
BBC 'told John Torode to resign and blame mental health issues' after 'racism allegation' and he REFUSED: MasterChef star reveals he too was ruled against alongside co-host Gregg Wallace
Gregg Wallace 's co-presenter came out last night to admit an allegation of using racist language had been upheld against him - but denied all wrongdoing.
It has now emerged Mr Torode reportedly refused to quit when urged to stand down over the weekend.
A source told The Sun the MasterChef star, 59, was asked by the BBC and production company Banijay to pretend he had mental health issues.
Taking to Instagram last night, Mr Torode, who has hosted the BBC1 cooking show with Wallace since 2005, said he was 'shocked' by the allegation which stated he 'used racial language' in a social situation.
A source close to Mr Torode told The Sun the presenter was at drinks after filming when he is alleged to have used an inappropriate racial term.
It is claimed the witness said Mr Torode apologised instantly and 'was mortified' and he 'didn't use the term as a slur'.
No one complained at the time, but the incident had been brought up during Wallace's inquiry, the source said.
Mr Torode to Instagram to say: 'For the sake of transparency I confirm that I am the individual who is alleged to have used racial language on one occasion'
The source went on to explain 'shockingly' Mr Torode was only made aware of the incident two weeks ago and was informed on Friday it would be upheld.
Mr Torode was reportedly called by The BBC on Thursday night, followed by an email on Friday, asking him to step back and he was told to have his answer by Monday.
The source said: 'They ambushed him, and it was suggested he quit due to the stress and scrutiny of the furore around the show.
'Obviously he was absolutely shocked and appalled and told them quite firmly he didn't have any mental health issues. To try to use mental health as a get-out clause seems incredibly low — and is also deeply unfair to those with genuine mental health trauma.
'John absolutely loves MasterChef, and doesn't want to lose his job because of an investigation into his co-star.'
Mr Torode said in last night's social media post: 'Following publication of the Executive Summary of the Investigation into Gregg Wallace while working on MasterChef, I am aware of speculation that I am one of the two other individuals against whom an allegation has been upheld.
'For the sake of transparency I confirm that I am the individual who is alleged to have used racial language on one occasion.
'The allegation is that I did so sometime in 2018 or 2019, in a social situation, and that the person I was speaking with did not believe that it was intended in a malicious way and that I apologised immediately afterwards.'
Mr Torode went on to say he had 'absolutely no recollection' of the incident and did 'not believe it happened'.
He added: 'I want to be clear that I've always had the view that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment.
'I'm shocked and saddened by the allegation as I would never wish to cause anyone any offence.'
The allegation is understood to have been upheld in a report as part of a review into the behaviour of Mr Torode's former co-presenter Gregg Wallace.
It comes after Wallace hit out at the BBC as the probe upheld more than half of the complaints of inappropriate behaviour against him, with the presenter warning he 'won't be the last' to be cancelled.
The report into Wallace's behaviour on the cooking show upheld 45 out of 83 complaints made, including one count of 'unwanted physical contact', leaving the BBC to admit it 'could and should have' acted sooner on the MasterChef host.
The damning investigation also found that two complaints about the behaviour of 'other people' were upheld.
While apologising for any 'distress' he caused, Wallace has taken aim at the MasterChef broadcaster, which he claims has valued 'protecting its legacy' over 'protecting people'.
Warning that it was 'dangerous' to be a 'working-class man with a direct manner' in the world of broadcasting, he said he 'won't be the last' to face cancellation.
The presenter said: 'In the end, the BBC left me exposed to trial by media and the damage it leaves in its wake.
'To those who've shown kindness, thank you. It mattered. This has been brutal. For a working-class man with a direct manner, modern broadcasting has become a dangerous place. I was the headline this time. But I won't be the last.
'There will be more casualties if the BBC continues down this path, where protecting its legacy matters more than protecting people. For my part, with full legal support, I will consider my next move.'
Patrick Holland, CEO of MasterChef production company Banijay, said he was 'extremely sorry' to those who had been impacted by Wallace's behaviour and added that the report makes the star's 'return to MasterChef untenable'.
Wallace's statement, supplied to the PA news agency before being published on Instagram, noted that he 'never set out to harm or humiliate' anyone and that he was 'deeply sorry for any distress caused'.
