
Minnesota lawmakers slog away at state budget impasse (again)
State of play: Legislative leaders and Gov. Tim Walz want a special session to pass the remaining bills by the end of this week, so that tentative layoff notices won't go out to tens of thousands of state workers on Monday.
Yes, but: The path — and the vote math — for getting the full budget across the finish line remained a work in progress as of Thursday, as leaders and chairs continued to negotiate (and re-negotiate) a slew of hot-button policy and spending issues that have tripped up talks for months.
The big picture: The Legislature is about as closely divided as it can get — with a tied House and Democrats holding a one-vote majority in the Senate.
Those dynamics, plus political differences within the two caucuses and the threat of a projected deficit in future years, have made this two-year budget an especially complicated plane to land.
What they're saying: "We're at a point right now where, quite candidly ... every single legislator is potentially a veto over the whole deal," Walz told reporters Wednesday.
Friction point: Part of the challenge, Walz and other leaders say, is that multiple issues, disputes and details threaten to derail the delicate "deal" leaders announced near the end of the regular session.
To resolve them, leaders must make changes that appease certain members and constituencies whose votes are needed, without alienating others whose votes are also essential.
Zoom in: Some of the outstanding hangups are tied to issues that have been sticking points all session, while others are smaller policies that matter to individual legislators whose votes are needed.
They include:
🩺 MinnesotaCare: Progressive Democrats won't vote for a budget bill that includes the agreement to end state-subsidized health care for undocumented adults, meaning the rollback would need to pass as standalone legislation with many GOP votes.
Republicans, fearful of being double-crossed by Democrats and Walz, want language tying the fate of other critical issues to the MNCare legislation's enactment as a failsafe.
💰 Taxes: Leaders intervened after a bicameral, bipartisan working group failed to strike an agreement on a tax package, releasing a "skinny bill" that sticks to policies included in the framework leaders signed off on in late May.
Tax chairs from both sides of the aisle rejected that compromise measure straight away, sending negotiators back to the drawing board.
While the Legislature doesn't need to pass a tax bill as part of the budget, the revenue impacts matter for the state's bottom line.
🚙 Local funding: Language in a transportation spending bill that would shift some sales tax revenues from metro counties to the Metropolitan Council was met with blowback from local leaders and some legislators.
A chair involved in negotiating that provision issued a statement Thursday raising concerns about how it came together and calling for more public input on the idea.
⚡️ Data centers and more: Behind-the-scenes negotiations are still swirling on a host of other hot-button issues, including potential changes to Minnesota's new ban on non-competes, tweaks to the Earned Sick and Safe Time law and proposals related to taxes and incentives for data centers.
🚧 Bonding: Talks are also ongoing on whether to tackle a capital investment package authorizing hundreds of millions of dollars for roads, infrastructure and other construction projects.
That needs bipartisan support in both chambers to pass.
📆 Schedules: Legislators are people too, and the start of summer brings graduations, weddings, vacations, and other conflicts and commitments that can complicate attendance (and votes), especially on the weekends.
Case in point: One member has a family funeral this weekend, Walz noted, and DFL Sen. Nicole Mitchell is scheduled to spend part of Monday at a hearing for her upcoming burglary trial, which is set to start June 16.
Wild card to watch: Senate Republican Leader Mark Johnson didn't sign the budget framework agreement reached in late May. That's notable because Senate DFL Leader Erin Murphy will need their votes to pass budget bills that can't get support from members of her caucus and to suspend rules for a speedy special session.
Whatever concessions and changes Senate Republicans seek in return for their support could result in leaders losing votes from more liberal factions of the DFL caucuses.
What's next: If the Legislature isn't done by Monday, tens of thousands more state workers will get formal notice that they may be temporarily laid off if lawmakers fail to meet their June 30 deadline for getting the budget done.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Thune's pre-August ambassador spree
President Trump is outpacing former President Biden — and even his own first-term clip — in getting his ambassadors confirmed by the Senate. Why it matters: Trump wants to go even faster. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is threatening to keep the chamber in session this weekend to clear more of Trump's nominations. But Democrats have been unwilling to speed up the process and are withholding unanimous consent for nominees — a practice Republicans grumble is a departure from tradition. By the numbers: Trump has 26 ambassadorial nominees who are awaiting a full Senate vote. This includes former Rep. Mike Waltz, whom the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved last week to be Trump's UN envoy. Nineteen of those nominees are ambassadors to foreign countries. The Senate has confirmed 11 of Trump's ambassadors to foreign countries so far, compared to six confirmations before August in the initial year of his first term. Biden didn't have a single ambassador confirmed before August in the first year of his term. Former Presidents Bush and Obama had both confirmed more than 20, but that was when the opposition party was not putting up quite as much of a procedural fight. What to watch: The Foreign Relations Committee will take up another five ambassador nominees in a hearing on Tuesday.


Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Heritage Action hires Tiffany Justice from Moms for Liberty
Heritage Action has enlisted Tiffany Justice, a co-founder of Moms for Liberty, to serve as executive vice president, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Justice is bringing her grassroots organizing skills to unite the conservative movement around the Trump agenda. It's also a signal that Heritage Action, the political arm of the Heritage Foundation, will be more focused ahead of the 2026 midterms on parental rights and education reform — two issues that GOP strategists are convinced helped President Trump expand his coalition and recapture the White House. In 2021, Justice co-founded Moms for Liberty, which is "dedicated to empowering parents to advocate effectively for their children at school board meetings and across all levels of government," according to its website. What they're saying:"Tiffany Justice is a force of nature, and her leadership comes at a critical moment when effective advocacy is essential," said Kevin Roberts, the president of Heritage Action and the Heritage Foundation. "It's not a time to manage decline or preserve the status quo, but to go on offense for the American Dream," he added. "Tiffany is a patriot and has been fighting for parents and the rights of all Americans for years," said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). Zoom out: Heritage Action, founded in 2010 to fight President Obama's health care plans, was one of the first groups to run ads boosting Trump's cabinet nominees. In December, it launched a $1 million campaign to persuade potentially wobbly Republicans to back Trump's picks. The ads targeted the home states of Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and former leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), along with seven other states with GOP senators. Zoom in: Justice has also impressed Trump, who praised her organizing skills during the presidential campaign.


New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dems' failed makeover, ‘In-N-Out' of Cali and other commentary
Conservative: Dems' Failed Makeover Democratic leaders hoped to 'reverse the party's hard-left drift and reconnect with working-class voters' after the election, but Democrats instead ran 'straight back into the arms of their radical base,' marvels Mike Howell at The Blaze. They 'poured money and institutional support into the No Kings protests,' for example — and these 'weren't fringe outbursts. In fact, they revealed the party's core.' The Oversight Project compiled the Instagram activity of 'one key protest organizer, a group called 50501,' and 'tracked who its social media managers followed, and what emerged was a clear pattern of associations: communist, neo-Marxist, anti-American, and foreign-aligned groups.' 'These protests didn't bubble up from the grassroots. They were built from the same radical networks that have long tried to destabilize the country from within.' Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! West Coast watch: 'In-N-Out' of Cali Fast-food burger chain In-N-Out's owner, Lynsi Snyder is leaving 'deep blue California for the friendlier environs of red state Tennessee,' where her company is building a second corporate headquarters, reports USA Today's Nicole Russell. 'Snyder said she's leaving the West Coast for the Mid-South for the sake of her family and her business,' just as 'hundreds of thousands of regular people' and businesses like Tesla, Chevron and Hewlett Packard have done, seeking 'better lives and better business opportunities in other states.' California has 'pushed tax rates and the cost of living to ridiculous extremes even as residents' quality of life has declined.' 'People and companies are not just fleeing California — in many cases, they are relocating to red states with a drastically different approach to politics and policy.' It's 'another indicator of California's decline.' Tech beat: The Push for Unbiased AI President Trump's new executive order banning the federal government from buying 'woke AI' gives tech executives 'powerful incentives' to develop 'unbiased AI models,' argues Christopher Rufo at City Journal. All AI has 'ideological' formulas — some, including concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism and DEI — 'baked' into their code. 'The question is not whether an AI system will be built upon a set of values; the question is which set of values the programmers will select.' Yet Trump's EO stipulates that the government will purchase only software that is ''truth-seeking' and committed to 'ideological neutrality.'' The president and his advisers 'have shifted the direction of artificial intelligence away from woke — and toward a vibrant American future.' Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters From the right: A Kamala Run Scares the Left 'California Democrats are rubbing their temples' at the thought of Kamala Harris running for governor, quips National Review's Noah Rothman. She'd be the heavy favorite, but the ex-veep might owe that 'less to her political acumen' than to 'California voters' bovine insouciance.' She'd have to defend Joe Biden and 'her role in the failed' coverup of his decline. And 'in the absence of any measurable charisma and 'notable risks' to the party overall, many Dems are attacking her. One state-level official even says she'd ruin the party's chance to 'win the House and hold on to three seats that we just flipped in 2024.' So 'Harris could get herself elected,' notes Rothman, 'while still serving as a net negative for her party.' Legal expert: Media's Russiagate Blinders Newly declassified material from the Russian collusion investigation reveals 'how high-ranking officials in the Obama Administration seeded' the false collusion narrative 'with the help of an eager, unquestioning press corps,' thunders Jonathan Turley at Fox News. Ex-CIA director John Brennan 'was the key figure insisting on the inclusion of the Steele dossier' in the Russian interference assessment. Ex-FBI director James Comey knew 'the Steele dossier was an unreliable political hit job,' yet he 'lied to a federal court to maintain' the investigation. 'The public is now learning about the real Russian conspiracy and its key players,' but 'the same media that pushed the false claims' are 'imposing a news blackout as they did with the Hunter Biden laptop.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board