NZ Government Out Of Touch On Employment Rights
The commitment at the 113th International Labour Organization conference to develop a binding Convention for securing decent work in the platform economy shows how disconnected and out of touch the New Zealand government is when it comes to employment rights.
'This decision is a huge step towards establishing internationally recognised labour rights for digital platform workers,' said NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi Secretary Melissa Ansell-Bridges.
'This is the mandate for much-needed regulation of digital labour platforms and by doing so, ensuring that innovation is not achieved at the expense of workers' rights.
'It's really telling, that while the international community comes together to support platform workers, Brooke van Velden has introduced a new Employment Relations Amendment Bill that will undermine the rights of those very workers in Aotearoa.
'Her Bill, which intends to misclassify workers as contractors and remove their legal right to challenge their employment status in court, is a severe undermining of worker rights. It is completely out of touch, and the Bill must be voted down', said Ansell-Bridges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
UNFCCC Parties Must Help Protect Civic Space In Climate Talks, Says Civil Society
Bonn, 24 June 2025 - Civil society constituencies participating in the UNFCCC climate negotiations have today shared an open letter with all Parties to the Convention, raising urgent concerns over the UNFCCC Secretariat's arbitrary and escalating censorship of peaceful expressions of solidarity with the Palestinian people. The letter - signed by the Women and Gender Constituency, YOUNGO, and Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations - the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice (DCJ) and Climate Action Network (CAN), calls attention to the Secretariat's recent decision to prohibit the use of the phrase 'End the Siege' during a planned action at SB62 in Bonn, despite allowing language such as 'end the genocide.' The UNFCCC Secretariat cited the need to 'maintain a neutral and constructive environment,' but civil society actors reject the idea that silence in the face of a humanitarian catastrophe constitutes neutrality. Tasneem Essop, Executive Director, Climate Action Network International, said: 'Let's be clear: the UNFCCC Secretariat is not neutral - it's policing civil society while the rest of the UN system, including the Secretary-General and the High Commissioner for Human Rights, openly call for an end to the siege of Gaza. When our banners are censored for using the same language as UN leaders, it's not about rules - it's about politics. The UNFCCC is embarrassingly out of step with the rest of the UN and with fundamental human rights. We refuse to be complicit in this erasure of the truth.' The letter states,'Silence is not neutrality. To censor calls to 'End the Siege' is to condone it. The climate crisis cannot be addressed in isolation from broader struggles for justice and human rights.' Read the letter: To: All Parties to the UNFCCC Cc: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Secretariat Bonn, 20th June 2025 Subject: Civil Society Protest Against UNFCCC's Arbitrary Censorship of Solidarity with Palestine Your Excellencies, We write to you today with grave concern and indignation. As civil society, we have been a part of the UNFCCC for close to three decades. Our engagement has included advocating for and bringing voices of peoples and communities on the frontlines through actions and press conferences inside the UNFCCC amongst others. For the last two years in the UNFCCC sessions, COP's and SB's, we have faced an escalating pattern of arbitrary censorship from the UNFCCC Secretariat - specifically targeting expressions of solidarity with the Palestinian peoples. Despite our repeated efforts to navigate and comply with an increasingly ambiguous and inconsistent set of restrictions, the Secretariat has continued to impose arbitrary limits on our collective rights. Legitimate, peaceful expressions of solidarity - statements, words, signs, and slogans that align with international human rights and international humanitarian law - have been censored or blocked. This situation has reached a new and deeply troubling low. The UNFCCC Secretariat, in a response to an application for a Palestine solidarity action in the venue of SB62, communicated that they could not authorise the use of the phrase 'End the Siege' in the banners and any accompanying text. As they did not object to the other phrases we use, including 'end the genocide', their focus on the siege wording is unusual and perplexing. This further demonstrates the arbitrariness of their decision-making. The reason provided by the UNFCCC Secretariat was their need to 'maintain a neutral and constructive environment that supports open dialogue among Parties', and authorisation must be assessed in light of the current context. We struggle to understand how a clamp down on the calling out of an ongoing and well-documented humanitarian catastrophe can be considered neutral, particularly when the UN Secretary General, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and representatives of other UN bodies have called for the same thing using the same language. In addition, a majority of states who are also Parties to the UNFCCC process have voted for a resolution in the UN General Assembly demanding an immediate and lasting ceasefire and an end to the blockade in Gaza. To silence the call to 'End the Siege' is to condone it. This is no longer a question of procedure or neutrality. It is picking a side, and in this case, a side that does not align with the UN's own values and international humanitarian law. Civil society has decided to end our negotiations on Palestinian Solidarity actions with the Secretariat that compromises our rights to civic space and freedom of expression within this space. We refuse to accept a decision that directly contradicts the rights and freedoms that the UN was founded to protect. We have therefore decided to make our grievances public in the hope that all people of conscience will support basic human rights and bring it to the attention of Parties because the UNFCCC Secretariat's attempts at silencing us is done in the name of Parties. . The climate crisis is inseparable from questions of justice and human rights. The Paris Agreement itself is emphatic that 'Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights [...]' The Secretariat's refusal to acknowledge an unfolding crime against humanity, together with its active suppression of calls to end the genocide and siege, and doing so in the name of Parties in the UNFCCC, has deeply shaken our confidence in this body's ability to safeguard humanity's future. This is a sentiment that echoes far beyond these walls, and risks making multilateralism irrelevant to humanity. The UNFCCC Secretariat's narrow understanding of climate, ignoring its intersections with civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, not only is contrary to the Convention and the Paris Agreement but will lead to a failure in finding systematic and sustained solutions to the climate crisis. We appeal to Parties to reaffirm the rights of civil society, particularly our freedom of expression in calling out a genocide and the vested interests that uphold this as well as the climate crisis. Silence is not neutrality. Sincerely,
