Revelations show appalling personal behaviour among some CHI medics
Children's Health Ireland
up for discussion in Government, further revelations about a toxic work culture operating in part of one of its hospitals will bolster the case of those who believe the organisation should simply be subsumed into the
Health Service Executive
.
Even among those who favour its continuation as an independent entity, there are serious doubts as to whether CHI, which is responsible for the governance and operation of the three paediatric hospitals in Dublin –
Temple Street
,
Crumlin
and
Tallaght
– is fit for the job of running the new national children's hospital.
Waves of scandal and controversy have overwhelmed the organisation in recent months.
A recent report found that
most hip surgeries carried out on children were unnecessary
. Prior to that, it emerged that devices not cleared for surgical use were inserted into children suffering from scoliosis – the management of which has been another long-running controversy.
READ MORE
Its chairman and four board members have resigned.
The revelations today have been quietly circulating in senior health and political circles in recent days, where they have shocked even the most hardened veterans of scandals in the health services.
They paint a picture of an almost unbelievably toxic culture that was operating in a part of one of the CHI hospitals – to the extent that 'numerous participants' who took part in the confidential survey process 'expressed concern for the emotional and physical wellbeing of colleagues working in the service'.
[
Report reveals 'toxic culture' among consultants at CHI hospital
Opens in new window
]
Repeatedly, throughout the report, the conclusions of the observers and the testimony of the employees who participated in its inquiries show that a culture of extreme toxicity characterised the operations of part of the CHI hospital.
While one consultant – who is not identified by name in the report – features prominently, there are also complaints about other consultants and a hospital management unable or unwilling to deal with the consequences of the behaviour of some senior medics.
Relationships between certain senior clinical figures deteriorated to the extent that one consultant instigated a legal action for defamation against another.
'It is reasonable to assume that such a case can only arise as a result of the fraught relationships within the ... service,' the report notes.
'Fraught relationships' seems to be something of an understatement.
The toll on medics who were training under some of the consultants was especially acute. They spoke of 'bullying' and 'harassment', being subjected to 'humiliating and intimidating experiences' and of an 'environment where an individual feels they may be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns or mistakes'.
The report also includes details of how the
National Treatment Purchase Fund
(NTPF) may have been abused by the manipulation of waiting lists. Pointing to a greater number of patients seen in private time slots than at public clinic, it asks: 'Was throughput prioritised over patient care in NTPF clinics, noting there is a €200 fee per patient, or are the public outpatient clinics failing to operate at full capacity?'
Yesterday, the Sunday Times reported that Minister for Health
Jennifer Carroll MacNeill
had ordered a full audit of governance and practices at CHI. There are very clearly significant systemic failings in parts of the organisation and in the hospitals for which it is responsible.
But the revelations today show something else too: appalling personal behaviour by some senior medics which damaged the care that patients in the hospitals received.
Some trainees felt punished and excluded, belittled and victimised, to the extent that some felt that the experience – 'working in a hostile environment', as one said – had a detrimental effect on their lives.
Aside from the personal consequences for people subjected to the behaviour of some senior colleagues, the report points out repeatedly that it creates an atmosphere that damages the care of patients.
Aside from individual instances detailed in the report, the toxic relationships also poison the atmosphere where people are supposed to be working together for the benefit of the patients.
'The communication style, accusatory language and indeed unprofessional antics that continued over this period add to further compromise interpersonal relations, heighten levels of mistrust among colleagues and ultimately are a distraction from patient-centric care,' it found.
'Consistently throughout this examination, it was found that participant experiences reflected a culture in which challenging behaviour appears to be the norm,' the report found.
