India's selection for this test is baffling: Tom Moody slams IND team management for ‘fixation on allrounders' vs ENG at Edgbaston
'India's selection for this test is baffling. No, Bumrah is one thing, but to only have 5 specialist batsmen is a gamble. The fixation on all-rounders who are there to offer depth with bat and ball has never worked. Specialists are always going to offer more over a test,' Moody posted on X.
The team have already come under flak for resting Bumrah in this Test after going 1-0 down when they lost the 1st Test at Leeds last week. There were also murmurs of dissatisfaction in most corners due to the non-inclusion of Kuldeep Yadav as well.
India's selection for this test is baffling. No Bumrah is one thing, but to only have 5 specialist batsmen is a gamble. The fixation on all-rounders who are there to offer depth with bat and ball has never worked. Specialists are always going to offer more over a test. #ENGvIND
— Tom Moody (@TomMoodyCricket) July 2, 2025
Asked why Bumrah was left out, India skipper Shubman Gill said: 'Just to manage his workload, this is an important match but third match being at Lords, there will be a bit in the wicket, and we thought we'll play him there.'
There was also no Kuldeep Yadav and Gill said they looked to add depth to the batting following the defeat in the series opener.
'We were tempted to play him but we thought of adding a bit of depth in our batting,' said Gill.
Even former head coach Ravi Shastri expressed disbelief at India's decision to rest a fully fit Bumrah, asserting that the pace spearhead should not have been given the option to sit out of a crucial game.
India, enduring a rough patch in Test cricket since October last year, have managed just one win in their last nine matches, marking their worst run in over a decade. Shubman Gill and his men lost the opening Test against England by five wickets in Leeds.
'If you look at the run, India has had, this becomes a very, very important test match. You've lost three against New Zealand, you've lost three against Australia,' Shastri told 'Sky Sports'.
'You've lost the first Test match here and you want to get back to winning ways. You have the best fast bowler in the world, and you make him sit out after seven days of rest, it's something very hard to believe,' he said.
(With agency inputs)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
IND vs ENG: 'Two best spinners ... ' – Sourav Ganguly slams India's 'surprising' XI call at Edgbaston
Shubman Gill and Jasprit Bumrah (Getty Images) NEW DELHI: India's playing XI for the second Test against England in Birmingham on Wednesday has triggered widespread debate. The inclusion of three new faces — Nitish Kumar Reddy, Washington Sundar, and Akash Deep — coupled with the resting of pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah and the omission of in-form spinner Kuldeep Yadav, drew sharp criticism from cricketing legends Sourav Ganguly, Sunil Gavaskar, and Ravi Shastri . India's recent Test form has been underwhelming, with just one win in their last nine matches — the team's poorest run in over a decade. The struggles continued with a five-wicket defeat to England in the first Test at Leeds. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Former India captain Sourav Ganguly voiced concern over the spin choices. 'I'm not sure whether India are playing their two best spinners,' Ganguly said on Sony Sports. 'England have chosen to field first — that's surprising. But this could be India's best chance. Put runs on the board and hopefully it works out.' 'I had two great spinners Anil Kumble and Harbhajan Singh in the team. I used to stop the run flow on Day 1 of the Test and the two became dangerous as the match went ahead,' he added. Sunil Gavaskar questioned the exclusion of Kuldeep Yadav, especially considering the pitch conditions. IND vs ENG 2nd Test: Shubman Gill's statement ton, Jaiswal misses out & Karun Nair at No.3? 'I'm a little baffled that Kuldeep wasn't picked — especially on a surface where everyone says there's a bit more turn,' Gavaskar said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He also stressed that batting wasn't India's primary issue. 'If your top-order isn't scoring runs, then bringing in Washington at seven or Nitish Reddy at eight won't solve that. Those weren't the batters who failed in the first Test. You scored over 830 runs — not 380 — across two innings. That's plenty,' he added. According to Gavaskar, the team needed more focus on bowling reinforcements. 'The area that needed strengthening was wicket-taking, not batting.' Former India head coach Ravi Shastri was critical of the decision to rest Bumrah, calling it a misstep in such a crucial match. 'You don't rest your premier fast bowler in a series-defining Test,' he remarked, suggesting that Bumrah should not have had the option to sit out. With Bumrah rested, India fielded Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar as their spin options in the Birmingham Test. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here . Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
