Green Party expels ex-health spokesperson after LGBTQ+ comment row
The party has not given any explanation for Dr Devulapalli's suspension or expulsion. But the BBC has obtained internal party documents showing she was expelled for "breaching" the terms of her original suspension by attending a Green Party event while under investigation.Dr Devulapalli, who works as a GP, told the BBC the event was a Christmas party with members of her local Green Party where she had been "invited as a private guest".But the report seen by the BBC found the invite came from a local party coordinator and was sent to supporters and volunteers. The Green Party's disciplinary body decided this made it an official party event.In its ruling, the party said she was being removed to "avoid or reduce the likelihood of further harm to the party".
Dr Devulapalli said finding out she had been expelled from the party she had served for 10 years "felt like I had been literally punched in the gut"."It sucked the breath out of me," told the BBC. Dr Devulapalli said she has "no doubt at all this is a political move".She claimed she was "expelled on a technicality" after years of internally campaigning for the party to treat "sex as a protected characteristic".The party's rights and responsibilities policy states "trans men are men, trans women are women, and that non-binary identities exist and are valid".The party also supports making it easier for trans people to be legally recognised in their chosen gender without the need for a Gender Reassignment Certificate (GRC), which Dr Devulapalli has called a "mistake".
Green Party documents show Dr Devulapalli was originally placed on an emergency suspension pending a code of conduct investigation last September.The councillor, who sits on West Norfolk Council, was at the time one of the Green's most high-profile figures and stood for the party at last year's general election in South West Norfolk, against former Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss.During the election she spoke at a hustings event hosted by Friends of the Earth, where she was asked to respond to reports on rising LGBTQ+ hate crime, as well as her opinion on single-sex spaces and where the Green party stood on that issue. She told the meeting: "I've yet to meet anyone that actually says somebody should not have the right to be addressed as they please, and to dress as they please."I really think there is something mischievous in the air - to make those out to be an issue."Following the hustings Dr Devulapalli clarified her comments, telling the BBC "there is no trans-hate in society in general".She said her remarks reflected her view that hate crime against LGBTQ+ people was "being politicised" and "most people weren't aware of the issue".She said she condemned anti-LGBTQ+ hate crimes.Government data show 4,732 hate crimes against trans people in the year before Dr Devulapalli's comments, up from 4,262 the previous year. Hate crimes against gay, lesbian and bisexual people have fallen 6% over the same period to 25,639.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Could a new party led by Jeremy Corbyn reshape politics?
The MP for Islington North – ex-leader of the Labour Party and informal spokesperson for the 'Alliance' group of independents in the House of Commons – could be staging a bit of a comeback. Jeremy Corbyn has been on ITV's Peston to drop the heaviest hint yet that he wants to start a new socialist party, and he's ready to lead it. Nobody expects him to be prime minister (albeit he's been underestimated before), but he could make an impact of sorts. What has Corbyn been saying? For some months, he's been talking about the need for an 'alternative' on the left of British politics, and the welfare bill fiasco offers an opportunity for him to explain Labour's current disarray. Last September, Corbyn addressed a meeting aimed at founding a new left-wing party, Collective; his faithful ally, the former Unite general secretary Len McCluskey, also attended along with various former 'independent' candidates. Now, Corbyn says the Alliance group of five independent MPs 'have worked ... very well together over the past year in parliament' and offer 'an alternative of a left independent party of socialist views'. He says a 'grouping will come together, there will be an alternative' because there is 'a thirst for an alternative view … which is about a society that deals with poverty, inequality, and a foreign policy that's based on peace not war.' Will Corbyn lead it? He's obviously the most experienced and high-profile of the five MPs. On the other hand, he'll be about 80 by the time of the next election. He says: 'I'm here to work – I'm here to serve the people in the way I've always tried to do.' Will it happen? Certainly. Corbyn and the others who left the Labour fold know there's no way back for them, and that, even if there was, they are electorally better off standing as independent candidates or standing for the new party, whether it's called Independent, Alliance, Collective or something else. Would it succeed? Polling suggests such a grouping might capture about 10 per cent of the vote on