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Annual Plan Adopted For Year Ahead
Kaipara District Council has unanimously adopted its Annual Plan for 2025/2026, with an average rates rise of 8.3% after growth. This includes a new targeted rate for three of the district's museums. Originally, the museums rate was expected to be on top of a previously signalled rate increases of 8.9% after growth for the coming year, but cost savings across other areas have reduced the final figure. Kaipara District Council Mayor Craig Jepson says the outcome reflects careful planning. 'We understand that any rates increase can be challenging for many members of our community, but this represents a significant achievement for our small rating base, especially given the current national economic climate.' Roading remains a key priority, with around $30 million planned on capital works this year, and around $13 million on operations and maintenance (excluding work carried forward from the previous financial year). Approximately $8 million is set aside for Cyclone Gabrielle and other extreme weather event-related repairs, of which up to 92% is funded by NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). Recovery work includes repairing under and over slips, road surfaces, remediating slips, fixing our bridges, and replacing damaged drainage systems. Some of the projects planned for this year include pumpstation upgrades for Dargaville, the progression of the Proposed District Plan, local elections, and Wood Street revitalisation stormwater and surrounds. The Annual Plan for 2025/2026 comes into effect at the start of the financial year, with new rates taking effect from 1 July 2025. Final digital versions can be viewed on the council website from next week. Print versions will be available at council offices and libraries across the district in late July. What is a Long Term Plan and an Annual Plan? Every three years Council develops a Long Term Plan (LTP) in consultation with the community. Our Long Term Plan 2024-2027 was adopted on 31 July 2024. It outlines the services we will provide, the projects to be undertaken, the cost of doing this work, how it will be paid for and how the performance for each shall be measured. Following major damage to local infrastructure during the 2023 weather events, Kaipara is one of eight councils with an unaudited three year LTP focused on recovery, rather than the typical ten year outlook. In the two years between adopting an LTP, an annual plan is developed. The Annual Plan is a yearly update on what has been agreed through the LTP, highlighting any budget changes and work plans for each specific year. View the council discussion and decision on the (from 2:34:07).
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
NZ Law Change Restores Balance – Fairer Rules For Partial Strikes
Hon Brooke van Velden Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety The Government has passed a change to the Employment Relations Act that reinstates the ability for employers to make pay deductions during partial strikes – making the system fairer for all, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden announced today. 'These changes will help both employers and unions to return to the bargaining table and restores the law to what it was before the previous government removed this option in 2018. 'I acknowledge the right of workers to strike in support of their collective bargaining claims, the right to strike remains,' says Ms van Velden. 'The changes were needed to ensure a fairer bargaining process and minimise the disruption partial strikes have caused to public and customer services. 'The key benefit for all workers and the public is less disruption to our communities – partial strikes had serious impacts on Kiwi families, students, patients, and other workers across our workplaces,' says Ms van Velden. Some of the impacts included MRI and nuclear medicine technologists limiting scans, around 50 per cent fewer procedures were done. That meant delays in early cancer treatment, growing waitlists, increased outsourcing costs and pressure on front-line staff to pick up the work of others participating in the partial strikes. In 2023, teachers took partial strike action, refusing to teach certain year levels on specific days. This disrupted student learning and made it hard for some parents to work. 'Rebalancing collective bargaining settings will support the Government's priority to deliver better public services, by reducing disruption and maintaining a high quality of service,' says Ms van Velden. This new law allows for pay to be deducted during partial strikes, but it's up to each affected employer to decide how they respond to partial strikes when they occur. Notes: What is partial strike and what did it mean prior to this change A partial strike is industrial action that would normally involve turning up to work but refusing to partake in parts of the job. Until now, if an employee was on a partial strike, their employer could not deduct their pay unless they suspended the employee or issued a lockout notice. Other noted impacts on the communities: Since mid-September 2024, NZDF PSA union members have been 'working-to-rule', and from November, they have been taking coordinated breaks and stopped working at heights or off-site. In response, the Minister of Defence has authorised uniformed personnel to cover civilian work in some selected areas. In September 2024, train operators in Wellington began work-to-rule industrial action including refusing shift changes, leading to disruption for travellers. What these changes mean Employers can respond to a partial strike by either: a) reducing an employee's pay by a proportionate amount, calculated in accordance with a specified method that is based on identifying the work that the employee will not be performing due to the strike, or b) deducting 10 percent of their wages. Employers will have to provide written notification to employees that they will be reducing their pay before the deduction is made (the amount of deduction is not required in the notice). If the union believes the employer has incorrectly applied a pay deduction, the union must advise the employer of that as soon as practicable, after receiving the employer's information on how they calculated the specified pay deduction if relevant. The union can apply to the Employment Relations Authority, who can determine whether the employer has correctly applied the deduction. Employers do not have to deduct pay in response to partial strikes – this simply provides an additional tool for how they can respond to a partial strike, if it works for them.
