logo
New York City Democrats face a clear choice: Socialist, or Cuomo?

New York City Democrats face a clear choice: Socialist, or Cuomo?

Yahoo23-06-2025
A Zohran Mamdani victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary would give progressives much-needed energy as they try to keep the party's center of gravity from shifting to the right.
And the nervous Democratic establishment is acting accordingly to make sure he doesn't survive Tuesday's ranked-choice vote.
Mamdani, a progressive state assemblyman, is running as a 180-degree turn from scandal-laden incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who declared himself 'the future' of his party just four years ago. The 33-year-old Muslim has promised New Yorkers free buses, rent freezes, and disinvestment from Israel — and he could become one of the most prominent Democratic figures in the US, should he win the nomination to take on Adams, a centrist who's now running on the independent line.
He'll have to beat back a broad alliance of opponents, many of whom dislike his criticism of Israel's war in Gaza and some of whom are openly supporting his primary rival, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The Democratic Majority For Israel rebuked Mamdani for his 'long-standing enmity towards Israel' and urged New York Democrats to reject him; the center-left group Third Way called his potential victory 'a devastating blow in the fight to defeat Trumpism.'
Whitney Tilson, a mayoral candidate and former hedge fund manager who helped start Teach for America, has campaigned extensively against Mamdani. He echoed the pointed criticism he has faced for his amid the war in Gaza.
'I think he's a particular threat to both the Jewish community and the business community, with his radical socialism and hatred of Israel,' Tilson told Semafor, after stopping at a Ukrainian festival in Brooklyn where he talked about sending aid to defend the country from Russia.
A defeat for Cuomo, whose lead stretched as high as 32 points when he entered the race, would be a remarkable upset — and prevent a comeback that many city leaders had made peace with.
'Eight months after being at 1%, we now stand just a few points away from toppling a political dynasty,' Mamdani told supporters on Sunday, at one of his final pre-vote rallies.
New York Democrats are filling out ranked-choice ballots that allow them to pick up to five candidates, out of 11, using the same electoral system that narrowly gave Adams his 2021 victory.
That's loomed as a challenge for Cuomo. Universally known by voters, he's consistently led the field; more than a third of New York Democrats are calling him their first-choice candidate, dominating the expected vote in the Bronx and Staten Island.
But Cuomo entered the race with the highest negative ratings of any Democratic candidate and his own scandal-marked record. His many enemies, including progressives who fumbled their 2021 campaign to stop Adams, had more time to plan.
In February, before Adams quit the race and Cuomo entered, a group of progressives launched 'Don't Rank Eric Adams for Mayor,' or DREAM, to advertise their strategy. When Cuomo tagged in, the acronym was changed to Don't Rank Evil Andrew. Mamdani's campaign surged ahead of every Cuomo alternative, despite some liberal worries about whether he could build a winning coalition.
By early June, they had accepted reality: The Working Families Party put Mamdani at the top of its slate, as did Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., as Comptroller Brad Lander cross-endorsed Mamdani and Bernie Sanders announced his own support for him.
In the final days of the race, as public polling showed Mamdani with a real chance to win, Cuomo picked up endorsements from centrist Democrats who describe him as the most experienced candidate.
But early voting was higher in the neighborhoods where Mamdani has run the strongest — and where his campaign has concentrated its volunteers. On Monday, centrist Democrats fretted that the 33-year old could beat Cuomo, with a combination of lower Election Day turnout during a heat wave, solidarity from most of the anti-Cuomo candidates, and an unapologetically progressive campaign that made no mistakes.
The New York Times, which declined to endorse in the race, instead published an editorial (that would immediately be quoted in a Cuomo ad) labeling Mamdani's agenda 'uniquely unsuited to the city's challenges.' A Mamdani victory, argued Matt Bennett, senior vice president for public affairs at Third Way, would put Democratic Socialists for America under the spotlight at a weak moment for the anti-Trump opposition.
'The stuff in the DSA platform is insane,' Bennett said. Third Way, which usually ignores mayoral contests, weighed in against Mamdani because they saw his membership in DSA as an enormous optics problem.
'Open the prisons and shut 'em down? Open the borders and make everything free? It's like a 9th-grader's idea of what a Marxist fantasy would be. It's packed with ideas that could be weaponized by Republicans,' Bennett said.The one sure thing about this race is that it won't be over on Tuesday night. It will take some time to count ballots until one candidate has crossed the 50% win threshold; polling suggested that this could take five rounds of ranked-choiced math, or more.
If Cuomo wins, there will be pressure on the Working Families Party to give Mamdani its ballot line for November, and to elect him in a contest with Cuomo as the Democratic nominee, Adams as an independent, businessman Jim Walden as another independent, and Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa as a Republican.
The late angst about a Mamdani win suggests another possible five-way contest: Mamdani as the Democratic nominee, and Cuomo as the nominee of his Fight and Deliver Party. (Cuomo's father Mario, who lost the 1977 Democratic mayoral primary, lost again in November as the defunct Liberal Party's nominee.)
The bigger question is what it means for the Democratic Party's brand. Outside New York, Cuomo's comeback looked inevitable until the last couple of weeks. Before that, Mamdani's rise as his chief rival gave pro-Cuomo Democrats hope.
Surely, they thought, a less left-wing candidate like Lander or City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams would be more formidable. They viewed the choice the way Jeb Bush's campaign viewed Donald Trump's rise 10 years ago — a distraction that would get the anti-establishment bug out of voters' systems, preventing a challenger who might be able to win. Surely, a socialist who refused to acknowledge Israel's right to exist as a 'Jewish state' or condemn the slogan 'globalize the Intifada' would punch himself out before anybody voted.
He didn't punch himself out. National Democrats have barely started to consider what it would mean if Mamdani can secure the nomination in New York — for their party's internal politics, for how their voters want to fight Trump, or for how ready they might be to throw off old leaders.In Politico, Jonathan Martin a Mamdani campaign that made 'affordability' its 'heartbeat' and became more robust than Cuomo et al expected.
In New York, Errol Louis stock of the mistakes the city's Democratic elites made on the way to the primary.
Earlier this month, I looked at the lessons Mamdani was from Bernie Sanders, in campaigning and in governing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump speaks with GOP holdouts blocking his megabill in early-morning call
Trump speaks with GOP holdouts blocking his megabill in early-morning call

