logo
I Like Microsoft's 13-Inch Surface Laptop, but the Larger Model Is the One to Get

I Like Microsoft's 13-Inch Surface Laptop, but the Larger Model Is the One to Get

CNET02-07-2025
CNET's expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.
8.0
/ 10
SCORE Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch) $1,000 at Microsoft Pros Beautiful, durable and compact design
Outstanding battery life
Better-than-expected audio output Cons 13-inch, 3:2 display can feel cramped
Laptop is harder to open than it should be
Lacks Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 connectivity
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch)
8.0/10 CNET Score
$1,000 at Microsoft
The reason to choose Microsoft's 13-inch Surface Laptop over the 13.8-inch version isn't for the greater portability: It's the lower price. It starts at $900, which is $300 less than the cheapest 13.8-inch model. When you bump up the 13-inch Surface Laptop's storage to match the entry-level 13.8-inch model's, however, the price difference drops to $200, where it becomes more difficult to make the case for the 13-inch Surface Laptop.
Like the 13.8-inch Surface Laptop I reviewed, the 13-inch model uses an Arm-based Qualcomm Snapdragon X series CPU and boasts a wonderfully streamlined and expertly crafted design that rivals that of the MacBook Air. I love the look and feel of the 13-inch Surface Laptop, but I like the added performance, superior display and haptic touchpad of the larger 13.8-inch model. It's the better value if you're shopping for a workhorse, everyday laptop. I'd only consider the smaller and cheaper 13-inch Surface Laptop as a secondary machine for travel. It makes sense as your primary laptop only if you have a work setup with an external monitor or two.
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch) Price as reviewed $1,000 Display size/resolution 13-inch 1,920x1,280 IPS LCD CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1-P42-100 Memory 16GB LPDDR5x-8448 Graphics Qualcomm Adreno Graphics Storage 512GB SSD Ports 2 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, combo audio jack Networking Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 Operating system Microsoft Windows 11 Home Weight 2.7 lbs (1.2 kg)
The Surface Laptop (13-inch) starts at $900 for a system with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1-P42-100 processor, 16GB of RAM, integrated Qualcomm Adreno graphics, a 256GB SSD and a 13-inch touch display with a boxy 3:2 aspect ratio and a 1,920x1,280-pixel resolution. There's just one upgrade offered, and my test system had it: 512GB of storage for an extra $100.
If you opt for the $1,000 model, then you can choose from two other colors -- Violet and Ocean -- in addition to the default Platinum. I received the 13-inch Surface Laptop in Ocean, which is a muted aqua color. The Violet looks more vibrant than the Ocean, judging from Microsoft's site.
The Surface Laptop (13-inch) starts at £899 in the UK and AU$1,699 in Australia.
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch) performance
Microsoft offers a lone CPU for the 13-inch Surface Laptop -- an 8-core Snapdragon X Plus processor -- which can't match the performance of Apple's M4 MacBook Air or the 13.8-inch Surface Laptop I tested with a 12-core Snapdragon X Elite chip. I didn't test the baseline 13.8-inch Surface Laptop, but it should also offer a bit more performance than the 13-inch Surface Laptop from its 10-core Snapdragon X Plus processor.
Its performance on the 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark shows that it's not a great pick for gamers or graphics pros, even if you were willing to use the small, 13-inch display. With a total of 45 TOPS, the 13-inch Surface Laptop's Snapdragon X Plus has the same TOPS count and AI-processing capabilities as higher-end Snapdragon X series CPUs. It performed well on our Procyon AI Computer Vision test, which measures integer math proficiency for AI workloads.
The little laptop also performed admirably in battery testing. Even among long-running, Arm-based laptops, its battery life was outstanding. It lasted 24 hours and 20 minutes on our YouTube streaming battery drain test, putting it in a select group of laptops that can last for longer than a day on a single charge. The 13.8-inch Surface Laptop lasted 19 hours and 50 minutes on the same test, in large part because its larger, higher-resolution display has more pixels to power. Likewise, the M4 MacBook Air has an even higher-res display than the 13.8-inch Surface Laptop and lasted 15 hours and 50 minutes.