'It is critical that an organisation takes time to reflect on and own the culture that exists and then seeks to address the issues and bring about the required change.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
19 minutes ago
- Irish Times
EU halts retaliatory tariffs as Trump again raises spectre of higher tariffs on pharma
The EU on Tuesday said it would suspend its retaliatory tariffs on the United States even as the specifics of a trade deal reached last month, including lower tariffs on European cars, have yet to be signed off by Donald Trump . The US president last week signed an executive order that will implement as of Friday a 15 per cent tariff rate on most EU products, which European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen agreed to when the two leaders met in Scotland at the end of July. But Mr Trump again threatened on Tuesday to announce separate tariffs on semiconductor and pharmaceutical imports 'within the next week or so' and made particular mention of Ireland in doing so during an interview with CNBC 'We'll be putting a initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year – one and a half years, maximum – it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in out country,' he said. READ MORE 'They [pharmaceutical companies] make a fortune with pharmaceuticals, and they make in China and Ireland and everything else. 'This is a, you know, this is a separate class than the 15 per cent tariffs on sort of everything. These are excluded classes, I like to call them, like steel, aluminium, made in our country,' Mr Trump said. 'We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips, which is a separate category,' the president continued. The bloc had readied higher levies on €93 billion worth of US exports, which were due to enter into force as of Thursday had trade talks failed. 'The suspension [of retaliatory tariffs] is a reflection of the fact that a political agreement has been reached,' said a senior EU official, noting that both sides were now implementing that deal. The official added that the retaliatory measures were now being 'put back into the freezer and we can always take it out if needed'. Washington and Brussels are still negotiating the text of a joint statement which was expected soon after Mr Trump and Ms von der Leyen shook hands in Scotland. Clarity is still lacking on when the US will lower its 27.5 per cent rate on European cars to 15 per cent – a key export sector for Germany – as well as the categories of products that will be traded at zero tariffs. 'We worked very hard to ensure we have that immediate tariff relief also for cars. We are working hard to see that in practice,' said the EU official. One aspect yet to be agreed is how to treat EU car parts that come from outside the bloc, particularly from China. The EU official said that 'there might be further ways to restrict content from certain non-market economies', adding that negotiations are ongoing. As for the zero-tariff exemption, the EU is still pushing for wine and spirits to be included, a key ask from France, Italy and Ireland – even as Washington has flatly denied they could receive such a carve-out. Brussels is also pushing for chemicals and certain medical devices to be excluded from the 15 per cent rate, but it remains unclear whether it will succeed. 'We're trying to get as many products into the list of exemptions ... we have a certain number of sectors where we agree [such as] aircraft and aircraft components,' said the official, while admitting that 'not all products that we care to see ... will be on that list immediately'. Negotiations are also ongoing on European steel and aluminium exports, currently subject to a 50 per cent rate. The EU is aiming to secure 'tariff rate quotas' – meaning lower rates for exports matching what has historically been traded with the US, while accepting higher rates above those thresholds. But US officials have not yet signed off on this concept. The EU official said there was an 'understanding reached at political level' on steel, but that it would 'take a little bit more time' to iron out. A majority of EU countries would eventually have to approve parts of the deal, such as lowering of EU tariffs on certain US exports, but that will only happen 'after the final deal' has been agreed, the EU official said. The EU-US deal was harshly criticised by countries including France and Germany for giving in too much and accepting higher tariffs. German finance minister Lars Klingbeil on Monday said that the EU had been 'too weak' in negotiations with the US and that Germany 'can't be satisfied with the result that was achieved'. The commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the bloc, pushed back on Tuesday saying that it was 'most surprising ... given that nothing has happened here ... without the clear signal received from our member states'. Officials also pointed out that the agreement averted an all-out trade war and Washington making good on its threat of pulling its security guarantees from Europe. Ms von der Leyen's trade agreement includes investment pledges and more purchases of US weapons and energy products. 'We chose the less bad option and we feel this is the better choice,' said the EU official. 'We're very clearly operating in a second best world.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025 / Bloomberg
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election: How much does it cost to run for the Áras?
