
PM Modi Reignites India's Civilisational Sense Through Chola Legacy
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's tribute to the civilisational legacy of the Cholas was a significant and a profoundly symbolic moment for India as a whole. It concretised India's civilisational aspirations to emerge as a great and decisive power in the comity of nations. That aspiration is legitimate for any nation or people which have existed, on a civilisational scale and proportion in the past.
The mighty Chola Temple of Gangaikonda Cholapuram has stood for a thousand years signifying that aspiration. It was an aspiration that led India, in the Chola era, to become master of the oceans and to disseminate her philosophy, thought, culture and coveted products across the Far East.
Diplomat-historian KM Pannikar, in his analysis of the 'Determining Periods of Indian History', argues that there 'are some periods which shape the course of the future more than others, when events of far-reaching importance are crowded together so that the centuries that follow seem to be working out the ideas generated at that period…Also, it may happen that discoveries, achievements or decisions taken at such a crucial period mark so definite a change as to give a new character to the ages that follow. These are the determining ages of the history of a country, a region or a civilisation".
The Chola era was certainly a 'determining period" in the flow and evolution of Indian civilisation. The apogee then achieved had a far-reaching and multifaceted impact. It was an impact that was not confined to India but was spread across a vast region covering large parts of Southeast Asia and the Far East.
The Chola Empire's spread and influence contributed to a unique synthesis and blending which enabled the evolution of a rich cultural and religious diffusion across Southeast Asia in which Hindu deities such as Shiva and Vishnu were central and defining. One is reminded of the words of that profound scholar of India's civilisational past, D Devahuti, who argued that the spread of Indian culture happened through a 'continuous flow of forceful ideas, and institutions". The Chola era ensured a continuous flow of ideas and of institutions that had a lasting impact, visible even today.
As one heard PM Modi speak, one was reminded of the words of Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore, spoken a hundred years ago, 'Do you know your own mind? Your own culture? What is best and most permanent in your own history? You must know at least that, if you are to save yourselves from the greatest of insults, the insult of obscurity, of rejection. Bring out your light and add it to this great festival of lamps of world culture."
While speaking on the greatness of the Chola legacy, PM Modi was, as if asking us similar questions, asking us to rediscover these defining epochs that shaped our civilisational consciousness of the past.
For decades after independence, the 'best and most permanent" in our history was ignored, omitted and suppressed. Eras recalling which would generate a collective national pride and self-esteem were relegated to the margins or dismissed as over-readings and false projections. Take the case of those legions of Indian scholars, in pre-independent India, who painstakingly traced sources and tracked new findings to establish the impressions of civilisational India left behind in lands that lay beyond India. However, in a free India these scholars, historians and thinkers, each formidable through their own achievements, were forgotten.
The saving of ourselves from a history of rejection and insult that colonisation brought in its wake, the talking back that could be done, standing on legacies such as the Cholas was not done. The Chola legacy could certainly reinstate that civilisational sense and consciousness and yet, successive governments, especially in Tamil Nadu, ignored its symbolism and its pan-India appeal. It is an appeal that can also move the vast Indian diaspora across the same region that came under the Chola spell in the past.
The Bay of Bengal was referred to as the 'Chola Lake' – Chola Samudram, because of the Chola control of sea routes and trade. The Chola empire was truly civilisational in nature. Its expanse, its reach, its cultural spread and trade outposts turned it into a formidable power and presence across India and vast swathes of Southeast Asia. The Cholas also played a significant role in the spread of civilisational India's cultural footprints, leaving India's cultural and religious expressions and traces all across this region.
While addressing the Adi Thiruvathirai Festival at Gangaikonda Cholapuram, PM Modi made several significant remarks about the essence and the foundational ideals of the Chola empire. These significance from the past must drive our present national quest for the rise of a civilisational India. The Chola age was indeed a golden era of Indian history. PM Modi spoke of the Chola empire as being the 'cradle of democracy". He was alluding to the unique Chola era Utthiramerur inscriptions, in Kanchipuram, which elucidated the democratic rights and duties of the people, of the elector and of the elected, a thousand years ago, making it the first such a democratic document. In many ways Rajendra Chola can be considered to be the first global Indian monarch. Military, naval and cultural strength defined the reigns of Rajaraja and Rajendra Chola.