Matt Elliott/CNET
Windows ultraportable masquerading as a mini MacBook
You might not get more performance than expected for the price with the 13-inch Surface Laptop, but you certainly get a better build quality and sleeker design than most laptops around its $900 price. It's every bit as well put together as the pricier 13.8-inch Surface Laptop, which is one of my favorite laptops. The 13-inch model boasts a simple, sturdy all-metal design that looks a lot like Apple's minimalist approach with its MacBooks.
The 13-inch Surface Laptop is smaller than the 13.6-inch MacBook Air and 13.8-inch Surface Laptop, more than even the size of the display might indicate. The 3:2 display allows it to be narrower and more compact than the other two laptops with 16:10 displays. It's just 11.3 inches wide, compared to nearly 12 inches wide for the MacBook Air and the larger Surface Laptop. At 0.6 inches thick, it's a bit thinner than the larger Surface Laptop but not as thin as the MacBook Air, which is just 0.4 inches thick. It may be a hair thicker than the Air, but the two weigh the same at 2.7 pounds. The larger 13.8-inch Surface Laptop is still eminently portable at 3 pounds.
Matt Elliott/CNET
I was worried the small 13-inch, 3:2 display might result in a cramped keyboard, but my fears were unfounded. The keys are widely spaced and feel very comfortable for typing. The spacebar and the keys along the sides, such as Tab, Shift, Backspace and Enter, are shortened to accommodate the narrower keyboard deck, but each is still wide enough that I didn't need to relearn any typing habits. The keys offered slightly deeper travel than with the MacBook Air, and didn't feel mushy with a firm, snappy response.
The touchpad also offers a firm and snappy click response, but it's one area where Microsoft makes a sacrifice to hit a lower price than the 13.8-inch Surface Laptop. It's a basic, mechanical touchpad as opposed to the lovely haptic touchpad you get with the larger model. The touchpad is perfectly acceptable but suffers somewhat from the diving board effect, where clicks are firmer toward the top edge and looser as you move toward the bottom edge. I much prefer the consistent (and customizable) click response you get with a haptic touchpad.
My only other complaint about the design is that the laptop is hard to open. There's no notch cut out on the front edge to help you lift the lid like with a MacBook, and nor does the lid have a tab that overhangs that would also provide something for your fingertip to grab onto to lift. With the 13-inch Surface Laptop, it's a two-handed operation to open the laptop. I found that the easiest way to lift the lid was by gripping each side of the display. Either that or using a fingernail to get between the top and bottom of the laptop to open it.
This Surface has a boxy 3:2 display and lifting the lid to see it is a challenge.
Matt Elliott/CNET
Once you do manage to lift the lid and open the laptop, you're greeted with a boxy 13-inch display with a 1,920x1,280-pixel resolution. Not only is the resolution and pixel-per-inch lower than you get with the 13.8-inch model -- 1,920x1,280 (178 ppi) versus 2,304x1,536 (201 ppi), but the refresh rate is also slower. The 13-inch Surface Laptop runs at a steady 60Hz to the 13.8-inch model's dynamic 120Hz rate, which results in smoother movement. Text and images still look crisp on the 13-inch Surface Laptop's display, but things just aren't quite as sharp, and scrolling through web pages doesn't look quite as smooth.
You also take a hit in color performance and brightness with the smaller Surface Laptop. On my tests with a Spyder X colorimeter, the 13-inch Surface Laptop hit a peak brightness of 414 nits and covered 96% of the sRGB gamut and only 71% of the larger AdobeRGB and P3 color spaces. Compare those figures with those of the 13.8-inch Surface Laptop: 572 nits and 100% sRGB, 87% AdobeRGB and 99% P3. The larger model is definitely the pick for color-accurate work, but I found the 13-inch Surface Laptop's display to be plenty bright. With its non-reflective finish, the display is usable outdoors under all but the sunniest of conditions.
