
SNAP Benefit Theft Explodes Across US
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Fraudulent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit transactions have increased by a staggering 55 percent between 2024 and 2025, according to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service.
Why It Matters
SNAP benefits are issued to more than 40 million Americans across the country, providing monthly cash benefits to help low- and no-income families buy groceries.
However, the program has been mired by criminals targeting recipients, with more than $100 million in food assistance benefits reported stolen since 2023 when public records began.
What To Know
SNAP benefits are administered to recipients through electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards, which are loaded with money every month to use in participating retailers. Like regular debit or credit cards, they are subject to scams such as cloning, phishing or skimming.
Between the final quarter of fiscal year 2024 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, the total number of fraudulent SNAP transactions jumped from 444,553 to 691,604—an increase of 247,051, or 55 percent. It marks the largest jump in claims across a single time period since the USDA began publishing these records.
Since the second quarter of fiscal year 2023, more than $102 million in stolen benefits has been replaced by the federal government, the dataset reveals.
The new figures come as the USDA has vowed to crack down on SNAP benefit theft. The federal agency announced it had taken part in "targeted benefit fraud" operations in California in late April.
Lawmakers in several states have also proposed action to stop SNAP fraud. In New York, a bill calling for EMV chips, which are used in credit and debit cards that make it more difficult to counterfeit or steal card information, to become standard on EBT cards has passed the state Senate. In Pennsylvania, SNAP users can now lock their EBT card through an app when not in use to prevent their benefits from being stolen.
Late last year, the USDA ended the federal reimbursement of stolen SNAP benefits. For benefits stolen prior to December 21, 2024, these were in most cases reimbursed by the USDA, which funds the program.
However, the funding required to repay theft victims was not approved by Congress in a continuing resolution passed by lawmakers in December. At the time, the federal agency said that "SNAP state agencies can choose to replace stolen benefits using state funds."
In April, Representative Al Green, a Texas Democrat, introduced the SNAP Secure Act of 2025, which calls for the reinstatement of federal funding to cover food stamp recipients who have been victims of fraud and theft.
What People Are Saying
USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said in a statement on May 2: "Fraud will not be tolerated by the Trump Administration. I want to thank our hardworking law enforcement officers who work every day to ensure federal benefits are properly distributed and safeguard taxpayer dollars from criminals. President Trump is restoring law and order. At USDA we are fighting back against fraud and misuse of taxpayer dollars and ensuring those who need and qualify for benefits, actually receive them."
Representative Al Green, a Texas Democrat, said in a statement in April: "I intend to turn this legislation into a modified amendment to the next appropriations bill. If accepted, this legislation would ensure that those who have had their SNAP benefits stolen will be able to feed themselves and their families."
What Happens Next?
Whether SNAP thefts continue to rise at the same rate remains to be seen, with the next dataset likely to be published in the late summer or fall.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
3 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Homeowners Who Gambled on Lower Rates Are Paying the Price
Millions of Americans bought homes in recent years with mortgage rates at 6.5% or higher, often betting they could refinance to a lower rate within a year or two. Now, with little hope of a rate cut in July after a solid jobs report on Thursday, many of these owners face the predicament of paying those higher costs for longer than they expected.

Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Hybrid vs EV vs Gas: Which Actually Saves You the Most Money?