In his classic 'Hindu Colonies of the Far East', RC Majumdar observes how Rajendra Chola controlled ports along the entire East Coast of India, and of how the 'mastery over the ports of Kalinga and Bengal gave the Chola king well equipped ships and sailors" which could ply across oceans and establish Chola presence and outposts. The Chola empire's control, under Rajendra Chola, of 'almost the whole volume of maritime trade between western and eastern Asia" and its control of regions across Sumatra, Malay peninsula, and Kedah, known in ancient Tamil lore as Kadaram – earning him the sobriquet of 'Kadaram Konda" – one who has won Kadaram, remains a significant and historic record of Chola naval prowess.
While listening to PM Modi's inspiring address on the essence, the richness and the enduring grandeur of the Chola legacy, when he spoke of the 'Chola heritage, deeply rooted in unwavering devotion to Lord Shiva" as having become 'immortal," one could not but help think that had it not been for the Chola impact, civilisational India's presiding deities Shiva and Vishnu would not perhaps have become integral to the civilisations of Southeast Asia. Several leading scholars have attested to the spread of the cultural ideals of civilisational India through the medium of Shiva and Vishnu.
Raghuvira, a leading scholar-philosopher of civilisational India observes that 'Visnu and Siva have a long history, both in India and outside India" and of how 'they have inspired mighty monuments in brick and stone, in bronze and ivory and in the fashioning of hearts and actions of men". In Kedah – Kadaram, for instance, KA Nilakanta Sastri, writes of the traces of a Shiva temple whose architecture and style represented the transition from Shiva temples found in South India to those which eventually evolved in Java. PM Modi's reiteration of the centrality of Shiva worship in the Chola era, brought these links to mind. The closing years of Rajendra Chola's reign, Sastri points out, 'formed the most splendid period" of the Cholas, 'the extent of the empire was at its widest and its military and naval prestige stood at its highest."
Intense worshippers of Shiva, the Cholas were also patrons of Buddhism. RC Majumdar records, from Chola inscriptions, that in or around the 21st year of Rajaraja Chola's reign, at the start of the 11th century, king of the Sailendra empire, around present-day Sumatra, Chudamanivarman, 'commenced the construction of a Buddhist Vihara at Nagapattana, modern Negapatam" [Nagapattinam], when a village was granted by the Chola king for its upkeep." King Chudamanivarman, 'died shortly after, and the Vihara was completed by his son and successor, Sri-Maravijayottungavarman." The symbolism of a mighty Indian monarch, an ardent Shiva worshipper, granting villages for the construction and upkeep of a 'Buddhist sanctuary, erected in India by a Sailendra king", was significant.
The deepest symbolism was when PM Modi brought the sacred water of Ganga from the north and offered it at Gangaikonda Cholapuram. It was a reiteration of the fundamental and essential unity of India, the civilisational state. The same act in the past, of Rajendra Chola's expedition to the north, to the banks of Ganga in Bengal, and the march back to his capital, of his erecting the 'liquid pillar of victory" – 'Jalamayam Jalasthambham" in the 'form of the tank of Colaganga" was an unprecedented moment in the history of civilisational India. PM Modi's reiteration of that civilisational act from the past, was a reiteration of the fundamental unity of India – cultural and spiritual, which remains undiluted and unbroken. For any nation aspiring to recover its civilisational status and self, such moments are assertively reinvigorating.
top videos
View all
Of the Chola era, its most famous chronicler Nilakanta Sastri writes, that it was the 'most creative period" in the history of South India, during which 'in local government, in art, in religion and letters, the Tamil country reached heights of excellence never reached again in succeeding ages". The height achieved in maritime activity and foreign trade, was also unprecedented. Narendra Modi at Gangaikonda Cholapuram, was redirecting our collective consciousness towards that past, with the intent of letting its memory and sense propel our future quest towards a comprehensive national and civilisational resurgence.
