ICE Deports Florida Pastor's Wife After 30 Years In US
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Federal immigration authorities deported the wife of a Florida pastor who has been living in the United States for nearly 30 years.
Daniella Isidro said in a Facebook post that her mother, Maria Isidro, had been removed back to Mexico from their home in Live Oak, Florida.
Newsweek has contacted the family and the Department of Homeland Security for comment.
A file image shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Baltimore Field Officer director Matt Elliston listens during a briefing, in Silver Spring, Maryland, on January 27, 2025.
A file image shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Baltimore Field Officer director Matt Elliston listens during a briefing, in Silver Spring, Maryland, on January 27, 2025.
Alex Brandon/AP
Why It Matters
The case comes amid President Donald Trump's hardline crackdown on immigration. Under the Trump administration, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has ramped up arrests across the country. The White House has maintained that anyone living in the country illegally is considered a "criminal."
What To Know
Maria Isidro initially came to the U.S. in 1998 to seek medical treatment for one of her children. At one point, she was subject to a removal order.
"She was also shackled by wrist, stomach and ankles, leaving bruises on her," Daniella Isidro wrote on Facebook. "This is a [woman] who is loved by a huge community, a pastor's wife, a nana, a wita and our mom."
She told ABC affiliate WCJB that her mother went to court for an update on her immigration case but was then held in an ICE detention center for over a week.
According to WCJB, after Maria Isidro was detained by ICE, her daughters received a call on June 11, informing them that she had been transferred from a detention center in Texas to Mexico.
"I had gone to work that day, and receiving the phone call that my mom had been detained was one of the hardest things I had to do," Daniella Isidro told WCJB.
After arriving in the United States, Maria Isidro took steps to follow legal procedures to remain in the country, according to the Facebook post by her daughter.
In an interview with CBS affiliate WCTV, the family said that they spent years working to secure Maria Isidro's citizenship and that she regularly met with the Department of Homeland Security to comply with requirements and avoid deportation.
As reported by the Tallahassee Democrat, she was issued a removal order in 2004 but had been granted a "stay of deportation" each year since—a discretionary measure that can be revoked at any time.
In 2023, she was approved for an I-130 petition, also known as a Petition for Alien Relative, which is a step toward obtaining legal status.
What People Are Saying
Maria Isidro's son, Jo Isidro wrote in a social media post: "She wasn't taken by illness. She didn't leave by choice. She was detained by ICE during what was supposed to be a routine immigration check-in. My mother is a Christian woman. A preacher's wife. A caregiver. A woman with no criminal record, who's always done things the right way. She showed up to every appointment. She trusted the system. And still, she was taken from us."
The family wrote in a post on GoFundMe: "She has shown up to every check-in for over 20 years, always with documents in hand, never hiding, always doing things the right way. As anyone who has gone through this process knows, it is a lengthy and costly process."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Denver's next two years: Johnston fights to save his "vibrant" vision
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston reaches the halfway mark of his first term Thursday, with his bold agenda running headlong into fiscal and political minefields. Why it matters: Johnston's next two years — with looming budget cuts and federal funding in doubt — could determine whether voters give him another four years in 2027, when he plans to run for reelection. The big picture: Johnston, a self-described " entrepreneur at heart," spent his first two years dreaming big and moving fast — drawing praise for results and criticism for rushed decisions and closed-door tactics. He's claimed some major wins: Reducing visible street homelessness (7,000 people have been moved into shelters since 2023 — though at a steep $58 million per year). Lowering violent crime (the homicide rate is down 58% this year, which Johnston says is "the largest drop of any of the top 100 cities in the country"). Reopening and rebranding 16th Street. Orchestrating a land swap to turn Park Hill Golf Course into a park. Securing a new women's soccer stadium. Mixed results: Navigating a migrant crisis, which triggered major budget cuts and tapping city savings to cover its roughly $180 million cost. Revamping the city's building permitting process, though multifamily residential buildings still average a 276-day wait time. And some setbacks: Voters rejecting his sales tax to fund affordable housing. City audits revealing homeless shelter failures and financial mismanagement of encampment sweeps. Stubbornly steep office vacancies downtown (currently 36.8%). Strained relationships with City Council for moving too fast, overruling their authority and lacking transparency — plus plummeting staff morale ahead of layoffs. Declining public approval. And, the latest, his flagship bond proposal — an $800 million plan for infrastructure, parks, rec centers — hitting intense resistance. State of play: Johnston's second half of his first term is shaping up to be less about big swings and more about surviving the fallout. Denver faces a $250 million shortfall, with layoffs and service cuts expected. With more than 13,000 city workers on payroll, even a 5% reduction would mean 650 jobs gone. That squeeze could translate into slower trash pickups, reduced library hours and other unpalatable cuts just as Johnston prepares for a reelection bid. Zoom out: Washington is tightening the vise, with federal funds already withheld. President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" guts Medicaid and SNAP — which could further strain Denver's safety net and Johnston's signature"All In Mile High" initiative. The bill also funnels $170 billion into immigration enforcement. Johnston's vows to protect undocumented residents, even at the risk of jail, already triggered a federal lawsuit and FEMA clawbacks, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement crackdowns could intensify. Meanwhile, new tariffs on steel, lumber and solar gear are inflating construction budgets, jeopardizing Johnston's housing and climate goals. Yes, but: Betting big is his brand. "Our toughest problems are solvable, and we are the ones to solve them," he says often.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
I was once an ICE prosecutor. What I see now in immigration courts is disturbing.