Matt Elliott/CNET
The basic pair of 2-watt stereo speakers produced a bigger sound than I anticipated. You don't get much bass, but the audio output was loud enough to fill a small room while also maintaining clarity. For such a compact laptop, I give the speakers an above-average grade. They are perfectly suitable for video chats and casual listening.
The 1080p webcam produces a sharp, well-balanced image and offers the full suite of Windows Studio Effects. On many Copilot Plus PCs, you get the trio of automatic framing, eye contact and background effects, but not the portrait light and creative filters. With the 13-inch Surface Laptop, you get all five. The camera doesn't have an IR sensor for facial recognition, but the power button doubles as a fingerprint reader, so there's at least one secure biometric feature.
Matt Elliott/CNET
The port selection is a bit of a disappointment because the pair of USB-C ports is of the slower USB 3.2 Gen 2 variety that offers half the 40Gbps transfer speed you'd get with Thunderbolt 4 or USB4. If fast USB speed is important to you, then that's another reason to spend more for the 13.8-inch Surface Laptop, which has two USB4 ports.
Is the 13-inch Microsoft Surface Laptop worth buying?
For a secondary machine used for travel, the 13-inch Surface Laptop makes sense for its sturdy and compact design. As a primary machine, the larger 13.8-inch is the better pick. For just $200 more (when you factor in the SSD upgrade required on the smaller model to put things on equal footing), the 13.8-inch Surface Laptop provides greater value with its superior display, haptic touchpad and faster USB connectivity. I like the 13-inch Surface Laptop, but the 13.8-inch model is currently my favorite Windows laptop.
Hide our expert take
Photo Gallery
1/1
How we test computers
Photo Gallery
1/1
The review process for laptops, desktops, tablets and other computerlike devices consists of two parts: performance testing under controlled conditions in the CNET Labs and extensive hands-on use by our expert reviewers. This includes evaluating a device's aesthetics, ergonomics and features. A final review verdict is a combination of both objective and subjective judgments.
The list of benchmarking software we use changes over time as the devices we test evolve. The most important core tests we're currently running on every compatible computer include Primate Labs Geekbench 6, Cinebench R23, PCMark 10 and 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra.
A more detailed description of each benchmark and how we use it can be found on our How We Test Computers page.
Hide our expert take
Geekbench 6 CPU (multi-core)
Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M4)
15049
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441
13471
HP Omnibook X 14
13428
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
13159
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
11490
Dell 14 Plus
11027
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch)
10985
HP Pavilion Aero 13
9534 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Geekbench 6 CPU (single-core)
Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M4)
3818
Dell 14 Plus
2694
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441
2448
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
2422
HP Pavilion Aero 13
2413
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch)
2400
HP Omnibook X 14
2370
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
2369 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Cinebench 2024 CPU (multi-core)
Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M4)
824
HP Omnibook X 14
809
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
799
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441
739
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
709
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch)
639
HP Pavilion Aero 13
556
Dell 14 Plus
465 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Cinebench 2024 CPU (single-core)
Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M4)
169
Dell 14 Plus
120
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441
109
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch)
107
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
107
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
107
HP Omnibook X 14
100
HP Pavilion Aero 13
97 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
3DMark Steel Nomad
Dell 14 Plus
575
HP Omnibook X 14
488
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
483
HP Pavilion Aero 13
349
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
233
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch)
