth, regardless of their parents' citizenship or legal status. Ms Lorena, a 24-year-old Colombian asylum seeker who lives in Houston and is due to give birth in September, pored over media reports on June 27 morning. She was looking for details about how her baby might be affected, but said she was left confused and worried. 'There are not many specifics,' said Ms Lorena, who like others interviewed by Reuters asked to be identified by her first name out of fear for her safety. 'I don't understand it well.' She is concerned that her baby could end up with no nationality. 'I don't know if I can give her mine,' she said. 'I also don't know how it would work, if I can add her to my asylum case. I don't want her to be adrift with no nationality.' Mr Trump, a Republican, issued an order after taking office in January that directed US agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the US who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The order was blocked by three separate US district court judges, sending the case on a path to the Supreme Court. The resulting decision said Mr Trump's policy could go into effect in 30 days but appeared to leave open the possibility of further proceedings in the lower courts that could keep the policy blocked. On June 27 afternoon, plaintiffs filed an amended lawsuit in federal court in Maryland seeking to establish a nationwide class of people whose children could be denied citizenship. If they are not blocked nationwide, the restrictions could be applied in the 28 states that did not contest them in court, creating 'an extremely confusing patchwork' across the country, according to Ms Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute. 'Would individual doctors, individual hospitals be having to try to figure out how to determine the citizenship of babies and their parents?' she said. The drive to restrict birthright citizenship is part of Mr Trump's broader immigration crackdown, and he has framed automatic citizenship as a magnet for people to come to give birth. 'Hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for that reason,' he said during a White House press briefing on June 27. Immigration advocates and lawyers in some Republican-led states said they received calls from a wide range of pregnant immigrants and their partners following the ruling. They were grappling with how to explain it to clients who could be dramatically affected, given all the unknowns of how future litigation would play out or how the executive order would be implemented state by state. Ms Lynn Tramonte, director of the Ohio Immigrant Alliance said she got a call on June 27 from an East Asian temporary visa holder with a pregnant wife. He was anxious because Ohio is not one of the plaintiff states and wanted to know how he could protect his child's rights. 'He kept stressing that he was very interested in the rights included in the Constitution,' she said. Advocates underscored the gravity of Mr Trump's restrictions, which would block an estimated 150,000 children born in the US annually from receiving automatic citizenship. 'It really creates different classes of people in the country with different types of rights,' said Ms Juliana Macedo do Nascimento, a spokesperson for the immigrant rights organisation United We Dream. 'That is really chaotic.' Adding uncertainty, the Supreme Court ruled that members of two plaintiff groups in the litigation - CASA, an immigrant advocacy service in Maryland, and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project - would still be covered by lower court blocks on the policy. Whether someone in a state where Mr Trump's policy could go into effect could join one of the organizations to avoid the restrictions or how state or federal officials would check for membership remained unclear. Ms Betsy, a US citizen who recently graduated from high school in Virginia and a CASA member, said both of her parents came to the US from El Salvador two decades ago and lacked legal status when she was born. 'I feel like it targets these innocent kids who haven't even been born,' she said, declining to give her last name for concerns over her family's safety. Ms Nivida, a Honduran asylum seeker in Louisiana, is a member of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and recently gave birth. She heard on June 27 from a friend without legal status who is pregnant and wonders about the situation under Louisiana's Republican governor, since the state is not one of those fighting Trump's order. 'She called me very worried and asked what's going to happen,' she said. 'If her child is born in Louisiana … is the baby going to be a citizen?' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
US Senate unveils new Trump tax draft with plans to vote soon
This is as the US moves closer to a vote on the tax cut package with a July 4 deadline set by President Donald Trump. PHOTO: REUTERS US Senate unveils new Trump tax draft with plans to vote soon WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans unveiled a new version of their US$4.2 trillion (S$5.1 trillion) tax cut package, moving closer to a vote as they near a July 4 deadline set by President Donald Trump. The new draft reflects compromises among warring factions of the Senate GOP which has been divided over how much to cut safety-net programs such as Medicaid and how rapidly to phase out of renewable energy tax credits enacted under the Biden administration. A tentative deal with House Republicans to increase the state and local tax deduction is included. The bill would raise the SALT deduction cap from US$10,000 to US$40,000 for five years before snapping back to the US$10,000 level. The new cap applies to 2025 and rises 1 per cent in subsequent years. Republicans plan to start voting on the tax bill on June 28 with final votes coming as soon as early on June 29. Party leaders plan to bring House members back to Washington early next week for what they hope will be final approval of the measure in time for Trump's Independence Day deadline. It is not yet clear if the 50 Senate Republicans needed to pass the bill are all on board. The bill can be further altered on the Senate floor to secure the votes if needed. The House could make more changes if Speaker Mike Johnson has trouble corralling votes for the measure. To win over moderate Republicans, the bill would create a new US$25 billion rural hospital fund aimed at helping some Medicaid providers avoid cuts. Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, however, had demanded a US$100 billion fund. Moderate Republicans also won a delay from 2031 to 2032 for when a new 3.5 per cent cap on state Medicaid provider taxes takes effect. The provider tax is a gimmick by which states boost their federal Medicaid reimbursement rates and many states have come to rely on the practice. Another change in the measure is that a tax credit for hydrogen production wouldn't be phased out until 2028 for projects that begin construction before then. Previous version ended the credit after 2025. The measure would avert a US payment default as soon as August by raising the debt ceiling by US$5 trillion. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