I hadn't heard the rattling of chains in a courthouse since 2012, when I was a prosecutor for the Department of Homeland Security at the Varick Immigration Court in New York City. Back then, shackles were reserved for individuals deemed a public safety threat or flight risk by ICE as they were being escorted from their holding cells. They often already had arrests or convictions. But in 2025, it's a whole new world. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and other elected officials have been arrested for bearing witness to immigration enforcement. Last month, ICE agents handcuffed New York City Comptroller Brad Lander at 26 Federal Plaza after he linked arms with an immigrant during what should have been a routine court appearance. Each day, ICE raises the stakes –– even targeting Americans who dare to show solidarity. I no longer work for ICE, but I still advocate for immigrants. And what I'm seeing representing clients at ICE check-ins and court hearings is seriously disturbing. Courtrooms that once served as venues for justice are now used to intimidate and remove those who challenge policy. President Trump's militarized immigration enforcement has produced shocking due process violations, chaos and widespread fear. The chains are back, but this time they serve a different purpose. Detainment is no longer about controlling security threats or managing who enters the country. Instead, courtroom arrests are part of a broader effort to restructure the immigration system by force and without debate or legislation. With each new policy, principled professionals inside the courtroom resign, leaving fewer voices willing to question what's happening. This quiet exodus should alarm us all, not just noncitizens. If no one within the system challenges this overreach now, we will soon witness the collapse of immigration courts as we know them. It is hard to ignore the growing sense of danger inside today's immigration courts. Since 2017, more than 300 immigration judges have resigned, retired or been pushed out, many citing political pressure and the erosion of judicial independence. Earlier this year, the Department of Justice abruptly fired 20 immigration judges, including five assistant chief judges and an entire incoming class, a purge widely condemned as politically motivated. Newer judges, trained under Trump-era protocols, now operate under intense scrutiny and are instructed to deny even the most basic continuances, including the standard 10-day extension attorneys typically receive to prepare a response. In April alone, immigration judges closed more than 11,000 asylum cases, a new record high. They also set another record: denial rates exceeded 80 percent. These denials often serve one purpose: to fast-track cases. This advances Trump's novel strategy of dismissing cases to expedite deportation, and to clear dockets to comply with ICE's removal quotas. The loss of judicial expertise coincides with a staggering funding imbalance: from fiscal 2023 through 2024, Congres s spent roughly $24 on ICE and Border Patrol for every dollar spent on immigration courts. This leaves judges overwhelmed and under-resourced, while enforcement agencies received hundreds of billions in support. With arrest quotas at 3,000 per day, and ICE surpassing its 41,500 funded bed spaces, the administration isn't seeking neutral arbiters. It is demanding compliant 'yes' judges to carry out its agenda of expedited removals. Fewer independent voices on the bench, rushed court proceedings and a courtroom culture that now prioritizes handcuffs over hearings have created another urgent crisis: There aren't enough immigration lawyers left to meet the needs of a ballooning docket. And the lack of oversight around ICE's tactics inside courthouses has had a chilling effect on those who remain. A national survey of asylum attorneys found that immigration lawyers experience levels of burnout and secondary traumatic stress higher than those seen in social work, prison care or nursing. Many report symptoms like depression, insomnia, intrusive thoughts and emotional detachment — signs that often mirror PTSD. For those representing unaccompanied children or trauma survivors, the emotional weight is compounded by a sense of moral injury — the psychological damage done by witnessing injustice while feeling powerless to prevent it. While data on government workers — particularly ICE attorneys — is scarce, the signs are troubling. There is no official count of how many have resigned or been pushed out, but those who remain face mounting political pressure and growing caseloads, and they are given no discretion. ICE's legal arm, the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, is tasked with prosecuting millions of immigration cases, yet, unlike federal prosecutors in criminal courts, its attorneys operate with little public accountability. While the departures of immigration judges have drawn concern, attrition within the office remains unnoticed and unexamined. Yet its impact is felt as experienced, ethical attorneys quietly exit, leaving behind many who are less experienced or less ethical, and who at any rate are expected to implement policies without regard to their legality or the dictates of their consciences. One of them, James Joseph Rodden, an ICE attorney in Dallas, was recently exposed for running a white supremacist social media account while actively prosecuting immigrants in court. ICE declined to comment in late March on whether Rodden remains employed. We need courage from within the system –– judges, attorneys and officials willing to uphold the rule of law –– and meaningful reform to guard against the erosion of due process. When defenders of the Constitution resign and those like Rodden stay behind, loyalty to equal justice is replaced by loyalty to power. For the sake of our nation, we must do better. We must demand a system where immigration courtrooms are guided by principle. Veronica Cardenas is a former prosecutor with the Department of Homeland Security. She is the founder of Humanigration, a digital platform serving immigrants and their legal advocates.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Campaign fundraising in NY-21 gives glimpse into 2026