In 2025, you can buy a Toyota Prius, skip the gas station for days, and still complain about the ride quality on potholes. That's the hybrid life: part monk, part commuter ninja. And with gas prices moonwalking toward $4 again, it's a lifestyle many Americans are still buying into-over 1.2 million hybrid sales last year alone. But the EV crowd is yelling louder every year: "Just go all electric!" So let's settle it - does the hybrid still make financial sense? Or is it a stepping stone past its prime? We did the math. Real numbers. Real assumptions. No "green halo" pricing fluff. Figure 1: 10-Year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Over a 10-year period, electric vehicles (EVs) can be the most cost-effective option-but only under ideal conditions like access to home charging and sufficient annual mileage. According to DOE and Argonne National Lab, hybrids remain the lowest total cost of ownership for the average American, especially for those without dedicated charging infrastructure. Assumptions: ICE: $28K purchase, $1,500/year fuel, $600/year maintenanceHybrid: $30K purchase, $1,200/year fuel, $700/year maintenanceEV: $35K purchase, $400/year electricity, $300/year maintenance The hybrid buyer still spends a little more upfront than the gas car buyer, but makes it back over time. You're saving around $300 a year at the pump, and while maintenance isn't zero (hello, regenerative braking sensors), it's generally lower than ICE over the long haul. Add in federal tax credits or state perks, and hybrids remain one of the best deals on the road, especially if you're putting in 15,000+ miles per year. Clarification: While EVs offer lower operational costs, hybrids remain the cheapest total cost option for many average-use cases, per Argonne. Here's the truth: EVs are significantly cheaper to run - when you can charge at home. Charging at home averages $400/year in electricity, compared to $1,200 in gas for a hybrid. Plus, there's no oil to change, no spark plugs to replace, and your brake pads last longer thanks to regen braking. But that advantage flips quickly if you rely on public fast-charging, which can be 3x to 5x more expensive than home charging. According to DOE/Argonne, EVs relying heavily on public charging often end up more expensive than hybrids or ICE cars over 10 years. EVs can save you about $7,000 over 10 years - but only if you charge smart and often at home. The myth that hybrids are more expensive to maintain because of "two powertrains" doesn't hold up. Most hybrid systems are built like tanks. Inverters or battery packs rarely fail under warranty, and regenerative brakes reduce wear. Meanwhile, ICE cars need regular oil changes, timing belt swaps, and eventually, catalytic converter work. EVs? Lowest upkeep by far. Scheduled EV maintenance at 6 cents per mile, compared to 10 cents for gas cars. However, battery replacement costs remain a wildcard for EVs beyond the warranty period, usually past year 8 or 10. That risk keeps hybrids competitive. So, here's what the numbers and studies actually tell us: The hybrid still offers the lowest total cost of ownership for the average driver, especially those without home charging or lower annual can be more affordable, but only with access to home chargingand consistent vehicles remain the costliest long-term, due to fuel and maintenance costs. So no, hybrids aren't a "marketing mirage." They're still the smartest move for the gas-averse, chargerless majority. And EVs? They're the future, but not everyone's present. The real question is this: Will the hybrid stay a stepping stone or become the sensible forever car? Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


CNBC
7 hours ago
- CNBC
Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'
Elon Musk said Saturday that he has formed a new political party, the "America Party," which he claims will give Americans "back your freedom." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" Musk wrote on X, one day after he posted a poll on the platform asking his followers if they support creating the "America Party." Musk, the world's richest man, suggested Friday that the new party could focus "on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts." "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people," Musk said Friday. Musk did not say where the party may be registered. It did not appear to be registered with the Federal Election Committee. He also said that the party would caucus independently and that "legislative discussions would be had with both parties," according to a reply to a user on X. Musk was the largest donor during the 2024 presidential campaign, giving more than $280 million throughout the cycle, predominantly to presidential candidate Donald Trump, although he also supported other Republican candidates. If Musk chooses to get involved in any competitive congressional races in 2026, it could make a significant difference in a close contest. The Tesla CEO's post comes after a public feud with Trump erupted. It was a dramatic turnaround for the two men, who had been close allies during the early days of the second Trump administration. But their relationship deteriorated as the two men exchanged barbs on social media, mainly due to Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill," CNBC has reported. Musk had previously spearheaded Trump's efforts to slash the federal government through the controversial "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), but stepped back from his role in May after his involvement with the program began to negatively impact his business. Since feuding with Trump, Musk has publicly floated the idea of a new political party, particularly amid his continued strong opposition to Trump's sweeping domestic policy package, which passed last week. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" Musk said Monday. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he said.