The author is chairman, Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation, and a member of the National Executive Committee, BJP. The views expressed are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 30, 2025, 14:55 IST
News opinion Opinion | PM Modi Reignites India's Civilisational Sense Through Chola Legacy
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Malegaon blast case: Forced to name Yogi Adityanath, says witness; court scraps his statement to ATS
A witness in his testimony to the special court in the 2008 Malegaon blast case had alleged that he was tortured and forced by the officers of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) to name Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in the case. Special Judge A.K. Lahoti, who on Thursday (July 31, 2025) acquitted all seven accused in the case, said he could not rely on the witness's statement to the ATS, as he submitted to the court that it was given involuntarily. 2008 Malegaon blast: Who were the accused? A brief timeline of the case In its more than 1,000-page judgment, made available on Friday (August 1, 2025), the court said the ATS had questioned prosecution witness Milind Joshirao in October 2008 about the functioning of the right-wing group Abhinav Bharat. He was asked about a meeting at the Raigad fort, where the accused had allegedly taken an oath to create a separate Hindu Rashtra. Joshirao, during his testimony to the court, claimed that the ATS had treated him like an accused. 'They (ATS officers) were telling him to take the names of Yogi Adityanath, Asimanand Indresh Kumar, Devdhar, Pragya and Kakaji in his statement,' the court said. 'The ATS officers assured him that if he took their names, they would let him go free,' it added. Controversy breaks out in Maharashtra after ex-policeman claims he was asked to pick up Mohan Bhagwat over 2008 Malegaon blast case The court noted that the witness had refused to do so and hence, the then Deputy Commissioner of Police Shrirao and Assistant Commissioner of Police Param Bir Singh had shown the fear of torture to him and extended threats. 'It further held that the witness had never stated the things mentioned in the statement and it was written by the ATS officers,' it said. 'Considering his testimony, it clearly indicates that the statement was involuntary,' the court said. 'The statement raises doubts regarding its admissibility and authenticity as it was involuntary,' the court said. Malegaon blast acquittals destroyed Congress 'conspiracy' to manufacture false narrative of Hindu terror: BJP 'When a statement is given involuntarily without actual knowledge of the facts mentioned in the same, nothing survives in it,' the court held, terming it as unreliable. Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit were among the seven to be acquitted by the court, which noted that the prosecution had failed to adduce cogent and reliable evidence to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Six people were killed and 101 were injured after a blast at Malegaon in Nashik district in September 2008.


Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
PCB issues ban on ‘Pakistan' name in private cricket after WCL 2025 fiasco: Report
Following the embarrassment faced by the Pakistan Legends side in the World Championship of Legends, the Pakistan Cricket Board has reportedly decided to ban all private cricket leagues from using the country's name, according to a recent report. The decision by the PCB comes shortly after India Champions refused to play with their Pakistani counterparts in the semi-final of the tournament in Birmingham. Prior to the semi-final clash, Indian players like Yuvraj Singh, Suresh Raina, Shikhar Dhawan and Harbhajan Singh had also opted out of the league stage match against the arch-rivals. The cricketers attributed the decision to the rising geopolitical tensions between the two countries, especially in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack and the ensuing Operation Sindoor launched by the Indian armed forces. With India boycotting the semi-final clash against Pakistan, the neighbours had qualified for the final match. If a report by Telecom Asia Sport is to be believed, the Pakistan Legends side has been allowed to play the final match against South Africa on Saturday, but the PCB has made it clear that no future teams or leagues will be permitted to use the 'Pakistan' name without formal clearance by the cricket board. The decision was reportedly taken by the PCB after an emergency meeting of the Board of Directors after India Champions refused to take the field twice against Pakistan. 'The decision was taken after a detailed discussion in the Board of Directors meeting on Thursday. The high-level authorities felt Indian players refusing to play Pakistan in the WCL's second edition twice was hurtful to the name of the country," quoted a source as saying. 'Going forward, no private organisation will be allowed to use the country's name in any capacity unless the PCB verifies the league's legitimacy and reputation. All violators will face legal action,' it added. Mint could not independently verify the report. After the cancellation of the semi-final match, WCL had issued a statement writing, 'At WCL, we have always believed in the power of sport to inspire and bring about positive change in the world. However, public sentiment must always be respected — after all, everything we do is for our audience,' the WCL statement read. 'We respect the India Champions' decision to withdraw from the semi-finals, and we equally respect the Pakistan Champions' readiness to compete. Taking all factors into consideration, the match between the India Champions and the Pakistan Champions has been called off,' it added.


Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's 25% Tariff on Indian Exports: A headline risk, not a structural threat
Exports to the U.S. account for just around 2% of India's GDP. Jimeet Modi says Trump's proposed 25% tariff on Indian exports is a headline risk, not a structural threat. With strong domestic demand, diversified trade, and policy support, India's economy and capital markets are well-positioned to absorb such external shocks without long-term disruption. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Sectoral Impact: Short-Term, Not Structural Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Reality Check: The Numbers Tell the Story Strategic Positioning & Policy Backstop Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Implications for the Capital Market Conclusion (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of .) The recent announcement by U.S. President Donald Trump of a proposed 25% tariff on select Indian exports has understandably stirred concerns among market participants tracking India's capital markets. While the headlines may sound alarming, it's important to put this development into perspective and assess its true economic me begin by stating clearly: this is not a significant threat to India's economic engine or its long-term investment there could be short-term headwinds for specific export-intensive sectors—particularly engineering goods, pharmaceuticals, auto components, textiles, and select metals and chemicals. These industries may face margin compression, supply chain friction, and temporary stock price the broader foundation of the Indian economy remains intact and resilient.*India's nominal GDP has crossed USD 4 trillion, positioning it as the fifth-largest economy in the world.*In FY 2024–25, India recorded total exports of USD 824.9 billion, which includes both goods and services. This constitutes roughly 20% of GDP, meaning that 80% of GDP is driven by domestic demand—a testament to India's robust internal economic activity.*Of the total goods exports, shipments to the U.S. stood at USD 87.4 billion, while imports from the U.S. were USD 41.8 billion.*Thus, exports to the U.S. account for just around 2% of India's GDP. Even if a subset of these is impacted by the tariffs, the macroeconomic fallout remains limited.*It's also worth noting that key growth sectors like IT services, digital exports, mobile phones, agri-tech, and clean energy remain largely untouched by these proposed tariff external trade diversification is another buffer. Exporters are actively expanding into markets across the Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, reducing over-reliance on Western diplomatic engagement continues. The 6th round of U.S.-India trade talks is scheduled for August 2025, and historical precedent suggests a realistic possibility of a rollback or sector-specific reprieve—as seen during earlier interactions with the Trump refusal to open its agriculture and dairy markets reflects a confident and principled trade stance. This underscores India's emergence as a credible global economic initiatives like Atmanirbhar Bharat, PLI schemes, infrastructure investments, and digital transformation are significantly boosting India's manufacturing competitiveness and supply chain independence. These initiatives act as policy cushions against external should differentiate between sentiment-driven volatility and long-term structural some export-led stocks may experience corrections in the near term, India's broader market indices remain supported by:*Robust domestic consumption*Stable macroeconomic indicators*Healthy credit growthMoreover, foreign portfolio investments (FPIs) continue to flow into domestic-facing sectors like financials, infrastructure, consumption, and energy transition, reaffirming global investor confidence in India's long-term proposed U.S. tariff is a tactical disruption, not a strategic derailment. With:*Low GDP exposure to impacted goods*Policy preparedness*Expanding trade partnerships, and*Strong domestic demandIndia is well-equipped to weather such external should view this episode as a short-term sentiment overhang—not a fundamental threat. The Indian growth story remains robust, broad-based, and attractively poised for the long term.