Jul. 16—The 2026 election season is over a year out, but fundraising for the next congressional race is already underway for a few candidates in NY-21. According to the latest campaign finance reports from the Federal Election Commission, Rep. Elise M. Stefanik is leading the group with over $4 million raised in the second quarter this year. Through her fundraising arms including her campaign, the Team Elise joint fundraising committee, E-PAC and the Elise Victory Fund, she brought in the largest off-year haul of any New York Republican before her. Her main campaign arm, Elise for Congress, raised $1 million, and ended the quarter with $10 million in the bank ready to spend. Stefanik is openly considering a run for governor and could take that money to her campaign against Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul. Stefanik's main opposition for NY-21 in the current landscape had a much less active quarter. Blake Gendebien, running as the leading Democratic candidate for 2026 after he was chosen as the party's preliminary pick for a special election to replace Stefanik that never happened. Gendebien entered the special election with momentum and a large campaign operation, but once Stefanik's elevation to President Donald J. Trump's administration was canceled, the runway for his campaign got a lot longer. According to his quarterly report, Gendebien raised $200,000, almost entirely from individual contributions, but spent $266,224. He ended the quarter with $1,961,649 in available cash on hand, plus about $6,000 in debts and obligations. Gendebien's filings show he was spending more heavily in the early weeks of the quarter — early April, just after it was announced that Stefanik would not be leaving her seat and would remain in the House. Records show the Gendebien campaign had 12 staff members paid directly, between $1,400 and $3,400, constituting a $28,171 payroll, paid out twice each month around April. More recently, the campaign slimmed down; just two people got a direct salary on June 27, the last payday included in this filing. Gendebien is not the only Democrat registered to run in NY-21 for 2025, nor is Stefanik the only Republican registered with the FEC. Because of the anticipated special election, over a dozen people expressed interest in running for Congress if Stefanik left her seat and registered to run. However, because Stefanik never left the seat, no election was formally called and all the interested parties registered to run for the 2026 election. There are 11 people registered to run for Congress in NY-21 in 2026; six have no registered financial activity, including Democrats Pamela Marshall, Justin M. Haller, Andrew Henson and John Gunther. Republican Otto D. Miller is also registered with no activity, as is Community Party candidate Richard Grayson. All of these individuals filed shortly after Stefanik was first nominated to join the Trump administration, so it's not clear if they plan to run in 2026. Registering with the FEC is only one step of seeking office, and registering with the FEC by no means ensures a candidate will actually make it to the primary or general election ballot. A handful of the other candidates do show some financial activity; Paula Collins, who ran against Stefanik last year, raised about $13,500 this year but is moving to close her campaign down. Anthony T. Constantino, an Amsterdam factory owner who self-funded a special election campaign with $2.6 million in money he won betting on Tesla in the stock market, filed a report showing he didn't take any donations, but spent $151,773 to maintain his campaign over the three-month period. The $2.6 million is recorded as a loan from Constantino to his own campaign; giving him the ability to pay it back with money raised in the future or write it off as a loss. It also shows he spent over $33,000 with his own company, Sticker Mule, for events including one $32,500 expense for food, beverages, management and donor mementos recorded on April 2, just before the special election was called off. The campaign recorded relatively small, routine operating charges through the remainder of the quarter, showing definite activity with payments for media production, consulting, software subscriptions, mailer creation, and similar transactions through May and June. One other candidate shows financial activity, although not anything significant in this quarter. Dylan Hewitt, a former Biden Administration staffer in the office of the U.S. Trade Representative, raised over $100,000 in the first quarter of this year, but didn't file anything for this most recent quarter. It also shows he recorded just under $3,000 in operating expenses and refunded close to everything he raised, leaving just $10,642 in his campaign accounts since April. Since April, his campaign recorded just $345 in fundraising and $91 in expenses. In a statement, Hewitt said he is still active in the district, touring the region and speaking with voters, but he isn't fundraising right now. "Tariffs are already driving up prices, and now experts say Elise Stefanik's deciding vote to gut Medicaid could mean a 114-mile stretch with no access to care between Glens Falls and Plattsburgh," he said in a statement to the Times. "It's a one-two punch that makes billionaires even richer while leaving our families with higher grocery bills and skyrocketing health care premiums. That's why, over the last three months, I didn't ask people for what's in their wallets, I spent that time traveling across the north country, asking my neighbors what's on their minds about their futures, their families, and their self-worth." Hewitt has not announced a plan to run for NY-21, which would entail a primary against Gendebien, but he's maintaining a presence at local gatherings, on social media and in local media.