He said his 'late autism diagnosis' - which he received while he stepped back from MasterChef at the end of last year - has helped him to understand how he communicates and how he is perceived.
He said: 'For eight months, my family and I have lived under a cloud. Trial by media, fuelled by rumour and clickbait. None of the serious allegations against me were upheld.
'I challenged the remaining issue of unwanted touching but have had to accept a difference in perception, and I am deeply sorry for any distress caused. It was never intended.
'I'm relieved that the Banijay report fully recognises that my behaviour changed profoundly in 2018.
'Some of my humour and language missed the mark. I never set out to harm or humiliate. I always tried to bring warmth and support to MasterChef, on screen and off.
'After nearly 20 years on the show, I now see that certain patterns, shaped by traits I've only recently begun to understand, may have been misread. I also accept that more could have been done, by others and by myself, to address concerns earlier.
'A late autism diagnosis has helped me understand how I communicate and how I'm perceived. I'm still learning. Banijay have given me great support, and I thank them.'
Wallace's fiery statement comes just days after he said he would 'not go quietly' in a post which has since been deleted from his Instagram page.
The BBC said the investigation into a 'substantial number of allegations of inappropriate conduct' over 19 years highlighted behaviour that falls below the corporation's values.
'Although the full extent of these issues were not known at the relevant time, opportunities were missed to address this behaviour - both by the production companies running MasterChef and the BBC,' a spokesman added.
'We accept more could and should have been done sooner.'
The corporation would not confirm whether they will broadcast the series of MasterChef they filmed with him last Autumn.
A spokesman for Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Downing Street welcomed the fact the BBC had 'severed ties' with Wallace, adding: 'We're clear that appropriate steps must be taken to ensure abuses of power are prevented from happening in the future.'
The seven-month investigation, conducted by law firm Lewis Silkin, heard 83 allegations from 41 complainants against Wallace, all relating to his time on the cookery programme.
It also found that 10 standalone allegations were made against 'other people', from 2012 to 2019, with two claims, relating to swearing and racist language being upheld.
The majority of the allegations against Mr Wallace (94 per cent) related to behaviour which is said to have occurred between 2005 and 2018. Only one allegation was substantiated post 2018.
The majority of substantiated allegations related to inappropriate sexual language and humour. A smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated. One allegation of unwanted physical contact was substantiated.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the allegations against Gregg Wallace were 'horrendous and appalling', and she welcomed the BBC's decision to end its association with the MasterChef presenter.
The investigation team found evidence that during the period from 2005 to 2024, six complaints were raised with the production company and 6 with the BBC (four of which had also been raised with the production company).
However, the investigator found that 'there was a tendency to address the concern informally on a case-by-case basis and not therefore consider each issue as additive to any prior allegations or to matters which had been observed by senior members of staff'.
More formal action was taken by the production company in 2015 and the BBC in 2017.
Wallace was diagnosed with autism during the time of the investigation and the report found that this was 'highly relevant' in the context of the findings.
They said: 'Mr Wallace's neurodiversity diagnosis is considered highly relevant in the context of the findings made, particularly regarding his use of humour as a 'masking' technique and his difficulty in reading social cues.
'Mr Wallace accepts that his diagnosis may help to explain some of his actions, but he does not wish to hide behind it.'
The categories of allegations were separated in seven categories which included inappropriate comments (jokes and innuendo), sexually explicit comments, being in a state of undress, sexualised comments made to or about someone, culturally insensitive / racist comments, bullying, unwanted physical contact.
The majority of the substantiated allegations against Mr Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour, however, a smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language, being in a state of undress and unwelcome physical contact were also substantiated.
Out of the 45 upheld complaints, 27 occurred between 2005 to 2011, 17 from 2012 to 2018 and just one from 2019 to 2024.
Overall, the report concluded that 16 sexually explicit comments, 12 inappropriate comments, two sexualised comments to or about someone and four culturally insensitive/racist comments were made.
One incident of unwelcome physical contact and three incidents of being in a state of undress were also substantiated.
While, seven cases of bullying were upheld.
Prior to 2016, the investigation found that there was little or no formal training or clear escalation procedures in place, leading to underreporting of inappropriate behaviour.
It also added that concerns were not always flagged to Wallace meaning he was 'not necessarily aware that his behaviour had caused offence'.