228 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Procyon AI Computer Vision (integer)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 13-inch (Hexagon NPU, SNPE)
1935
Acer Swift Go 14 AI (Hexagon NPU, SNPE)
1829
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441 (Hexagon NPU, SNPE)
1792
HP Omnibook X 14 (Hexagon NPU, SNPE)
1749
Dell 14 Plus (Intel AI Boost NPU, OpenVINO)
1654
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 (Hexagon NPU, SNPE)
1559 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Online streaming battery drain test
HP Omnibook X 14
25 hr, 12 min
Microsoft Surface Laptop (13-inch)
24 hr, 20 min
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
23 hr, 13 min
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441
23 hr, 11 min
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
19 hr, 50 min
Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M4)
15 hr, 50 min
Dell 14 Plus
14 hr
HP Pavilion Aero 13
10 hr, 12 min Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pre-order deals: Get up to $300 in Samsung credit with your Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Flip 7
Pre-order deals: Get up to $300 in Samsung credit with your Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Flip 7

Android Authority

time22 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Pre-order deals: Get up to $300 in Samsung credit with your Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Flip 7

Lanh Nguyen / Android Authority These offers are available directly from Samsung's official website. The deals are available for all color versions available. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 + free 512GB upgrade and $300 in Samsung credits Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 + free 512GB upgrade and $300 in Samsung credits Thin, light, high-powered, and it folds! The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 offers an 8-inch OLED screen, a 200MP camera, the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chipset, and a 4,400mAh battery. The Galaxy AI experience is baked in, offering tools across the camera, Circle to Search, and much more. Best of all, Samsung continues to evolve their fold folding hinge assembly, promising reduced visibility of the crease. See price at Amazon Save $420.00 If you're looking to get the biggest, most exciting foldable phone available from Sasmung, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is no slouch. Amazon offers a free upgrade to 512GB of storage and throws in a $300 gift card. Essentially, you are getting the same as with Samsung. That said, if you were already considering getting another Samsung accessory or product, you can use the Samsung credit right away and get everything ordered in one go. On the other hand, you will have to wait for your Amazon gift card and get whatever you want through a separate purchase, which then you also have to wait for, as it will ship separately. Additionally, Samsung is offering some extra discounts on bundled accessories. For example, the Galaxy Watch 8 gets an added $50 discount when bundled with your Galaxy Z Fold 7. So, you're not just saving $300 on it; you're actually saving $350 (it would be free). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 + free 512GB upgrade and $150 in Samsung credits Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 + free 512GB upgrade and $150 in Samsung credits Melds Galaxy AI with the new edge-to-edge FlexWindow With a 6.9-inch main display and a 4.1-inch FlexWindow outer display, the Samsung Galaxy Flip 7 focuses on putting AI smarts in your pocket. Measuring just 13.74mm thick when folded, it's the slimmest Z Flip phone yet. Packed with a 50MP camera and a suite of AI tools, Samsung calls the Z Flip 7 a "pocket-sized selfie studio." See price at Amazon Save $350.00 If you're looking to get the smaller Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7, it may seem like the free $200 Amazon gift card is better than the $150 Samsung credit, but you are pretty much getting the same deal here, because you will also get that extra Samsung credit for bundling an accessory with it. As an example, if you add the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, you will only pay $79.99 for it, instead of the full $349.99. That's $270 in savings! And again, you won't have to wait for the gift card, make a separate purchase, then wait for the second purchase. By the way, you also get the free 512GB upgrade for free with this one, regardless of which retailer you pick. If you were already considering using your credit or gift card for something else from Samsung, it's better to just go directly to Samsung's website. Now, if all you want is the phone and would rather be able to buy anything with the free incentive, Amazon is definitely the better alternative.