average, taking votes principally away from Labour and thus hugely widening the gap between the government and Reform UK. More in Common found Labour would drop from 23 per cent of the vote to 20 per cent, with Reform unchanged at 27 per cent. Greens would also lose some support to the new Corbynistas. In short, the net result would make a Farage government more likely. The new party's support, as now, would tend to be higher in constituencies with larger Muslim or student populations and places where there are lots of middle-class public sector workers. Some big Labour names would be vulnerable to losing their seats on current trends: Shabana Mahmood (Birmingham Ladywood) and Wes Streeting (Ilford North). Who are the Alliance Group? Aside from Corbyn there are four who campaigned mainly on the Palestinian issue and in protest at Labour's stance, and all beat Labour candidates and MPs over the party's position on Gaza: Shockat Adam (Leicester South) who dislodged Jonathan Ashworth; Ayoub Khan (Birmingham Perry Barr); Adnan Hussain (Blackburn); and Iqbal Mohamed (Dewsbury and Batley). If grouped together, they number as many MPs as Reform UK or the Democratic Unionist Party; as a formal party, with electoral funding, they could wield more influence. Would they attract Labour MPs to defect? Quite possibly, especially if the Labour leadership keeps taking the whip off its leftist or pro-Palestine rebels so they feel they have nowhere else to go. Does Corbyn's grouping have any rivals on the left? Lots of Marxist sects, but at the moment it's mostly the Greens and the Workers Party of Britain, led by George Galloway, who are in the same sort of territory. Who knows what could happen there. They could compete with each other and split the radical vote; or cooperate Germany-style and maximise their parliamentary representation as a Red-Green coalition. The Workers Party of Britain ran Angela Rayner a close second in the last general election, although Galloway lost Rochdale to Labour. He might like a rematch with Labour member Paul Waugh. What might the new Corbyn party be like? To some degree, it would resemble Labour under Corbyn: a fairly clear alternative on most issues, a hopeless muddle on others – prone to splits, big on rallies and trade union links, at odds with the media and plagued by accusations of antisemitism. What do the five MPs agree on? Working to end the suffering of the Palestinian people, and left-of-centre economics. One particular matter that will take up their time in the coming months is the legal definition of Islamophobia and, indeed, the disgusting wave of anti-Muslim hatred that appears on social media and elsewhere. This rise in racism is a distressing trend for anyone, but especially so for Muslim people. The grooming gang scandal has worsened the problem. What are their differences? Depending on how far Galloway gets involved, these could include the extent of their support for a two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine conflict; policy on the war in Ukraine; the EU; and 'culture war' controversies such as trans rights. Any other problems? The group's emergence as a party could exacerbate communalism in local politics in the big cities, based on ethnic or religious rather than class differences. The even more horrific prospect is that they allow a Farage-led government into power with all that entails for legitimising Islamophobia.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Parliamentary privilege allows pro-Palestine Action MPs to voice support
MPs who voice support for Palestine Action in the Commons will be shielded from prosecution under terror laws by parliamentary privilege. Parliamentary convention dictates that no MP can be prosecuted for anything they say in the Commons chamber, Westminster Hall or formal committee of the House even if they voice support for a proscribed organisation such as Palestine Action. It also protects MPs from being sued for defamation or libel. It means any MP will be free to support or even encourage backing for Palestine Action, even though saying it outside the Commons would leave them liable for up to 14 years in prison. Nine Labour MPs were among the 26 members who voted against the Government's move to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, putting it on a par with Hamas, al-Qaeda and Islamic State. The group of Labour MPs included Diane Abbott, the veteran Left-winger, Clive Lewis and Richard Burgon, who served in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet. Mr Corbyn, who sits as an independent, also voted against proscribing Palestine Action, along with fellow independent John McDonnell, his former shadow chancellor. The Commons voted by 385 to 26 in favour of proscribing Palestine Action. On Thursday, the Lords backed it without a vote. A so-called regret motion proposed by a Green Party peer criticising the measure was rejected by 144 votes to 16. It is unclear when the ban, which needs final sign-off by the Home Secretary, will come into force as the group is mounting a court challenge to temporarily block the move with a hearing scheduled on Friday, pending further proceedings. Two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 causing £7 million worth of damage, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Four people have been charged by counter-terrorism police over the incident and were remanded in custody following a court appearance. Commons officials confirmed that any MP speaking in support of the group would be exempt from prosecution under parliamentary privilege. Guidance for MPs states: 'This allows you to speak up on behalf of constituents, express an opinion, or condemn corruption, malpractice or even criminal activity without fear of legal action, as long as you do so in proceedings of the House. 