
Lawmakers want U.S. tech CEOs to address concerns about submarine cables
Washington has been raising alarm about the network of more than 400 subsea cables that handle 99% of international internet traffic and about threats from China and Russia.
The letter raised concerns that entities affiliated with China "such as SBSS, Huawei Marine, China Telecom, and China Unicom, have continued to provide maintenance or servicing to cable systems in which your companies maintain direct or indirect operational involvement or ownership."
The letter was signed by Representative John Moolenaar, who chairs a House panel on China, and also by Republican representatives Carlos Gimenez and Keith Self, who chair subcommittees.
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately comment.
The tech companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The letter said the committees are "examining the extent to which foreign adversarial actors are positioning themselves, both overtly and covertly, to compromise subsea cable systems at key points of vulnerability."
The lawmakers want the companies to disclose by August 8 whether they are aware of any instances of suspected hardware tampering, optical signal tapping, unexpected signal distortion or other operational irregularities during any cable repair or maintenance event.
"A growing body of evidence points to a pattern of coordinated malign activity linked to the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation targeting subsea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea, Indo-Pacific, and other strategic regions," the letter said.
Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr said last week that the the agency plans to adopt rules to bar companies from connecting undersea submarine communication cables to the United States that include Chinese technology or equipment.
Since 2020, U.S. regulators have been instrumental in the cancellation of four cables whose backers had wanted to link the United States with Hong Kong. In November 2024, two fiber-optic undersea telecommunication cables in the Baltic Sea were cut, prompting investigations of possible sabotage.
In 2023, Taiwan accused two Chinese vessels of cutting the only two cables that support internet access on the Matsu Islands. In addition, Houthi attacks in the Red Sea may have been responsible for the cutting of three cables providing internet service to Europe and Asia.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
'In no one's interest': China extends support to Brazil as Trump threatens 50% tariffs on Brasilia
China responded sharply to the US threat of imposing a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, calling out Trump's aggressive trade stance. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun emphasised that 'tariff wars have no winners' and slammed unilateral actions, saying they 'serve no one's interests.' Show more Show less


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Jaishankar slams Opposition during Op Sindoor debate, asks ‘Which one of you…'
External affairs minister S Jaishankar on Monday invoked the strikes on terror camps in Pakistan to underline the Modi government's resolve in responding to cross-border terrorism. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar speaks during debate on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha.(PTI) 'It was a commitment made by the Prime Minister, to the people of India, that we would hit those symbols, those sites, those planning places,' Jaishankar said in the Lok Sabha. Jaishankar questioned the Opposition parties, asking if any of them had ever imagined that terror hubs like Bahawalpur and Muridke could be hit the way they were. 'So today, when I hear many questions from across the A, I want to say, which one of you would imagine that Bahawalpur and Muridke would be brought down the way it was. Which one of you thought?' he asked. Jaishankar hits out at Opposition for ruling out strikes Jaishankar said the opposition never even considered such strikes during their tenure and stressed that the May 7 operation sent a strong message to Pakistan to stop supporting terror. 'When did you even think of it during your term? You didn't even cross your mind. In fact, on the contrary, you ruled it out after 26 years,' he said. 'So, I think our objectives are very clear. We wanted to send a message to the terrorists. We wanted to send a message to Pakistan, but do not continue the support for terrorism. And I think on the morning of 7th of May, that message went home loud and clear,' the minister added. Jaishankar said Operation Sindoor reflects a new normal in India's anti-terror response, hit out at the Opposition for enabling Chinese tech earlier, and asserted that unlike past governments, the current regime engaged China with clarity on terrorism, trade, and de-escalation. 'Opposition lectures us on dealing with China but they allowed 2G and 3G from China; our government made indigenous 5G, ' said Jaishankar, adding, 'Did not go to China for Olympics, secret deals; went there to make India's stand clear on terror, trade and de-escalation.'


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
China speed: How Chinese companies accelerate product development and enable faster time-to-market
In the 17-minute Audio Interview , Mr. Hofmann discusses these questions: Why is 'China Speed' an even more pressing issue for Western automotive companies compared to five years ago?What are key differences in automotive product development processes between Chinese and Western (European/NA) OEMs?Are there any 'quick wins' Western automotive companies can try to incorporate into their product development process? How does the corporate culture within Chinese automotive companies enable faster time-to-market processes? What is the outlook for Western companies facing this challenge?