With the presidential election looming, just how much does it cost to run a successful campaign or otherwise? It is a question that parties and candidates are considering as they either enter the race or think about doing so. National poster campaigns, online advertising and campaign teams cost money and a lot of it. The six candidates in 2018 declared a total spend of €1.36 million in the race for the Áras. The 2011 election cost even more, with more than €2.3 million in spending across seven candidates. Fine Gael has decided to go for it and run a candidate – former European commissioner Mairead McGuinness – for an office the party has never held, and having been burned by presidential elections in the past. Independent left-wing Galway West TD Catherine Connolly is also in the race with the backing of smaller parties and Independents to get on the ballot paper. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to decide if they will enter the fray. Labour backs Connolly, and Flatley jumps the shark Listen | 50:26 Presidential elections are fraught with risks for candidates and political parties. Professor of politics at University College Dublin David Farrell says these risks are 'not just financial', but 'reputational' also. 'There have been plenty of examples of campaigns that have completely come unstuck in all sorts of ways that couldn't have been anticipated,' he says. 'It's a courageous person who puts themselves forward and I think particularly if they're representing one of the larger parties, that in itself could come home to bite them if they don't do particularly well.' Farrell suggests that Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin may face embarrassment if they do not enter the race, but could also look bad, temporarily at least, if they do and their candidates do not perform well. Independent TD Catherine Connolly has held a press conference outside Leinster House where she spoke about her plans to run for president. Video: Bryan O'Brien It may be a case of 'they're damned if they do and they're damned if they don't', he says. There is some State support when it comes to the costs, but only if a candidate wins or reaches more than 25 per cent of the quota. Under those circumstances, they are entitled to a reimbursement of election expenses up to a maximum of €250,000. However, there is no guarantee of getting any money back, as recent elections have shown. Just two of the six candidates in the 2018 election got refunds – the winner, President Michael D Higgins and the Independent candidate who came second, Peter Casey. Mr Higgins's re-election campaign cost just over €367,000, the most spent that year, and it was reimbursed up to the then-maximum sum of €200,000. Mr Casey, meanwhile, was refunded the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911. Sinn Féin spent some €209,716 on its 2018 candidate Liadh Ní Riada's campaign, but lost out on any reimbursement as her vote share was too low. The most expensive campaign of recent times was Fine Gael's unsuccessful attempt to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011. Mitchell's campaign – which cost €527,152 – did not qualify for any reimbursement after he secured only 6.4 per cent of the first preference votes. It was a disastrous result and one that Fine Gael – and the other two large parties deliberating on entering the upcoming election – will want to avoid. Two names in the race for the Áras: early-mover advantage or risky tactic? Listen | 28:04 Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin all had considerable costs last year as they fought local, European and Limerick mayoral elections in June and the general election in November. All three parties recorded deficits for 2024, according to financial statements. Fine Gael and Sinn Féin reported more cash reserves than Fianna Fáil. But this comes with the proviso that any of this that comes from State funding cannot be used for election purposes. Fine Gael remortgaged its Dublin headquarters last September to raise money in advance of the general election. The party did not offer an estimate on how much it will spend on McGuinness's election campaign. A statement indicated it will run 'a vigorous' campaign, which will be 'funded from the party's fundraising activities, the vast majority of which comes from the Fine Gael Superdraw'. It said all campaign spending 'will be in line with electoral guidelines and published with Sipo [Standards in Public Office Commission] after the election'. Fianna Fáil's financial statements for last year indicated 'net expenditure on election activity of €1,600,112 in 2024, contributing to a debt position at the end of the year of €1,527,288 which was in line with our projections at this point of the Dáil cycle'. The party said it will clear this debt and 'build an election fund for the future election cycles in this Dáil period'. It is understood that Fianna Fáil held a fundraising draw earlier this year that raised about €600,000. There are mixed views within Fianna Fáil on whether the cost of the presidential election will influence the decision on whether or not to contest it. One source suggested the party's finances will be a 'huge factor' and it is a reason 'not to run someone for the sake of running someone'. A different Fianna Fáil source said the identity of the candidate and strategy, not costs, will be what is taken into account in the decision-making. Another source said there is a strong view within the parliamentary party that Fianna Fáil should field a candidate, but it has to be the right one. 