I Take This Cliq Portable Camping Chair Everywhere, and These Two Colors Are $40 Off Right Now
I Take This Cliq Portable Camping Chair Everywhere, and These Two Colors Are $40 Off Right Now

CNET

time22 minutes ago

  • CNET

I Take This Cliq Portable Camping Chair Everywhere, and These Two Colors Are $40 Off Right Now

Deal alert: The Cliq Classiq 1.0 portable chair is available for $110 -- a $40 markdown, or 27% off -- in two colors, Moss 1.0 and Red 1.0. The Cliq website has shifted focus to a newer, pricier model, making now a good time to nab the original for less. Summer's in full swing, and whether I'm going on a late-sunset hike or hitting a backyard BBQ, my day bag now holds three non-negotiables: a water bottle, a power bank and, believe it or not, a portable camping chair. The one that earned permanent EDC status is the Cliq Classiq 1.0, a bottle-size seat that pops open in seconds. Amazon is the only place you can still snag the Classiq 1.0 (Cliq's website has moved on to the pricier 2.0 model). There you can find the Cliq Classiq 1.0 for a discounted price of $110, which is roughly half what Cliq charges for the newer version. Cliq chair specs Product Dimensions : 21.99"D x 22"W x 26"H : 21.99"D x 22"W x 26"H Item Weight : 3.6 lbs : 3.6 lbs Maximum Weight Recommendation : 300 lbs : 300 lbs Fill Material : Polyester : Polyester Furniture Finish: Aluminum The Cliq chair can go with you anywhere, which is why I love it so much The Cliq portable chair is a lightweight camping chair that folds up to the size of a large water bottle, like a Stanley tumbler, so you can easily toss it into your backpack, tote bag, large purse, back pocket (I've done this before), drawstring bag or Cliq chair carry bag. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. It's also really simple to fold and unfold. You just unfasten the velcro strap, extend the four legs and lock them into place. And then do the same, but reverse, to make it compact again. The biggest surprise, though, is just how comfortable it is. The Cliq chair has a slight recline, so you can lean back despite its size. I've always had bad experiences with traditional camping chairs and my back always ends up hurting from prolonged sitting. But not with the Cliq chair. It's so comfortable I've actually fallen asleep in it many times. The Cliq chair also has solid rubber feet tips so you can get pretty stable on uneven ground, whether you're on sand, rocks or a hill. I also appreciate how easy it is to keep clean. The chair is made of waterproof nylon so it's perfect for outdoors. You can easily wash off any dirt that gets on the chair during a hike or at the beach. I usually give it a rinse and let it dry in the sun. This is my Cliq chair compared to a size 12 Crocs clog and an old-school Stanley tumbler. Nelson Aguilar/CNET To sum it up, if I'm going golfing, I take my Cliq chair. If I'm heading to the beach, I'm taking my Cliq chair. The DMV office down the street from my house is always packed and there's never anywhere to sit. So I take my Cliq chair. I even have it with my right now, as I write this, while I'm on a skiing vacation. Yeah, I may look a little weird whipping out a camping chair in a crowded place like that but hey, at least I'm comfortable. And really, what more could you want in life? If you want more recommendations for handy products that will make your life easier, check out our editors picks for the best outdoor tech, from pizza ovens to solar lamps.

Army Puts $43M Bet On Next Gen Leonidas High Power Microwave Counter Drone Tech
Army Puts $43M Bet On Next Gen Leonidas High Power Microwave Counter Drone Tech

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Army Puts $43M Bet On Next Gen Leonidas High Power Microwave Counter Drone Tech

Today, high power microwave (HPM) system maker Epirus announced it has received a $43,551,060 contract from the U.S. Army's Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO) for delivery of two of its new advanced Generation II Leonidas HPM air defense systems along with associated equipment and spares for test events, with options for additional tests, components and support. The Leonidas systems are being built now. The first is expected to be completed by the end of July and the second by the end of August, Eprius' CEO Andy Lowery revealed at a media roundtable attended by TWZ at the company's Washington, D.C., offices last week. A third system will be finished by late September. The Army formally refers to the Leonidas HPM system as the 'Integrated Fires Protection Capability High-Power Microwave' (IFPC-HPM) system. IFPC-HPM is intended for the critical low-altitude air defense (LAAD) role, defending installations, platforms, and formations. Leonidas is largely aimed at defeating unmanned aircraft, including swarms of drones. It could also potentially be employed against more traditional aircraft, as well as low-flying cruise missiles, and robotic threats on the ground or on the water. Epirus describes IFPC-HPM as an