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump speaks with GOP holdouts blocking his megabill in early-morning call

President Trump spoke on the phone with a handful of Republican lawmakers blocking his 'big, beautiful bill' in the early hours of Thursday morning, The Hill has learned, as GOP leaders race to coalesce the conference around the sprawling package. The phone call — which took place around 1 a.m. as holdouts huddled in a room off the House floor — came as a key procedural vote for the megabill remained open for almost four hours, with hardline conservatives and one moderate Republican hampering the legislation from moving forward. As of 2 a.m. on Thursday, the vote was 207 to 217, with five Republicans having voted 'no' and eight withholding their support. The combination has threatened to tank the rule, since Democrats are united against it, and a vote on the final package can't proceed without that rule. Trump spoke to some of those holdouts, including Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) and Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who were seen entering the room shortly before the call began. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) were seen leaving the room after the call. Massie and Spartz voted against the rule, while Burchett had been withholding support. During the conversation, Massie — who has been at odds with Trump over the megabill for weeks — suggested he was ready to drop his opposition and support the rule if Trump stops attacking him, The Hill has learned. Trump and those in his orbit have gone after Massie in recent months after the Kentucky Republican voted against the House version of the megabill in May, and said the president's strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities were 'not Constitutional.' A Trump-aligned super PAC, led by the president's 2024 co-campaign manager, has rolled out ads bashing Massie as those in Trump world vow a primary challenger. Trump also tore into Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who voted against the megabill in the upper chamber earlier this week. During an interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity late Wednesday night, Johnson said Trump was willing to speak to Republican holdouts. 'He has been, in fact, he called me most recently about an hour ago and said who else needs to have a discussion, I'm ready to get on the phone. And I said, 'Mr. President, you've done your job and we'll do ours here,'' Johnson told Hannity. The president had also fired off a series of late-night Truth Social posts, urging the GOP holdouts to drop their opposition to a procedural rule needed to advance the core of his domestic agenda, including tax cuts, tougher immigration rules and a boost in energy production. Rather than gaveling the vote closed, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has opted to leave it open as he and his leadership team race to convince the holdouts to support the rule.

Mike Johnson wages war of attrition against GOP rebels
Mike Johnson wages war of attrition against GOP rebels