The report found that many contestants felt unable to speak out on MasterChef because 'their desire to do well in the competition, meant that they were unlikely to complain or allow their reactions to show.'
Karen Baxter, the head of investigations at Lewis Silkin, who conducted the report did find that after the BBC warned Wallace about his behaviour in 2017 that he did change his behaviour.
She said: 'There is evidence which shows that Mr Wallace took some proactive steps to modify his behaviour, seek guidance from colleagues on his choice of language, and to remove himself from work-related social situations.'
Patrick Holland, CEO Banijay UK said: 'In earlier years, specifically prior to 2016 where the vast majority of these issues arose, it is clear that escalation procedures were not as robust as they should have been, and awareness of policies and procedures were lacking particularly amongst freelance staff. '
A spokesman for the BBC said: 'We welcome the publication of the findings by Lewis Silkin, following the investigation into the conduct of Gregg Wallace.
'In light of these findings, Banijay UK and the BBC have agreed Mr Wallace's return to MasterChef is untenable. The BBC has informed Mr Wallace we have no plans to work with him in future.
'The investigation details a substantial number of allegations of inappropriate conduct spanning 19 years. This behaviour falls below the values of the BBC and the expectations we have for anyone who works with or for us.
'Although the full extent of these issues were not known at the relevant time, opportunities were missed to address this behaviour - both by the production companies running MasterChef and the BBC. We accept more could and should have been done sooner.
'We want to thank all those who took part in the investigation, including those who first raised concerns directly with the BBC in November last year. We apologise to everyone who has been impacted by Mr Wallace's behaviour.
'Lewis Silkin's findings include two further allegations which were upheld, relating to other individuals. The BBC takes these findings very seriously and we have asked Banijay UK to take action to address these issues, which is underway. This will be completed as a priority.
'The BBC will not be commenting further at this stage, but we are clear we expect the highest standards of respect at work to be upheld on the production.
'At this stage we are not going to make a final decision on the broadcast of the series that was filmed last year. We know this is disappointing for fans of the show and those who took part and at the appropriate time Banijay UK will consult further with the amateur contestants.
'In April the BBC published a detailed response to an independent review of workplace culture, which reinforces expectations around behaviour and that we will act more decisively when standards are not met. This also requires all TV production partners to align with the Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) standards.
'We want to reaffirm, there is no place for the abuse of power, unacceptable behaviour or language at the BBC, or shows made for the BBC.'
John Torode, The BBC and Banijay UK have been contacted for further comment on the 'mental health' allegation and whether Mr Torode had been asked - and refused - to step down.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
John Torode's contract on MasterChef not renewed, BBC and Banijay UK confirm
Australian-born Torode, 59, started presenting MasterChef alongside Gregg Wallace in 2005. On Monday night, Torode confirmed he was the subject of an allegation of using racist language that was upheld as part of a review carried out by law firm Lewis Silkin into the alleged behaviour of his co-presenter Wallace. John Torode after being made an MBE during an investiture ceremony at Buckingham Palace (Kirsty O'Connor/PA) A statement from Banijay UK said: 'In response to John Torode's statement, it is important to stress that Banijay UK takes this matter incredibly seriously. 'The legal team at Lewis Silkin that investigated the allegations relating to Gregg Wallace also substantiated an accusation of highly offensive racist language against John Torode which occurred in 2018. 'This matter has been formally discussed with John Torode by Banijay UK, and whilst we note that John says he does not recall the incident, Lewis Silkin have upheld the very serious complaint. 'Banijay UK and the BBC are agreed that we will not renew his contract on MasterChef.' The Lewis Silkin report, commissioned by Banijay UK, found 45 out of 83 allegations against Wallace were substantiated, alongside two standalone allegations made against other people, including one for using racist language. Torode confirmed on Monday night he was the person alleged to have used racist language but said he had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation. A BBC spokesperson said: 'John Torode has identified himself as having an upheld allegation of using racist language against him. 'This allegation – which involves an extremely offensive racist term being used in the workplace- was investigated and substantiated by the independent investigation led by the law firm, Lewis Silkin. John Torode denies the allegation. 'He has stated he has no recollection of the alleged incident and does not believe that it happened. He also says that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment. 'The BBC takes this upheld finding extremely seriously. We will not tolerate racist language of any kind and, as we have already said, we told Banijay UK, the makers of MasterChef, that action must be taken. 'John Torode's contract on MasterChef will not be renewed.' In 2022, Torode was made an MBE in the Queen's Birthday Honours, for services to food and charity.