effective, cost-efficient electromagnetic interference system with a 'one-to-many' capability to disrupt the electronics of multiple drones simultaneously. It does so by transmitting long-pulse microwave energy across multiple frequency bands, which overloads the electrical systems of drones that fly into the electromagnetic field it creates. In view of the recent success of so-called 'Trojan Horse' drone attacks inside Russia by Ukraine and inside Iran by Israel, the Army and DoD writ large are eager to acquire defenses against pop-up swarms. These groups of drones could threaten U.S. bases, sensors, ships, ports, communications, and wider military/civilian infrastructure abroad and here at home. The Leonidas IFPC-HPM is part of a product line that also includes Leonidas Mobile, which features the company's HPM array integrated atop a Stryker vehicle system; Leonidas H₂O, a marinized system designed for counter-unmanned surface vessel and maritime counter-swarm; Leonidas Pod, a UAS-borne system for electronic attack; and an Expeditionary Directed Energy Counter-Swarm system for forward-deployed defense for the Marine Corps, which TWZ covered earlier this year. The Generation II (GEN II) systems that the RCCTO is acquiring build on the design of the first version of Leonidas. They also benefit from user feedback from the deployment of four GEN I system prototypes to the Middle East in 2024 and to the Indo-Pacific earlier this Spring. The Army plans to test two of the GEN II systems at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake in California in October. The tests will assess their cooperative fires capability and other engineering metrics. Epirus' CEO told the roundtable that, in his view, the tests will be 'a defining moment' for the company. If the systems perform as expected, formal Army acquisition should follow. Success with the Army would kickstart demand for IFPC-HPM and the other Leonidas-based systems in at least three emerging markets, according to Lowery. The first is the basic overseas LAAD requirement that the Army seeks to fill. Lowery calls this the 'Tower 22' scenario, a reference to a drone attack launched by the Islamic Resistance in Iraq that struck Tower 22, a U.S. military outpost in Rukban, northeast Jordan, in January 2024. The attack killed three U.S. soldiers and injured 47 others. If an Epirus system had been in place and properly engaged, the American losses would have been prevented, Lowery maintains. He also cites the recent Israeli success in disrupting Iranian air defenses by attacking from within Iran with drones and loitering munitions as another demand driver in the overseas market, particularly in the Middle East. 'I think that's one of the most urgent applications of our system – get to those Patriot [surface-to-air missile system] sites in CENTCOM [the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility] and put Leonidas next to every one of those sites.' Homeland defense represents a second market. Lowery opines that IFPC-HPM and other Epirus systems could logically be part of the layered homeland air defense envisioned in the Trump administration's Golden Dome initiative. Noting potential threats associated with the upcoming World Cup soccer series, which U.S. cities will host next June-July, he suggests there is a need for in-place HPM systems near the match venues and at the U.S. southern border. Lowery also noted a recent meeting he had with Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Lt. General Adrian Spain, who expressed the service's urgent requirement for 'point defense' for Air Force bases and flightlines. TWZ has extensively elaborated on the risks of drone attacks to USAF bases at home and abroad for years. As a result of the threat and the meeting, Lowery said that he thinks the Air Force is likely to begin leasing IFPC-HPM systems in 2026. Possible acquisitions by the Marines (ExDECS, Leonidas POD) and the Navy may follow upcoming demonstrations for both services. The third market is in foreign military sales, spurred by developments in Ukraine and the Middle East. Lowery also noted the AUKUS Pillar II agreement, which has led to Epirus' participation in Australia's Project LAND 156, aimed at neutralizing small drones (up to 25kg) on the battlefield. Eprius' CEO says the company is 'fairly confident' that it will be chosen as a supplier for the non-kinetic effector portion of the program. AUKUS is a trilateral Australia-United Kingdom-United States defense cooperation agreement. Momentum for the sale of the latest version of the system is highly positive, Lowery told the roundtable. He added that the Army was 'extremely happy' with the two previous experimental deployments of IFPC-HPM I systems in the Middle East and Indo-Pacific. He characterized Eprius' discussions with the Army and DoD not as a question of whether they wish to move forward. 