
The diversity of families: Kerala HC does well to back transgender co-parenting
In August 2022, granting maternity leave to a central government employee who had previously availed it for the care of her step-children, a bench comprising Justices D Y Chandrachud and A S Bopanna had observed that 'atypical' families are equally deserving of legal protections and social welfare benefits. 'The black letter of the law must not be relied upon to disadvantage families which are different from traditional ones,' they had held. The apex court's refusal to extend civil union or joint adoption rights to LGBTQIA+ couples and its deferral of substantive rights to legislative reform — despite acknowledging queer love and lived discrimination — however, has come as a setback after years of progressive milestones, such as the 2014 NALSA verdict recognising the rights of transgender persons and the 2018 Navtej Johar ruling that decriminalised same-sex relations. In such circumstances, the Kerala High Court's verdict offers a template for affirming queer parenthood within the existing legal framework — and places the child at the centre of that empathetic recognition. It asserts that constitutional dignity cannot wait for political consensus.
Days after the Kerala HC verdict, the Madras High Court, while ruling on a habeas corpus petition by a woman forcibly estranged from her lesbian partner, upheld her right to 'find a family'. 'The concept of a 'chosen family' is now well-settled and acknowledged in LGBTQIA+ jurisprudence,' the division bench said. In a country grappling with entrenched social prejudices, these affirmations of diversity reflect a welcome judicial sensitivity to the complexities and plurality of lived experience. They validate, with quiet strength, the right to belong — not as a privilege granted conditionally by tradition, but a truth that embraces every identity, even those that challenge convention.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Activists condemn VCK leader Thirumavalavan's comments on same-sex relationships
CHENNAI: LGBTQIA+ rights activists have condemned VCK chief Thol Thirumavalavan for describing same-sex relationship as 'perversion' during a public event, and demanded an apology and clarity on the party's stands on LGBTQIA+ rights. A collective statement, issued by LGBTQIA+ Persons Who Stand For Social Justice called the comment 'deeply disturbing' and 'unscientific.' The comment, made at the Let Us Learn Democracy and Student Parliament 2025 conference on April 12, came in response to a law student's question about same-sex relationships in the context of Tamil society's definition of love. Thirumavalavan replied that 'in English, they call that perversion' and stated that love between two men goes against nature. The Tamil Nadu Rainbow Coalition (TNRC), a collective of groups and individuals from the sexual and gender minority communities, in a separate open letter to Thirumalavan, expressing 'deep anguish and disappointment', stated that homosexuality is neither unnatural nor a disorder, citing the World Health Organization's removal of homosexuality from its International Classification of Disorders in 1990. They also noted the Indian Psychiatric Society's endorsement of homosexuality as a natural variation of human sexuality.


Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
BMC निवडणुकीपूर्वी शिवसेना पक्ष, धनुष्यबाण परत मिळवण्याची तयारी; ठाकरे गटाची न्यायालयात मागणी
Shivsena Ubt Demands Court To Decide On Shiv Sena Party Name And Symbol Before Bmc Elections


India Gazette
15 hours ago
- India Gazette
Delhi HC directs Centre to frame rules for mode-specific RTI information
New Delhi [India], July 2 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the relevant authority of the Union Government to take necessary steps and issue directions or frame rules to guarantee that information under the Right to Information Act, 2005, is provided in the format or mode requested by the applicant, while ensuring that appropriate safety measures are in place. Highlighting a gap in the current RTI Rules, a division bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela stated that the need for providing information in the format sought by applicants--such as email or pen drives--while ensuring proper safeguards. The Court emphasised that existing rules do not account for present-day digital preferences, which can limit accessibility and defeat the spirit of the RTI Act, 2005. The judges instructed the appropriate authority to evaluate the issue and make a decision within three months. The directions came in response to a petition filed by two law students, who argued that RTI procedures continue to reference outdated formats, such as diskettes and floppies. They urged that information delivery should reflect current technology, including cloud platforms and secure email transfers. The plea also requested clear provisions for modern digital payment methods, such as UPI, net banking, and credit cards, to make the RTI process more user-friendly. Despite earlier representations made to the concerned ministries, no action had been taken, prompting the petitioners to approach the Court, stated the plea. The High Court concluded that framing updated rules is essential for ensuring the effective realisation of citizens' rights under the RTI Act in today's digital era. (ANI)