Axios

time23 minutes ago

  • Axios

Mike Johnson wages war of attrition against GOP rebels

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is fighting a battle of inches as he tries to secure the last few votes he needs to get President Trump's " big, beautiful bill" across the finish line. Why it matters: Johnson is racing against the clock to meet Republicans' self-imposed deadline to pass the marquee tax and spending bill, which they hope will get to the president's desk by July 4. That deadline is at threat of slipping as right-wing hardliners and moderates dig in against the bill over aspects they find unsavory. Republicans on Thursday broke the record for the longest House vote as they held open a procedural vote for an astonishing seven hours and 24 minutes as they tried to cajole GOP holdouts. Johnson continued to huddle with holdouts off the House floor past midnight, and Trump has been working the phones in coordination with Johnson, the speaker said on Fox News. State of play: Shortly after concluding their record-breaking vote, Republicans moved to advance the bill to a final vote on the House floor. But that key vote was being stymied by GOP defectors as of early Thursday morning, with nearly half a dozen Republicans voting with Democrats against advancing the bill — enough to kill it. Another group of around eight Republicans — mostly right-wing hardliners upset at how much the Senate version of the bill increases the deficit — hadn't voted yet as of Thursday morning. A group of key holdouts left the House floor just after 1:00am and headed back to their offices, including Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who told reporters "don't take a nap" yet. Burchett has still not voted on the rule. What they're saying: "There's no cracking of skulls ... this is part of the process. We're tying up loose ends," Johnson told Fox News host Sean Hannity in an appearance late Wednesday night. The speaker said he "might keep [the vote] open a little while" because "among those 'no' votes I've got a couple of folks that are actually off-site right now, had to attend family affairs or events this evening, and so some of them are on the way back." That includes Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), the sole centrist "no" vote on the procedural motion, who rushed out of the House chamber shortly after voting. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) who doesn't typically vote down the rule, switched his vote from yea to nay last minute, and has stayed firm in his opposition. Between the lines: Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) posted on X that she intends to support final passage of the bill, but voted against the procedural measure because of Johnson's "broken commitments." It's not typical for a member of the majority party to vote down the rule, and even more abnormal to vote down the rule but support final passage. Some members, like Spartz, are notorious for saying they're a no but voting yes.

Trump to kick off a yearlong celebration of America's 250th anniversary

timean hour ago

Trump to kick off a yearlong celebration of America's 250th anniversary

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to deliver a 'spectacular' yearlong birthday party to mark 250 years of American independence. On Thursday, he will be in the U.S. heartland to kick off the patriotic festivities leading up to next year's anniversary. The event at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines will feature 'dazzling' displays of Americana and American history, musical performances and a fireworks show to cap the night, said U.S. Ambassador Monica Crowley, Trump's liaison to the organizing group, America250. Organizers see the coming year of festivities as a way to help unite a polarized nation and bridge partisanship — a monumental task given the country's divides. Thursday's event comes as the Republican-controlled Congress pushed for final passage of a sweeping tax cuts and spending package that's at the heart of Trump's legislative agenda but has united all Democrats against it. More U.S. adults also disapprove than approve of how the Republican president is doing his job. Iowa was a 'logical choice' for the kickoff, Crowley said, because of its central location and Trump's affinity for the state, which supported him in each of the last three general elections. She also said Iowa's middle-of-the-country geography is symbolic of the desire to use the coming celebrations to help bring people together. 'We've had so much division and so much polarization over the last many decades, but certainly over the last few years, that to be able to bring the country together to celebrate America's 250th birthday through patriotism, shared values and a renewed sense of civic pride, to be able to do that in the center of the country, is incredibly important,' she said. A recent Gallup poll showed the widest partisan split in patriotism in over two decades, with only about a third of Democrats saying they are proud to be American compared with about 9 in 10 Republicans. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults approve of Trump's performance as president, according to a June AP-NORC poll, while about 6 in 10 disapprove. That poll also showed a majority of Americans said the June military parade that Trump greenlit in Washington for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army — an event that fell on his 79th birthday — was 'not a good use' of government money. Crowley spoke to the political and ideological schisms that left the country 'torn apart' ahead of its last big birthday celebration, noting that 1976 closely followed the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal that led Richard Nixon to resign from the presidency. 'That moment was critical to uniting the country and moving forward, and I am very optimistic and hopeful that the yearlong celebration that we're about to launch will do the same thing in this present moment,' she said in an interview. America's 250th birthday 'is something that I think that all Americans can come together to celebrate and honor our history as well as our present and our future,' Crowley said. On July 4, 1776, the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence, officially marking the 13 colonies' split from Great Britain. 'We're gonna have a big, big celebration, as you know, 250 years,' Trump said about the birthday during his Memorial Day address to a solemn audience at Arlington National Cemetery. 'In some ways, I'm glad I missed that second term where it was because I wouldn't be your president for that." Video of then-candidate Trump proposing a 'Great American State Fair' in Iowa in May 2023 began to recirculate after his reelection last November. Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, a Republican, told the White House earlier this year that Iowa stood 'ready" to host the event and that Trump had the state's full support, according to a draft of Reynolds' letter obtained by The Associated Press. The culminating fair instead will be held next year on the National Mall in Washington, according to a White House official who was not authorized to share details publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. But Trump honored his initial proposal with a kickoff in the first-in-the-nation caucus state. The lineup Thursday night will include Lee Greenwood, according to social media posts advertising the event, whose song, 'God Bless the USA,' is a regular feature at Trump rallies and official events. Also attending will be Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store