The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Olivia Attwood hits back at backlash over surprise This Morning role after cruel trolls said they'll ‘stop watching'
OLIVIA Attwood has hit back at trolls who reacted cruelly to her inclusion in This Morning's line-up of summer presenters. The Love Island favourite, who has built a successful career fronting documentaries and as a Loose Women panellist, is one of a number of stars filling in for regular hosts Cat Deeley and Ben Shephard over the summer break. Though she's not the first reality star to host the show, with fellow summer star and X Factor icon Rylan Clark having already proven a dab hand on the set, Olivia's villa background hasn't gone down well with some traditionalists who have gone so far as to say they'll "definitely stop watching'. But Olivia, 34, is confident in her abilities and feels she's earned her stripes to become ITV's new golden girl. She exclusively told The Sun: "Those who know me understand the hard work I've put in to get where I am today. "I'm forever grateful to Love Island for being the springboard to my career, but I'm excited to show there's so much more to me beyond the villa." She continued: "It's been a lot of hard work, but I've always stayed focused on my goals and believed in myself and I'm very thankful for ITV in believing me." As someone who grew up watching the show as a child, she knows what it's about and the position it has in the national consciousness. She said: "When I got the gig, I was over the moon! I grew up watching the show, and to be a part of it feels like such a huge achievement!" Olivia will turn to an old motto when it is her time in front of the camera, telling us her ultimate piece of advice is: "Stay true to who you are, no matter how much your world changes." Other stars fronting the show this summer include Sian Welby, Dermot O'Leary, Emma Willis, Josie Gibson, Rochelle Humes, Joel Dommett, Craig Doyle, and Andi Peters. We recently revealed how This Morning bosses will ensure Olivia and her ex-boyfriend Chris Hughes, who is a roving reporter on the show, won't have to interact. Chris is said to be unhappy with a number of comments Olivia made about him and his now girlfriend JoJo Siwa while they were in the Celebrity Big Brother house. However, a friend of Olivia's told us, she hasn't even thought about it. They said: 'To be honest, it hadn't even crossed her mind when she took the This Morning gig. 'Of course, she wouldn't relish having to interact with Chris on camera, but she's a professional at the end of the day. 'She's focused on making the most of the summer hosting slot and doing her job well - who else is on the rota doesn't concern her. When you work in telly, not everyone you work with is going to be your best mate.' When her first This Morning gig does roll around, Olivia will be fuelled up with Costa Coffee Latte, which she calls her "the "perfect pick-me-up for those busy days". 5 5 Ahead of then, she's teamed up with Roman Kemp to launch the Costa Hypeline - WhatsApp line to get the nation motivated. Fans can WhatsApp +44 7763 218 600 before this Thursday, letting Roman or Olivia know what they need hyping for and they could get a voice note back, tailored to their moment of need. Olivia said: 'Motivation is an important thing as most of us hit a wall way before lunchtime. A little hype can go a long way. "I'm buzzing to be on the other end of the line with Costa, handing out some words of encouragement. "We'll be managing the Costa Hypeline for one day only on the 17 th July to help give out those much-needed boosts of productivity – message in for a hype!'


Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
10 scenes ruined by ridiculous product placement
When you go to the cinema or turn on your television, chances are that you are going to have something sold to you, ideally very subtly, while you watch it. There is a reason why technology and luxury goods companies pay millions to have their products displayed on screen, and that is because this kind of subliminal advertising is supposed to work. However, sometimes they overstep the mark, which is deemed to be what happened when Channel 4 soap Hollyoaks was deemed to have breached Ofcom's rules after an episode made both verbal and visual reference to the financial services app ClearScore. Of course, the advertisement of goods on-screen in film and television has existed since the medium came into being, and, at its best, can transform the fortunes of a product. Sales of Ray-Ban Aviator sunglasses soared after Tom Cruise wore them in Top Gun (and its sequel), and after M&Ms refused to allow their sweets to be used on-screen in ET, Reese's Pieces were only too happy to oblige instead. They duly reaped the benefits of their confectionery becoming every child's go-to treat that summer. Put the right product in the right film or series in the right context, and the results can be stellar. Get it wrong, however, and it can either be humiliating, bizarre or both. It was not for nothing that both Wayne's World and Arrested Development had some of their best jokes revolving around the egregious promotion of on-screen products, and audiences now are savvier than ever about being given the hard sell through cynically thought-out marketing schemes. Here are 10 occasions when the product placement went that bit too far, and the picture or show suffered as a result. Wings (1927) The first film to win Best Picture at the Oscars was a silent aeronautical epic that introduced many cinematic precedents, including a pioneering use of product placement that now seems comically on-the-nose. Although it was not the first picture to contain an advertisement of a commercially available product (that would be 1920s short film The Garage, with Red Crown petrol), there is a scene in which a young Gary Cooper, playing the Tom Cruise-Maverick character of his day, firstly impresses two would-be pilots by telling them about his daredevil antics, and then produces a bar of Hershey's chocolate. The full-screen close-up, with the camera lingering on the chocolate just that bit too long, established a more unwelcome trend that continues to this day. Mac and Me (1988) McDonald's and its wares has been found in countless films, not least those aimed at children, and the fast food giant is all too aware of the power of the commercial tie-ins that it specialises in. However, the worst picture that it has ever been associated with is almost certainly the dismal E.T rip-off Mac and Me, which focuses on the friendship between a young boy and a 'Mysterious Alien Creature' (or MAC) but in fact seems to exist as an extended advertisement for the Golden Arches, to say nothing of Coca-Cola. How else to explain a bizarre, almost horrific extended scene at a McDonald's establishment, complete with a terrifying Ronald McDonald himself dancing madly? Still, its producer RJ Louis – a former advertising executive who worked on McDonald's campaigns – could at least proudly boast that he was 'still the only person in the universe that ever had the exclusive motion picture rights to the McDonald's trademark, their actors, their characters and the whole company'. Yes, and Mac and Me – a film in which a child in a wheelchair flies off a cliff – is the miserable result. You've Got Mail (1998) Back in 1998, Starbucks was still a relatively hip coffee chain that had pioneered initiatives like jazz being played in their stores, exotic iced drinks with names like 'Frappuccino' and comfy sofas to lounge on. All well and good, but none of this excuses the sheer ubiquity of its name-checking and on-screen presence in the Meg Ryan-Tom Hanks romantic comedy You've Got Mail. For a film about the struggle of the quirky independent (Ryan's bookstore owner) against The Man (Hanks's bookshop chain owner), there is an awful lot of emphasis on them all visiting Starbucks (yes, including Ryan, who is otherwise vociferously anti-corporations). In a line that has become duly (in)famous, Hanks's character has a mini-monologue about how the coffee chain specialises in being all things to all men, ending with a remarkable line reading of the words 'Tall. Decaf. Cappuccino!' Cast Away (2000) Hanks must have enjoyed his experience of acting alongside commercial products, because one of his next big roles came a couple of years later when he played FedEx systems analyst Chuck Noland, who is shipwrecked when a FedEx cargo plane crashes and must fend for himself on an uninhabited tropical island. While the film attracted much attention for the Wilson volleyball who becomes a mute companion of sorts to Noland, its central message – that Noland will ensure that the last surviving FedEx package will eventually make it to its destined recipient – means that the film (which has not endured especially well) ultimately plays out as the longest, most expensive FedEx advert ever made. It is almost a surprise, when the end credits begin, not to hear a voiceover deliver the parting line: 'FedEx: getting you your deliveries, whatever the circumstances.' Casino Royale (2006) Daniel Craig and Martin Campbell rebooted the Bond franchise for an edgier, post-Bourne audience, and the results are still