'The question becomes, what do we move forward with?,' he said. Today, Eprius could produce 20 IFPC-HPM II systems per year at its Torrance, California, facility with relative comfort, Lowery says, and may be able to stretch to 30 if required. With a view to potential demand, the company is assessing additional production in proximity to the Army's Joint Counter-Small UAS University and Fires Center of Excellence at Fort Sill in Oklahoma. Prior to potential production, nailing down specific requirements, including maintenance, a curriculum for training, the deployed number of operators per system, and more, must be finalized with the Army. Ensuring that IFPC-HPM II meets range expectations as part of a layered LAAD system is vital as well. Lowery confirms that the Army has defined a region called 'Final Protective Fires,' which has a one-kilometer radius and a 600-foot altitude. 'That's the layer that IFPC HPM is designed to go into.' As TWZ has previously noted, radio frequency directed-energy weapons offer notable advantages over 'soft-kill' options, like electronic warfare jammers, given that they can also bring down drones that are operating autonomously, or those using fiber-optic-cable guidance, by disrupting their onboard electronics. However, Andy Lowery stressed that Epirus does not view Leonidas simply as a directed energy or HPM system. He makes a point of referring to it as 'weaponized electromagnetic interference.' Lowery explained that when Epirus began development in 2018, it was initially envisioned as a phased array version of a THOR-type (Tactical High-power Operational Responder) system. But after further developing IFPC-HPM GEN I, the company realized that Leonidas wasn't operating anything like THOR. Leonidas, he says, doesn't destroy drones by narrowly targeting and overloading their capacitors like THOR. Lowery compares THOR to a 'death ray.' Leonidas, he explains, generates a very intense electromagnetic interference field (EIF). The EIF formed by the system creates a dome or umbrella, which stretches out to what the Army calls 'tactically relevant range' around the transmitter and up to about 600 feet above ground at its apex. It does not target specific drones or even swarms. Instead, drones fly into the EIF on their way to their targets. IFPC-HPM does this by extending an electromagnetic field through large periods of time. Traditional HPM puts out a massively powerful pulse for about 10 nanoseconds – shorter than the distance between one computer clock pulse and the next clock pulse – Lowery says. Leonidas' HPM pulse extends to a millisecond, longer than even radars. 'Imagine, a thousand clock cycles might be in that millisecond. The whole time that electromagnetic energy is just hitting and hitting that [target], confusing it to the point where the system shuts down. That's how the [Leonidas system] works.' Along with illustrating how Epirus' HPM concept works, Lowery made what should be considered a noteworthy claim: 'We found that electromagnetic interference can be smart… It can figure out pathways into hardened areas if you get the carrier frequency pulses right. If everything is dialed in right, you can even penetrate what you might think to be a hardened, non-susceptible drone.' The ability to disrupt and down even electromagnetically shielded drones (or ground robots, uncrewed surface vessels, etc.) would present U.S. adversaries with a steep challenge if IFPC-HPM-type systems proliferate. In simple terms, the system consists of a phased-array antenna, supporting computer processing equipment, command-control links, a user interface, a trailer, and a transmitter. The heart of the transmitter consists of Line Replaceable Amplifier Modules (LRAMs), rectangular boxes which can scale in number to meet size, weight, and power requirements or desired range output. The IFPC-HPM has about 150 LRAMs. Lowery explains that most of the system's high-value electronics are in the LRAMs. Upgrades would be sent primarily to these modules as well. As a rule of thumb, the system's size and range scale linearly with the number of LRAMs. For example, a 10 LRAM system would have ten times less range than a 100-element system. In remarks to the roundtable, Lowery put the range of IFPC-HPM GEN I at about one kilometer. The GEN II version of the system increases the range to somewhere around 2 kilometers (1.25 miles). Expanding on the theme, he gave an intriguing example when discussing the scalability and range. If increased range were desired, Epirus could make a '25 LRAM by 25 LRAM' system, which would total 625 elements. Such a system, he said, would 'give you at least six or seven kilometers of range.' Lowery quickly added that 'this is all theoretical' and that Epirus is not selling any 625-element systems today. Leonidas' scalability aligns with cost, as well. According to Lowery, LRAMs represent 65% of the cost of IFPC-HPM, with the remaining 35% sunk into other equipment, including the antenna's metal columns, trailer, positioner, and other ingredients mentioned above. The open architecture and modularity of the system – from its LRAM complement to its phased array modules – make continuous software-defined improvement and upgrades possible. Given that its modules fail individually, IFPC-HPM can still function when one or more are lost, and failed modules can be easily replaced. This means that a buyer does not need to buy two Leonidas systems (primary and backup) to support 99% mission availability. With replacement modules on hand, field maintenance should be relatively straightforward. All of the above give it a sustainment cost much lower than traditional HPM or other directed energy systems, Lowery argues, putting the purchase price 'between $10 and $20 million' per system. 