'Lord's Test More Important Than Series?': Gambhir & Co. Blasted For 'Carrying Baggage' As Bumrah Rested
Last Updated: India have been criticised for not playing Jasprit Bumrah despite a seven-day break between the first and second Tests. India's call to rest Jasprit Bumrah for the ongoing 2nd Test against England in Birmingham continues to draw criticism. Sri Lanka legend Kumar Sangakkara is the latest to join the list wondering whether the decision was taken after discussion with the player and the medics. India are trailing 0-1 in the five-match series and with Bumrah being their pace spearhead, it would have been logical for the 31-year-old to be part of the 2nd Test as they hope to draw parity. However, the tourists made three changes to the eleven that suffered a five-wicket defeat last month in Leeds as they added more depth to their batting. Sangakkara felt that with series on the line, Bumrah, if fit, shouldn't have been rested. 'Interesting to understand how the decision is being made and who makes it? Is it after a consultation with the players or the physios? It depends on whether the Lord's Test is more important than the series. The series is on the line. If we see the score, it's an even day, perhaps a little bit more tilted towards England with the five wickets down. So I would have expected the coach to have gone to Bumrah and say 'Yes, we thought you might play the 3rd and the 5th Test, but we're going 1 and 2. Take a look if you can play the third if you can, because then you've got two weeks off before the next one'," Sangakkara said on Sky Sports. Ever since Gautam Gambhir's appointment as head coach, India have endured torrid time in Test cricket. Of the 11 Tests they have played under his watch, India have lost seven, won three and drawn one. The run includes a historic 0-3 clean sweep at the hands of New Zealand at home. Sangakkara thinks that the Indian team is carrying the baggage of their previous Tests under Gambhir and therefore desperate to break the trend which led to the changes. 'It's not just a reaction to the last Test. I think there is a bit of chat about the last 9-10. Seven losses, one win, one draw. There is a little bit of baggage as well to turn that pattern around. So there was a lot of pressure and they were looking at this game and thinking 'alright, what can we do?' and they ring in all the changes," Sangakkara said. First Published:
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"Does Surprise Me": England Great On Jasprit Bumrah Missing Birmingham Test
India's pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah missed the second Test against England at Edgbaston, Birmingham as a part of workload management. He will return to the Indian playing eleven against the Three Lions in the third Test at Lord's next week, informed India captain Shubman Gill. The right-arm pacer played in the first Test at Leeds which India lost by five wickets. "Third Test being at Lord's, we think there'll be more in that pitch so we'll use him there," said Gill at the toss for the second game. It is worth noting that the Indian team management had declared at the start of the series that Bumrah will only play in three Tests out of five. While Bumrah missing the second Test seemed inevitable as per the plans of the team management, former England pacer Stuart Broad was left surprised over the decision. He added that the Indian team should not disclose prior which matches Bumrah will be part of. "A week is a very good time off for a fast bowler. (Bumrah's omission) does surprise me and what also surprised me was him saying before the series he will only play three of the five Tests. You keep those cards close to your chest and play each week as it comes. They will definitely want Bumrah at Lord's because of the movement you can get through the air, so can they risk him here?" Broad said on Sky Sports. Former India player Ravi Shastri too wanted India to play Bumrah in the Birmingham Test as the visitors are 0-1 down in the five-match series. Bumrah stood out among the India bowlers during the match in Leeds that had a flat track on offer. Terming the Birmingham Test as "very important match", Shastri said that Bumrah should have played the game. The third Test will be played at Lord's, London. The ground is tradionally known as a venue that provides help to fast bowlers, thanks to the breeze around it. India wanted Bumrah badly in the game but there is just a three-day gap between the second and the third Test, which meant that Bumrah would have played either of the two games as part of workload management.