terrific. Less tremendous, however, is the sheer amount of product placement on show, as if producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson had taken fright at the potential cost of making an 007 film and had chosen to offset their expense against as many on-screen commercial partners as possible. You'll find everything from Heineken to Virgin Atlantic here, but there are a couple of truly excruciating moments, whether it's Bond driving, of all things, a Ford Mondeo, or the scene in which, asked by Eva Green's Vesper Lynd if he's wearing a Rolex, he replies 'Omega', only for Vesper to purr 'Beautiful.' Apparently the various advertisers paid $100 million to have their wares displayed on screen. For a franchise often (and rightly) criticised for its over-reliance on commercial tie-ins, this was a scheme worthy of a Bond villain. Jack and Jill (2011) In his memoir Sonny Boy, Al Pacino candidly explained the peculiar circumstances by which he came to play himself in the disastrous Adam Sandler 'comedy'. 'Jack and Jill was the first film I made after I lost my money. To be honest, I did it because I didn't have anything else. Adam Sandler wanted me, and they paid me a lot for it. So I went out and did it, and it helped.' Sandler (who Pacino calls 'a great actor and a hell of a guy') may have saved the great actor's bacon, but it was a different kind of foodstuff that features in the film's most peculiar scene. Pacino, in full 'Hoo-ha!' mode, over-enthusiastically promotes Dunkin' Donuts new drink, the Dunkaccino, at Sandler's behest. Announcing that his name is now 'Dunk', Pacino raps away, misquoting famous lines from his earlier films ('You want creamy goodness, I'm your friend/Say hello to my chocolate blend') and humiliating himself beyond measure. When Pacino, watching the commercial's playback, remarks to Sandler, in character, 'Burn this…this must never be seen by anyone', you can only wish that his request was followed. Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014) You would struggle to mount a defence of any of Michael Bay's Transformers films on artistic grounds – they are, after all, loud and imbecilic pictures aimed at pubescent boys that are intended to sell toy robots- but the sheer level of on-screen shilling that goes on during the miserable fourth instalment took excess to new depths. During its interminable 165 minute length, no fewer than 55 brands are featured on screen, most obviously Bud Light and Victoria's Secret, and Bay's background in advertisements is clear from the lingering close-ups that he gives every one of these products. Nearly every one, that is. Hilariously, it came out in 2016 that the Chinese company Wulong Karst Tourism were suing the producers for $27million on the grounds that their logo was not displayed prominently enough in the finished film, a reminder that this monstrosity was made during that brief, bizarre period when Hollywood desperately sucked up to China. In this instance, clearly not effectively enough. Sherlock (series 4, 2017) This is less offensive or annoying than many of the other examples, and more simply jarring. By the fourth series of the much-admired Cumberbatch-Freeman Sherlock Holmes revamp, it was clear that the show was not operating in the same way that most BBC series did, and so the usual Beeb rules of not using recognisable technological products (ie Apple's iPhones) did not apply. Therefore, we are shown Cumberbatch's Sherlock using a then-modish iPhone 6S, which, viewers are invited to infer, is the technological equivalent of the great detective's legendarily wide-ranging brain. It's not so much horrible, as just a bit forced. One half-expects the great detective to ask 'Siri, how do I solve this particular case?' Ted Lasso (2020- ) It is obviously unfair to criticise Apple for asking that their products be included in series that they have funded at enormous cost to themselves, and many people are enormously fond of the big-hearted comedy-drama Ted Lasso, with Jason Sudeikis as the sunniest football coach you could ever hope to meet. It's just a shame, then, that the product placement here is ladled on with a trowel. Virtually every single scene features a character wielding an iPhone or a MacBook, checking out something on an iPad or watching an Apple-branded monitor. And the software gets a big plug, too. When Ted's chatting to his son back home in the United States, what's his method of choice? FaceTime, naturally; Zoom doesn't get much of a look in here. Incidentally, Apple will only allow their products to be used for non-villainous characters, so Anthony Head's dastardly rival football club owner doesn't get a look in. Barbie (2023) Greta Gerwig's feminist toy fantasia was a huge box office hit and critically acclaimed, not least because it was thought to subvert its potentially tacky consumerist message with a deep strain of self-aware humour. (See, for instance, Rob Brydon being introduced in his micro-cameo not as the notorious 'Sugar Daddy Ken' but as 'Sugar's Daddy, Ken'.) However, it also functions as a two-hour advertisement for Mattel and the Barbie character. Despite its satirical nods at Mattel's patriarchal set-up, it's also a picture that is very keen to sell expensive merchandise to its audience, ranging from Tag Heuer watches to women's Birkenstocks. And when Ryan Gosling's scene-stealing Ken turns up at the end in a hoodie emblazoned with the term 'I am Kenough', it is no great stretch to imagine the sweater's £58 price tag becoming part of an incredibly expensive post-film shopping trip.