'This protection extends to written proceedings: for example, written and oral questions, motions, early day motions, and amendments tabled to bills and motions. 'Anyone giving evidence to a committee of the House also has this protection, which is a safeguard for witnesses and also ensures that select committees are not obstructed in their inquiries by threats of legal action, or any other kind of threat against witnesses.' Lord Hanson of Flint, the Home Office minister, said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe. 'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence. We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme Right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action. 'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.' However, Mr Corbyn warned that the ban would have a 'chilling effect' on protests, adding: 'Surely we should be looking at the issue that Palestine Action are concerned about, and the supply of weapons from this country to Israel, which has made all this possible. If this order goes through it will have a chilling effect on protests.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ministers face backbench calls to widen access to top tier of sickness benefits
Ministers are facing Labour backbench calls to widen access to their proposed top tier of sickness benefits. Labour backbencher Graeme Downie has proposed a welfare reform Bill amendment, so universal credit claimants with Parkinson's or multiple sclerosis who cannot work do not face repeated medical assessments to receive a payout. If MPs back his amendment, patients with 'evolving' needs who cannot work could also qualify for a higher rate of benefits. The Government's Bill has already cleared its first Commons hurdle at second reading, after work and pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms vowed not to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes coming in only after a review of the benefit. To meet his promise, ministers have had to table amendments to their own draft new law, to remove one of its seven clauses, which MPs will debate next Wednesday. Universal credit claimants with Parkinson's 'are already possibly struggling financially', Mr Downie told the PA news agency ahead of the debate. He added: 'The cost of living with a condition like Parkinson's can be very high. 'You may well require or need additional support.' The Dunfermline and Dollar MP said patients who struggle with their motor control might buy pre-chopped vegetables or chicken. 'Those things are expensive, so if you're already on universal credit and you're struggling, being able to do that significantly impacts your health, it significantly impacts your ability to live properly,' he continued. As part of the Government's reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions has proposed a new 'severe conditions criteria' for universal credit. Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money. To qualify, claimants must have limited capability for work or work-related activity (LCWRA) and symptoms which 'constantly' apply. Mr Downie's amendment would expand these criteria to claimants with 'a fluctuating condition'. It would cover 'conditions like Parkinson's but also multiple sclerosis, ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis), long Covid and a whole range of other conditions where, you know, in the morning things could be really good and in the afternoon things could be really bad, and even hour by hour things could change', he said. 'I felt it was necessary to table an amendment to really probe what the Government's position is on this, and ensuring that people with Parkinson's and conditions like that are not excluded from even applying and being considered.' Mr Downie's proposal has backing from 23 cross-party MPs. Juliet Tizzard, external relations director at Parkinson's UK, said: 'Criteria in the Bill say that a new claimant for the universal credit health payment will have to be 'constantly' unable to perform certain activities to qualify. 'This doesn't work for people with Parkinson's, whose symptoms change throughout the day. ' People with Parkinson's and other fluctuating conditions like multiple sclerosis will be effectively excluded from getting all the financial support they need. 'The Government has responded to our call and withdrawn the damaging restrictions to Pip. 'Now, they must do the same with the universal credit health element. The health of many people with Parkinson's is in their hands.'