'There's no point in having a candidate and spending half a million euro and getting no positive result,' said the source. A separate source said the cost of the election 'is a factor' in Fianna Fáil's decision, but added: 'Is it a dominating factor? I don't believe it is. The party will want to see a viable candidate, one that can compete, and that will be the dominating factor.' There has been speculation about potential Fianna Fáil candidates, including former taoiseach Bertie Ahern, to ex-ministers Mary Hanafin and Éamon Ó Cuív. None appear to have been met with much enthusiasm within the party. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has ruled himself out and is consulting with the party on its approach to the election. It could be September before he makes a final decision on running a candidate. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald, meanwhile, surprised many recently by not ruling herself out as a candidate as her party continues its deliberations. The Irish Times previously reported there is little appetite within Sinn Féin for her to run, with sources saying they would prefer her to stay in the Dáil, leading efforts to get into government. Sinn Féin may yet join other left-wing parties in backing Connolly. On the extent to which the cost of a campaign is influencing its deliberations, a Sinn Féin source said: 'The internal party discussion on the approach to contesting the upcoming presidential elections are primarily political. Financing a campaign is not the determining factor.' At her campaign launch last month, Connolly said she self-funded her last two Dáil election campaigns, and it will be 'big shift for me to move up and look at a national campaign with a serious amount of money'. [ Fine Gael says Mairead McGuinness 'acted in full accordance' with medical advice after being injured in crash Opens in new window ] She said she would be asking for contributions and the parties backing her are also 'open to providing funds in whatever way they see fit'. The Social Democrats said they are 'proud' to be supporting Connolly, adding: 'While we envisage there will be a financial contribution from the party, the bulk of donations will come from individuals and fundraising efforts around the country.' The Labour Party – also supporting Connolly – said it is 'finalising our approach to the upcoming presidential campaign'. A statement noted: 'As is standard practice, a separate fundraising stream will be established specifically for the purposes of the presidential campaign.' [ Labour Party backs Catherine Connolly's bid for Áras Opens in new window ] The Connolly campaign has been fundraising through its website and a spokeswoman said: 'We're very encouraged by the support Catherine Connolly is getting from around the country. It's really going to be a grassroots campaign.' As of Monday afternoon, the campaign has raised almost €35,000 in less than three weeks. On the evidence of previous presidential elections, Connolly's campaign, and those of any rivals in the race, will need a lot more.
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Husband of woman who killed herself and child calls for changes to support bereaved
Darren Coleman was at work as a primary school teacher one Friday in the winter of 2020 when he received a phone call from an unknown number. On the other line was someone from Crumlin children's hospital (CHI) in Dublin . They said the toxicology screening for his seven-month-old son Henry, who died a number of weeks earlier, had been completed and asked him what he wanted to do with his organs. 'They said I could incinerate them or I could bury Henry with them, which would mean digging his body back up again. And they asked me to let them know early next week. That was it. I went back into the class and went on with work,' he says. 'I rang back next week, because I wasn't going to dig up his body.' READ MORE The phone call came just over a month after Mr Coleman's wife Nicola Keane (34) died by suicide after administering a lethal dose of medication to their son Henry on October 22nd, 2020. She was suffering frompost-natal depression and psychosis. The Health Service Executive (HSE) has since admitted a breach in duty by failing to appreciate Ms Keane suffered from psychotic depression, failing to communicate this to her husband and failing to ensure she received inpatient treatment. [ Man whose late wife administered lethal dose of medication to their baby says mental health system is broken Opens in new window ] 'I feel there was no empathy or care towards me a month or so after burying my family.' Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill/ The Irish Times Speaking publicly to highlight issues he faced in the aftermath of his family's death, Mr Coleman says when he received the phone call from Crumlin, he was still deep in the throes of grief. He was feeling a range of emotions: anger, sadness, guilt. The call, he says, added to those difficulties. 'Maybe they didn't know I was back at work but these are personal things they're talking about. It should've been a letter asking me to come in to discuss, or they could've called the garda liaison and she could've called over and told me,' he says. 'I feel there was no empathy or care towards me a month or so after burying my family.' A spokeswoman for CHI acknowledged 'unexpected communication was distressing, and we apologise for additional pain caused'. There have since been new guidelines introduced, she said, adding that the experience of Mr Coleman and other families 'helped to inform what we hope are significant improvements in the process'. Ms Keane worked as a paediatric nurse in Crumlin hospital. As a result, Mr Coleman thought he would receive 'too much help' in the weeks after his wife and child died. 