'We think Leonidas is very reasonably costed. We didn't build this with exquisite parts and gold-plated apertures.' Epirus began re-engineering IFPC-HPM in 2022, in accordance with the Army's desire for improved performance. 'Although [GEN I and GEN II] do the exact same thing, they are completely different,' Lowery adds. The new system produces 30% more power, can transmit continuously for much longer, and emits more heavy-duty pulses and cycles. It also exploits all the different cardinal signal polarizations, a capability that GEN I did not have. (Full signal polarization capability enables transmission of specially filtered waves.) 'We anticipate the range to be 2.5 times the range [of Gen 1] in the same size package,' Lowery affirmed. The changes, including increased peak power, called for a redesigned power supply structure, which now includes 800 pounds of lithium-poly batteries. The increased energy storage means that IFPC-HPM II can operate without any external power for up to 30 minutes of firing. Given that a typical engagement with one drone might take 4 seconds, Lowery says a 30-minute run with GEN II could take out many, many drones or guard against wave attacks. In the field or at a base, operators can choose whether they plug in a 70 kW generator and go for continuous use or employ a 20kW generator to periodically charge the system batteries like charging a Tesla. With GEN II also comes the ability to connect a pair of IFPC-HPM systems and fire them cooperatively. They would effectively operate as one, Lowery says, with a 2X linear increase in power and range. As noted, the cooperative fires capability will be tested at China Lake. It's ironic, if predictable, that the capability that IFPC-HPM has apparently demonstrated is also a vulnerability. In response to a question about the system's electronic signature and its high value as a target, Lowery admitted. 'I have a lot of concerns about that. When the system is dormant or in standby, there's no signature, no radiation, maybe a little heat signature. There isn't a lot to target off of other than its metal and physical size.' 'But if you transmitted with our system in Kyiv, they would be able to detect it in St. Petersburg. If they had a direction-finder, they'd be able to say, 'Hey, we had something 1,000 miles away just go off in the L-band.' It puts out a massive amount of energy, more electromagnetic interference energy than any other system in the world.' Given that IFPC-HPM II will be 'as bright as the sun' when transmitting, the Army will have to develop a concept of operations for use at the combat edge to ensure survivability in the face of adversary attempts to wipe it out. Lowery says the service may develop 'shoot-and-scoot' tactics, lighting IFPC-HPM up briefly to down drone or other threats, then immediately moving to another location to make the system harder to target by missile. Other attack risks, like drones dropping in from high altitude at high trajectories, will have to be considered, as well. Lowery says that Leonidas was 'born to be mobile' and that the IFPC-HPM system can go from a stowed position to a cold-start to up and firing in 'between 15 and 20 minutes.' Epirus will have integration efforts for its various Leonidas-based offerings on multiple vehicles early next year, with a nod to increasing their survivability and expanding their range by making them mobile. The sort of cat-and-mouse game that will play out with systems like IFPC-HPM is one that Lowery says has pervaded his career. Over the course of it, he has come to the realization that war is already being fought in a '6th domain' which joins air, land, sea, space, and cyber. He calls the new domain 'physical cyber'. 'The 6th domain war is a war of guerrilla robots, guerrilla warfare leveraging robots, autonomy, Qualcomm Snapdragon, and Nvidia processors.' Ukraine, Israel, and Russia all now have service branches dedicated to drone warfare, Lowery notes. The U.S. military does not. But with the acquisition of IFPC-HPM and other counter-drone systems seemingly on the horizon, the possibility that America may stand up a dedicated robotic warfare service branch has increased. Lowery asserts that if the U.S. military does not adopt such systems and a 6th domain mentality quickly, it will lose. Contact the editor: Tyler@ Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store