'All the people who were around Crumlin [hospital] - I was in and out visiting Henry's body - and there were so many people coming up to me saying they will get help for me. And I was like: ''Yeah, send help', but it never came,' he says. He organised counselling through FirstLight, a charity that provides free support to parents who have experienced the sudden loss of a child. He also returned to work eight days after the funeral in a bid to resume a sense of normality. But while he was trying to navigate these feelings, he was also worrying about the house, changing the bills into his name, and other life administrative tasks. For the first year, he says, he blamed himself for their deaths. 'I kept thinking I had missed something.' After obtaining one report into his wife's care, he realised he needed to do further research. He spent the next three or four years reading reports, going over what happened again and again. 'She told them how sick she was. She was crying out for help. But she wasn't getting the help she needed,' he says. [ Demand for HSE's free 'talk therapy' reaches 1,000 a month Opens in new window ] The inquests were another difficult moment during his grieving process. On two occasions, he said they were cancelled with two weeks' notice because depositions weren't handed over on time. It took a toll on him, he says, as in the lead up to the inquests he was preparing to 'go back through every fact of the day'. He sued Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and the HSE over the circumstances leading to his family's deaths. The mediation process was long and difficult, he says, once again hindering his ability to grieve properly. In May 2024, the legal action was settled through mediation. Though the HSE admitted a breach in care, CHI denied all claims. Mr Coleman is still frustrated he never received an apology from CHI. Less than a month before their deaths, Ms Keane attended a play therapy session with Henry at CHI Crumlin. Following this session, a child psychiatrist from the hospital informed Ms Keane's adult psychiatrist they believed she was psychotic. However, Mr Coleman says he was never informed of this and they allowed his son to go home with her when they believed she was experiencing psychosis. 'It's just about changing things so that other people who need help can get it. The help I wasn't given.' Photograph: Collins Courts 'I think they still have to be found accountable. Just an apology. That's all. I should've got an apology,' he adds. A spokeswoman for CHI said it cannot comment on individual cases, but extended its 'deepest condolences to the family'. In the aftermath of the settlement, it was announced the HSE would conduct a review into the care received by Ms Keane and her son Henry. Mr Coleman said he didn't want or ask for one, as he didn't think it would bring him any more closure. By that stage, it was almost four years since they died; he wanted to move on. Draft terms of reference for the review were sent to Mr Coleman on July 2nd last year. In it, they described Henry as being four months old instead of seven, and said the date of deaths was October 22nd, 2023, when in fact it was three years earlier in 2020, email correspondence shows. 'It was a lack of consideration towards me again. That really hurt me, it just brought back the negligence. It was only a two page document and they had two glaring mistakes,' he says. [ Better mental health support needed for women after giving birth says midwifery professor Opens in new window ] The terms of reference said the review would be completed within 125 days. Last October, Mr Coleman contacted Kevin Brady, the head of mental health at the Dublin South, Kildare and West Wicklow HSE health area, as that deadline was approaching, requesting an update. Mr Brady responded to Mr Coleman via text stating that 'regrettably there has been a delay in getting commenced' adding that the 'restructuring within the HSE' delayed the review process. Mr Coleman said this news sent him 'right back at rock bottom again', adding that he wants to move on but has 'no trust or confidence in this review being done correctly'. He is not engaging with the review process. Responding to a series of questions from The Irish Times, a spokeswoman for the HSE acknowledged 'the profound and devastating impact that the deaths of Nicola and Henry have had on Mr Coleman and we would like to reiterate our deepest regret and sincere sympathies to him, and to their extended families'. The review into their care is 'well advanced', the spokeswoman said, and the review team 'are in the process of drafting a report'. 'The HSE continue to remain available to engage with Mr Coleman and make what supports he needs available,' she added. Now, Mr Coleman is letting the anger he had go. Instead, he is looking 'positively to the future'. He runs marathons, has started travelling more, and climbed Machu Picchu in Peru. He returned to college to do a postgraduate degree and sought career advancement in work. What he would love to see in the future is an improvement in supports for the people who are left behind, picking up the pieces, when tragedy occurs. He wants to see the immediate establishment of mother and baby units, which provide inpatient care to mothers with serious mental health conditions. He also believes there should be family liaison officers or link workers in hospitals, to help people in the immediate aftermath of such incidents so they can understand what happens next. 'I'm not even a file number. Henry and Nicola are file numbers, but I'm not even considered in anyway. I'm just invisible. I often think it's because I'm a man that no-one was knocking on my door,' he says. 'Now, it's just about changing things so that other people who need help can get it. The help I wasn't given.'
